PRDM10 RCC: A Birt-Hogg-Dubé-like Syndrome Associated With Lipoma and Highly Penetrant, Aggressive Renal Tumors Morphologically Resembling Type 2 Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical manifestations and genetic basis of a familial cancer syndrome in patients with lipomas and Birt-Hogg-Dubé-like clinical manifestations including fibrofolliculomas and trichodiscomas and kidney cancer. METHODS: Genomic analysis of blood and renal tumor DNA was performed. Inheritance pattern, phenotypic manifestations, and clinical and surgical management were documented. Cutaneous, subcutaneous, and renal tumor pathologic features were characterized. RESULTS: Affected individuals were found to be at risk for a highly penetrant and lethal form of bilateral, multifocal papillary renal cell carcinoma. Whole genome sequencing identified a germline pathogenic variant in PRDM10 (c.2029 T>C, p.Cys677Arg), which cosegregated with disease. PRDM10 loss of heterozygosity was identified in kidney tumors. PRDM10 was predicted to abrogate expression of FLCN, a transcriptional target of PRDM10, which was confirmed by tumor expression of GPNMB, a TFE3/TFEB target and downstream biomarker of FLCN loss. In addition, a sporadic papillary RCC from the TCGA cohort was identified with a somatic PRDM10 mutation. CONCLUSION: We identified a germline PRDM10 pathogenic variant in association with a highly penetrant, aggressive form of familial papillary RCC, lipomas, and fibrofolliculomas/trichodiscomas. PRDM10 loss of heterozygosity and elevated GPNMB expression in renal tumors indicate that PRDM10 alteration leads to reduced FLCN expression, driving TFE3-induced tumor formation. These findings suggest that individuals with Birt-Hogg-Dubé-like manifestations and subcutaneous lipomas, but without a germline pathogenic FLCN variant, should be screened for germline PRDM10 variants. Importantly, kidney tumors identified in patients with a pathogenic PRDM10 variant should be managed with surgical resection instead of active surveillance.

TFEB and TFE3 drive kidney cystogenesis and tumorigenesis.

Birt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) syndrome is an inherited familial cancer syndrome characterized by the development of cutaneous lesions, pulmonary cysts, renal tumors and cysts and caused by loss-of-function pathogenic variants in the gene encoding the tumor-suppressor protein folliculin (FLCN). FLCN acts as a negative regulator of TFEB and TFE3 transcription factors, master controllers of lysosomal biogenesis and autophagy, by enabling their phosphorylation by the mechanistic Target Of Rapamycin Complex 1 (mTORC1). We have previously shown that deletion of Tfeb rescued the renal cystic phenotype of kidney-specific Flcn KO mice. Using Flcn/Tfeb/Tfe3 double and triple KO mice, we now show that both Tfeb and Tfe3 contribute, in a differential and cooperative manner, to kidney cystogenesis. Remarkably, the analysis of BHD patient-derived tumor samples revealed increased activation of TFEB/TFE3-mediated transcriptional program and silencing either of the two genes rescued tumorigenesis in human BHD renal tumor cell line-derived xenografts (CDXs). Our findings demonstrate in disease-relevant models that both TFEB and TFE3 are key drivers of renal tumorigenesis and suggest novel therapeutic strategies based on the inhibition of these transcription factors.

Evaluation of Recipients of Positive and Negative Secondary Findings Evaluations in a Hybrid CLIA-Research Sequencing Pilot.

While consensus regarding the return of secondary genomic findings in the clinical setting has been reached, debate about such findings in the research setting remains. We developed a hybrid, research-clinical translational genomics process for research exome data coupled with a CLIA-validated secondary findings analysis. Eleven intramural investigators from ten institutes at the National Institutes of Health piloted this process. Nearly 1,200 individuals were sequenced and 14 secondary findings were identified in 18 participants. Positive secondary findings were returned by a genetic counselor following a standardized protocol, including referrals for specialty follow-up care for the secondary finding local to the participants. Interviews were undertaken with 13 participants 4 months after receipt of a positive report. These participants reported minimal psychologic distress within a process to assimilate their results. Of the 13, 9 reported accessing the recommended health care services. A sample of 107 participants who received a negative findings report were surveyed 4 months after receiving it. They demonstrated good understanding of the negative secondary findings result and most expressed reassurance (64%) from that report. However, a notable minority (up to 17%) expressed confusion regarding the distinction of primary from secondary findings. This pilot shows it is feasible to couple CLIA-compliant secondary findings to research sequencing with minimal harms. Participants managed the surprise of a secondary finding with most following recommended follow up, yet some with negative findings conflated secondary and primary findings. Additional work is needed to understand barriers to follow-up care and help participants distinguish secondary from primary findings.