RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has evolved over the last 2 decades. The aim of the study was to identify the impact of era and technical improvements on perioperative outcome after MIMVS. METHODS: A tota of 1000 patients (mean age: 60.8 ± 12.7 years, 60.3% male) underwent video-assisted or totally endoscopic MIMVS between 2001 and 2020 in a single institution. Three technical modalities were introduced during the observed period: (i) 3D visualization, (ii) use of premeasured artificial chordae (PTFE loops) and (iii) preoperative CT scans. Comparisons were made before and after the introduction of technical improvements. RESULTS: A total of 741 patients underwent isolated mitral valve (MV) procedure, whereas 259 received concomitant procedures. These consisted of tricuspid valve repair (208), left atrium ablation (145) and persistent foramen ovale or atrial septum defect (ASD) closure (172). The aetiology was degenerative in 738 (73.8%) patients and functional in 101 patients (10.1%). A total of 900 patients received MV repair (90%), and 100 patients (10%) underwent MV replacement. Perioperative survival was 99.1%, and periprocedural success 93.5% with a periprocedural safety of 96.3%. Improvement in periprocedural safety attributed to the lower rates of postoperative low output (P = 0.025) and less reoperations for bleeding (P < 0.001). 3D visualization improved cross-clamp (P = 0.001) but not cardiopulmonary bypass times. The use of loops and preoperative CT scan both had no impact on periprocedural success or safety but improved cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased surgical experience improves safety in MIMVS. Technical improvements are related to increased operative success and decreased operative times in patients undergoing MIMVS.
RESUMO
Background and objectives: Certain clinical and anatomical conditions are absolute or relative contraindications for safe mitral valve surgery via the right mini-thoracotomy access. It is uncertain whether patients with these contraindications may benefit from the less invasive approach via upper hemi-sternotomy compared to standard full sternotomy. Materials and methods: Out of 2052 mitral valve surgery patients, operated from 6/04 through 2/19, 1535 were excluded due to the different criteria for eligibility to both approaches. Out of these, 350 received full sternotomy and 167 upper hemi-sternotomy. After propensity score matching, 164 pairs were analyzed for operative variables, postoperative complications and 30-day and one-year survival. Results: Upper hemi-sternotomy was associated with a survival benefit of 30 days (99.4% vs. 82.1%; p < 0.001) and one-year (93.9% vs. 79.9% p < 0.001, HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.49). Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were comparable in both groups. Upper hemi-sternotomy resulted in less low cardiac output syndrome (18.9% vs. 31.1%; p = 0.011); ventilation time (8 vs. 13 h; p < 0.001), length of intensive care stay (1 vs. 2 days; p < 0.001) and total hospital stay (8 vs. 9 days; p < 0.001) were shorter in the upper hemi-sternotomy group. Conclusion: In patients undergoing mitral valve surgery, upper hemi-sternotomy is associated with short- and mid-term survival benefits as well as lower postoperative complication rates compared to full sternotomy. Hence, the less invasive upper hemi-sternotomy can be a valid approach in patients with contraindications for right mini-thoracotomy.
