Reducing Tracheostomy-Related Pressure Injuries.

An interprofessional team was established to prevent tracheostomy-related acquired pressure injuries. The team performed an in-depth analysis of practice from tracheostomy insertion through postinsertion care. A literature evaluation identified best practices, and a root cause analysis for all tracheostomy-related pressure injury cases identified common causes. Lessons learned from the practice and literature reviews drove care standardization and reduced variation. Preimplementation and postimplementation data were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of improvement interventions. Improvement strategies included use of a more flexible tracheostomy tube, standardization of suturing, timing of suture removal, application of a hydrocolloid dressing at time of insertion and a foam dressing after suture removal, and caregiver education regarding early identification of and interventions for complications related to sutures and swelling. The result has been an 80% reduction of tracheostomy-related acquired pressure injuries systemwide.

Evaluation of User-Interface Alert Displays for Clinical Decision Support Systems for Sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Hospitals are increasingly turning to clinical decision support systems for sepsis, a life-threatening illness, to provide patient-specific assessments and recommendations to aid in evidence-based clinical decision-making. Lack of guidelines on how to present alerts has impeded optimization of alerts, specifically, effective ways to differentiate alerts while highlighting important pieces of information to create a universal standard for health care providers. OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into clinical decision support systems-based alerts, specifically targeting nursing interventions for sepsis, with a focus on behaviors associated with and perceptions of alerts, as well as visual preferences. METHODS: An interactive survey to display a novel user interface for clinical decision support systems for sepsis was developed and then administered to members of the nursing staff. RESULTS: A total of 43 nurses participated in 2 interactive survey sessions. Participants preferred alerts that were based on an established treatment protocol, were presented in a pop-up format, and addressed the patient's clinical condition rather than regulatory guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The results can be used in future research to optimize electronic medical record alerting and clinical practice workflow to support the efficient, effective, and timely delivery of high-quality care to patients with sepsis. The research also may advance the knowledge base of what information health care providers want and need to improve the health and safety of their patients.

Hourly rounding and patient falls: what factors boost success?

BACKGROUND: Falls are a persistent problem in all healthcare settings, with rates in acute care hospitals ranging from 1.3 to 8.9 falls per 1,000 inpatient days, about 30% resulting in serious injury. METHODS: A 30-day prospective pilot study was conducted on two units with pre- and postimplementation evaluation to determine the impact of patient-centered proactive hourly rounding on patient falls as part of a Lean Six Sigma process improvement project. Nurse leaders and a staff champion from Unit 1 were involved in the process from the start of the implementation period, while Unit 2 was introduced to the project for training shortly before the intervention began. RESULTS: On Unit 1, where staff and leadership were engaged in the project from the outset, the 1-year baseline mean fall rate was 3.9 falls/1,000 patient days. The pilot period fall rate of 1.3 falls/1,000 patient days was significantly lower than the baseline fall rate (P = 0.006). On Unit 2, where there was no run-in period, the 1-year baseline mean fall rate was 2.6 falls/1,000 patient days, which fell, but not significantly, to 2.5 falls/1,000 patient days during the pilot period (P = 0.799). DISCUSSION: Engaging an interdisciplinary team, including leadership and unit champions, to complete a Lean Six Sigma process improvement project and implement a patient-centered proactive hourly rounding program was associated with a significant reduction in the fall rate in Unit 1. Implementation of the same program in Unit 2 without engaging leadership or front-line staff in program design did not impact its fall rate. CONCLUSIONS: The active involvement of leadership and front-line staff in program design and as unit champions during the project run-in period was critical to significantly reducing inpatient fall rates and call bell use in an adult medical unit.

Do patients accurately perceive their fall risk?

BACKGROUND: In U.S. hospitals, from 700,000 to 1 million inpatients fall each year. About a third of these falls could have been prevented. OBJECTIVES: This project's purpose was to document patient perceptions of their inpatient fall risk and determine how these perceptions were associated with clinical indicators of fall risk. METHODS: From six medical-surgical units, 193 patients were randomly selected and surveyed about their perceived fall risk during their hospital stay. For 101 of them, the Schmid fall risk assessment score, age, and gender were recorded. A retrospective review of the Schmid scores of all patients who fell during a 6-month historical sample period was reviewed for comparison. RESULTS: Most patients (88%) reported that they didn't feel at risk for falling during their hospital stay. No correlation between their Schmid score and their perceived fall risk was found. Historical review of all inpatients who'd fallen in a prior period showed that the 358 patients with known Schmid scores had a full range of scores. These are normally distributed from 0 to 6, with over 40% of patients experiencing falls having Schmid scores of less than 3. CONCLUSIONS: Patient perceptions of falls match neither their clinical risk nor their actual likelihood of falling. When designing fall prevention strategies, it may be important to remind providers of this gap in patient knowledge, which includes overconfidence in the role of the care team in preventing falls

Emergency department tachypnea predicts transfer to a higher level of care in the first 24 hours after ED admission.

OBJECTIVES: The authors hypothesized that vital sign abnormalities detected in the emergency department (ED) can be used to forecast clinical deterioration occurring within 24 hours of hospital admission. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study performed after implementation of a hospitalwide rapid response team (RRT) system. Inclusion criteria for study patients consisted of age > or = 18 years, admission to the general floor though the ED, and RRT activation and subsequent transfer to a higher level of care in the first 24 hours. Control patients were > or =18 years, were admitted to the floor though the ED, never required RRT or transfer to a higher level of care, and were matched to cases by risk of mortality. Multilevel logistic regression was used to model the odds of an adverse outcome as a function of race and sex, respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), and systolic (sBP) and diastolic blood pressure (dBP) at time of transfer from the ED. RESULTS: A total of 74 cases and 246 controls were used. RR (odds ratio [OR] = 2.79 per 10-point change, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.41 to 5.51) and to a lesser extent dBP (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.97) contributed significantly to the odds of intensive care unit (ICU) or intermediate care transfer within 24 hours of admission; HR (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.37) did not. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department RR preceding floor transfer appears to have a significant relationship to the need for ICU or intermediate care transfer in the first 24 hours of hospital admission.

Improving handoff communication.

By improving our process, we enhanced patient care and made handoff communication more effective.