Wear Resistance of Additively Manufactured Resin with Different Printing Parameters and Postpolymerization Conditions.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the wear resistance of a printed interim resin manufactured with different printing and postpolymerization parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 130 rectangular resin specimens (15 × 10 × 10 mm) were 3D-printed. Among the specimens, 60 were printed with different printing orientations (0, 45, and 90 degrees) and layer thicknesses (50 and 100 µm) to create six groups to investigate the effects of the printing parameters (n = 10 per group). The remaining 70 specimens were used to evaluate the effects of postpolymerization; for this, seven groups were created as follows (n = 10 per group): nonpostpolymerized; postpolymerized for 5, 15, and 30 minutes with an ultraviolet light-emitting diode (LED) device; and postpolymerized for 5, 15, and 30 minutes with an ultraviolet light bulb device. After masticatory simulation, the wear volume loss was calculated with 3D metrology software. One-way and two-way ANOVA were used for intergroup comparisons (α = .05). RESULTS: The group printed with a build angle of 45 degrees showed lower wear volume loss than the 0- and 90-degree groups (P < .01). The wear volume loss in the ultraviolet LED group was significantly greater than that in the ultraviolet light bulb group (P = .04). No significant difference was observed in the wear volume loss of the printed resin with respect to the layer thickness and polymerization time (P > .05). However, the non-postpolymerized group showed significantly greater wear volume loss than the other groups (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The printed resin showed greater wear resistance when it was printed at a build angle of 45 degrees and postpolymerized with an ultraviolet light bulb device.

Color and surface stainability of additively and subtractively manufactured interim restorative materials against mouth rinses.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Interim restorations are often used along with mouth rinses during the healing period following surgical procedures. However, evidence regarding the color and surface properties of digitally fabricated interim restorations after oral rinsing is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate whether different mouth rinses could affect the color and surface roughness of milled and printed interim restorations after simulated oral rinsing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Disk-shaped specimens (Ø15×2 mm; N=180) were fabricated by using conventional (Jet Tooth Shade), milled (Yamahachi PMMA Disk), and printed (NextDent C&B) resin materials. All resin specimens were divided into 3 different groups according to the rinsing material: distilled water, whitening mouth rinse (Listerine Healthy White), and conventional mouth rinse (Listerine Cool Mint). The specimens were further allocated into short- and long-term subgroups, and oral rinsing simulation was performed (n=10). Short-term rinsing simulated the conditions in a usual interim restoration period, and long-term rinsing was performed to evaluate the properties of the interim materials. The color differences (CIEDE2000, ΔE00) between the baseline and each time point were determined by using a spectrophotometer. The surface roughness of the tested specimens was measured by using a confocal laser scanning microscope. Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests with nonparametric pairwise comparisons were used to analyze the data (α=.05). RESULTS: On simulation of a 6-month use of the mouth rinse, the color change in the milled resin did not differ from that in the conventional resin (P>.334), but the printed resin showed a significantly greater color change than the other resins (P<.007). The greatest color change with the printed resin was observed when a conventional mouth rinse was used. However, all color changes were below a perceptible threshold of 1.30. When daily rinsing for 14 years was simulated, all resin groups showed a perceptible color change when conventional mouth rinse was used, and the printed resin showed the greatest median ±interquartile range ΔE00 (2.24 ±0.2). In both short- and long-term simulations, the printed resin rinsed with the conventional mouth rinse showed significantly greater roughness than that rinsed with distilled water (P<.009). CONCLUSIONS: The printed resin showed higher stainability than the conventional resin, and the color change was greatest with the conventional mouth rinse. However, in 6 months of daily mouth rinse simulation, all the tested resin materials exhibited imperceptible color change and clinically acceptable surface roughness.

A digital method for wear volume loss analysis using a single-scan three-dimensional dataset.

A straightforward digital method of evaluating wear volume loss is described. This method allows the measurement of the wear by analyzing only the three-dimensional scan dataset of the worn specimen without needing a separate baseline scan. Compared to the conventional method, involving superimposition of the two datasets scanned before and after the wear test, this method can reduce labor and accuracy errors caused by repeated scans and superimposition procedures. Further, this analysis can be conducted using free computer-aided design software, which makes it more efficient for the analysis of wear volume loss of restorative materials.

Wear of 3D printed and CAD/CAM milled interim resin materials after chewing simulation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the wear resistance and surface roughness of three interim resin materials, which were subjected to chewing simulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three interim resin materials were evaluated: (1) three-dimensional (3D) printed (digital light processing type), (2) computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) milled, and (3) conventional polymethyl methacrylate interim resin materials. A total of 48 substrate specimens were prepared. The specimens were divided into two subgroups and subjected to 30,000 or 60,000 cycles of chewing simulation (n = 8). The wear volume loss and surface roughness of the materials were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test (α=.05). RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation values of wear volume loss (in mm3) against the metal abrader after 60,000 cycles were 0.10 ± 0.01 for the 3D printed resin, 0.21 ± 0.02 for the milled resin, and 0.44 ± 0.01 for the conventional resin. Statistically significant differences among volume losses were found in the order of 3D printed, milled, and conventional interim materials (P<.001). After 60,000 cycles of simulated chewing, the mean surface roughness (Ra; µm) values for 3D printed, milled, and conventional materials were 0.59 ± 0.06, 1.27 ± 0.49, and 1.64 ± 0.44, respectively. A significant difference was found in the Ra value between 3D printed and conventional materials (P=.01). CONCLUSION: The interim restorative materials for additive and subtractive manufacturing digital technologies exhibited less wear volume loss than the conventional interim resin. The 3D printed interim restorative material showed a smoother surface than the conventional interim material after simulated chewing.