Detection of Cardiotoxicity Using Right Ventricular Free Wall Longitudinal Strain in Low Cardiovascular Risk Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Low-Dose Anthracycline Treatment.

Objective Breast cancer patients who receive chemotherapy may develop cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity, particularly if they have pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors. Notably, right ventricle dysfunction may manifest before the left ventricle. Our study aims to compare conventional echocardiography with global longitudinal strain (GLS) in low cardiovascular risk patients on low-dose anthracycline, focusing on early cardiotoxicity detection. Additionally, we explore the predictive role of right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS) in cardiotoxicity. Methods In a recent study, 28 women with low cardiovascular risk who underwent low-dose anthracycline chemotherapy for breast cancer were assessed for cardiac function using two-dimensional echocardiography and speckle-tracking echocardiography. The measurements included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), right ventricular systolic function (RVS'), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), and RVFWLS. All patients had normal LVEF at the beginning of the study. Cardiotoxicity was defined as a new decrease in LVEF by 10% or below 53% and/or changes in LVGLS/RVFWLS by 15%. Results In our study, no significant changes were observed in the LVEF following chemotherapy treatment. The LVEF values remained stable, changing slightly from 63 ± 3.7 to 65.0 ± 3.4, with a t-test value of 1.790 and a p-value of 0.079. Similarly, the analysis found no significant changes in RVS' and TAPSE values following chemotherapy treatment. However, significant changes were observed in strain measurements. LVGLS decreased from -21.2 ± 2.1 to -18.6 ± 2.6 (t-test = -4.116; df = 54, p=0.001), and RVFWLS decreased from -25.2 ± 2.9 to -21.4 ± 4.4 (t-test = -3.82; df = 54, p=0.001). Notably, 35% of participants showed changes in RVFWLS greater than 15%, whereas LVGLS changed by less than 15%. This indicates that RVFWLS is more sensitive to the treatment compared to LVGLS. Conclusions The study results indicate that during the initial phases of chemotherapy treatment in low cardiovascular risk patients, early changes in strain measures reveal subclinical cardiotoxicity. This suggests that GLS measurements are more effective at detecting early signs of myocardial damage and potential deterioration in cardiac function than traditional echocardiographic parameters. Additionally, it is noteworthy that RVFWLS exhibits greater sensitivity to these changes, regardless of the chemotherapy dosage and regimen.

Study of blood rheological parameters and NO in coronary artery disease patients with and without collaterals.

BACKGROUND: In coronary artery disease (CAD), an alternative way of improvement of blood circulation in the ischemic area of the myocardium is coronary collateral circulation. Our study aimed to investigate the rheological parameters of blood and nitric oxide (NO) content in patients with various degrees of collateral development and the likelihood of the influence of blood fluidity on collateral angiogenesis. METHODS: We studied patients with stable CAD who underwent elective coronary angiography and a control group with the same mean age. We investigated patients with different degrees of developing collaterals and those without them. In studied patients, the blood plasma viscosity, aggregability, and deformability of erythrocytes, as the main indicators of blood rheology. We recorded content of stable metabolic end products of nitric oxide (NOx). RESULTS: Results of the studies showed that in the blood of studied patients with CAD erythrocyte aggregation was increased and NO content decreased compared to the control level; NO content was as lower, as less was the number of developed collaterals was recorded. CONCLUSION: In this work, the role of the aggregation ability of erythrocytes and the endothelial origin of NO in the direct and feedback regulatory mechanism of angiogenesis in patients with CAD are discussed.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on heart failure management: Global experience of the OPTIMIZE Heart Failure Care network.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, reductions in heart failure (HF) hospitalizations have been widely reported, and there is an urgent need to understand how HF care has been reorganized in countries with different infection levels, vaccination rates and healthcare services. The OPTIMIZE Heart Failure Care program has a global network of investigators in 42 countries, with first-hand experience of the impact of the pandemic on HF management in different care settings. The national coordinators were surveyed to assess: 1) the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic for continuity of HF care, from both a hospital and patient perspective; 2) the organizational changes enacted to ensure continued HF care; and 3) lessons learned for the future of HF care. Contributions were obtained from 37 national coordinators in 29 countries. We summarize their input, highlighting the issues raised and using the example of three very different settings (Italy, Brazil, and Taiwan) to illustrate the similarities and differences across the OPTIMIZE program.

Optimization of heart rate lowering therapy in hospitalized patients with heart failure: Insights from the Optimize Heart Failure Care Program.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization is an opportunity to optimize heart failure (HF) therapy. As optimal treatment for hospitalized HF patients in sinus rhythm with heart rate≥70bpm is unclear, we investigated the impact of combined beta-blocker (BB) and ivabradine versus BBs alone on short and longer term mortality and rehospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 370 hospitalized HF patients with heart rate≥70bpm (150 BB+ivabradine, 220 BB alone) in the Optimize Heart Failure Care Program in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Russia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan, from October 2015 to April 2016. RESULTS: At 1month, 3months, 6months and 12months, there were fewer deaths, HF hospitalizations and overall hospitalizations in patients on BB+ivabradine vs BBs alone. At 12months, all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization was significantly lower with BB+ivabradine than BBs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.64, P<0.0001). Significantly greater improvement was seen in quality of life (QOL) from admission to 12months with BB+ivabradine vs BBs alone (P=0.0001). With BB+ivabradine, significantly more patients achieved ≥50% target doses of BBs at 12months than on admission (82.0% vs 66.6%, P=0.0001), but the effect was non-significant with BBs alone. CONCLUSIONS: Heart rate lowering therapy with BB+ivabradine started in hospitalized HF patients (heart rate≥70bpm) is associated with reduced overall mortality and re-hospitalization over the subsequent 12months. A prospective randomized trial is needed to confirm the advantages of this strategy.