Neonatal outcomes in term and preterm infants following adjunctive azithromycin antibiotic prophylaxis for non-elective cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: It is currently unknown whether adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis at the time of non-elective cesarean has differential effects on neonatal outcomes in the context of prematurity. The objective of this study was to compare whether neonatal outcomes differ in term and preterm infants exposed to adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis before non-elective cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A planned secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial that enrolled women with singleton pregnancies ≥24 weeks gestation undergoing non-elective cesarean delivery (during labor or ≥4 h after membrane rupture). Women received standard antibiotic prophylaxis and were randomized to either adjunctive azithromycin (500 mg) or placebo. The primary composite outcome was neonatal death, suspected or confirmed neonatal sepsis, and serious neonatal morbidities (NEC, PVL, IVH, BPD). Secondary outcomes included NICU admission, neonatal readmission, culture positive infections and prevalence of resistant organisms. Odds ratios (OR) for the effect of azithromycin versus placebo were compared between gestational age strata (preterm [less than 37 weeks] versus term [37 weeks or greater]). Tests of interaction examined homogeneity of treatment effect with gestational age. RESULTS: The analysis includes 2,013 infants, 226 preterm (11.2%) and 1,787 term. Mean gestational ages were 34 and 39.5 weeks, respectively. Within term and preterm strata, maternal and delivery characteristics were similar between the azithromycin and placebo groups. There was no difference in the odds of composite neonatal outcome between those exposed to azithromycin versus placebo in preterm neonates (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.48-1.41) and in term neonates (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.46), with no difference between gestational age strata (p = 0.42). Analysis of secondary outcomes also revealed no differences in treatment effects within or between gestational age strata. CONCLUSION: Exposure to adjunctive azithromycin antibiotic prophylaxis for non-elective cesarean delivery does not increase neonatal morbidity or mortality in term or preterm infants. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01235546.

Utility of Weekly Laboratory Monitoring in the Expectant Management of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.

Our retrospective cohort study evaluates the diagnostic yield of weekly laboratory surveillance in outpatient management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) based on patient clinical status at the time of laboratory testing. The study included 459 patients and 1,082 laboratory episodes: 356 (32.9%) episodes were performed in the setting of concerning clinical findings and 726 (67.1%) when the patient was asymptomatic. Overall, the diagnostic yield for abnormal laboratory values (n=11) was 1.0% (95% CI 0.4-1.6%) of all assessments performed and 2.4% (95% CI 1.0-3.8%) among all patients in the cohort. The prevalence of abnormal test results was higher in patients with clinical findings (2.8%, 95% CI 1.1-4.5%) compared with those who were asymptomatic (0.1%, 95% CI 0-0.2%) ( P <.01). Clinical findings suggestive of worsening disease had a 91% sensitivity (95% CI 59-100%) and a 99% (95% CI 99-100%) negative predictive value for abnormal laboratory values. Directed screening based on signs and symptoms, rather than universal weekly screening, may be a potential strategy to lower costs and reduce multiple blood draws for patients with HDP, because there is a low diagnostic yield for this practice.

Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients After Completion of the mRNA Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination Series Compared With Unvaccinated Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare frequency of perinatal death between pregnant patients who completed the mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination series and unvaccinated patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 15,865 pregnant patients who delivered 16,132 newborns after 20 weeks of gestation within a large regional health system between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. Patients who received two doses of mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech [BNT162b2] or Moderna [mRNA-1273]) were included in the vaccinated group and were compared with unvaccinated patients. Exclusions included partial vaccination, viral-vector vaccine, major congenital anomalies, and higher-order multiple gestation. Our primary outcome was perinatal death, including stillbirth and neonatal death, which was evaluated by logistic regression. Unadjusted odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were reported, controlling for age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, smoking, twin gestation, and insurance status. Propensity score matching was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 15,865 patients were included in the final analysis: 2,069 in the vaccination group and 13,796 in the control group. Only 13.0% of the cohort was included in the vaccination group; however, the vaccination rate increased over the course of the study period as the vaccine became more widely available and accepted. Vaccinated patients were older, with higher rates of people of non-Black racial non-Hispanic ethnic backgrounds, people with private insurance, and those with higher BMIs. Vaccination was associated with a lower incidence of perinatal death (0.5% vaccinated group vs 0.8% unvaccinated group, aOR 0.20 0.05-0.88). Vaccination against COVID-19 was also associated with lower rates of preterm delivery (aOR 0.63, 0.48-0.82), neonates with very low birth weight (aOR 0.35, 0.15-0.84), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (aOR 0.66, 0.52-0.85). The association between vaccination and lower rates of perinatal death was no longer significant after propensity score matching. CONCLUSION: In a large retrospective cohort study, receipt of the primary mRNA COVID-19 vaccination series was associated with a lower rate of several adverse pregnancy outcomes, including perinatal death, preterm delivery, neonates with very low birth weight, and NICU admission. Although the decreased rates of perinatal death did not remain significant after propensity score matching, there was evidence of directional benefit for vaccinated patients.

Unexpected Term Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admissions and a Potential Role for Centralized Remote Fetal Monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: Centralized remote fetal monitoring (CRFM) has been proposed as a method to improve the performance of intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring and perinatal outcomes. The purpose of this study is to determine whether CRFM was associated with a reduction in unexpected term neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. STUDY DESIGN: A pre-post design was used to examine the effectiveness of CRFM which was implemented in stages across five hospitals. The exposure group was all women who underwent intrapartum monitoring via CRFM. The unexposed group was of women who delivered at the same hospitals prior to implementation of CRFM. Pregnancies with expected NICU admissions, gestational age <37 weeks, birth weight <2,500 g, or major fetal anomalies detected prenatally were excluded. The primary outcome was unexpected term NICU admission; secondary outcomes were cesarean and operative vaginal delivery (OVD), and 5-minute Apgar's score of <7 rates. Maternal and delivery characteristics were examined with Student's t, Wilcoxon's, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: There were 19,392 live births included in this analysis. In the univariable analysis, the odds of unexpected term NICU admission was lower among the CRFM exposed group compared with the unexposed group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.99; p = 0.038). In multivariable analysis, this did not reach statistical significance (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.79-1.06; p = 0.24). Cesarean and OVD were less likely in the exposed group (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.97; p = 0.008) and (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59-0.83, p < 0.001), respectively, in univariable analysis. When adjusted for potential confounders, the effect remained statistically significant for cesarean delivery (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.98; p = 0.012). When adjusted for hospital, OVD rate was lower at the highest volume and highest acuity site (OR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.36-0.65, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In some practice settings, utilization of a CRFM system may decrease the risk of unexpected term NICU admission, cesarean, and OVD rate. KEY POINTS: · CRFM may decrease unexpected term NICU admissions in some clinical settings.. · CRFM may decrease cesarean delivery rates in some clinical settings.. · CRFM may decrease OVD rates in some clinical settings..

Comparison of In-Hospital Maternal Mortality Between Hospital Systems in Queensland, Australia and Louisiana, United States.

BACKGROUND: It is well documented that the American maternal mortality ratio has increased during the years 2000-2015. The Australian maternal mortality ratio, in contrast, has decreased during the same time period, a trend common among most Western countries. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study of cases of in-hospital maternal deaths in the Ochsner Health System (Louisiana, United States) and the Queensland Health System (Australia) from 1995 to 2013. The aim was to determine if American and Australian women have a similar rate of preventable maternal death and if the deaths were attributable to the same factors. A multidisciplinary team assessed medical records to determine preventability. RESULTS: Sixteen eligible medical records were identified in the Ochsner Health System and 15 in the Queensland Health System. In the American cohort, deaths in the private insurance group (n=5) were least likely to be preventable (P=0.003). Australian maternal deaths were less likely to occur among women with late or no prenatal care than American maternal deaths; the risk difference was 44.5% for all deaths (95% confidence interval [CI]=9.7%, 79.4%; P=0.03) and 50.0% for potentially preventable deaths (95% CI=9.3%, 90.6%; P=0.04). CONCLUSION: Women from Louisiana, United States and Queensland, Australia have similar rates of preventable maternal death. No statistically significant factors explained trends in Australian maternal death; American maternal mortality was significantly associated with point of entry into prenatal care, likely influenced by insurance status. Furthermore, the majority of deaths in this group were complicated by hospital systems-based factors.

A review of the preventability of maternal mortality in one hospital system in Louisiana, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To determine preventability of in-hospital maternal mortality in the Ochsner Health System (OHS) in the US state of Louisiana. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken of all known cases of in-hospital maternal death (during pregnancy or within 42 days of termination) that occurred within OHS facilities in 1995-2013. Associations between characteristics and mortality and preventability were investigated. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated in view of varying reference values. RESULTS: Among 16 eligible deaths, 12 (75%) were deemed potentially preventable. The incidences of overall and preventable maternal death were higher if the patient had late entry to prenatal care (IRR 6.3 [P=0.004] and 8.8 [P=0.004], respectively). Maternal mortality was increased if the patient had required transfer to the OHS (IRR 15.8 [P<0.001] overall and 15.8 [P=0.002] for preventable mortality). Deaths of patients with private insurance were more likely to be not preventable than were those of patients without such insurance (P=0.003). Uninsured patients had the highest MMR, with an IRR of 13.8 (P=0.014) when compared with Medicaid patients. CONCLUSION: The factors most predictive of mortality were late entry to prenatal care, critical status requiring transfer from an outside facility, and non-private insurance status.

Adnexal Mass in a Spontaneous Pregnancy Diagnosed as Heterotopic Pregnancy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic pregnancy is a rare complication usually seen in populations at risk for ectopic pregnancy or undergoing fertility treatment. Most commonly, heterotopic pregnancy is diagnosed at the time of rupture when surgical management is required. CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old gravida 2 para 1 patient had a right adnexal mass discovered in the first trimester that was conservatively managed for the remainder of her pregnancy. She underwent a cesarean delivery with right salpingectomy. Heterotopic pregnancy was diagnosed after final pathology. The patient had no risk factors for heterotopic pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Heterotopic pregnancy should be suspected in patients with an adnexal mass, even in the absence of risk factors.