Preliminary Outcomes of Scapholunate Ligament Augmentation with Internal Brace Technique.

Purpose: Injury to the scapholunate (SL) interosseous ligament (SLIL) is a common cause of carpal instability. Internal brace augmentation has been used in various ligament repair procedures; however, further investigation of its outcomes in hand surgery is needed. This study aimed to examine outcomes for patients who underwent SLIL repair with internal brace augmentation. Methods: Patients who underwent SLIL repair with the internal brace technique and had at least 1 year of follow-up were contacted. Available patients returned for an in-person evaluation with new radiographs and physical examination. If patients could not be contacted but had x-rays and physical examinations performed at greater than 1 year after surgery, these data were collected from their medical records. Participating patients completed the QuickDASH and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation surveys and rated their satisfaction with the surgery. Outcomes assessed included wrist range of motion, grip strength, scaphoid shift test, SL gap, SL angle, and radiographic evidence of radiocarpal arthritis. Results: We collected outcomes for 14 SLIL repairs among 13 patients (12 male). Mean length of the follow-up was 41 months (n = 14, 17-64). Mean QuickDASH and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores were 6.1 (0-43.2) and 9.6 (0-65), respectively. Radiographic measurements remained stable from immediate to latest follow-up, and no radiocarpal arthritic changes were noted. However, SL gap decreased from a mean of 5.33 mm (3.4-6.7) before surgery to 3.34 mm (2-4.6) at the latest follow-up, and SL angle decreased from a mean of 79.5° (67°-97°) before surgery to 67.3° (51°-85°) at the latest follow-up. All scaphoid shift tests were stable. Conclusions: Therefore, SL internal brace augmentation has favorable short-term results with improvements in pain, function, satisfaction, and carpal alignment at greater than 1 year postoperatively. This technique can be an effective option for the management of SL instability in the short term. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Multimodal Pain Management After Outpatient Orthopedic Hand Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Purpose: Opioid stewardship ensures effective pain management while avoiding overprescribing of opioids after surgery. This prospective randomized study investigates the efficacy of a multimodal postoperative pain regimen compared to a traditional opioid-only pain regimen following elective outpatient orthopedic hand surgery. We hypothesized that patients receiving multimodal pain management would consume fewer opioids and report greater satisfaction than patients receiving only opioids. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing outpatient hand and upper extremity surgery performed by two board-certified fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons at one institution were recruited and randomized into either a study or control group. The study group received a standing multimodal postoperative regimen consisting of scheduled oral acetaminophen and naproxen as well as oxycodone to be taken as needed. The control group received only oxycodone to be taken as needed. Postoperatively, daily pain levels, medication usage, refills, satisfaction, and adverse events were recorded. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results: Of the 112 patients enrolled, 54 were randomized to the control group, and 58 were randomized to the study group. Study and control group patients did not differ significantly based on daily average pain scores or daily worst pain scores. However, study group patients reported fewer average daily oxycodone intake and total oxycodone pill count (7.0 vs 2.4 total pills, P <.005). In addition, the study group patients were more likely to report satisfaction with their postoperative pain control than control regimen patient's and were more likely to use the same pain regimen again if required. Conclusion: A multimodal postoperative pain regimen reduces opioid usage and has higher patient satisfaction rates in comparison to traditional opioid-only regimens. Use of multimodal pain regimens that use nonopioids, such as acetaminophen and naproxen, over an opioid should be considered for postoperative pain after orthopedic hand surgery. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic II.

Outcomes Following Fully Threaded Intramedullary Nailing of Metacarpal Fractures.

Purpose: Intramedullary screw fixation has emerged as a popular approach for the treatment of displaced metacarpal fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the functional and radiographic outcomes of a newly designed, headless noncompressive fully threaded intramedullary nail (TIMN) for the treatment of metacarpal fractures. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who were treated with the INnate TIMN (ExsoMed) at a single academic institution with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Patient-reported functional outcomes included Quick Disabilities for the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires, return to work and physical activity time, and overall satisfaction. Radiographs were retrospectively reviewed to determine radiographic union, change in angulation, and metacarpal shortening. Results: A total of 49 patients (58 fractures) with a mean age of 36 years (range: 17-75 years) were included. The mean follow-up time was 2.7 years (range: 1.4-4.3 years). Overall, the mean patient satisfaction rating was 4.9 of 5 (range: 3-5). The mean return to work time was 7.2 weeks (range: 0.14-28 weeks), and the mean return to sport or activity was 8.3 weeks (range: 1-28 weeks). Average QuickDASH scores across all patients were 4 (range: 0-56.9). The median radiographic healing time was 6.1 weeks (range: 4.7-15.4 weeks). Mean postoperative shortening in the fifth metacarpal fracture was 3 mm (range: -4.2 to 8 mm) at the initial postoperative visit and 3.6 mm (range: -3.3 to 7.9 mm) at the final radiographic follow-up. Subgroup analysis showed that postoperative shortening was similar, regardless of the fracture pattern. The following four complications were reported: one case of persistent pain and stiffness, one case of carpal tunnel syndrome, one nonunion, and one fractured intramedullary nail. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the TIMN allows for a reliable return to work and physical activity, high patient satisfaction, low complication rate, and minimal shortening at the final radiographic follow-up. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Nonunion After Using Procedure-Specific Instrumentations for Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy.

Objectives: The primary purpose of this study was to compare the rates of nonunion among different osteotomy designs (company brand) and the rates of nonunion between oblique and transverse osteotomies. We secondarily aimed to assess the differences in reoperation and hardware removal rates after ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO). Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ulnar shortening osteotomy between 2015 and 2022 in our institute amongst 17 providers resulted in 92 consecutive patients. We included skeletally mature patients who underwent USO for the ulnar impingement abutment diagnosis. Demographic information was collected, including age, gender, race/ethnicity, BMI, and medical comorbidities. Six brand-specific devices were used and compared to the conventional plate fixation. Nonunion was determined based on the final available radiograph with a minimum follow-up of four months. Results: Of the 92 patients, 83 (90%) had a bone union. There is a remarkable difference in union among implant brands, although statistical analysis was not performed due to the small number of patients in each group. Transverse osteotomy was significantly related to a higher nonunion rate. Out of nine patients with resultant nonunion (10%), three healed after revision surgery (3.2%), two were lost to follow-up (2.2%), and four remained asymptomatic despite radiographic nonunion (4.6%). Plate removal was performed in four patients (4.3%), all of whom were in the union group. Conclusion: Patients should be informed about the nonunion rate with possible subsequent secondary surgery. Using procedure-specific devices may have mitigated the risk of nonunion.

Early Revision Rate Following Primary Carpal Tunnel Release.

Purpose: The published revision rates after carpal tunnel release (CTR) vary from 0.3% to 7%. The explanation for this variation may not be fully apparent. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of surgical revision within 1-5 years following primary CTR at a single academic institution, compare it with rates reported in the literature, and attempt to provide explanations for these differences. Methods: We identified all patients who underwent primary CTR at a single orthopedic practice by 18 fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons from October 1, 2015, through October 1, 2020, using a combination of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD), 10th Revision, codes. Patients who underwent CTR because of a diagnosis other than primary carpal tunnel syndrome were excluded. Patients who required revision CTR were identified using a practice-wide database query using a combination of CPT and ICD-10 codes. Operative reports and outpatient clinic notes were reviewed to determine the cause of revision. Data on patient demographics, surgical technique (open vs single-portal endoscopic), and medical comorbidities were collected. Results: A total of 11,847 primary CTR procedures were performed during the 5-year period on 9,310 patients. We found 24 revision CTR procedures among 23 patients, resulting in a revision rate of 0.2%. Of 9,422 open primary CTRs performed, 22 cases (0.23%) went on to undergo revision. Endoscopic CTR was performed in 2,425 cases, with 2 cases (0.08%) ultimately undergoing revision. The average length of time from primary CTR to revision was 436 days (range, 11-1,647 days). Conclusions: We noted a substantially lower rate of revision CTR within 1-5 years of primary release (0.2%) in our practice than that noted in previously published studies, although we accept that this does not account for out-of-area migration. There was no significant difference in the revision rates between open and single-portal endoscopic primary CTR. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.

Appropriateness of Self-Scheduled Office Visits in Outpatient Hand Surgery.

PURPOSE: Our practice recently implemented a system that enables patients to self-schedule outpatient visits through an online portal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of self-scheduled appointments in the Hand and Wrist Surgery Division of our practice. METHODS: Outpatient visit notes from 128 new patient visits among 18 fellowship-trained hand and upper extremity surgeons were collected; 64 visits were self-scheduled online, and 64 were scheduled using the traditional call center system. The notes were deidentified and divided among 10 hand and upper extremity surgeons, such that each note was reviewed by two different reviewers. The surgeons scored each visit on a scale of 1-10, with 1 representing a completely inappropriate visit for a hand surgeon and 10 representing a completely appropriate visit. Primary diagnoses and treatment plans were recorded, including whether surgery was planned during the visit. The final score for each visit resulted from the average of the two separate scores. The average appropriateness score for all self-scheduled visits was compared with the average score for all traditionally scheduled visits with a two-sample t test. RESULTS: The average appropriateness score for self-scheduled visits was 8.4 of 10, with seven visits resulting in a planned surgery (10.9%). Traditionally scheduled visits had an average appropriateness score of 8.4 of 10, with eight visits resulting in a planned surgery (12.5%). The average difference in the scores between reviewers for all visits was 1.7. CONCLUSIONS: In our practice, the appropriateness of visits that are self-scheduled is nearly identical to the appropriateness of traditionally scheduled visits. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Implementation of self-scheduling systems may allow for greater patient autonomy and access to care and reduce administrative burden on office staff.

The effect of outpatient web-based online scheduling versus traditional staff scheduling systems on progression to surgery and no-show rates.

Background: This study aimed to compare the rate of scheduled surgery and no-show rates between online-scheduled appointments and traditionally scheduled appointments. Materials and Methods: All scheduled outpatient visits at a single large multi-subspecialty orthopedic practice in three U.S. states (PA, NJ, and NY) were collected from February 1, 2022, to February 28, 2022. Visits were categorized as "online-scheduled" or "traditionally scheduled" and then further grouped as "no-show," "canceled," or "visited." Finally, visits were categorized as either "new patient" or "follow-up." Results: There was no significant difference between scheduling systems for patient progression to any procedure within 3 months of the initial visit (P = 0.97) and patient progression for surgery only within 3 months of the initial visit (P = 0.88). However, we found a significant difference with a higher rate of progression to surgery in traditionally scheduled than online-scheduled visits when accounting for only new patient visits that progressed to surgery within 3 months of the initial encounter (P = 0.036). No-show rates between scheduling systems were not significant (P = 0.79), but no-show rates were significant when comparing the practice's subspecialties (P < 0.001). Finally, no-show rates for online-scheduled compared to traditionally scheduled patients for both new and follow-up appointments were not significantly different (P = 0.28 and P = 0.94, respectively). Conclusion: Orthopedic practices should utilize online-scheduling systems as there was a higher progression to surgery of traditionally scheduled appointments compared to online. Depending on the subspecialty, no-show rates differed. Furthermore, online-scheduling allows for more patient autonomy and less burden on office staff.

Outpatient Visit Current Procedural Terminology Code Level Selection Trends in Hand Surgery Following Criteria Changes by the American Medical Association.

INTRODUCTION:  Beginning on January 1, 2021, the American Medical Association (AMA) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented considerable revisions with regard to the outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) criteria dictating the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code level selection. The primary goal of the current study was to determine how the recent E/M coding criteria changes have impacted code level selection by orthopedic hand surgeons in the outpatient setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  All outpatient visits within the hand and wrist surgery division of a single orthopedic practice were collected during two timeframes: March 1, 2019, to June 30, 2019, and March 1, 2021, to June 30, 2021. Procedure codes and insurance categories were collected for each visit. The primary endpoint analyzed was the visit level of care based on CPT E/M codes. For each timeframe, we determined the number of total visits that were coded at each level and expressed them as a percentage of the total visits for that time period. The insurance plan billed for each visit was recorded and classified as Medicare, Medicaid, Workers' Compensation, or commercial. RESULTS:  In 2019, prior to the billing level requirement changes, 7.2% of all visits were billed as level 2, 84.8% of all visits were billed as level 3, and 7.8% of all visits were billed as level 4. In 2021, 1.9% of visits were billed as level 2, 47.3% of visits were billed as level 3, and 50.5% of visits were billed as level 4. Level 1 and 5 visits did not exceed 0.5% in either timeframe. Within each insurance category, the proportion of visit levels of care followed a similar trend of reduced level 2 and 3 visits and increased level 4 visits from 2019 to 2021. CONCLUSION: We noted a significant trend toward higher code level selection following the recent code level changes, and we anticipate these recent code selection trends to have major financial implications moving forward.

New Evaluation and Management Code Level Selection Trends in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Patients.

BACKGROUND: On January 1, 2021, the American Medical Association implemented changes regarding the outpatient Evaluation and Management (E/M) criteria dictating Current Procedural Terminology code level selection to help diminish administrative burden and emphasize medical decision-making as the primary determinant in E/M level of service (EML). The goal of this study was to describe EML coding trends in outpatient visits for hip and knee osteoarthritis after the 2021 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services changes to the E/M system. METHODS: All outpatient visits for primary hip and knee osteoarthritis within the divisions of Joint Replacement, Operative Sports Medicine, and Nonoperative Sports Medicine at a single orthopaedic practice were retrospectively analyzed during 2 separate 10-month timeframes in 2019 and 2021. The primary endpoint was the visit EML (1 through 5) based on Current Procedural Terminology E/M codes. RESULTS: In 2019, 7.8% of all visits were billed as level 2, 85.8% of all visits were billed as level 3, and 6.3% of all visits were billed as level 4. In 2021, 2.8% of visits were billed as level 2, 54% of visits were billed as level 3, and 41.3% of visits were billed as level 4. Level 1 and Level 5 visits did not exceed 2% in either year. Across all 3 divisions, level 2 and 3 visits decreased significantly (P < .05), while level 4 visits increased significantly (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Since the E/M coding criteria overhaul in 2021, there has been a significant trend towards higher level of service code selection across multiple divisions in our orthopaedic practice.

An Evaluation of the Source and Content of Dupuytren's Disease Information Available on the Internet.

Introduction The internet continues to expand in both size and number of users, and patients are using the internet with increasing frequency to research orthopedic conditions and treatment options. Despite the prevalence of patients searching for medical information, the quality of the available information varies substantially. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and accuracy of the information available on the internet for Dupuytren's disease. We hypothesized that the informational content found on the internet regarding this condition would be of acceptable quality. Methods The search phrasing "'Dupuytren' OR 'Dupuytren's'" was used to mimic how patients would likely search for information on the disease. These terms were entered into the five English-language search engines with the most frequent use on the internet. On each search engine, the first 50 URLs were recorded, including sponsored sites. The 250 total sites were filtered to remove duplicate sites and URLs linking to other search engines, resulting in a final list of 84 websites for informational scoring. A previously published information evaluation protocol was used to grade each website. Each site was graded according to these guidelines by two authors and scored based on authorship, content, disease summary, treatment options, pathogenesis, complications, and results. A third author resolved any conflict on authorship or content before analysis. The resultant "informational value" is the sum of the disease summary, treatment options, pathogenesis, complications, and results and can range from 0-100.  Results The mean total information score for all sites was 47.5 out of 100 points. Forty-three (51.2%) of the websites evaluated were authored by a physician or academic institution, and thirty-four (40.5%) of the sites were commercial in nature. The final seven websites (8.3%) had nonphysician, unidentified, or lay authorship. Physician and academic institution authored websites had an average informational score of 55.5 out of 100 points, compared to 39.7 out of 100 for all other websites. This difference was statistically significant (p <0.01). The mean informational score for the 10 sponsored websites was 16.4 out of 100. Conclusion We concluded that internet information on Dupuytren's disease is of poor quality and incomplete. Academic and physician authored sites have higher quality than commercial sites, but significant room for improvement still exists. Patients should be advised to identify the authorship of the websites they obtain information from and avoid advertisements and commercial sites.

Timing of Preoperative Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Primary One-Level to Three-Level Lumbar Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between timing of preoperative surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs) among patients with 1-level to 3-level lumbar fusion. METHODS: Patients having undergone a primary 1-level to 3-level lumbar fusion at a single institution were allocated into 5 groups based on the time from preoperative antibiotic administration to incision (group A, 0-15 minutes; group B, 16-30 minutes; group C, 31-45 minutes; group D, 46-60 minutes; and group E, 61+ minutes). Timing of antibiotic administration as a continuous variable was also analyzed. All patients received irrigation with 3 L of normal saline containing bacitracin as well as local administration of vancomycin powder. SSIs were identified by the definition set forth by the 2017 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. RESULTS: Among 1131 patients, 27 (2.4%) were found to have an SSI. Compared with patients with antibiotic administration within 0-15 minutes before incision, patients with administration 61+ minutes before incision (group 4) had significantly higher odds of developing an SSI (P < 0.001). Patients had a 1.05-fold higher likelihood of infection for each additional minute delay of administration before incision (P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis reported an area under the curve of 0.733 and 0.776 for time as a continuous and categorical variable, respectively. Age (P = 0.02), body mass index (P = 0.03), diabetes mellitus diagnosis (P = 0.04), and type of antibiotic (P = 0.004) were significant predictors of SSI. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that preoperative antibiotic administration beyond 1 hour in patients who have undergone lumbar fusion is associated with higher rates of SSI.

An Adjunct Indicator for the Diagnosis of Fracture-Related Infections: Platelet Count to Mean Platelet Volume Ratio.

Introduction: Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a common complication associated with orthopaedic fracture care. Diagnosing these complications in the preoperative setting is difficult. Platelets are a known acute phase reactant with indices that change in accordance with infection and inflammation. The purpose of our study was to assess the diagnostic utility of platelet indices at assessing FRI. Methods: A retrospective review performed for all patients who underwent revision surgery for fracture nonunion between 2013 and 2018. Radiographs were employed to define nonunion. Intraoperative cultures were used to define FRI. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic ability of preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and the platelet count/mean platelet volume ratio (P/V) at recognizing FRI. Results: Of the 53 revision surgeries that were performed for fracture nonunion, 17 (32.1%) were identified as FRI. There were no significant demographic differences between the two cohorts. Patients with FRIs exhibited higher values for ESR (54.82 vs. 19.16, p<0.001), CRP (0.90 vs. 0.35, p=0.003), and P/V (37.4 vs. 22.8, p<0.001) as compared to those within the aseptic nonunion cohort. ROC curve analysis for P/V demonstrated that at an optimal ratio of 23, area under the curve (AUC) is 0.814, specificity is 55.6%, and sensitivity is 100.0%. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance of the serum biomarkers but only ESR and P/V had an AUC greater than 0.80. The negative predictive value (NPV) for P/V, ESR, and CRP was 100.0%, 84.6%, and 78.6%, respectively. Conclusion: The P/V ratio may serve as a reliable screening test for FRI.

A review of cervical spine alignment in the normal and degenerative spine.

With recent advancements in surgical spine technology and techniques, the importance of regional and global spine alignment has become an important factor in surgical planning. Our review aims to consolidate the current literature on cervical and global alignment parameters and its relationship to cervical symptomatology, quality of life (QOL), requirements for surgery, potential surgical complications and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes.