Contribution of APOBEC3G/F activity to the development of low-abundance drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants.

Plasma drug-resistant minority human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants (DRMVs) increase the risk of virological failure to first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor antiretroviral therapy (ART). The origin of DRMVs in ART-naive patients, however, remains unclear. In a large pan-European case-control study investigating the clinical relevance of pre-existing DRMVs using 454 pyrosequencing, the six most prevalent plasma DRMVs detected corresponded to G-to-A nucleotide mutations (V90I, V106I, V108I, E138K, M184I and M230I). Here, we evaluated if such DRMVs could have emerged from apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide 3G/F (APOBEC3G/F) activity. Out of 236 ART-naive subjects evaluated, APOBEC3G/F hypermutation signatures were detected in plasma viruses of 14 (5.9%) individuals. Samples with minority E138K, M184I, and M230I mutations, but not those with V90I, V106I or V108I, were significantly associated with APOBEC3G/F activity (Fisher's P < 0.005), defined as the presence of > 0.5% of sample sequences with an APOBEC3G/F signature. Mutations E138K, M184I and M230I co-occurred in the same sequence as APOBEC3G/F signatures in 3/9 (33%), 5/11 (45%) and 4/8 (50%) of samples, respectively; such linkage was not found for V90I, V106I or V108I. In-frame STOP codons were observed in 1.5% of all clonal sequences; 14.8% of them co-occurred with APOBEC3G/F signatures. APOBEC3G/F-associated E138K, M184I and M230I appeared within clonal sequences containing in-frame STOP codons in 2/3 (66%), 5/5 (100%) and 4/4 (100%) of the samples. In a re-analysis of the parent case control study, the presence of APOBEC3G/F signatures was not associated with virological failure. In conclusion, the contribution of APOBEC3G/F editing to the development of DRMVs is very limited and does not affect the efficacy of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor ART.

Rilpivirine, emtricitabine and tenofovir resistance in HIV-1-infected rilpivirine-naive patients failing antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVES: In the context of simplification strategies, it is essential to know the feasibility of a switch to a rilpivirine-based therapy. The aim of this study was to describe rilpivirine, tenofovir and emtricitabine resistance in HIV-1-infected patients who experienced virological failure during their previous antiretroviral treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The studied population included two groups of patients, all rilpivirine naive, tested for resistance by bulk sequencing from 2008 to 2011: the first group (n = 998) failing a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) plus boosted protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen and the second group (n = 3733) failing an NRTI plus non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimen. RESULTS: In the first group, the frequency of rilpivirine mutations and resistance to rilpivirine (5.1%) was similar to that in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients. Among the 1605 patients from the second group with at least one NNRTI mutation in their HIV, the prevalence of viruses 'resistant' or 'possibly resistant' to efavirenz, nevirapine and etravirine was 78%, 79% and 74%, respectively, while 59% were resistant to rilpivirine. Resistance to rilpivirine was significantly more frequent in non-B subtype versus B subtype viruses. Among pretreated patients with viruses with at least one NNRTI mutation (other than for rilpivirine), 22% of sequences were susceptible to the combination rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. CONCLUSIONS: In patients failing an NRTI plus NNRTI-based regimen, to know the feasibility of a switch to rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, reliable resistance information should be available at the time of use of concurrent NNRTI therapy.

NRTI-sparing regimens yield higher rates of drug resistance than NRTI-based regimens for HIV-1 treatment.

To treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, international guidelines recommend the combination of two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors [N(t)RTIs] and a third agent [non-NRTI (NNRTI), boosted protease inhibitor (r/PI) or integrase inhibitor (INI)] for initial treatment. The objective of this study was to compare the selection of resistance to antiretrovirals (ARVs) for regimens containing or lacking N(t)RTIs in patients experiencing their first virological failure. Eligible patients had a first virological failure, defined as the occurrence of two consecutive HIV plasma viral loads ≥50copies/mL. Genotypic resistance testing was performed at the time of virological failure (on the second sample with detectable viral load ≥50copies/mL) in patients failing regimens of N(t)RTIs+r/PI or NNRTI or INI, r/PI+NNRTI or INI, and INI+NNRTI. Among 434 virological failures analysed, resistance testing results were available in 416 cases (95.9%). Higher rates of drug resistance were observed in patients receiving N(t)RTI-sparing regimens. When the combination of N(t)RTIs+r/PI was used, PIs protect themselves and the associated N(t)RTIs from the selection of resistance; however, this was not observed with the NNRTI+r/PI combination. The same phenomenon was observed for raltegravir: when used in combination with N(t)RTIs, INI resistance mutations were less frequently selected compared with its use in combination with PIs or NNRTIs. In conclusion, regimens of the ARV classes combined impact the frequency of resistance development. Lower resistance is observed for N(t)RTI-based regimens, with more therapeutic options for subsequent regimens after failure.

Prevalence of pre-existing resistance-associated mutations to rilpivirine, emtricitabine and tenofovir in antiretroviral-naive patients infected with B and non-B subtype HIV-1 viruses.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of rilpivirine, emtricitabine and tenofovir resistance-associated mutations (RAMs), described in vitro and in vivo, was determined in antiretroviral-naive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2011, 1729 treatment-naive patients were tested for resistance by bulk sequencing. We studied the primary rilpivirine RAMs (K101E/P, E138A/G/K/Q/R, V179L, Y181C/I/V, H221Y, F227C and M230I/L) and other potential rilpivirine-associated mutations (V90I, L100I, K101T, E138S, V179D/I, Y188L, V189I, G190A/E/S and M230V). We also studied the M184V/I and K65R mutations for emtricitabine and tenofovir, respectively. RESULTS: Among 1729 sequences, half of patients had B-subtype viruses and the other half non-B (with 26.7% CRF02, n=461). Primary rilpivirine RAMs were infrequent (4.6%, n=79) and the most prevalent were E138A (3%, n=52), E138K, (0.3%, n=5), H221Y (0.3%, n=5), E138G (0.2%, n=4) and Y181C (0.2%, n=4). The frequency of the primary rilpivirine RAMs was similar between B and non-B subtypes. The other potential rilpivirine-associated mutations that were most prevalent were V179I (8.4%, n=145), V90I (3.8%, n=65) and V189I (2.3%, n=40). The common V179I, V189I and V90I polymorphisms have not been associated with virological failure in Phase 3 clinical studies. By the ANRS algorithm, 4.9% (n=84) of samples were resistant to rilpivirine, 3.7% (n=32) of B-subtype viruses versus 6% (n=52) of non-B-subtype viruses (P=0.02, χ(2) test). The prevalence of K65R and M184I/V was 0.06% (1/1729) and 1% (18/1729), respectively. The prevalence of K103N was 2% (35/1729). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of rilpivirine, emtricitabine and tenofovir resistance mutations was very low in antiretroviral-naive patients. The prevalence of resistance to rilpivirine (4.9%, n=84) was not statistically different from the prevalence of efavirenz and nevirapine resistance in our population.

HIV-1 dynamics and coreceptor usage in Maraviroc-treated patients with ongoing replication.

There is evidence that HIV-1 evolution under maraviroc (MVC) pressure can lead to the selection of either X4-tropic variants and/or R5-tropic, MVC-resistant isolates. However, the viral dynamics of HIV-1 variants in patients with virological failure (VF) on MVC-containing regimens remain poorly studied. Here, we investigated the V3 loop evolution of HIV-1 on MVC in relation to coreceptor usage and the nature of HIV-1 quasispecies before MVC therapy using bulk population sequences and ultradeep sequencing. The majority of patients had no detectable minority X4 variant at baseline. The evolution of tropism was followed up until VF and showed three possibilities for viral evolution in these patients: emergence of preexisting X4 variants, de novo selection of R5 variants presenting V3 loop mutations, or replication of R5 variants without selection of known mutations.

Structure-analysis of the HIV-1 integrase Y143C/R raltegravir resistance mutation in association with the secondary mutation T97A.

The HIV-1 integrase (IN) mutations Y143C/R are known as raltegravir (RAL) primary resistance mutations. In a previous study (S. Reigadas et al., PLoS One 5:e10311, 2010), we investigated the genetic pathway and the dynamics of emergence of the Y143C/R mutations in three patients failing RAL-containing regimens. In these patients, the Y143C/R mutation was associated with the T97A mutation. The aim of the present biochemical and molecular studies in vitro was to evaluate whether the secondary mutation, T97A, associated with the Y143C/R mutation could increase the level of resistance to RAL and impact IN activities. Site-directed mutagenesis experiments were performed with expression vectors harboring the region of the pol gene coding for IN. With a 3'-end processing assay, the 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC(50)) were 1.2 µM, 1.2 µM, 2.4 µM (fold change [FC], 2), and 20 µM (FC, 16.7) for IN wild type (WT), the IN T97A mutation, the IN Y143C/T97A mutation, and the IN Y143R/T97A mutation, respectively. FCs of 18 and 100 were observed with the strand transfer assay for IN Y143C/T97A and Y143R/T97A mutations, with IC(50) of 0.625 µM and 2.5 µM, respectively. In the strand transfer assay, the IN Y143C or R mutation combined with the secondary mutation T97A severely impaired susceptibility to RAL compared to results with the IN Y143C or R mutation alone. Assays without RAL suggested that the T97A mutation could rescue the catalytic activity which was impaired by the presence of the Y143C/R mutation. The combination of the T97A mutation with the primary RAL resistance mutations Y143C/R strongly reduces the susceptibility to RAL and rescues the catalytic defect due to the Y143C/R mutation. This result indicates that the emergence of the Y143C/R/T97A double-mutation pattern in patients is a signature of a high resistance level.

European guidelines on the clinical management of HIV-1 tropism testing.

Viral tropism is the ability of viruses to enter and infect specific host cells and is based on the ability of viruses to bind to receptors on those cells. Testing for HIV tropism is recommended before prescribing a chemokine receptor blocker. In most European countries, HIV tropism is identified with tropism phenotype testing. New data support genotype analysis of the HIV third hypervariable loop (V3) for the identification of tropism. The European Consensus Group on clinical management of tropism testing was established to make recommendations to clinicians and clinical virologists. The panel recommends HIV-tropism testing for the following groups: drug-naive patients in whom toxic effects are anticipated or for whom few treatment options are available; patients who have poor tolerability to or toxic effects from current treatment or who have CNS pathology; and patients for whom therapy has failed and a change in treatment is considered. In general, an enhanced sensitivity Trofile assay and V3 population genotyping are the recommended methods. Genotypic methods are anticipated to be used more frequently in the clinical setting because of their greater accessibility, lower cost, and faster turnaround time than other methods. For the interpretation of V3 loop genotyping, clinically validated systems should be used when possible. Laboratories doing HIV tropism tests should have adequate quality assurance measures. Similarly, close collaboration between HIV clinicians and virologists is needed to ensure adequate diagnostic and treatment decisions.

Clinically validated mutation scores for HIV-1 resistance to fosamprenavir/ritonavir.

BACKGROUND: We developed clinically relevant genotypic scores for resistance to fosamprenavir/ritonavir in HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced patients. METHODS: PI-experienced patients with virological failure receiving fosamprenavir/ritonavir as the sole PI for at least 3 months and with detectable fosamprenavir plasma levels were included. The impact of baseline protease mutations on virological response (VR, i.e. decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA between baseline and month 3) was analysed using the Mann-Whitney test. Mutations with prevalence >10% and P value <0.10 were retained. The Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to select the combination of mutations most strongly associated with VR. The association between score and VR was assessed by multivariate backward regression. RESULTS: In the 73 patients included, the median baseline HIV-1 RNA was 4.6 log(10) copies/mL (range: 2.7-6.9) and the mean decrease at month 3 was -1.07 +/- 1.40 log(10) copies/mL. Ninety per cent of the patients were infected by HIV-1 subtype B variants. Two fosamprenavir/ritonavir mutation scores were constructed: score A (L10F/I/V + L33F + M36I + I54L/M/V/A/T/S + I62V + V82A/F/C/G + I84V + L90M) was based only on mutations associated with a worse VR, whereas score B (L10FIV + L33F + M36I + I54L/M/V/A/T/S + A71V - V77I - N88S + L90M) also took into account favourable mutations. Both scores were independent predictors of VR, however, co-administration of tenofovir was associated with a worse VR and the presence of the N88S protease mutation and co-administration of enfuvirtide with a better VR. CONCLUSIONS: These clinically validated mutation scores should be of interest for the clinical management of PI-experienced patients. The fosamprenavir/ritonavir score A was introduced in the 2006 ANRS algorithm along with isolated mutations I50V and V32I + I47V.

[Benefit of isokinetic evaluations of knee before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in soccer players]. / Intérêts des évaluations isocinétiques du genou avant et après reconstruction du ligament croisé antérieur chez le footballeur.

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyse the evolution of the isokinetic performance of the knee flexor and extensor muscles in soccer players before and after intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (Kennet-Jones). METHODS: Two isokinetic evaluations were carried out before surgery and after rehabilitation (i.e. 4 months later) in 18 soccer players. RESULTS: The initial evaluation showed that the stabilizing muscles of the knee were affected differently after lesion of the external anterior crossed ligament. At the opposite of the flexor muscles, the performance of the knee extensor muscles of the injured leg was significantly reduced as compared with that of the healthy leg (peak torque at 90 degrees /s, -16%; power at 180 degrees /s, -14%; total work at 240 degrees /s, -11%). Even if 4 months after surgery, this deficit was accentuated (peak torque at 90 degrees /s, -26%; power at 180 degrees /s, -23%; total work at 240 degrees /s, -19%), the preoperative results of the knee extensor muscle do not condition the postoperative performance. CONCLUSION: After a rupture of the external anterior crossed ligament, a regular program of isokinetic evaluation of the knee seems to be relevant in the follow-up of the wounded athlete. The evaluation before surgery can be used as reference, and from a psychological point of view, this evaluation can create confidence in the athlete during hospitalization. A second evaluation 4 months after surgery can be used to quantify the muscular deficit to direct the exercises of rehabilitation.

[Lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected patient with long-term virological failure: immunovirological response and tolerance in 121 patients of the ANRS CO8 Aproco-Copilote cohort]. / Lopinavir/ritonavir chez le patient infecté par le VIH en situation d'échec virologique prolongé: évolution immunovirologique et tolérance chez 121 patients de la cohorte ANRS CO8 Aproco-Copilote.

OBJECTIVE: This study was made to determine the immunovirological outcome and tolerance to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in HIV-infected protease inhibitors-experienced patients with long-term virological failure. DESIGN: Prospective follow-up was implemented for the French cohort ANRS CO8 Aproco-Copilote of 121 patients starting an LPV/r-containing regimen after a median duration of virological failure of 30.6 months. At baseline the median HIV-RNA plasma level was 4.1 log(10) copies/ml and the median CD4 cell count was 273/mm(3). RESULTS: On initiation of LPV/r, these patients were heavily pre-treated: 62% had received at least 4 NRTI, 65% at least 1 NNRTI, and 33% at least 3 PI. On prescription of LPV/r, the associated antiretroviral regimen was: no drug to which patients were previously naïve in 49 cases (40%), at least one new drug in 72 cases: 1 NRTI (n=42), 2 NRTI (n=22), 1 NNRTI (n=10), at least one new PI (n=6), enfuvirtide (n=2). The median HIV-RNA level was 2 log(10) copies/ml at M4 and M12, 1.7 log(10) copies/ml at M24 with respectively 74, 71 and 85% of patients achieving plasma HIV-RNA below 2.7 log(10) copies/ml. The median CD4 cell count was 385 and 429/mm(3) at M12 and M24 respectively. Among patients with genotypic testing at the time of LPV/r initiation, Ninety-five percent had at the most 5 protease mutations known to reduce LPV/r susceptibility. Thirty serious adverse events were reported but only 6 were related to LPV/r. CONCLUSION: The use of LPV/r in HIV-infected patients failing multiple antiretroviral regimens provided a potent and durable immunovirological response.

HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) genotypic patterns and treatment characteristics associated with the K65R RT mutation.

BACKGROUND: The K65R HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) mutation is a multidrug resistance mutation which may be correlated with specific antiretroviral combinations and with the presence or absence of other RT resistance mutations. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were: (i) to determine the prevalence of the K65R mutation in a cohort of antiretroviral-treated patients; (ii) to study genotypic patterns and treatment characteristics in patients in whom the K65R mutation was present. STUDY DESIGN: We included in the study all antiretroviral-experienced patients followed up at the Bordeaux University Hospital in 2003 and 2004 for whom an HIV-1 genotypic resistance analysis was available. Information on RT resistance mutations was reported from a hospital database including therapeutic and biological parameters. The prevalence of K65R was investigated for all patients. Genotypic patterns and treatment characteristics were examined at the time of detection of the K65R mutation. RESULTS: The prevalence of K65R was 1.9% (26 of 1404 patients). K65R was associated with nucleoside RT inhibitor-based regimens in 22 patients, and with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lamivudine, didanosine and abacavir in 23, 17, 17 and eight patients, respectively. The M184V and Q151M mutations were the most commonly co-selected substitutions. Thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) were rarely co-selected with K65R and inversely associated with K65R. CONCLUSION: The K65R mutation may emerge preferentially in the absence of zidovudine and TAMs, suggesting the possibility of an antagonistic interaction between K65 and TAMs.

[Viral assumption and inverted papilloma: role of human herpes viridae n 8]. / Hypothèse virale et papillome inversè: mise au point a propos du rôle de HHV 8.

INTRODUCTION: The aetiology of inverted papillomas is still not known. Current thinking favours a viral agent in particular OBJECTIVE: To widen viral research to "Human Herpes Viridae n 8" (HHV 8). MATERIAL AND METHOD: 14 patients were included in a prospective study over a 38 months period. The average age was 49.6 years. The technique used is the PCR. RESULTS: No samples revealed the presence of HHV n8. CONCLUSION: The virus "human herpes viridae" was found in no samples, but as long as the etiopathogeny of the inverted papilloma is unknown. Further viral research is needed.

Detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antiretroviral resistance mutations by high-density DNA probe arrays.

Genotypic resistance testing has become an important tool in the clinical management of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Standard sequencing methodology and hybridization-based technology are the two principal methods used for HIV-1 genotyping. This report describes an evaluation of a new hybridization-based HIV-1 genotypic test of 99 clinical samples from patients infected mostly with HIV-1 subtype B and receiving treatment. This test combines RNA extraction with magnetic silica particles, amplification by nested reverse transcriptase PCR, and detection with high-density probe arrays designed to detect 204 antiretroviral resistance mutations simultaneously in Gag cleavage sites, protease, reverse transcriptase, integrase, and gp41. The nested reverse transcriptase PCR success rates at viral loads exceeding 1,000 copies/ml were 98% for the 2.1-kb amplicon that covers the Gag cleavage sites and the protease and reverse transcriptase genes, 92% for the gp41 amplicon, and 100% for the integrase amplicon. We analyzed 4,465 relevant codons with the HIV-1 DNA chip genotyping assay and the classic sequence-based method. Key resistance mutations in protease and reverse transcriptase were identified correctly 95 and 92% of the time, respectively. This test should be a valuable alternative to the standard sequence-based system for HIV-1 drug resistance monitoring and a useful diagnostic tool for simultaneous multiple genetic analyses.

Mechanism of virologic failure after substitution of a protease inhibitor by nevirapine in patients with suppressed plasma HIV-1 RNA.

A prospective study was set up to evaluate the emergence of HIV-1 resistance after a switch from an effective protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen to a multitherapy regimen including nevirapine (NVP). After 6 months with an undetectable viral load under a PI-containing regimen, the patients were switched to NVP with conservation of the associated nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Patients were followed-up at 1 month and then every 3 months after switching therapy. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the pol gene was performed at the first points of virologic failure. Thirty-four patients were included. The NRTI-naive group (22 patients) had begun antiretroviral therapy with a PI-containing regimen, whereas 12 patients (experienced group) had been previously treated by nucleoside mono-and/or dual therapy. After a median follow-up of 40 weeks, no patient of the naive group, versus 41% of the experienced group, developed a virologic failure after the change toward NVP ( p =.003). The virologic failures were associated with the appearance of NNRTI-resistant mutations. All rebound mutants also presented NRTI-resistance mutations. These results are consistent with a higher risk of virologic failure after a switch to an NNRTI in patients with prior suboptimal treatment and suggest the hypothesis that archived resistant viruses may facilitate the emergence of NNRTI resistance.

Prevalence of resistance mutations in antiretroviral-naive chronically HIV-infected patients in 1998: a French nationwide study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of resistance-conferring mutations to antiretroviral drugs in previously untreated patients with chronic HIV-1 infection as a basis for French recommendations on viral genotyping before antiretroviral treatment initiation. DESIGN: Resistance mutations were sought in samples from 404 patients seen in 23 specialized centres throughout metropolitan France in 1998. METHODS: The protease and reverse transcriptase (RT) genes of plasma virions were sequenced. Primary and secondary protease and RT gene mutations were identified from the International AIDS Society resistance testing - USA panel. RESULTS: The prevalence of patients with primary and secondary mutations were 3.7% (95% CI 1.7-5.7) and 50.3% (95% CI 45.0-55.6), respectively. The prevalence of patients with mutations associated with resistance to nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTI) and non-nucleoside RT inhibitors was 3.3% (95% CI 1.5-5.1) and 0.8% (95% CI 0.0-1.7), respectively. The prevalence of patients with NRTI primary mutations differed according to whether seropositivity had been diagnosed more or less than one year previously (0.2 versus 2.2% P = 0.023). Primary mutations associated with protease inhibitor resistance occurred at a prevalence of 1.9% (95% CI 0.5-3.4) with no difference according to the duration of known seropositivity. CONCLUSION: In France, in 1998, the prevalence of patients with primary mutations associated with resistance to antiretroviral drugs was low. Genotyping before the initiation of therapy was not recommended in chronically HIV-1-infected naive patients. A national sentinel survey of resistance in this clinical setting is performed regularly to update the recommendations for resistance testing.

Clinical, biologic, and behavioral predictors of early immunologic and virologic response in HIV-infected patients initiating protease inhibitors.

Predictors of virologic (plasma HIV RNA viral load [VL] < 500 copies/ml) and immunologic (rise in CD4+ cell count > 50 cells/mm3) response after 4 months of therapy (M4) were studied in 750 HIV-1-infected patients prospectively enrolled at the initiation of a protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen. A virologic response was observed in 80% of patients, and an immunologic response was observed in 64%. Sixty-two percent of patients self-reported full adherence to therapy at 1 month of therapy (M1) and M4. In multivariate analysis, a virologic response was more frequent in fully adherent patients (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0; p =.001). An immunologic response was associated with age < 36 years (OR =1.4; p =.03), baseline VL (OR = 1.5 per 1 log10 copies/ml higher; p <.01), decrease in VL at M1 (OR = 1.5 per 1 log10 copies/ml decrease; p <.01), baseline total lymphocyte count (OR = 1.7 per 50% lower; p <.001), and baseline CD4+ cell percentage > or = 20% (OR =1.9; p <.001) but not with adherence to therapy. Full adherence seems to be a major predictor of a virologic response to PI-containing triple therapy. An immunologic response may be possible despite incomplete adherence, at least early in therapy.

Zidovudine genotypic resistance in HIV-1-infected newborns in the French perinatal cohort.

A retrospective study was set up to investigate the frequency of zidovudine (ZDV)-resistant HIV-1 in infected newborns after ZDV prophylaxis in the French Perinatal Cohort study. Nucleotide sequence analysis was carried out from 34 infants' isolates and 18 maternal plasma samples. Mutations related to ZDV resistance were found in the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase in 7 of 34 children (20%). Evidence of mother-child transmission of ZDV-resistant HIV-1 was found in 4 cases. Phylogenetic analysis showed that 14 of 34 HIV-1 isolates from the infants belonged to non-B subtypes. The presence of ZDV resistance-encoding mutations in the newborn isolates was associated with a longer total duration of exposure to ZDV. In a context of a wide HIV-1 variability, ZDV resistance can be one of the factors contributing to mother-child transmission.

Genotypic and phenotypic resistance patterns of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants with insertions or deletions in the reverse transcriptase (RT): multicenter study of patients treated with RT inhibitors.

Genomic rearrangements in the 5' part of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) have been involved in multidrug resistance to nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTI). We carried out a retrospective, multicenter study to investigate the prevalence, variability, and phenotypic consequences of such rearrangements. Data concerning the HIV-1 RT genotype and the biological and clinical characteristics of NRTI-treated patients were collected from 10 virology laboratories. Sensitivities of the different HIV-1 variants to RT inhibitors were analyzed in a single-cycle recombinant virus assay. Fifty-two of 2,152 (2.4%) RT sequences had a rearrangement in the 5' part of the RT, with an extensive molecular variation. The number of codons inserted between positions 68 and 69 ranged from 1 (3 samples) or 2 (41 samples) to 5 and 11 in one case each. In four cases, codon 67 was deleted. High levels of phenotypic resistance to zidovudine (AZT), lamivudine (3TC), stavudine (d4T), abacavir (ABC), and didanosine (ddI) were found in 95, 92, 72, 62, and 15% of the 40 samples analyzed, respectively. Resistance to AZT, d4T, and ABC could be found in the absence of the T215Y/F mutations. Resistance to 3TC could develop in the absence of specific mutations. Low-level resistance to ddI was noticed in 40% of the patients. The deletions of codon 67 seemed to have little effect on NRTI sensitivity. Most of the rearrangements were shown to contribute to cross-resistance to NRTI. The results regarding susceptibility to ddI raise the question of the interpretation of the phenotypic data concerning this drug.