Prevalence and clinical significance of ANCA positivity in lupus nephritis: a case series of 116 patients and literature review.

The prevalence and clinical significance of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies [ANCAs] in patients with lupus nephritis [LN] is not fully elucidated. Our aim was to determine whether LN patients with ANCA positivity had different clinicopathological features and outcomes compared to ANCA-negative patients. METHODS: Among our LN patients we retrospectively selected those who underwent ANCA testing the day of the kidney biopsy and before the start of induction treatment. Clinical/histopathological features at kidney biopsy and renal outcome of ANCA-positive patients were compared with those of ANCA-negative subjects. RESULTS: We included 116 Caucasian LN patients in the study; 16 patients [13.8%] were ANCA-positive. At kidney biopsy, ANCA-positive patients presented more frequently with an acute nephritic syndrome than ANCA-negative ones; the difference however does not reach statistical significance [44 vs. 25%, p = 0.13]. At histological evaluation, proliferative classes [100% vs 73%; p = 0.02], class IV [68.8% vs 33%; p < 0.01] and necrotizing tuft lesions [27 vs 7%, p = 0.04] were more frequent, and the activity index was higher [10 vs 7; p = 0.03] in ANCA-positive than in ANCA-negative patients. Despite worse histological features, after a 10-year observation period, there were no significant differences in the number of patients with chronic kidney function impairment (defined as eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2) between the ANCA-positive and negative groups [24.2 vs 26.6%, p = 0.9]. This could be the result of the more aggressive therapy, with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, that ANCA-positive patients received more frequently than ANCA-negative ones [25 vs. 1.3%, p < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: ANCA-positive LN patients frequently have histological markers of severe activity (proliferative classes and high activity index) that require timely diagnosis and aggressive therapy to limit the development of irreversible chronic kidney damage.

Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Amyloid A Amyloidosis: Association or Coincidence?

AA amyloidosis may complicate several chronic inflammatory conditions. From a clinical point of view, causality between inflammatory pathology and AA amyloidosis can be assumed because of the data described in the literature; some of the best known include rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, inflammatory bowel disease, and chronic infections. Singles cases of inflammatory diseases have been found at AA amyloidosis. Causality becomes more plausible if at least two different cases with AA amyloidosis are both found to have the same rare inflammatory disease. We describe the case of a patient with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) with development of AA amyloidosis conditioning a nephrotic syndrome, likely secondary to failure to control the chronic inflammatory process. Only two cases in the literature describe the association of this rare disease and the appearance of AA amyloidosis. The treatment of AA amyloidosis consists in treating the underlying inflammatory disorder; to date, few effective treatments are available for PSC. Therefore, and in view of the limited data in the literature, we believe it is important to describe its association.

Erratum to: Relapsing Minimal Change Disease Superimposed on Late-Onset p.N215S Fabry Nephropathy.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfab148.].

Relapsing minimal change disease superimposed on late-onset p.N215S Fabry nephropathy.

We present the case of a 76-year-old man with late-onset Fabry disease caused by the p.N215S missense mutation, with Fabry cardiomyopathy and nephropathy. In this case, the diagnosis of Fabry disease was incidental and followed minimal change disease (MCD) onset, with nephrotic syndrome and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy. Fabry nephropathy associated with the p.N215S mutation is becoming increasingly recognized among older patients. The importance of electron microscopy is herein highlighted and histological features common to Fabry nephropathy and MCD are discussed, along with the challenges associated with the diagnosis and clinical management.

Elevated Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements are Associated with a Progressive Form of Fabry Disease.

 INTRODUCTION: Published data on hypertension incidence and management in Anderson-Fabry disease are scant and the contribution of elevated blood pressure to organ damage is not well recognized. AIM: Therefore, we have assessed blood pressure values and their possible correlations with clinical findings in a well described cohort of Fabry patients. METHODS: Between January 2015 and May 2019, all adult Fabry patients (n = 24 females, n = 8 males) referred to our institute were prospectively enrolled. During the first examination patient's genotype and clinical characteristics were recorded. Blood pressure data were obtained by standard observed office measurements followed, within 6 months, by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and home self-recordings. Organ involvement, including kidneys, heart and brain, was monitored over time. Consequently, patients were defined as clinically stable or progressive through the Fabry Stabilization Index. RESULTS: The standard office measurements have diagnosed hypertension in three (9.37%) patients, but the ambulatory monitoring showed elevated blood pressure in six (18.75%) patients, revealing three cases of masked hypertension. All the hypertensive patients were females and, compared with normotensive subjects, they presented a lower glomerular filtration rate (p < 0.05) and a more advanced cardiac hypertrophy (p < 0.05). Four (66.7%) of them were diagnosed with a progressive form of the disease through the Fabry Stabilization Index while the majority of the normotensive group (84.6%, n = 19) was stable over time. No correlation was found between the prevalence of hypertension and the type of mutations causing Fabry disease. CONCLUSION: Hypertension can be found in a restricted portion of clinically stable Fabry patients. In contrast, patients presenting with a progressive organ involvement, particularly renal impairment, have a major risk of developing uncontrolled blood pressure, and should be followed carefully. Moreover, the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring proved to be useful to reveal masked hypertension, which can contribute to the progressive worsening of the organ damage. Therefore, a proper diagnosis and therapy of hypertension may improve the outcome of Fabry patients.