"Spine Surgery Checklist": A Step towards Perfection through Protocols.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel checklist that was designed specifically for the "spine-surgerysubspecialty" to reduce the incidence of some common preventable human errors and major perioperative complications in spine surgery. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: We propose a unique spine surgery-specific checklist that recognizes the risk factors, anticipates the possible human errors, and thus helps in preventing these errors. This checklist is associated with increased patient safety awareness, improved communication (keeps everyone updated regarding their responsibilities), reduction in the surgical claims, and reduction in the number of postoperative complications, including mortality. METHODS: This retrospective pilot study was performed at single center on 858 spine surgery patients. The patients were divided into the following two groups: the study group (after implementation of the checklist [2016-2017]) and the control group (before the implementation of the checklist [2015-2016]). The incidence of common preventable human errors and major perioperative complications in spine surgeries were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of wrong-level surgeries was 0%, and the overall prevalence of the preventable errors was 1.63% (7/428). The rate of adverse, near-miss, and no-harm events was 0.23% (1/428), 0.70% (3/428) and 0.70% (3/428), respectively. The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative errors were 0.70% (3/428), 0.23% (1/428), and 0.70 (3/428), respectively. The reoperation rate related to preventable errors reduced after the checklist was used. There were significant differences in the total preventable errors related to complications, such as infections, prolonged hospital stays, and unplanned hospital readmission/revision surgeries (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose the first-of-its kind spine surgery-specific checklist that is comprehensive and involves perioperative parameters. The checklist is easy to use, safe, and effective for reducing the unforgiving errors and perioperative complications. However, its broader implementation would require validation in large, multi-center, randomized control studies.

Anthropometric evaluation for surgical feasibility of C1-C2 transarticular screw stabilization in Indian population.

STUDY DESIGN: This study was a radiographic observational study for C1-C2 anthropometry. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to understand the anatomic relationship of C1-C2 in view of transarticular screw (TAS) fixation, to overcome the difficulties related with TAS placement, and to minimize the technique-related complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was an anthropometric observational study with retrospectively obtained anatomical data of randomly selected 116 patients from a single center. The anatomical measurements such as pars width, pars height, screw trajectory, and length were evaluated on the axial, sagittal, and three-dimensional reconstructed cervical CT scan using the radiant DICOM viewer software by the two fellowship trained spine surgeons which were blind to the study group details. The intra- and interobserver reliability with regard to the measured parameters was statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of male and female was 28 and 29 years. The average BMI was calculated to be 23.5 and 25 for males and females, respectively. The mean right pars width in males was 5.78 ± 0.93 (range: 3.1-6.5 mm), while in female, it was 5.84 ± 0.95 (range: 3.1-6.5). The mean left pars width in males was 5.95 ± 1.13 (range: 3.8-8.1 mm), while in females, it was 5.70 ± 1.18 (range: 3.7-8.1 mm). Right side mean pars height in males was 5.90 ± 1.2 (range: 3.7-9.4 mm), and in females, it was 6.11 ± 1.04 (range: 3.8-9.3 mm). Left-sided mean pars height in males was 6.0 ± 1.1 (range: 3.2-9.4 mm) as compared to females, in which it was 5.77 ± 1.23 (range: 4.1-9.3 mm). The mean lateral angulation angle in males was 9.99° ± 1.70° (8.1°-15°), while in females, it was 10.15° ± 1.73° (8.1°-15°). The mean sagittal angulation in males was 26.33° ± 3.32° (21.0°-32.80°), while in females, it was 27.18 ± 3.05 (21.0°-32.10°). The average screw length in males was 41.74 ± 5.63 (34-54.8 mm), whereas in females, it was 41.35 ± 4.77 (34-54.8 mm). CONCLUSION: This study provides a morphometric database which is characteristic of the C1-C2 vertebrae in the normal Indian population with regard to the anatomic feasibility of the TAS fixation for various C1-C2 pathologies. The C2 pars width and height measured in the current study can guide the selection of TAS screws in the Indian population. This study could serve in providing the baseline anatomic parameters assessed in the healthy individuals to design and develop customized screws and related implant assembly which might provide wider clinical applicability.

"A decade with micro-tubular decompression": Peri-operative complications and surgical outcomes in single and multilevel lumbar canal stenosis.

PURPOSE: We present ten years experience with micro-tubular decompression (MTD) performed for single and multilevel lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) assessing the peri-operative complications and mid-term surgical outcome. The aims of this study were to review the incidence of peri-operative complications and classification of complications and define risk factors to prevent it while negotiating the learning curve. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data over a period of ten years involving 625 patients who underwent single/multilevel lumbar MTD. Peri-operative clinical-radiological parameters, post-operative complications, clinical outcome (VAS and ODI), and satisfactory outcomes in the form of Wang and Bohlmann's criteria were evaluated. The peri-operative complications were divided into five broad categories based on their time of occurrence, severity, and system affected. The comparison between the patients with and without complications was done to evaluate the causative risk factors. RESULTS: The overall incidence of the peri-operative complication was 12.96% over ten years with higher rate (29.8%) during the initial three years of practice and lower rate (8.78%) in the last seven years. The most common peri-operative complications were urinary tract infections (UTI). The risk factors for complications with MTD revealed in statistical analysis were presence of one or more comorbidities, L4-L5 single-level stenosis, bilateral stenosis with ipsilateral and bilateral decompression done through unilateral approach, and multilevel MTD done through single incision for multilevel LCS. More than 95% patients operated with MTD showed excellent to good outcome as per the Wang and Bohlmann's criteria at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study represents 12.96% overall incidence of peri-operative complications with higher rate (29.8%) during the initial three years of practice and lower rate (8.78%) in the last seven years with MTD for single/multilevel LCS with. MTD is an effective procedure with substantial clinical benefits in the form of excellent to good clinico-radiological outcomes at two year follow-up. However, there is a learning curve associated with the adoption of the technique. The described classification for peri-operative complications is helpful to record, to evaluate, and to understand the aetiology and risk factors based on its duration of occurrence in the peri-operative period.

Perioperative Complications of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): 10 Years of Experience With MI-TLIF.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study. OBJECTIVES: We present a largest study until date performed over a period of 10 years assessing the perioperative complications. The primary aim of this study was to review the incidence of perioperative complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) in single-level lumbar degenerative diseases. METHODS: A prospective study performed over a period of 10 years involving 560 patients who underwent single-level lumbar MI-TLIF. Perioperative clinical and radiological parameters, postoperative complications, and satisfactory outcomes in the form of Wang's criteria were evaluated. All patients were scrutinized into 5 different categories based on the descriptive classification for perioperative complications suggested by the authors. RESULTS: The mean age was 61.8 ± 12.7 years and male to female ratio was 0.8:1. The overall incidence of the perioperative complication was 25.5%. In all, 19.64% patients developed single complication, 4.64% patients were with 2 complications, and 1.25% patients developed 3 complications from the described categories. A total of 16.78% patients developed early (<6 months postsurgery) and 8.75% patients developed late (>6 months postsurgery) complications. CONCLUSION: This study showed 25.5% incidence of perioperative complications in MI-TLIF for degenerative lumbar disease over a period of 10 years with a higher incidence rate during the initial 3 years of practice. The described classification for perioperative complications is helpful to record, to evaluate and to understand the etiology based on its duration of occurrence in the perioperative period. MI-TLIF is an effective procedure with substantial clinical benefits in the form of excellent to good clinical-radiological outcomes.

Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PURPOSE: This study's primary objective was to compare the clinico-radiological outcomes and incidence of perioperative complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at lower lumbar levels for elderly and younger patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of age on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in the two groups. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The lumbar interbody fusion surgery in elder age has been reported to produce a higher complication rate and suboptimal results. Literature evaluating efficacy and safety of TLIF in elderly population is scanty. The effect of age on clinical outcome and the overall patient satisfaction after TLIF has been understudied. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted from 2011 to 2017 with 121 patients, who underwent TLIF and were divided into two cohorts based on age (group A, >65 years and group B, <65 years). Perioperative clinical/radiological parameters, postoperative complications, and satisfactory outcomes were evaluated in both groups. A statistical analysis between two matched groups was performed with logistic regression analysis and Student t-test. RESULTS: The mean age was 73.8±4.5 years in group A and 47.3±12.7 years in group B. There was no statistical difference in surgical time (p=0.15), mobilization, or hospital stay (p=0.15) between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences noted in the Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale, or Wang's outcome score between the two groups at final follow-up. Postoperative complications not affecting outcome were common in the elderly group, but there was no statistically significant difference noted among neurological or cardiopulmonary events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In judiciously selected patients with proper preoperative risk assessment and optimized medical co-morbidities, TLIF surgery can have successful results, in terms of clinical outcome and satisfaction, in the elderly. Older age should not be a contraindication for TLIF in patients with degenerative lumbar disease.

Study of Patients with Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Replacement Procedure with Coexisting Lumbar Spondylosis Symptoms.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study involving patients who were followed for 2 years after total knee replacement (TKR) to determine changes in lumbar spine and knee symptoms. PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to determine the percentage of patients undergoing bilateral TKR who present with coexisting lumbar spine problems and determine if TKR relieves lumbar spine symptoms. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: No studies quantify the percentage of TKR patients who experience relief of lumbar spine symptoms after TKR surgery. METHODS: The study included 200 patients (164 females, 36 males) undergoing primary TKR. Follow-up was performed at 4 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Lumbar spine and knee symptom improvements were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Oxford Knee Score, respectively. RESULTS: All 200 patients undergoing bilateral TKR presented with radiographic lumbar spine degenerative pathology; 60% (n=120) of the patients presented with moderate to severe clinical symptoms of lumbar spondylosis, including 54% (n=108) with degenerative lumbar spondylosis and lumbar canal stenosis and 6% (n=12) with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Of the 120 patients who presented with lumbar spine problems, 90% (n=108) reported improvement in their symptoms; the ODI score improved from 42.5%±4.1% preoperative score to 15.6%±2.3% postoperative score (p-value<0.001). Of the 12 patients with no improvement, 10 patients underwent percutaneous procedures for their lumbar spine pathology with good results, one patient underwent surgery, and one declined any intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of patients (60%) undergoing bilateral TKR also present with symptomatic lumbar spine problems. Patients with mild to moderate lumbar spine degenerative symptoms and no associated severe radiating pain on activity are more likely to experience relief of their symptoms post-TKR.

Dural Leak: Is It Deterrent to Outcomes in Spine Surgery?: 10 Years Retrospective Analysis of Incidence, Management Protocol, and Surgical Outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVES: To review the incidence of dural leaks, evaluate the efficacy of primary closure of durotomy and to study its effect on clinical outcome. The secondary aim is to classify the dural leaks and proposing a treatment algorithm for dural leaks. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Dural leaks are described as one of the fearful complications in spine surgery. Literature evaluating the actual incidence, ideal treatment protocol, efficacy of primary repair techniques and its effects on long-term surgical outcomes are scanty. METHODS: It was a retrospective analysis of 5390 consecutively operated spine cases over a period of 10 years. All cases were divided into two groups-study group (with dural leak-255) and control group (without dural leak-5135). Dural leaks were managed with the proposed treatment algorithm. Blood loss, surgical time, hospital stay, time for return to mobilization, pain free status, and clinical outcome score (ODI, VAS, NDI, and Wang criteria) were assessed in both groups at regular intervals. The statistical comparison between two groups was established with chi-square and t-tests. RESULTS: The overall incidence of dural leaks was 4.73% with highest incidence in revision cases (27.61%). There was significant difference noted in mean surgical blood loss (P 0.001), mean hospital stay (P 0.001), time to achieve pain-free status after surgery, and return to mobilization between two groups. However, no significant difference was noted in operative time (P 0.372) and clinical outcome scores at final follow-up between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Primary closure should be undertaken in all amenable major dural leak cases. Dural leaks managed as proposed by the author's treatment algorithm have shown a comparable clinical outcome as in patients without dural leaks. Dural leak is a friendly adverse event that does not prove a deterrent to long-term clinical outcome in spine surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Learning Curve of Microendoscopic Discectomy in Single-Level Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc in 120 Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate learning curve of tubular microendoscopic discectomy (MED) in lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc (PIVD) patients based on surgical and clinical parameters and delineate the challenges faced in early cases while practicing MED in large series of patients. METHODS: This study was an institutional review board-approved retrospective study of the first 125 consecutive patients with single-level lumbar PIVD managed with tubular MED from 2008 to 2016 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. A total of 120 patients available at final follow-up were divided into quartiles (30 each) as per the date of surgery, with each consecutive group serving as a control for the previous group. Preoperatively and postoperatively clinical parameters (pain scores [Visual Analogue Scale; VAS], functional disability [Oswestry Disability Index; ODI] score, modified MacNab criteria), perioperative parameters (operative time, blood loss, hospital stay), technical issues (guide wire migration, tube docking-related problems, dural tear), and postoperative complications (postoperative leg pain, neural injury, infection, recurrence) were evaluated. Statistical analysis-logarithm curve-fit regression analysis and ANOVA test. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 75 males and 45 females (mean age: 42.54 years) with no significant difference among the quartiles. There was significant difference (P < .005) noted in mean operative time (quartile 1, 87.33 minutes; quartile 2, 58.5 minutes) and mean blood loss (quartile 1, 76.33 mL; quartile 2, 32.66 mL) between quartile 1 and quartile 2, with no further significant reduction in quartile 3 and quartile 4. Significant difference (P < .005) in clinical parameters (VAS preoperative/postoperative 5.28/0.99; ODI preoperative/postoperative 32.18/12.08) were noted but was not associated with surgical experience. Overall, 90% (108 out of 120) of the patients had good to excellent results according to the modified MacNab criteria. The mean hospital stay did not show any significant difference among the quartiles. Guide wire migrated issues, neural injury, dural tear, and tube docking-related problems were significantly reduced after quartile 1. However, recurrence occurred at any phase. Infection occurred in one patient in quartile 1. Although blood loss and operative time showed a declining trend, it was not significant after quartile 2. So asymptote lay in quartile 1 and we recommend that novice surgeon should perform 25 to 30 cases to achieve mastery in this technique. CONCLUSION: For mastering the art of tubular MED for lumbar PIVD and to reduce its learning curve, novice surgeons can avoid the challenges and problems faced during initial cases with improvement in surgical skills by practicing on cadavers, wet labs, and bone-saw models following certain recommendations that we have after achieving asymptote. Familiarity with instrumentation, communication between surgical team, and defined expectations from radiology technicians are key to reduce the learning curve.

The Practice of Continuation of Anti-platelet Therapy During the Perioperative Period in Lumbar Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (MISS): How Different Is the Morbidity in This Scenario?

STUDY DESIGN: Cohort. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing minimally invasive spine surgery of the lumbar spine while continuing the antiplatelet drug (APD) perioperatively as compared with those not continuing these drugs and those not on these drugs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While discontinuation of antiplatelet drugs carries with it the risk of thrombosis of the cardiac stents, myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular occlusion, cerebro-vascular events and other thrombotic complications, continuation of these drugs has the risk of intra spinal bleeding and the serious consequences of subsequent epidural hematoma with associated spinal cord compression. METHODS: This institutional review board approved study included 1587 patients from 2011 to 2018. Perioperative parameters were analyzed for 216 patients who underwent spinal surgery after the discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy, 240 patients who continued to take APD daily through the perioperative period and 1131 patients who were never exposed to APD therapy. The operative time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, incidence of clinically evident hematoma, and transfusion of blood products were also recorded and compared in three cohorts. RESULTS: The patients who continued taking APD in the perioperative period had a longer length of hospital stay on average (2.5 ±â€Š0.67 vs. 1.59 ±â€Š0.76 and 1.67 ±â€Š0.83, P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference in the operative time, estimated blood loss, the amount of blood products transfused, and overall intra and postoperative complication rate. There were no instances of postoperative wound soakage or neurological deficit suggestive of possible spinal epidural hematomas in either of the study groups. CONCLUSION: The current study has observed no appreciable increase in perioperative morbidities including bleeding related complication rates in patients undergoing lumbar minimally invasive spine surgery while continuing to take APD compared with patients who either discontinued APD prior to surgery or those not taking APD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Drug sensitivity patterns in Xpert-positive spinal tuberculosis: an observational study of 252 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity patterns of anti-tubercular drugs in Xpert MTB-positive spinal tuberculosis (TB) patients and to formulate the guidelines for early start of empiric anti-tubercular treatment (ATT) in MDR-TB spine based on resistance pattern in this large series. METHODS: It was a cross-sectional observational study of 252 consecutive patients who were Xpert MTB-proven spinal TB cases with retrospective analysis of prospective data. The Xpert MTB/RIF (Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin) assay was used to diagnose spinal TB and RIF resistance. All patients underwent drug sensitivity testing (DST) to 13 commonly used anti-tubercular drugs using BACTEC MGIT-960 system. The drug sensitivity pattern of primary and secondary anti-tubercular drugs was recorded and compared. RESULTS: The DST study revealed 110 (43.6%) cases of multi-drug resistant (MDR-resistance to both isoniazid and rifampicin) and 24 (9.5%) cases of non-MDR-TB spine. The widespread resistance was found for both isoniazid (91%) and rifampicin (85%), followed by streptomycin (61.9%). The least resistance was found for kanamycin, amikacin and capreomycin and no resistance found for clofazimine. CONCLUSION: The Xpert MTB/RIF assay is an efficient technique for the rapid diagnosis of spinal TB and suspected MDR-TB; however, it is recommended to do culture and DST in all patients with spinal TB to guide the selection of appropriate second-line drugs when required. In cases of non-availability of culture and DST, it is suggested to use data from large series such as this to plan the best empirical ATT regimen. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Diagnostic Efficacy, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF Assay for Spinal Tuberculosis and Rifampicin Resistance.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional observational study. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Mycobacterium Tuberculosis/Rifampicin resistance) for the detection of spinal Tuberculosis (TB) and rifampicin (RIF) resistance. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Spinal TB is often a paucibacillary extra pulmonary tuberculosis which gives a major challenge in early diagnosis and initializing the correct anti-tubercular treatment (ATT). Due to its rapidity and sensitivity, the dependence and reliability on the Xpert MTB/RIF assay has increased in the last few years. The studies describing accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in spinal TB are scanty. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved study included 360 diagnosed spinal TB patients. To determine the accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, it was compared with other diagnostic tests like histopathology, acid fast bacilli (AFB) smear, culture, and drug sensitivity testing (DST). RESULTS: The Xpert MTB/RIF assay showed 86.3% sensitivity and 85.3% specificity when compared with culture for the diagnosis of Spinal TB and showed 75.86% sensitivity, 96.12% specificity for RIF resistance when compared to DST. Four cases were false positive and 11 cases were false negative for RIF resistance on the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. CONCLUSION: The Xpert MTB/RIF assay is an efficient technique for the rapid diagnosis of spinal TB; however, a clinician should not solely rely on it for starting ATT. As there are false results also with this test which should be read cautiously and be well correlated with culture and DST pattern to guide the start of sensitive drug regimen only. The purpose is to prevent exposure of the second line drugs to false cases found on the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and avoid emergence of new acquired drug resistance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Superior Facet Joint Violations in Single Level Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective comparative study. PURPOSE: To compare the incidence of iatrogenic superior facet joint violation (SFV) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and open TLIF (OPEN-TLIF) at a single lower lumbar fusion level and to evaluate the patient and surgical factors influencing the outcome. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Iatrogenic SFV is a significant risk factor for adjacent segment disease (ASD). Blind screw placement technique in MIS-TLIF contributes to the increasing incidence of iatrogenic SFV which can be influenced by several other potential factors. There are only limited studies comparing the incidence of iatrogenic SFV in MIS-TLIF and OPEN-TLIF. METHODS: In total, 225 cases (450 top screws; MIS-TIFL, 120; OPEN-TILF, 105) undergoing single-level lower lumbar fusion were included in the study. Postoperative computed tomography grading system was used to evaluate iatrogenic SFV. Patient and surgical factors such as age, body mass index, top-screw level, side of the top screw, depth of the spine, and superior facet joint angle (SFA) were analyzed in iatrogenic SFV and non-violation groups to determine their influence on iatrogenic SFV. The clinical outcomes in both groups were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: The overall incidence of iatrogenic SFV and high-grade violations was higher in MIS-TLIF (41.25%) than in OPEN-TLIF (30.4%). In both groups, bivariate analysis showed a significantly greater incidence of the iatrogenic SFV in patients aged <60 years and those with obesity, top pedicle screws at L4, right-sided top screws, SFA >35°, and depth of the spine >50 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the incidence of iatrogenic SFV is greater in MIS-TLIF than in OPEN-TLIF at a single lower lumbar level. MIS-TLIF is effective for lumbar degenerative disease; however, the incidence of iatrogenic SFV was higher. Patient and surgical factors must be considered to protect the facet joints in both TLIF methods to avoid ASD.

Unstable Hangman's fracture: Anterior or posterior surgery?

CONTEXT: Literature evaluating the efficacy and long-term clinico-radiological outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior fixation at C2-C3 for the treatment of unstable hangman's fractures is scanty. AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, clinical-radiological outcomes, and complications of ACDF and posterior fixation techniques performed for unstable hangman's fractures. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study design involves retrospective comparative study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study conducted from 2012 to 2018 included 21 patients with unstable hangman's fracture (Levine and Edwards Type II, IIa and III). All patients were divided into two groups based on the approach taken for fracture fixation (Group A-anterior approach and Group B-posterior approach). Peri-operative clinical, radiological parameters, postoperative complications, and outcomes were evaluated and compared in both the groups. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-square test and Student's t-test were used. RESULTS: The mean age was 39.8 ± 4.5 years in-group A and 41.3 ± 6.7 years in-group B. The male patients outnumbered the female patients and road traffic accident was the most common cause of unstable fractures. There were statistical significant differences in surgical time (P = 0.15), operative blood loss, pain-free status postsurgery, and hospital stay (P = 0.15) between two groups. No statistically significant differences noted in clinic-radiological outcomes in the form of visual analog scale and fusion rate at final follow-up between two groups at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The unstable hangman's fractures can be effectively managed with both anterior and posterior approaches with comparable clinico-radiological outcome. A minimally invasive nature, earlier pain-free status, early mobilization with reduced hospitalization make the ACDF efficacious, particularly in cases with no medullary canal in C2 pedicles and traumatic C2-3 disc herniation with listhesis compressing the spinal cord.

Outcome after internal fixation of intraarticular distal humerus (AO type B & C) fractures: Preliminary results with anatomical distal humerus LCP system.

PURPOSE: The treatment of intraarticular fractures of the distal humerus is challenging and involves the risk of complications and bad functional results. Anatomical and stable internal fixation with early postoperative mobilization is expected to improve the functional outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiological results, along with the complications associated, of open reduction and internal fixation using precontoured anatomical locking LCP plate system for intraarticular distal humerus fractures in adult patients. METHODS: This prospective study consist of 31 patients with a mean age of 41.2 years (range 19-62) were treated with open reduction and angular stable internal fixation. All underwent posterior transolecranon surgical approach. Mean follow-up to the final interview was 10 months (from 6 to 20 months). All operated patients were available at the time of last followup. AO classification showed 26 C-fractures (9*13C 1, 12*13C2,5* 13C3) and 5 B-fracture (1* 13B1,1* 13B2,3* 13B3). There were 25 closed fractures and 6 open grade 1 fractures. The clinical followup using Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and radiographic follow up with elbow anterior-posterior and lateral view X-rays were performed postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean MEPS was 87.9 points out of 100 (range 55-100) with 61% Excellent, 29% good and 10% fair and poor scores. Mean elbow flexion of 115.8° (range 85°-150°). The mean deficit in extension was 19° (range 5°-35°). All olecranon osteotomy were united .Nonunion of distal humerus fracture occurred in 2 cases. Other complications were hardware prominence in 3 cases, superficial infection in 4 cases and Ulnar nerve neuropraxia in 1 case which was recovered uneventfully. Revision surgery was not required in any complication. CONCLUSION: Open reduction and internal fixation with precontoured distal humerus anatomical locking plate system is a good method of treatment for complex Supra- intercondylar fracture of distal humerus with good functional outcome and low rates of complications. Even though early results are promising, longer term investigations and larger patient groups are necessary to confirm the presented data.