Allograft and Autologous Reconstruction Techniques for Neglected Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Mid-Long-Term Follow-Up Analysis.

Achilles tendon ruptures that are not immediately recognized and treated are sometimes diagnosed as delayed injuries and may require different surgical repair options based on gap size. The potential complications associated with using an allograft for reconstruction may lead some surgeons to prefer the use of autologous techniques. However, allografts are often considered a salvagement option when large defects are present. In this study, we examined the long-term clinical outcomes and complications of 17 patients who underwent surgical repair for chronic ruptures with large gaps using both autologous and allograft techniques. During an 11-year period, nine patients were treated with autologous techniques (mean gap of 4.33 ± 1.32 cm) and Achilles allograft reconstruction was performed in eight patients (47.1%) (mean gap of 7.75 ± 0.89 cm). At a mean of 82 ± 36.61 months of follow-up, all 17 patients (100%) were able to perform a single heel rise and improved AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) and ATRS (Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score) scores. No infections, complications, or re-ruptures were recorded at the end of the follow-up. No significant differences were found in the AOFAS and ATRS scales between both techniques. When an extensive defect is present, the reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft can be considered a proper treatment option, as it does not show a higher rate of complications than autologous techniques achieving similar functional outcomes.

Conservative Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis.

Despite the disabling nature of ankle osteoarthritis (OA), there is poor scientific evidence for a conservative treatment compared to the hip and knee OA. In this regard, most of the treatment options in use are not based on clinical studies of the ankle, and they are extracted from evidence obtained from clinical studies of other lower limb joints. However, this does not seem to be a good idea, since the aetiology of ankle OA is quite different from that of the hip or knee. Nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, hyaluronic acid, corticosteroid, platelet-rich plasma injection and mesenchymal stem cells injections have been reported. However, further research is required in this field to obtain a specific clinical practice guideline for the conservative treatment of ankle OA.

Minimally invasive technique for stage III adult-acquired flatfoot deformity: a mid- to long-term retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to present the functional, radiological, and quality of life outcomes of a series of stage III adult-acquired flatfoot deformity corrections using an original operative approach based on minimal incision surgery (MIS). METHODS: Sixty-two patients (67 feet) with a symptomatic stage III flatfoot deformity were treated using a modified double arthrodesis by MIS. The mean age was 63 years (range, 50 to 81) and the mean follow-up was 6.6 years (range, 3.2 to 11.5). Clinical, radiological, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hindfoot score (AOFAS score), quality of life (SF-36), and satisfaction scores were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean AOFAS score improved by 54.27 (95% [CI], 57.27-51.3; P < 0.0001), and the SF-36 improved by a mean of 17.5 points (95% CI, 1.4-20.9) in the physical component summary (PCS). Deformity correction was confirmed by a significant improvement in the x-ray measurements (six angles). Bony union was observed in 89.5% of cases (60/67). In all, nine patients (13.4%) needed a secondary surgery: three for talonavicular nonunion, four for progression of the flatfoot deformity, and two for screw protrusion. No cases of superficial infection, wound dehiscence, or avascular necrosis of the talus were observed. CONCLUSION: The present series represents the largest study of stage III flatfoot correction using MIS with a mid- to long-term follow-up. Because the data showed clinical and functional improvement after surgery with fewer complications, this technique may be ideal for patients at risk of complications. Graphical abstract.

Protective Approach for Anatomical Structures at Risk in Total Ankle Replacement.

Currently, total ankle replacement (TAR) is an alternative to arthrodesis in selected patients, with the anterior approach being the most widely used to carry it out. Regardless of the type of implant used, the pins for bone resection guides, chisels, and the saw for distal tibial resection can endanger the neurovascular and tendon structures that lie in intimate proximity to the posterior aspect of the ankle. Additionally, there is a documented complication rate of up to 15.3% in such surgery. We have implemented a protective posteromedial approach that complements the anterior approach to reduce this risk of intraoperative iatrogenic injury. Using this method we introduce a protective instrument that separates the posterior anatomical structures from the posterior cortex of the tibia. This article describes the surgical technique used to carry out TAR through an anterior approach in a safer way, without increasing complications or the duration of real-time surgery.