2020 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: BAV Guidance, CLSI H62, Biotherapeutics Stability, Parallelism Testing, CyTOF and Regulatory Feedback (Part 2A - Recommendations on Biotherapeutics Stability, PK LBA Regulated Bioanalysis, Biomarkers Assays, Cytometry Validation & Innovation Part 2B - Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine).

The 14th edition of the Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (14th WRIB) was held virtually on June 15-29, 2020 with an attendance of over 1000 representatives from pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations, and regulatory agencies worldwide. The 14th WRIB included three Main Workshops, seven Specialized Workshops that together spanned 11 days in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy and vaccine. Moreover, a comprehensive vaccine assays track; an enhanced cytometry track and updated Industry/Regulators consensus on BMV of biotherapeutics by LCMS were special features in 2020. As in previous years, this year's WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2020 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the Global Bioanalytical Community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2020 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication covers the recommendations on (Part 2A) BAV, PK LBA, Flow Cytometry Validation and Cytometry Innovation and (Part 2B) Regulatory Input. Part 1 (Innovation in Small Molecules, Hybrid LBA/LCMS & Regulated Bioanalysis), Part 3 (Vaccine, Gene/Cell Therapy, NAb Harmonization and Immunogenicity) are published in volume 13 of Bioanalysis, issues 4, and 6 (2021), respectively.

A flow cytometric assay for HLA-DR expression on monocytes validated as a biomarker for enrollment in sepsis clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Decreased expression of HLA-DR on monocytes (mHLA-DR) is a reliable indicator of immunosuppression in patients with sepsis and is correlated with increased risk of secondary infection and mortality. A flow cytometry-based laboratory developed test for the measurement of mHLA-DR in whole blood was validated for clinical trial enrollment, which is considered medical decision-making, for patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. METHODS: The BD Quantibrite™ anti-HLA-DR/anti-monocyte reagent measures antibodies bound per cell of HLA-DR on CD14+ monocytes. The mHLA-DR assay was planned to support inclusion/exclusion of patients for a clinical trial and was validated according to New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) requirements for a new non-malignant leukocyte immunophenotyping assay. RESULTS: Normal, healthy donor and sepsis patient samples were stable up to 72 h post-collection in Cyto-Chex BCT phlebotomy tubes. Pre-determined acceptance criteria were met for precision parameters (average %CV ≤ 20%) and global laboratory-to-laboratory comparisons (average %Δ ≤ 20%). The approaches taken to evaluate and report accuracy, analytical specificity and sensitivity, reportable range, reference interval, and the proposed multi-level quality control were accepted by NYSDOH. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the validation strategy necessary when the intended use of assay results changes from exploratory to medical decision making (patient enrollment), which successfully resulted in regulatory approval, is described.

High-Throughput Analysis of Clinical Flow Cytometry Data by Automated Gating.

Advancements in flow cytometers with capability to measure 15 or more parameters have enabled us to characterize cell populations at unprecedented levels of detail. Beyond discovery research, there is now a growing demand to dive deeper into evaluating the immune response in clinical trials for immune modulating compounds. However, for high-volume, complex flow cytometry data generated in clinical trials, conventional manual gating remains the standard of practice. Traditional manual gating is resource intense and becomes a bottleneck and an impractical method to complete high volumes of flow cytometry data analysis. Current efforts to automate "manual gating" have shown that computational algorithms can facilitate the analysis of daunting multi-parameter data; however, a greater degree of precision in comparison with traditional manual gating is needed for wide-scale adoption of automated gating methods. In an effort to more closely follow the manual gating process, our automated gating pipeline was created to include negative controls (Fluorescence Minus One [FMO]) to enhance the reliability of gate placement. We demonstrate that use of an automated pipeline, heavily relying on FMO controls for population discrimination, can analyze multi-parameter, large-scale clinical datasets with comparable precision and accuracy to traditional manual gating.

Development and validation of flow cytometry methods for pharmacodynamic clinical biomarkers.

Flow cytometry is a powerful analytical tool for the analysis of multiple biological parameters of individual cells or particles within heterogeneous cell populations. It has been widely used in biomedical research to perform immunophenotyping, cell counting and numerous cell function assessments, such as intracellular cytokine production, protein phosphorylation, cell proliferation and apoptosis. The implementation of standardized flow cytometry-based biomarker assays in clinical trials remains a challenge due to the limited stability of clinical specimens and the technical variations between instruments. To ensure data quality, it is crucial to develop robust assays for clinical applications. In this review, we summarize current practice in developing, validating and implementing flow cytometry assays to evaluate biomarkers in clinical research.