Proposal of classification and terminology of interventional endoscopic ultrasonography/endosonography.

Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography/endosongraphy (I-EUS) procedures have rapidly evolved since their introduction three decades ago; however, the classification and terminology for these procedures remain unstandardized. To address this, the Subcommittee for Terminology of I-EUS in the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society was established to define classifications and a glossary of I-EUS terms. They categorized I-EUS procedures into five types based on purpose and method: (i) EUS-guided sampling; (ii) EUS-guided through-the-needle examination; (iii) EUS-guided drainage/anastomosis (EUS-D/A); (iv) trans-endosonographically/EUS-guided created route (ESCR) procedures; and (v) EUS-guided delivery. EUS-guided sampling includes tissue acquisition and fluid sampling, classified by needle type into fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy. Through-the-needle examinations include imaging, measurements, and biopsies. EUS-D/A includes organ drainage/anastomosis, fluid collection drainage, and digestive tract anastomosis. In the EUS-D/A route, "anastomosis" is used for organ-to-organ procedures, whereas "tract" is for fluid drainage. ESCR is a newly proposed term for procedures via anastomosis or tract, such as endoscopic necrosectomy and EUS-guided antegrade stenting. The term "trans-luminal drainage/anastomosis stent" is used for stents that maintain the ESCR rather than treating strictures. EUS-guided delivery involves the delivery of substances, such as fluids, drugs, medical devices, and energy. This proposed categorization and terminology aimed to clarify I-EUS procedures and will require updates as new techniques and concepts emerge.

Technical feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver abscess drainage for the right hepatic lobe using a novel metal stent as first-line treatment (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver abscess drainage (EUS-LAD) has been developed, only the left hepatic or caudate lobe can traditionally be drained by EUS. However, there is no evidence for the technical feasibility of EUS-LAD for the right hepatic lobe. In this retrospective study, the technical feasibility of EUS-LAD using a novel partially covered self-expandable metal stent (PCSEMS) with an anti-migration system was evaluated as a first-line drainage technique for right hepatic lobe abscesses. METHOD: This study included consecutive patients with right liver abscesses between December 2020 and February 2024. The primary outcome in this study was the technical success rate of EUS-LAD. Technical success of EUS-LAD was defined as successful stent deployment from the liver abscess to the duodenum. Clinical success, procedure time, duration of hospital stay, recurrence of liver abscess, and adverse events were evaluated as secondary outcomes. RESULT: 19 patients were enrolled in this study. The location of the liver abscesses was mainly at segment 6. The mean size of the liver abscesses was 91.8 mm. The liver abscess could be identified under EUS guidance from the duodenum in 16 patients. Puncture using a 19-G needle was attempted, but the needle could not reach the liver abscess in one patient. The novel PCSEMS was successfully deployed in all patients. Technical success rate of EUS-LAD was 78.9% (15/19). Adverse events associated with the procedure were observed in 3 patients, but conservative treatment was successful. Clinical success was obtained in 14 patients (93.3%). The median duration of stent placement was 19 days (range, 7 to 41 days). The median follow-up period was 556 days, and recurrence of liver abscess was not observed in any patients. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, EUS-LAD for the right liver lobe using a novel PCSEMS can be feasible and safe.

The updated Asia-Pacific consensus statement on the role of endoscopic management in malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

The first Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations for endoscopic and interventional management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma were published in 2013. Since then, new evidence on the role of endoscopy for management of malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) has emerged. To update the recommendation, we reviewed the literature using a PICO (population/intervention/comparison/outcomes) framework and created consensus statements. The expert panel voted anonymously using the modified Delphi method and all final statements were evaluated for the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. The important points with inadequate supporting evidence were classified as key concepts. There were seven statements and five key concepts that reached consensus. The statements and key concepts dealt with multiple aspects of endoscopy-based management in MHBO starting from diagnosis, strategies and options for biliary drainage, management of recurrent biliary obstruction, management of cholecystitis after biliary stenting, and adjunctive treatment before stenting. Although the recommendations may assist physicians in planning the treatment for MHBO patients, they should not replace the decision of a multidisciplinary team in the management of individual patients.

WONDER-02: plastic stent vs. lumen-apposing metal stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts-study protocol for a multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal drainage has become a first-line treatment modality for symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts. Despite the increasing popularity of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs), plastic stents may resolve non-necrotic fluid collections effectively with lower costs and no LAMS-specific adverse events. To date, there has been a paucity of data on the appropriate stent type in this setting. This trial aims to assess the non-inferiority of plastic stents to a LAMS for the initial EUS-guided drainage of pseudocysts. METHODS: The WONDER-02 trial is a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial, which will enrol pancreatic pseudocyst patients requiring EUS-guided treatment in 26 centres in Japan. This trial plans to enrol 80 patients who will be randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive either plastic stents or a LAMS (40 patients per arm). In the plastic stent group, EUS-guided drainage will be performed using two 7-Fr double pigtail stents. In the LAMS group, the treatment will be performed in the same way except for LAMS use. The step-up treatment will be performed via endoscopic and/or percutaneous procedures at the trial investigator's discretion. The primary endpoint is clinical success, which is defined as a decrease in a pseudocyst size to ≤ 2 cm and an improvement in inflammatory indicators (i.e. body temperature, white blood cell count, and serum C-reactive protein). Secondary endpoints include technical success, adverse events including mortality, pseudocyst recurrence, and medical costs. DISCUSSION: The WONDER-02 trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of plastic stents compared to a LAMS in EUS-guided treatment of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts with a particular focus on the non-inferior efficacy of plastic stents. The findings will help establish a new treatment algorithm for this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06133023 registered on 9 November 2023. UMIN000052647 registered on 30 October 2023. jRCT1032230444 registered on 7 November 2023.

Diagnosis of isolated hilar-/extrahepatic-type IgG-4-related sclerosing cholangitis can be increased by improved recognition of this condition-A Japanese multicenter analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with isolated IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC) often undergo unnecessary resection. The aim of this study was to validate the revised Japanese diagnostic criteria for isolated IgG-4-SC and to improve awareness about this condition in the population. METHODS: This was a Japanese retrospective multicenter study. We focused on the data and diagnostic yield obtained using the Japanese diagnostic criteria published initially in 2012 and revised later in 2020 for the diagnosis of isolated IgG4-SC. RESULTS: Patients with isolated IgG4-SC could be classified into two groups based on the primary location of the lesion: the hilar type (n = 40) and the extrahepatic type (n = 13). In total, 10 patients with the hilar type had undergone unnecessary resection. The revised 2020 criteria are useful for the diagnosis of extrahepatic lesions, which are not included in the 2012 criteria. The need for a steroid trial was reduced from 37.7% when the diagnosis was based on the 2012 criteria to 7.6% when the diagnosis was based on the revised 2020 criteria. The diagnostic specificity also improved from 58.5% for the 2012 criteria to 88.7% for the revised 2020 criteria. CONCLUSION: Our validation of the 2020 criteria for the diagnosis of IgG4-SC could contribute to avoiding unnecessary resection in patients with isolated IgG4-SC, which can be classified into the hilar and extrahepatic types. The 2020 criteria can enhance the diagnosis rate of isolated IgG4-SC and uncover this tough-to-diagnose entity based on inclusion of the imaging findings and decrease the dependence on a steroid trial.

Cardiocerebral Infarction Presenting in a Neurosurgical Emergency: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Cardiocerebral infarction (CCI), the simultaneous occurrence of acute ischemic stroke and acute myocardial infarction (AMI), is a rare but critical condition. However, the optimal treatment strategy, particularly regarding the use of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), remains unclear. This case report describes a patient with CCI diagnosed during a neurosurgical emergency. A 67-year-old man with a history of hypertension presented with sudden right hemiparesis and sensory aphasia 30 minutes prior to hospital arrival. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging revealed acute cerebral infarction in the left middle cerebral artery territory but without large-vessel occlusion. Routine electrocardiography (ECG) showed ST-T elevation in leads V1, V2, II, III, and aVF (augmented vector foot). Subsequent blood tests confirmed positive troponin T and elevated creatine kinase levels. Despite the absence of reported AMI symptoms, the patient received a diagnosis of CCI. Due to the uncertain time of AMI onset and to expedite transfer to the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) unit, t-PA administration was withheld. Upon transfer, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (200 mg) and clopidogrel (300 mg) was initiated. Emergency coronary angioplasty successfully treated a 99% stenosis of the left anterior descending artery (#7). The patient's post-procedure course was uneventful. After 18 days, he was transferred to a rehabilitation hospital with a modified Rankin Scale score of 3. This case highlights the importance of routine 12-lead ECG in neurosurgical emergencies, regardless of presenting symptoms like chest pain. While guidelines support the use of t-PA in CCI, its administration requires careful consideration due to specific risks, including cardiac rupture and limitations on antithrombotic therapy within the first 24 hours.

Mechanical evaluation of the dilation force of dilation devices during interventional endoscopic ultrasound.

Background and study aims To insert the metal stent delivery system (8.5F) during interventional endoscopic ultrasound (I-EUS), several dilation steps are needed, which may be related to increased bile leakage from a fistula. There have been no definitive studies of dilation force. The aim of the present study was to evaluate dilation force during I-EUS using several dilation devices. Methods In the present study, seven dilation devices were evaluated including bougie dilators such as a straight-shaped dilator (the ES dilator, Soehendra dilator, a standard ERCP catheter) a screw-shaped dilator (Tornus ES, Soehendra stent retriever), and a 4-mm balloon catheter (REN biliary balloon catheter, Hurricane RX). The diameter of each dilator and dilation force were measured. Results Of the bougie dilators, the dilation force of the ES dilator was the highest (0.908±0.035 kg). Of the balloon catheters, the dilation force of the Hurricane RX (3.261±0.024 kg) was slightly higher than that of the REN (3.159±0.072 kg). Of the bougie dilators, although the diameter of the ES dilator was not larger than that of the Tornus ES, the dilation force was stronger. Similarly, the diameter of the Soehendra stent retriever was greater than that of the ERCP catheter or Soehendra dilator and the dilation force was lower. Conclusions Compared with bougie dilators, balloon catheters have stronger dilation force according to our experimental study. The present results should be evaluated in clinical trials.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage: a comprehensive state of the art review.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) has traditionally been the standard modality for pancreatic endotherapy. However, in certain situations, failure of retrograde ductal access may warrant an alternative modality of drainage. This can occur in various settings like difficult and/or surgically altered anatomy or duodenal obstruction. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD) is a relatively newer addition to the armamentarium for endoscopic access to the PD. AREAS COVERED: This comprehensive state-of-art review aims to give an overview of the indications, technical details, different approaches, and outcomes of EUS-PDD, with the latest evidence available in scientific literature. EXPERT OPINION: Akin to its biliary drainage counterpart, EUS-PDD enables an EUS-assisted-ERP using rendezvous technique or EUS-guided drainage through transmural stenting. The technique has evolved over the ensuing years with multitude of accessories, approaches, and devices to optimize the outcomes. However, the technical success and adverse events rates need to be further improved. Additionally, it has a steep learning curve with requirements of advanced technical skill and optimum infrastructure back-up. Meticulous patient selection, precise knowledge of ductal anatomy, appropriate approach, and carefully chosen accessories can improve its clinical outcomes.

Multicenter study comparing EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy and ERCP for malignant biliary obstruction in patients with accessible papillae.

BACKGROUND: One advantage of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is that it is difficult for reflux cholangitis, caused by duodenal pressure increasing due to duodenal obstruction, to occur. In addition, since stent deployment is performed away from the malignant stricture site, longer stent patency than with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) may be obtained. However, no study has previously compared EUS-HGS and ERCP for patients without duodenal obstruction or surgically altered anatomy. The aim of the present study was to compare clinical outcomes between EUS-HGS and ERCP in normal anatomy patients without duodenal obstruction. METHOD: In the ERCP group, patients who initially underwent biliary drainage were included. In the EUS-HGS group, patients who underwent EUS-HGS due to failed biliary cannulation were included. Patients with an inaccessible papilla, such as with surgically altered anatomy or duodenal obstruction, were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 314 patients who underwent ERCP and EUS-HGS were enrolled in this study. Of the 314 patients, 289 underwent biliary stenting under ERCP guidance, and 25 patients underwent biliary stenting under EUS-HGS. After propensity score-matching analysis, the adverse event rate tended to be lower in the EUS-HGS group than in the ERCP group. Although overall survival was not significantly different between the EUS-HGS and ERCP groups (p = .228), stent patency was significantly longer in the EUS-HGS group (median 366.0 days) than in the ERCP group (median 76.5 days). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-HGS had a lower adverse event rate, shorter procedure time, and longer stent patency than ERCP in cases of normal anatomy without duodenal obstruction.