Aortic Root Thrombus Directly After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

A 70-year-old female heart failure patient could not be weaned from temporary left ventricular mechanical support with Impella CP (Abiomed Inc, Danvers, MA) after myocardial infarction; therefore, she underwent left ventricular assist device implantation (HeartMate 3; Abbott, Chicago, IL). After uneventful surgery, the patient had an early postoperative thrombus in the aortic root, and surgical thrombectomy on extracorporeal circulation was performed on the seventh postoperative day. The patient recovered well and presented in good condition with no neurologic symptoms at the 6-month follow-up visit. Surgical excision of aortic root thrombus is a feasible option even for frail patients with a left ventricular assist device.

Après un infarctus du myocarde, une patiente de 70 ans présentant une insuffisance cardiaque n'a pas pu être sevrée d'une assistance mécanique temporaire pour le ventricule gauche par dispositif Impella CP (Abiomed Inc, Danvers, MA); elle a donc subi l'implantation d'un dispositif d'assistance ventriculaire gauche (HeartMate 3; Abbott, Chicago, IL). Après une intervention sans incident, la patiente a présenté un thrombus postopératoire précoce dans l'anneau aortique, et une thrombectomie chirurgicale sous circulation extracorporelle a été réalisée le septième jour suivant l'intervention. La patiente s'est bien rétablie et semblait en bonne santé, sans symptômes neurologiques, au moment de la visite de suivi six mois plus tard. L'excision chirurgicale du thrombus de l'anneau aortique est une option réaliste même chez les patients fragiles ayant un dispositif d'assistance ventriculaire gauche.

5-year results of a newly implemented mechanical circulatory support program for terminal heart failure patients in a Swiss non-cardiac transplant university hospital.

BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, long-term circulatory support programs have been limited to heart transplant centers. In 2014, to improve the management of patients with end-stage heart failure not eligible for transplantation, we implemented a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) program for destination therapy at the University Hospital of Basel. METHODS: We described the program set-up with practical aspects. Patients aged 65 and above with therapy refractory end-stage heart failure without major contraindication for LVAD implantation were included. Younger patients with bridge-to-candidacy profile were also considered. Using the Kaplan-Meier estimate, we retrospectively analyzed the overall survival and freedom from major adverse events after LVAD implantation. We compared our results to internationally reported data. RESULTS: Between October 2014 and September 2019, 16 patients received an LVAD in our center. The mean age at implantation was 67.1 years. The mean EuroSCORE II was 24.4% and the median INTERMACS level was 4. Thirteen patients received an LVAD as destination therapy and three patients as bridge-to-candidacy. The overall survival was 87.5 and 70% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Freedom from stroke was 81.3% at 1 and 2 years. Freedom from device infection was 67.7 and 58.7% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Freedom from gastrointestinal bleeding was 75 and 56.3% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Freedom from readmission was 50 and 31.3% and at 6 months and 1 year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Basel experience demonstrated the possible implementation of an LVAD program for destination therapy or bridge-to-candidacy in a non-transplant comprehensive heart-failure center with midterm survival results and freedom from major adverse events comparable to international registries. Patient selection remains crucial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov database ( NCT04263012 ).