[A Case of Laparoscopic Uterine and Vaginal Resection for Local Recurrence after Abdominoperineal Resection for Anal Canal Cancer].

The patient was an 80s woman. She visited our hospital with chief complaint of melena, and further evaluation revealed anal canal cancer. We performed robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection(D3 lymphadenectomy)and lateral lymph node dissection. The pathological diagnosis was anal canal cancer, muc>por1>tub2, T3N1bM0, pStage Ⅲb. One year after the surgery, she had a mass in the soft tissue of perineum on CT scan and PET-CT showed abnormal accumulation, which was diagnosed as local recurrence. At the same time, she also had a mass with abnormal accumulation in ascending colon, and it was diagnosed as ascending colon cancer. In both cases, we judged radical resection was possible, and the policy of surgery was decided. First, laparoscopic ileocecal resection was performed. The local recurrence lesion became a mass, invading the soft tissue of the perineum, the posterior wall of the vagina, and the cervix. So, we performed laparoscopic excision of local recurrent region together with the uterus and the posterior wall of the vagina. Based on the result of pathological examination, the patient was diagnosed with ascending colon cancer(tub1, pT1bN1aM0, pStage Ⅲa), and recurrence of anal canal cancer. The postoperative course is good and there are no signs of recurrence for 6 months after the operation.

[A Case of Early Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma Coexisting with High-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm].

We report a case of a female in her fifties with early appendiceal adenocarcinoma coexisting with high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm(HAMN)with a review of the literature. The patient presented to our hospital because of an enlarged appendix noted by contrast-enhanced CT performed for hematuria. Contrast-enhanced CT showed that the appendix had swollen to 10 mm and mucus had accumulated inside, which had no evidence of obvious malignancy. She was followed up on CT once a year. Four years after her first visit, she underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for a definitive diagnosis. There were no adhesions or inflammation in her abdominal cavity, and the appendix root was dissected with an automatic anastomosis device. Her resected specimen macroscopically showed mild wall thickening, but no obvious neoplastic lesion. Pathological examination revealed that in many areas centered on the tip of the appendix, highly columnar atypical epithelium with enhanced mucus production was densely proliferated in the form of glandular tubular and papillary. The nuclei of the proliferating epithelium were large and the fission image was conspicuous, but they remained in the mucosa. Pathological examination diagnosed as HAMN according to the WHO classification. The atypical epithelium in a small area at the tip was particularly strong in nuclear atypia, and showed a strong positive diffusely in p53, which was an image of well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. The pathological diagnosis was V, Type 0-Ⅱb, 2 mm, tub1 in HAMN, pTis, Ly0, V0, Pn0, pPM0, pDM0, pRM0, R0. Six months have passed since the operation, but no recurrence has been observed.