Modified prone position to dissect the popliteal fossa.

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, the prone position is used for dissecting the popliteal fossa, which requires endotracheal intubation. Access to the airway in this position is limited, hence the complications. It is not surprising that the prone position is not favoured by the anaesthetists, especially in patients with a high body mass index. We describe a safe and novel alternative to the prone position. METHODS: The modified prone position (MPP) is described as an alternative position that facilitates access to the airway. RESULTS: Between October 2007 and May 2010, 12 patients underwent popliteal fossa dissection using the MPP. All patients had general anaesthesia using a laryngeal mask airway with the exception of one, who had an epidural anaesthesia. There were no airway or haemodynamic complications. The surgical access to the popliteal fossa was as good as with the traditional prone position. CONCLUSIONS: The MPP was satisfactory for both the surgeon and the anaesthetists. The authors now use this position routinely for dissecting the popliteal fossa.

Radiological classification of optic pathway gliomas: experience of a modified functional classification system.

Optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) in childhood are associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and since 1958 have been classified anatomically using the Dodge classification (DC). MR scanning permits a more detailed anatomical description than can be classified by this historical system. A modified Dodge classification (MDC) has been applied to MRI scans from a cohort of 72 patients (36.1% NF1-positive) from 4 centres participating in an international clinical trial. The MDC was feasible, applicable and more detailed than the original DC. NF1-positive cases more commonly involved both optic nerves (p = 0.021) and other multiple locations (p = 0.001). NF1-negative tumours more commonly involved the central chiasm (p = 0.005) and hypothalamus (p = 0.003). Fewer hypothalamus-positive tumours were associated with optic nerve involvement (p = 0.009), whereas more were associated with central chiasm involvement (p<0.001). From diagnosis to follow-up, there was concordance between DC and MDC in 51/72 cases (70.8%). The MDC is therefore proposed for use in clinical trials of new treatments for OPGs.