Enteric plexus neuropathy associated with PD-L1 blockade in a patient with small-cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the management of patients with cancer. The increasing use of these agents has brought up a new set of adverse events which are widely heterogenous and potentially life-threatening. Rare immune-related adverse events associated with nervous system have not been described thoroughly, but their early recognition and management may be crucial. Immune-related autonomic neuropathy may be presented with a constellation of symptoms ranging from gastrointestinal and urinary complaints, to sweating and hypotension. Intestinal pseudo-obstruction as consequence of immune-related myenteric autonomic neuropathy is an under-recognized, not-well described and potentially fatal adverse event. We herein, present a unique case of enteric plexus neuropathy induced by PD-L1 blockade in a patient with small-cell lung cancer.

Lay abstract Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has improved the life expectancy in many cancer patients. However, the stimulation of immune system to fight cancer may also affect healthy tissues, bringing about the risk of adverse events. These adverse events may affect almost every organ system of the body and may vary from mild to life-threatening. Immunotherapy-related damage to nervous plexuses, which supply the guts with nerves, has been reported only in a small number of cases. The symptoms usually mimic those of gut inflammation, including diarrhea, constipation, abdominal distension, and vomiting. Upon these symptoms, enteric nervous system toxicity should be considered. Early recognition and management are crucial to stop further neurological damage. We present a rare case of enteric nerve damage in a patient with small-cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy.

Persistence and adherence to nucleos(t)ide analogues in chronic hepatitis B: a multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Adherence and persistence to long-term therapy with nucleos(t)ides analogues are crucial to the outcome of treatment in chronic hepatitis B. Our aim was to determine the persistence and adherence rates to nucleos(t)ides analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients under maintenance therapy and to identify relative to prediction of adherence factors. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed electronic prescription data of patients (2011-2016; n = 400) with chronic hepatitis B treated with nucleos(t)ides analogues at 4 tertiary liver centers in Greece. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-six of 400 patients were under or initiated treatment in 2011-2012 (existing patients), while the remainder initiated or switched medication from January 2013 and onward (new patients). The median adherence rate was 99%, with 89.7% achieving adherence >80% during a mean follow-up of 28 ± 14 months. The overall 12-month persistence rate was 57%, with no difference between patients receiving tenofovir, entecavir or double therapy (57.8%, 52.8% and 68.4%, respectively, P = 0.399). The decline in persistence was more pronounced during the first 3 months of follow-up and in existing patients (P = 0.057). Overall, 80% and 55.1% of nonpersistent patients succeeded adherence to nucleos(t)ides analogues >80% and >90%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that existing (vs. new) patients were less likely to have >80% adherence (odds ratio: 0.324, P = 0.44) and persistence (odds ratio: 0.562, P = 0.057) to nucleos(t)ides analogues therapy. CONCLUSION: In this real-world cohort of chronic hepatitis B patients, high adherence to nucleos(t)ides analogues was coupled with suboptimal persistence with prescribing the medication. Our data indicate that persistence and adherence are distinct measures that should be approached separately in educational programs targeting to improve medication-taking behavior in chronic hepatitis B.