Characterization of the supervision of clinical reasoning by nurse anesthetists with student nurse anesthetists: a qualitative study / Caractérisation de la supervision du raisonnement clinique par les infirmiers anesthésistes auprès des étudiants infirmiers anesthésistes : une étude qualitative.

Introduction: Errors in reasoning are the main causes of poor decision-making in clinical practice. To remedy this, many studies highlight the importance of supervising clinical reasoning during medical internships. Although decision-making is an ongoing process at all key moments of the perioperative period, there are no studies on the supervision of clinical reasoning during student nurse anesthetist internships. The objective of this study was to identify the characteristics of the supervision of clinical reasoning by anesthesia professionals with student nurse anesthetists. Methodology: A multicenter qualitative study was carried out using observations and individual interviews with five nurse anesthetists and five students. Results: Three themes are identified : the characteristics of the learner's and supervisor's posture ; the teaching methods used ; and the specificities of clinical reasoning. Analysis: The nurse anesthetists question clinical reasoning only when they detect difficulties in the student. However, no traceability is carried out. Students spontaneously verbalize their clinical reasoning when unexpected events occur. Discussion: The results will be used as a basis for a new tool for tracing learning during internships.

Introduction: Les erreurs de raisonnement sont les principales causes de mauvaise prise de décision en clinique. Pour y remédier, de nombreuses études montrent l'importance de la supervision du raisonnement clinique pendant les stages en médecine. Bien que la prise de décision soit permanente lors de tous les moments clés de la période péri-opératoire, il n'existe aucune étude sur la supervision du raisonnement clinique durant les stages des étudiants infirmiers anesthésistes. L'objectif de cette étude est d'identifier les caractéristiques de la supervision du raisonnement clinique par les professionnels d'anesthésie auprès des étudiants infirmiers anesthésistes. Méthodologie: Une étude qualitative multicentrique a été réalisée à l'aide d'observations et d'entretiens individuels auprès de cinq infirmiers anesthésistes et cinq étudiants. Résultats: Les trois thèmes identifiés sont les caractéristiques de la posture de l'apprenant et du superviseur, les méthodes pédagogiques utilisées et les spécificités du raisonnement clinique. Analyse: Les infirmiers anesthésistes questionnent le raisonnement clinique uniquement quand ils détectent des difficultés chez l'étudiant ; cependant, aucune traçabilité n'est réalisée. Les étudiants verbalisent spontanément leur raisonnement clinique lors d'événements imprévus. Discussion: Les résultats serviront de base à un nouvel outil de traçabilité des apprentissages en stage.

Perceptions and Experiences of the COVID-19 Pandemic amongst Frontline Nurses and Their Relatives in France in Six Paradoxes: A Qualitative Study.

Due to their frontline position to fight the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the professional and personal life of nurses was severely disrupted. To understand and describe their lived experiences and perceptions during the pandemic's first wave in France, we interviewed 49 nurses, including 16 nursing students, and 48 of their family members from June to July 2020. Using a purposeful sampling, the semi-structured interviews were scripted according to Abric's method with probing questions. The interview analysis led to the identification of six paradoxical perceptions concerning the pandemic's consequences: the Silence Paradox, the Hero Paradox, the Workforce Paradox, the Learning Paradox, the Symbolic Exchange Paradox, and the Uncertainty Paradox. However, despite different experiences, the nurses perceived their frontline position both as a burden jeopardizing their safety and well-being and as a spotlight of nurses' tough working conditions. Indeed, because they were in the frontline position, nurses and nursing students were psychologically vulnerable, even more so when they felt alone and inadequately protected. Besides, their families were vulnerable too, as they were also exposed to the consequences of the nurses' frontline engagement. Thus, to preserve their safety and well-being, institutions should also provide them with better organizational support and inclusive leadership, without neglecting their families.