Technical note: A facility for respiration measurements in cattle.

A respiration system consisting of 4 climate-controlled chambers and 1 set of flowmeters and analyzers was constructed and validated. Each chamber had volume of 21.10m(3) (3.68×2.56×2.24m) and was made from steel with double-glazed windows on either side enabling visual contact between animals. The chambers are independently climate-controlled and can maintain temperature and relative humidity in a range from 5 to 45°C and 30 to 80%, respectively. A flow generator and mass flowmeter continuously pull air from each chamber and a slight negative pressure inside the chamber is ensured. Air from all chambers and ambient air share a common gas analysis and data acquisition system for monitoring O2, CO2, and CH4 concentrations over the measurement period, with the cycle time set to 20min. Analyzers are regularly calibrated and the chambers have mean recoveries of 99.0 and 98.0% for CO2 and CH4, respectively. The chambers are equipped with infrared cameras and electronic feed and water bins for intake measurements, as well as sensors for monitoring animal position and heart rate. Data acquisition and analysis software is used to calculate the rate of consumption of O2 and production of CO2 and CH4. The dynamic respiration measurements are integrated with feed intake data and other sensors. The daily gas exchanges are estimated by integration to determine methane emission and heat production. We conducted a trial with 12 lactating 3/4 Holstein × 1/4 Gyr crossbred dairy cows (6 multiparous and 6 primiparous) under 2 feeding regimens (ad libitum or restricted) to validate the system. Two 22-h respiration measurements were obtained from each cow. Restricted-fed cows showed lower values for milk yield, methane emission, and heat production compared with ad libitum-fed animals. We found no difference between groups for CH4 produced per kilogram of dry matter intake. Repeatability for CH4 emission and heat production was high (0.97 and 0.92, respectively). The respiration system described herein is a useful tool for measuring the dynamic and accumulated data of heat production, methane emission, and feed intake.

Evolução anual da qualidade do leite cru refrigerado processado em uma indústria de Minas Gerais / Annual evolution of raw milk quality processed in a dairy industry of Minas Gerais state, Brazil

Analisou-se a evolução anual da qualidade de leite cru refrigerado pelo levantamento e análise estatística do banco de dados das análises individuais de leite dos tanques refrigeradores, computadas mensalmente entre abril de 2002 e dezembro de 2008 em uma indústria de Minas Gerais. O volume de leite em conformidade com a IN51 para contagem bacteriana total para o ano de 2008 aumentou de 74,3% em 2002 para 85,8% em 2008. Considerando-se a IN51 para o ano de 2011, esses valores seriam de 30,5% e 46,6%, respectivamente. O volume de leite em conformidade com a IN51 para contagem de células somáticas reduziu-se de 93,5% em 2002 para 90,1% em 2008. Para o ano de 2011, esses valores seriam de 64,9 e 60,5%, respectivamente. Em relação à composição sólida do leite, o volume de leite em conformidade com a IN51 para os teores de gordura, de proteína e de extrato seco desengordurado foi de 95,2%, 98,2% e 89,6%, respectivamente. As variações sazonais influenciaram a qualidade do leite cru refrigerado de tanques de expansão. A implantação de um sistema de pagamento por qualidade do leite ao produtor foi eficaz na melhoria dos índices de qualidade da matéria-prima.

The present study aimed to analyze the annual evolution of cooled raw milk quality, through analytical analysis of the data base of individual bulk milk tanks analysis, monthly computed from April/2002 to December/2008 at a dairy industry in Minas Gerais. The mean volume of milk in compliance with IN51 for total bacterial count for year 2008 increased from 74.3% in 2002 to 85.8% in 2008. Considering IN51 for year 2011, these values would be 30.5% and 46.6%, respectively. The mean volume of milk in compliance with IN51 for somatic cells count reduced from 93.5% in 2002 to 90.1% in 2008. Considering the legal standard for the year of 2011, these values would be 64.9 and 60.5%, respectively. In relation to the solid composition of milk, the mean volume of milk in compliance with IN51 for fat, protein and solids nonfat were 95.2%, 98.2% and 89.6%, respectively. The season variations affected the quality of the bulk tank cooled raw milk from bulk tanks. The implantation of a payment system for the quality of milk to the producer revealed to be efficient in its objective to improve the quality indexes of raw milk.