Systems Biology and Inborn Error of Metabolism: Analytical Strategy in Investigating Different Biochemical/Genetic Parameters.

Inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) are a group of about 500 rare genetic diseases with large diversity and complexity due to number of metabolic pathways involved in. Establishing a correct diagnosis and identifying the specific clinical phenotype is consequently a difficult task. However, an inclusive diagnosis able in capturing the different clinical phenotypes is mandatory for successful treatment. However, in contrast with Garrod's basic assumption "one-gene one-disease," no "simple" correlation between genotype-phenotype can be vindicated in IEMs. An illustrative example of IEM is Phenylketonuria (PKU), an autosomal recessive inborn error of L-phenylalanine (Phe) metabolism, ascribed to variants of the phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) gene encoding for the enzyme complex phenylalanine-hydroxylase. Blood values of Phe allow classifying PKU into different clinical phenotypes, albeit the participation of other genetic/biochemical pathways in the pathogenetic mechanisms remains elusive. Indeed, it has been shown that the most serious complications, such as cognitive impairment, are not only related to the gene dysfunction but also to the patient's background and the participation of several nongenetic factors.Therefore, a Systems Biology-based strategy is required in addressing IEM complexity, and in identifying the interplay between different pathways in shaping the clinical phenotype. Such an approach should entail the concerted investigation of genomic, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics profiles altogether with phenylalanine and amino acids metabolism. Noticeably, this "omic" perspective could be instrumental in planning personalized treatment, tailored accordingly to the disease profile and prognosis.

Myo-Inositol and D-Chiro-Inositol as Modulators of Ovary Steroidogenesis: A Narrative Review.

Myo-inositol is a natural polyol, the most abundant among the nine possible structural isomers available in living organisms. Inositol confers some distinctive traits that allow for a striking distinction between prokaryotes and eukaryotes, the basic clusters into which organisms are partitioned. Inositol cooperates in numerous biological functions where the polyol participates or by furnishing the fundamental backbone of several related derived metabolites, mostly obtained through the sequential addition of phosphate groups (inositol phosphates, phosphoinositides, and pyrophosphates). Overall myo-inositol and its phosphate metabolites display an entangled network, which is involved in the core of the biochemical processes governing critical transitions inside cells. Noticeably, experimental data have shown that myo-inositol and its most relevant epimer D-chiro-inositol are both necessary to permit a faithful transduction of insulin and of other molecular factors. This improves the complete breakdown of glucose through the citric acid cycle, especially in glucose-greedy tissues, such as the ovary. In particular, while D-chiro-inositol promotes androgen synthesis in the theca layer and down-regulates aromatase and estrogen expression in granulosa cells, myo-inositol strengthens aromatase and FSH receptor expression. Inositol effects on glucose metabolism and steroid hormone synthesis represent an intriguing area of investigation, as recent results have demonstrated that inositol-related metabolites dramatically modulate the expression of several genes. Conversely, treatments including myo-inositol and its isomers have proven to be effective in the management and symptomatic relief of a number of diseases associated with the endocrine function of the ovary, namely polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Space Biomedicine: A Unique Opportunity to Rethink the Relationships between Physics and Biology.

Space biomedicine has provided significant technological breakthroughs by developing new medical devices, diagnostic tools, and health-supporting systems. Many of these products are currently in use onboard the International Space Station and have been successfully translated into clinical practice on Earth. However, biomedical research performed in space has disclosed exciting, new perspectives regarding the relationships between physics and medicine, thus fostering the rethinking of the theoretical basis of biology. In particular, these studies have stressed the critical role that biophysical forces play in shaping the function and pattern formation of living structures. The experimental models investigated under microgravity conditions allow us to appreciate the complexity of living organisms through a very different perspective. Indeed, biological entities should be conceived as a unique magnification of physical laws driven by local energy and order states overlaid by selection history and constraints, in which the source of the inheritance, variation, and process of selection has expanded from the classical Darwinian definition. The very specific nature of the field in which living organisms behave and evolve in a space environment can be exploited to decipher the underlying, basic processes and mechanisms that are not apparent on Earth. In turn, these findings can provide novel opportunities for testing pharmacological countermeasures that can be instrumental for managing a wide array of health problems and diseases on Earth.

Paradoxical Behavior of Oncogenes Undermines the Somatic Mutation Theory.

The currently accepted theory on the influence of DNA mutations on carcinogenesis (the Somatic Mutation Theory, SMT) is facing an increasing number of controversial results that undermine the explanatory power of mutated genes considered as "causative" factors. Intriguing results have demonstrated that several critical genes may act differently, as oncogenes or tumor suppressors, while phenotypic reversion of cancerous cells/tissues can be achieved by modifying the microenvironment, the mutations they are carrying notwithstanding. Furthermore, a high burden of mutations has been identified in many non-cancerous tissues without any apparent pathological consequence. All things considered, a relevant body of unexplained inconsistencies calls for an in depth rewiring of our theoretical models. Ignoring these paradoxes is no longer sustainable. By avoiding these conundrums, the scientific community will deprive itself of the opportunity to achieve real progress in this important biomedical field. To remedy this situation, we need to embrace new theoretical perspectives, taking the cell-microenvironment interplay as the privileged pathogenetic level of observation, and by assuming new explanatory models based on truly different premises. New theoretical frameworks dawned in the last two decades principally focus on the complex interaction between cells and their microenvironment, which is thought to be the critical level from which carcinogenesis arises. Indeed, both molecular and biophysical components of the stroma can dramatically drive cell fate commitment and cell outcome in opposite directions, even in the presence of the same stimulus. Therefore, such a novel approach can help in solving apparently inextricable paradoxes that are increasingly observed in cancer biology.