RESUMO
PURPOSE: It was aimed to compare the levels of inflammation-related parameters, such as neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), in patients with advanced keratoconus (KC) and healthy controls. Also, we evaluated the relationships between these parameters and several corneal topography values used in the KC diagnostic index. METHODS: Forty patients with advanced and 40 healthy volunteers were included in this study. In the KC group, 20 patients were nonprogressive KC and 20 patients were progressive KC. In all participating individuals, we evaluated detailed ophthalmologic examination findings and complete blood count data, while corneal topographic measurements were also recorded in patients with KC. RESULTS: The mean NLR value was 2.3 ± 1.19 in the progressive KC group; nonprogressive KC values were 1.99 ± 1.69 and 1.81 ± 0.72 in the control group. Mean PLR value was 113.24 ± 48.44 in the progressive KC group, nonprogressive KC values were 96.47 ± 31.04 and 104.09 ± 35.14 in the control group. No statistically significant difference was found between patients with progressive KC, nonprogressive KC, and healthy volunteers in terms of mean NLR and PLR values (P > 0.05). NLR values were found to demonstrate significant positive correlations with the corneal topography parameters, Symmetry Index front (r = 0.278, P = 0.025), KC Vertex front (r = 0.247, P = 0.048), and Baiocchi Calossi Versaci front (r = 0.273, P = 0.028); there was no significant relationship between corneal topography parameters and PLR values. CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant difference between the progressive KC, nonprogressive KC, and control groups in inflammation parameters such as NLR and PLR, a positive correlation was observed between the NLR value and some corneal topography findings used in the diagnosis of KC. The role of inflammation in the etiology of KC can be better understood by clinical studies and laboratory tests conducted with prospective studies involving a higher number of patients.
Assuntos
Ceratocone , Topografia da Córnea , Humanos , Inflamação/diagnóstico , Inflamação/etiologia , Ceratocone/diagnóstico , Ceratocone/etiologia , Linfócitos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia has become appropriate for many surgical procedures. Neuraxial anesthesia can result in acute and late complications like hypotension, bradycardia, local anesthetic toxicity, postdural-puncture headache, backache and spinal nerve damage. Although the body's physiological responses to spinal anesthesia are well understood, its effects on intraocular pressure (IOP) haven't been mentioned before. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of spinal anesthesia on IOP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty patients receiving spinal anesthesia for subumblical surgery were recruited for the study, after ethics committee approval and patients' written informed consent. IOP was measured by Icare PRO tonometer (Icare, Finland) before spinal anesthesia (BS), immediately after spinal anesthesia (AS) and finally on the first postoperative day (PO1). Both eyes of the patients were included in the study. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients completed the study. Mean BS, AS and PO1 intraocular pressures were 16.53±3.17 (9.40-24.00), 17.08±3.16 (10.00-24.00) and 16.76±2.80 (10.20-23.00) mm Hg, respectively. Mean IOP measurements were not statistically different among the three groups (p=0.104). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia alone has no acute or subacute effects on IOP. Studies can be made to evaluate the chronic effects. Further studies must be focused on the relationship between postdural puncture headache and intraocular pressure changes after spinal anesthesia.