Convalescent plasma for COVID-19 in hospitalised patients: an open-label, randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The effects of convalescent plasma (CP) therapy in hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain uncertain. This study investigates the effect of CP on clinical improvement in these patients. METHODS: This is an investigator-initiated, randomised, parallel arm, open-label, superiority clinical trial. Patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to two infusions of CP plus standard of care (SOC) or SOC alone. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with clinical improvement 28 days after enrolment. RESULTS: A total of 160 (80 in each arm) patients (66.3% critically ill, 33.7% severely ill) completed the trial. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) age was 60.5 (48-68) years; 58.1% were male and the median (IQR) time from symptom onset to randomisation was 10 (8-12) days. Neutralising antibody titres >1:80 were present in 133 (83.1%) patients at baseline. The proportion of patients with clinical improvement on day 28 was 61.3% in the CP+SOC group and 65.0% in the SOC group (difference -3.7%, 95% CI -18.8-11.3%). The results were similar in the severe and critically ill subgroups. There was no significant difference between CP+SOC and SOC groups in pre-specified secondary outcomes, including 28-day mortality, days alive and free of respiratory support and duration of invasive ventilatory support. Inflammatory and other laboratory marker values on days 3, 7 and 14 were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: CP+SOC did not result in a higher proportion of clinical improvement on day 28 in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 compared to SOC alone.

Leukemoid reaction: A 21st-century cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Leukemoid reaction (leukocyte count >50 cells ×109  L) is a rare but extremely relevant finding. Since little has been published on this condition's clinical relevance and prognosis, we investigated leukemoid reaction in patients with a white blood cell count of >50 × 109  L, including etiology and outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients at a Brazilian tertiary hospital between January 2016 and July 2018 > 18 years with a total leukocyte count >50 cells×109  L. Demographics, complete blood count, clinical features, and the exams used to diagnose and determine leukemoid reaction etiology were analyzed. A Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis was performed, and a binary logistic regression model identified variables associated with death. RESULTS: Of the 267 cases with white blood cell count of >50 × 109 , 162/267 (60%) were secondary to hematopoietic neoplasm and 105/267 (40%) presenting as a true leukemoid reaction. The primary causes of the true leukemoid reaction cases were infection (59), nonhematopoietic neoplasm (17), or other causes (29). Patient deaths (66) differed significantly between groups (P < .001, log-rank [Mantel-Cox] Test). Lower hemoglobin, older age, and increased segmented neutrophil count were associated with increased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: This was a modern cohort analysis of leukemoid reactions, inclusive of all etiologies. The most common cause was infection, which involved several microorganisms. Paraneoplastic leukemoid reaction was also common. Both conditions have a poor prognosis with high mortality, being a major medical challenge.