Assessing lung fluid status using noninvasive bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with acute heart failure: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient monitoring of pulmonary congestion in heart failure (HF) patients may reduce hospitalization rates. This study tested the feasibility of non-invasive high-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (HF-BIA) for estimating lung fluid status. METHODS: This prospective study included 70 participants: 50 with acute HF (HF group) and 20 without HF (control group). All participants underwent a supine chest CT scan to measure lung fluid content with lung density analysis software. Concurrently, direct segmental multi-frequency BIA was performed to assess the edema index (EI) of the trunk, entire body, and extremities. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients between lung fluid content and EI measured using HF-BIA were r = 0.566 (p < 0.001) and r = 0.550 (p < 0.001) for the trunk and whole body, respectively. In the HF group, the trunk EI (0.402 ± 0.015) and whole body EI (0.402 ± 0.016) were significantly higher than those of the control group (trunk EI, 0.383 ± 0.007; whole body EI, 0.383 ± 0.007; all p < 0.001). The lung fluid content was significantly higher in the HF than that in the control group (23.7 ± 5.3 vs. 15.5 ± 2.8%, p < 0.001). The log value of NT pro-BNP was significantly correlated with trunk EI (r = 0.688, p < 0.001) and whole-body EI (r = 0.675, p < 0.001) measured by HF-BIA, and the lung fluid content analyzed by CT (r = 0.686, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BIA-based EI measurements of the trunk and whole body significantly correlated with lung fluid content and NT pro-BNP levels. Non-invasive BIA could be a promising screening tool for lung fluid status monitoring in acute HF patients.

Development and validation of equation for cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), as measured by maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), is an important independent predictive factor of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). However, it is unclear whether conventional equations for estimating CRF are applicable to patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: This study included 521 patients with HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%) whose CRF was directly measured by cardiopulmonary exercise test using a treadmill. We developed a new equation (Kor-HFpEF) for half of the patients in the HFpEF cohort (group A, n = 253) and validated it for the remaining half (group B, n = 268). The accuracy of the Kor-HFpEF equation was compared to that of the other equations in the validation group. RESULTS: In the total HFpEF cohort, the directly measured VO2max was significantly overestimated by the FRIEND and ACSM equations (p < 0.001) and underestimated by the FRIEND-HF equation (p <0.001) (direct 21.2 ± 5.9 mL/kg/min; FRIEND 29.1 ± 11.8 mL/kg/min; ACSM 32.5 ± 13.4 mL/kg/min; FRIEND-HF 14.1 ± 4.9 mL/kg/min). However, the VO2max estimated by the Kor-HFpEF equation (21.3 ± 4.6 mL/kg/min) was similar to the directly measured VO2max (21.7 ± 5.9 mL/kg/min, p = 0.124), whereas the VO2max estimated by the other three equations was still significantly different from the directly measured VO2max in group B (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Traditional equations used to estimate VO2max were not applicable to patients with HFpEF. We developed and validated a new Kor-HFpEF equation for these patients, which had a high accuracy.

Improvement of the aerodynamic performance by wing flexibility and elytra--hind wing interaction of a beetle during forward flight.

In this work, the aerodynamic performance of beetle wing in free-forward flight was explored by a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFDs) simulation with measured wing kinematics. It is shown from the CFD results that twist and camber variation, which represent the wing flexibility, are most important when determining the aerodynamic performance. Twisting wing significantly increased the mean lift and camber variation enhanced the mean thrust while the required power was lower than the case when neither was considered. Thus, in a comparison of the power economy among rigid, twisting and flexible models, the flexible model showed the best performance. When the positive effect of wing interaction was added to that of wing flexibility, we found that the elytron created enough lift to support its weight, and the total lift (48.4 mN) generated from the simulation exceeded the gravity force of the beetle (47.5 mN) during forward flight.