Perioperative Primary Care Utilization and Postoperative Readmission, Emergency Department Use, and Mortality in Older Surgical Patients.

BACKGROUND: Postdischarge primary care follow-up is associated with lower readmission rates after medical hospitalizations. However, the effect of primary care utilization on readmission has not been studied in surgical patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older undergoing major inpatient diagnostic or therapeutic procedures (n = 3,552,906) from 2017 through 2018, examining the association between postdischarge primary care visits within 14 days of discharge (primary exposure), and Annual Wellness Visits in the year prior (secondary exposure), with 30-day unplanned readmission (primary outcome), emergency department visits, and mortality (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: Overall, 9.5% (n = 336,837) had postdischarge visits within 14 days, 2.9% (n = 104,571) had Annual Wellness Visits in the year preceding the procedure, 9.5% (n = 336,401) were readmitted, 9% (n = 319,054) had emergency department visits, and 0.6% (n = 22,103) of the cohort died within 30 days. Our fully adjusted propensity-matched proportional hazards Cox regression analysis showed that postdischarge visits were associated with a 5% lower risk of readmission (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.97), 43% higher risk of emergency department use (HR, 1.43, 95% CI, 1.40-1.46) and no difference in mortality risk (HR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.90-1.06), compared with not having a visit within 14 days of discharge. In a separate set of regression models, Annual Wellness Visits were associated with a 9% lower risk of readmission (HR, 0.91, 95% CI, 0.88-0.95), 45% higher risk of emergency department utilization (HR, 1.45, 95% CI, 1.40-1.49) and an 18% lower mortality risk (HR, 0.82, 95% CI, 0.75-0.89) compared with no Annual Wellness Visit in the year before the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Both postdischarge visits and the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit appear to be extremely underutilized among the older surgical population. In those patients who do utilize primary care, compared with propensity-matched patients who do not, our study suggests primary care use is associated with modestly lower readmission rates. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether targeted primary care involvement can reduce readmission.

Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Team to Improve the Quality of Care for Older Surgical Patients at a Rural Academic Medical Center.

For the first time in history, people age older than 65 years make up >20% of the non-metro population, compared with 16% of the metro population. From 2010 to 2020 the nonmetro population age older than 65 years grew by 22%, while the working-age population declined by 4.9%, and the population aged under 18 years declined by 5.7%.1,2 Multidisciplinary geriatric surgical programs are an increasingly recognized approach to the care of older surgical patients and preliminary data suggest they can reduce length of stay. Although rural areas have the greatest proportion of patients age older than 65 years, implementation of such programs faces special challenges in rural settings with limited resources. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center is one of the most rural academic centers in the United States. Challenges include a shortage of geriatric-trained providers, long distances to access primary care and subspecialists, and extremely limited postacute care options and skilled nursing facility beds. To address the unique needs of our provider and patient population we began with a development period where we conducted stakeholder interviews. Using these data, we mapped out a workflow and developed pilot projects to address different portions of the workflow, such as preoperative screening for frailty and cognitive impairment, interdisciplinary weekly case conferences, proactive case management, delirium and geriatric surgery postoperative pathway order sets, and a variety of tools for reorientation and delirium management. Herein we describe the process of development and pragmatic clinical implementation of geriatric-focused care for older surgical patients in our rural tertiary center, including some of the main challenges we faced and the strategies we undertook to overcome them, and some of our early patient centered and clinical outcomes. This information may assist other institutions as they design geriatric-focused surgical programs to address the growing population of older adults and the need for compliance with state legislation. The clinical program described is not a research study, and the outcome data we report is for the purpose of description, and should not be interpreted as a rigorous research investigation of the effect of our intervention.

Preoperative Communication Between Anesthesia, Surgery, and Primary Care Providers for Older Surgical Patients.

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal communication between clinicians remains a frequent driver of preventable adverse health care-related events, increased costs, and patient and physician dissatisfaction. METHODS: Cross-sectional surveys on preoperative interspecialty communication, tailored by stakeholder type, were administered to (1) primary care providers in northern New England, (2) anesthesia providers working in the perioperative clinic of a tertiary rural academic medical center, (3) surgeons from the same center, and (4) older surgical patients who underwent preoperative assessment at the same center. RESULTS: In total, 107/249 (43.0%) providers and 103/265 (39.9%) patients completed the survey. Preoperative communication was perceived as logistically challenging (59.8%), particularly across health systems. More than 77% of anesthesia and surgery providers indicated that they communicate frequently or sometimes, but 92.5% of primary care providers indicated that they rarely or never communicate with anesthesia providers. Some of the most common reasons for preoperative communication were discussion of complex patients, perioperative medication management, and optimization of comorbidities. Although 96.1% of older surgical patients reported that preoperative communication between providers is important, only 40.4% felt that their providers communicate very or extremely well. Many patients emphasized the importance of preoperative communication between providers to ensure transfer of critical clinical information. CONCLUSION: Surgeons and anesthesiologists infrequently communicate with primary care providers in one rural tertiary center, in contrast to patient expectations and values. These study results will help identify priorities and potentially resolvable barriers to bridging the gap between the inpatient perioperative and outpatient primary care teams. Future studies should focus on strategies to improve communication between hospital and community providers to prevent complications and readmission.