[Cavitary lung lesions in COVID-19 associated pneumonia: a single-center study of 40 cases]. / Polostnye obrazovaniya legkikh pri COVID-19-assotsiirovannoi pnevmonii.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate clinical features and outcomes in patients with cavitary lung lesions and COVID-19 associated pneumonia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records of 8261 patients with COVID-19 was performed. We selected 40 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Sex, age, hospital-stay, lung tissue lesion, comorbidities, treatment, methods of respiratory support, complications and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Cavitary lung lesions were more common in men (67.5%). Age of patients ranged from 28 to 88 (mean 64.9±13.7) years. Hospital-stay in patients with cavitary lung lesions was 9-58 (median 27.5) days. There were 18 complications in 14 (35%) patients. Pneumothorax, isolated pneumomediastinum, pleural empyema, hemoptysis and sigmoid colon perforation were considered as complications of cavitary lung lesions. Nine (22.5%) patients died (5 of them with complications). Three patients died after surgical treatment. Long-term results were analyzed in 8 (25.8%) patients. Patients were followed-up for 3 months after discharge. Shrinkage of lesions occurred after 7-60 (mean 23) days, and complete obliteration of cavities came after 32 (range 14-90) days. CONCLUSION: Cavitary lung lesions are a rare complication of COVID-19 pneumonia. There was no significant correlation of complications with age, sex, therapy, volume of lung lesions and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Despite more common fatal outcomes in older patients undergoing NIV, the last one was prescribed exclusively due to disease progression and respiratory failure. Further research on this problem is necessary to identify possible risk factors of cavitary lung lesions.

[Risk factors of pulmonary cavitation in COVID-19 pneumonia]. / Faktory riska poyavleniya polostnykh obrazovanii legkikh pri COVID-19-pnevmonii.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors of pulmonary cavitation in COVID-19 pneumonia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study included 8261 patients with COVID-19 between April 2020 and March 2022. Inclusion criteria: age >18 years, COVID-19 confirmed by polymerase chain reaction. Two cohorts of patients were formed: 40 patients with pulmonary cavitation and 40 patients without these lesions. Both groups were comparable in age, lung lesion volume and oxygenation. Sex, age, length of hospital-stay, CT grade of lung lesion, comorbidities, treatment, respiratory support, oxygen saturation and in-hospital outcomes were evaluated. The highest lung lesion volume during hospitalization was assessed. CT was performed upon admission and approximately every 5 days for evaluation of treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics software (IBM Corporation, USA). RESULTS: Patients with pulmonary cavitation significantly differed in age, SpO2, lung lesion volume, more common non-invasive ventilation and prolonged hospital-stay. Cardiovascular diseases were more common in both groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed age, cardiovascular diseases, CT-based severity of lung damage, absence of biological therapy and non-invasive ventilation as risk factors of pulmonary cavitation. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, these predictors were CT-based severity of lung damage and absence of biological therapy. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that pulmonary cavitation had no significant effect on mortality (OR=2.613, 95% CI: 0.732-9.322, p=0.139). CONCLUSION: The risk of pulmonary cavitation in COVID-19 is directly related to advanced lung damage and untimely or absent biological therapy with IL-6 inhibitors. Pulmonary cavitation in COVID-19 is not a typical manifestation of disease and can be caused by some factors: fungal infection, secondary bacterial infection, tuberculosis and pulmonary infarction. Further study of this problem is required to develop diagnostic algorithms and treatment tactics.

[Exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis].

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is usually characterized by a chronic and slowly progressive course. According to several studies, a small number of patients with IPF (about 515%) develops an acute deterioration of deasese exacerbation of IPF. Exacerbations of IPF can occur at any time of the disease and sometimes becomes the first manifestation of IPF. Pulmonary hypertension in IPF is a fairly frequent complication, which leads to severe violations of gas exchange and reduced tolerance to physical stress. Currently, proven effective treatments for exacerbations of IPF do not exist, the management of this condition is based on supportive therapy (oxygen, respiratory support) and interventions with inadequate evidences (corticosteroids, immunosuppressant). During exacerbation of IPF a careful search of all the possible triggers is justified. In the presented clinical case of exacerbation of IPF there was demonstrated the efficacy of complex therapy including antifibrotic therapy, PAH-specific medicines and enhanced oxygen therapy.

[A patient with severe idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: Is there a way out?] / Patsient s tiazhelym techeniem idiopaticheskoi legochnoi arterial'noi gipertenzii: est' li vykhod?

The paper considers a clinical example of current therapy for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension in a female patient with its clinical deterioration. It shows the tactics of switching from one drug (bosentan) to others (macitentan) within in the same pathogenetic therapy group (endothelin receptor antagonists). The latest pulmonary hypertension classification (Nice, 2013) is presented. The current strategies of pathogenetic therapy for pulmonary hypertension are discussed.