RESUMO
Background: Nonsurgical management of congenital ear anomalies using molding devices shows efficacy but lacks standardization of treatment protocols and outcome measures. Learning Objective: To compare ear molding techniques and identify factors related to treatment outcomes. Design Type: Systematic review of the literature (1990-2021). Methods: Studies reporting molding for congenital ear anomalies were assessed. PRISMA guidelines were used. Data extracted included: age at treatment initiation, treatment duration, correction rates, and complications. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and outcomes were compared using the Student t-test. Results: In total, 37 studies with 3,341 patients (mean patients per study, 95; range, 5-488) were included. Infants in whom treatment was initiated at 4.8 weeks (median, 3.7; range, 0.9-8.8 weeks) were treated for 5.1 weeks (median 4.7, range 2.6-7.6 weeks) with 11.0 months follow-up (median 11.4, range 1.4-21.0 months). Individualized devices (physician-customized) were used more (62.2% of studies) than commercial devices. No difference in correction (p = 0.44) or complication rates (p = 0.19) was identified between devices. Totally, 70.3% of studies reported complications and 40.5% of studies included long-term follow-up data. Conclusions: The available evidence supports initiating ear molding in the first weeks of life to be most effective, yet outcome data should be standardized in future studies to improve evidence quality.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Differential responses to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) exist in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); however, contributing factors are poorly understood. Tobacco smoke is a common risk factor for PDAC, with nicotine-induced chemoresistance observed in other cancers. This study aimed to explore the potential association between tobacco use and NAT efficacy in PDAC. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective analysis was conducted that included all consecutive patients with PDAC who underwent surgical resection after NAT with a documented smoking history (N = 208). NAT response was measured as percentage fibrosis in the surgical specimen. Multivariable models controlled for covariates and survival were modeled using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Postoperatively, major responses to NAT (>95% fibrosis) were less frequently observed in smokers than in nonsmokers (13.7% vs 30.4%, respectively; P = .021). Pathologic complete responses were similarly less frequent in smokers than in nonsmokers (2.1% vs 9.9%, respectively; P = .023). On multivariate analysis controlling for covariates, smoking history remained independently associated with lower odds of major fibrosis (odds ratio [OR], 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.59; P = .002) and pathologic complete response (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.03-0.84; P = .05). The median overall survival was significantly longer in nonsmokers than in smokers (39.1 vs 26.6 months, respectively; P = .05). CONCLUSION: Tobacco use was associated with diminished pathologic responses to NAT. Future research to understand the biology underlying this observation is warranted and may inform differential NAT approaches or counseling among these populations.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Fumar , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidade , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Fibrose , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Fatores de Risco , Estimativa de Kaplan-MeierRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tumor fibrosis after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) correlates with treatment response. Herein we assessed how different NAT strategies influence pathologic responses and survival. METHODS: Patients with surgically resected PDAC who received NAT (1991-2020) were included. Descriptive statistics compared outcomes amongst fibrosis groups (none, minor <50 â%, partial 51%-94 â%, major ≥95 â%) and NAT (chemotherapy alone, chemoradiation, or chemotherapy â+ âchemoradiation (total neoadjuvant therapy, TNT)). RESULTS: Patients with major fibrosis most often received TNT (65.8 â%, p â< â0.001). Major fibrosis was associated with the greatest rate of downstaging (77.8 â%, p â< â0.001), highest R0 margin rate (100 â%, p â< â0.01), and lowest mean positive lymph node ratio (0.80, p â< â0.01). Amongst complete responders, 11/14 (78.6 â%) received TNT. Median overall (66.3 months, p â= â0.003) and disease-free (54.7months, p â= â0.05) survival were highest with major fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Major fibrosis and complete pathologic responses after NAT are most frequent with a TNT strategy and are associated with improved outcomes.