Radiation Adverse Outcome pathways (AOPs): examining priority questions from an international horizon-style exercise.

PURPOSE: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) Development Programme is being explored in the radiation field, as an overarching framework to identify and prioritize research needs that best support strengthening of radiation risk assessment and risk management strategies. To advance the use of AOPs, an international horizon-style exercise (HSE) was initiated through the Radiation/Chemical AOP Joint Topical Group (JTG) formed by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) High-Level Group on Low Dose Research (HLG-LDR) under the auspices of the Committee on Radiological Protection and Public Health (CRPPH). The intent of the HSE was to identify key research questions for consideration in AOP development that would help to reduce uncertainties in estimating the health risks following exposures to low dose and low dose-rate ionizing radiation. The HSE was conducted in several phases involving the solicitation of relevant questions, a collaborative review of open-ended candidate questions and an elimination exercise that led to the selection of 25 highest priority questions for the stated purpose. These questions were further ranked by over 100 respondents through an international survey. This final set of questions was judged to provide insights into how the OECD's AOP approach can be put into practice to meet the needs of hazard and risk assessors, regulators, and researchers. This paper examines the 25 priority questions in the context of hazard/risk assessment framework for ionizing radiation. CONCLUSION: By addressing the 25 priority questions, it is anticipated that constructed AOPs will have a high level of specificity, making them valuable tools for simplifying and prioritizing complex biological processes for use in developing revised radiation hazard and risk assessment strategies.

Human respiratory tract cancer risks of inhaled formaldehyde: dose-response predictions derived from biologically-motivated computational modeling of a combined rodent and human dataset.

Formaldehyde inhalation at 6 ppm and above causes nasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in F344 rats. The quantitative implications of the rat tumors for human cancer risk are of interest, since epidemiological studies have provided only equivocal evidence that formaldehyde is a human carcinogen. Conolly et al. (Toxicol. Sci. 75, 432-447, 2003) analyzed the rat tumor dose-response assuming that both DNA-reactive and cytotoxic effects of formaldehyde contribute to SCC development. The key elements of their approach were: (1) use of a three-dimensional computer reconstruction of the rat nasal passages and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling to predict regional dosimetry of formaldehyde; (2) association of the flux of formaldehyde into the nasal mucosa, as predicted by the CFD model, with formation of DNA-protein cross-links (DPX) and with cytolethality/regenerative cellular proliferation (CRCP); and (3) use of a two-stage clonal growth model to link DPX and CRCP with tumor formation. With this structure, the prediction of the tumor dose response was extremely sensitive to cell kinetics. The raw dose-response data for CRCP are J-shaped, and use of these data led to a predicted J-shaped dose response for tumors, notwithstanding a concurrent low-dose-linear, directly mutagenic effect of formaldehyde mediated by DPX. In the present work the modeling approach used by Conolly et al. (ibid.) was extended to humans. Regional dosimetry predictions for the entire respiratory tract were obtained by merging a three-dimensional CFD model for the human nose with a one-dimensional typical path model for the lower respiratory tract. In other respects, the human model was structurally identical to the rat model. The predicted human dose response for DPX was obtained by scale-up of a computational model for DPX calibrated against rat and rhesus monkey data. The rat dose response for CRCP was used "as is" for the human model, since no preferable alternative was identified. Three sets of baseline parameter values for the human clonal growth model were obtained through separate calibrations against respiratory tract cancer incidence data for nonsmokers, smokers, and a mixed population of nonsmokers and smokers, respectively. Additional risks of respiratory tract cancer were predicted to be negative up to about one ppm for all three cases when the raw CRCP data from the rat were used. When a hockey-stick-shaped model was fit to the rat CRCP data and used in place of the raw data, positive maximum likelihood estimates (MLE) of additional risk were obtained. These MLE estimates were lower, for some comparisons by as much as 1,000-fold, than MLE estimates from previous cancer dose-response assessments for formaldehyde. Breathing rate variations associated with different physical activity levels did not make large changes in predicted additional risks. In summary, this analysis of the human implications of the rat SCC data indicates that (1) cancer risks associated with inhaled formaldehyde are de minimis (10(-6) or less) at relevant human exposure levels, and (2) protection from the noncancer effects of formaldehyde should be sufficient to protect from its potential carcinogenic effects.

Biologically motivated computational modeling of formaldehyde carcinogenicity in the F344 rat.

Formaldehyde inhalation at 6 ppm and above causes nasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in F344 rats. The human health implications of this effect are of significant interest since human exposure to environmental formaldehyde is widespread, though at lower concentrations than those that cause cancer in rats. In this article, which is part of a larger effort to predict the human cancer risks of inhaled formaldehyde, we describe biologically motivated quantitative modeling of the exposure-tumor response continuum in the rat. An anatomically realistic, three-dimensional fluid dynamics model of the F344 rat nasal airways was used to predict site-specific flux of formaldehyde from inhaled air into tissue, since both SCC and preneoplastic lesions develop in a characteristic site-specific pattern. Flux into tissue was used as a dose metric for two modes of action, direct mutagenicity and cytolethality-regenerative cellular proliferation (CRCP), which in turn were linked to key parameters of a two-stage clonal growth model. The direct mutagenicity mode of action was represented by a low dose linear dose-response model of DNA-protein cross-link (DPX) formation. An empirical J-shaped dose-response model and a threshold model fit to the empirical data were used for CRCP. In the clonal growth model, the probability of mutation per cell generation was a function of the tissue concentration of DPX while the rate of cell division was calculated from the CRCP data. Maximum likelihood methods were used to estimate parameter values. Survivor (a nontumor outcome) and tumor data for controls from the National Toxicology Program database and from two formaldehyde inhalation bioassays were used for likelihood calculations. The J-shaped dose-response for CRCP provided a better description of the SCC data than did the threshold model. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the rodent tumor response is due to the CRCP mode of action, with the directly mutagenic pathway having little, if any, influence. When evaluated in light of modeling and database uncertainties, particularly the specification of the clonal growth model and the dose-response data for CRCP, this work provides suggestive though not definitive evidence for a J-shaped dose-response for formaldehyde-mediated nasal SCC in the F344 rat.

The use of non-tumor data in cancer risk assessment: reflections on butadiene, vinyl chloride, and benzene.

The estimation and characterization of a cancer risk is grounded in the observation of tumors in humans and/or experimental animals. Increasingly, however, other kinds of data (non-tumor data) are finding application in cancer risk assessment. Metabolism and kinetics, adduct formation, genetic damage, mode of action, and biomarkers of exposure, susceptibility, and effects are examples. While these and other parameters have been studied for many important chemicals over the past 30-40 years, their use in risk assessments is more recent, and new insights and opportunities are continuing to unfold. To provide some perspective on this field, the ILSI Risk Science Institute asked a select working group to characterize the pertinent non-tumor data available for 1,3-butadiene, benzene, and vinyl chloride and to comment on the utility of these data in characterizing cancer risks. This paper presents the findings of that working group and concludes with 15 simple principles for the use of non-tumor data in cancer risk assessment.