The interplay between diabetes Mellitus and soft tissue infections in general surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a worldwide pandemic affecting 500 million people. It is known to be associated with increased susceptibility to soft tissue infections (STI). Despite being a major public health burden, the literature relating the effects of DM and the presentation, severity and healing of STIs in general surgical patients remain limited. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients admitted with STI in a tertiary teaching hospital over a 12-month period. Patient demographics and surgical outcomes were collected and analysed. RESULTS: During the study period, 1059 patients were admitted for STIs (88% required surgery). DM was an independent risk factor for LOS. Diabetic patients presented with higher body-mass index (28 vs. 26), larger abscess size (24 vs. 14 cm2) and had a longer length of stay (4.4 days vs. 2.9 days). They also underwent a higher proportion of wide debridement and application of negative pressure wound therapy (42% vs. 35%). More diabetic patients underwent subsequent re-operation within the same sitting (8 vs. 4). Diabetic patients were two times more likely to present with carbuncles (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The incidence of STIs among DM patients represent a significant disease burden, surgeons should consider intensive patient counselling and partnering with primary care providers in order to help reduce the incidence of future STI admissions based upon lifestyle modification and glucose control.

Ectopic parathyroid gland within carotid sheath.

During operative exploration of the neck for parathyroid surgery, the surgeon should always consider possible ectopic locations of the glands and have a reasonable surgical strategy for locating these ectopic glands.

Is the acute surgical unit model feasible for Australian regional centres?

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of general surgery emergency procedures are conducted after-hours in regional centres. The acute surgical unit (ASU) model reduces the number of after-hours operations performed. We review the burden of emergency surgery in a regional centre and assess what components of the ASU model would benefit regional hospitals. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on data for all emergency cases performed at Latrobe Regional Hospital (LRH) over a 1-year period. Time into and out of theatre was used to determine total theatre usage and if the operation occurred after-hours. ED triage time to theatre and start time for appendicectomy was compared to data from our metropolitan referral hospital, Monash Medical Centre (MMC), which has employed an ASU. RESULTS: General surgery emergency cases in regional areas are regular and predictable with a median of two emergency cases performed, and a mean theatre time of 156 min per day at LRH. On weekdays, 43.1% (n = 503) of emergency cases were done in the evening (18.00-24.00 hours), compared to 20.3% (n = 217) on weekends when an emergency theatre is available during the day. LRH performed more appendicectomies after-hours than MMC over a 1-year period. CONCLUSION: Regional centres have a significant burden of general surgery emergency procedures; of which the number performed after-hours is comparable to metropolitan centres. The number of procedures and theatre time required by these cases justify a dedicated emergency theatre in-hours similar to metropolitan ASU models and this would reduce emergency operating after-hours.

Impact of an acute care surgery model on appendicectomy outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Monash Medical Centre introduced the acute surgical unit (ASU) in July 2011. The ASU is modelled on the concept of acute care surgery (ACS). This study reviews the impact of the ASU on the outcomes in an appendicectomy population. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients (aged 16-99 years) who underwent appendicectomies in the 2-year study time frame (from July 2010 to June 2012) at our centre was performed. The cohort (n = 539) was divided into two groups for analysis: the ASU group, patients admitted on or after 18 July 2011 (n = 283), and the control group, patients admitted prior to 18 July 2011 (n = 256). RESULTS: Median time to operation (1129 min versus 1080 min, P = 0.963) and negative appendicectomy rate (24.2% versus 24.8%, P = 0.871) were similar in both groups. The proportion of operations performed overnight (18.00-08.00 hours) was significantly decreased in the ASU group (17.1% versus 30.7%, P < 0.001). Perforation rate was marginally higher in the ASU group (17.8% versus 11.8%, P = 0.053) but failed to reach statistical significance. There was an increase in the usage of preoperative imaging (40.3% versus 30.5%, P = 0.018) in the ASU group. Operating times, length of stay, laparoscopic-to-open conversion and surgical site infection rates remained similar. CONCLUSION: We conclude that implementation of an ACS model does not lead to objective differences in outcome for patients after appendicectomy. However, the ACS model significantly decreased the number of operations performed after-hours.