Efficacy and Safety of Long-Acting Subcutaneous Lenacapavir in Heavily Treatment-Experienced People with Multi-Drug Resistant HIV-1: Week 104 Results of a Phase 2/3 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Lenacapavir is a long-acting HIV-1 capsid inhibitor for treatment of HIV-1 infection. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenacapavir in combination with an investigator-selected optimized background regimen (OBR) after 104 weeks in adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1. METHODS: This ongoing, international, Phase 2/3 trial at 42 sites included 72 adults living with multidrug-resistant HIV-1. Following a 2-week oral lenacapavir loading phase, participants received subcutaneous lenacapavir every 26 weeks with an OBR. HIV-1 RNA, CD4 cell counts, and adverse events were assessed over 104 weeks. One participant did not enter the extension phase. RESULTS: At Week 104, 44 of 71 participants (62%, 95% CI 50; 73) had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL via US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot algorithm. When missing data (including discontinuations) were excluded, 44 of 54 participants (82%) had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 104, mean CD4 cell count increased by 122 cells/µL (95% CI 80; 165), and the proportion of participants with CD4 cell count <200 cells/µL decreased from 64% (46 of 72) at Baseline to 29% (16 of 55). Fourteen participants had treatment-emergent lenacapavir resistance; seven resuppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) while maintaining lenacapavir use. There were no Grade 4 or serious treatment-related adverse events. One participant discontinued study drug due to an injection site reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with subcutaneous lenacapavir in combination with an OBR was well tolerated and resulted in a high rate of virological suppression over 104 weeks. Lenacapavir represents an important treatment option in people with multidrug-resistant HIV-1.

Therapeutic Perspectives in the Systemic Treatment of Kaposi's Sarcoma.

In patients with Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), the therapeutic goal is to achieve a durable remission in the size and number of skin and visceral lesions. Although most patients show tumor regression in response to standard systemic chemotherapy regimens, alternative systemic treatments are needed for patients who develop refractory KS. Anti-angiogenic therapies represent attractive therapeutic targets in this context, due to the central role of angiogenesis in KS pathogenesis. Pomalidomide, which exhibits such anti-angiogenic activity through inhibition of VEGF, currently constitutes the most promising agent of this class and has been recently approved by the FDA. In addition, immune checkpoint blockade also represents an interesting alternative therapeutic approach through the restoration of immunity against HHV-8, the causative agent of KS, and improvement of tumor control. Although small series of cases treated successfully with these drugs have been reported, there is no marketing approval for anti-immune checkpoint antibodies for KS to date. In the present review, we will discuss potential therapeutic options for patients with recurrent or refractory KS, including systemic chemotherapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-herpesvirus agents, and anti-angiogenic drugs. Well-conducted clinical trials in this population are urgently needed to correctly address the efficacy of targeted agents and immunomodulators, while monitoring for adverse effects.

Is the Risk of Myocardial Infarction in People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Associated With Atazanavir or Darunavir? A Nested Case-Control Study Within the French Hospital Database on HIV.

BACKGROUND: The Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti-HIV Drugs (DAD) study has reported an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases in people with human immunodeficiency virus who were exposed to darunavir (DRV) but not to atazanavir (ATV). Our objective was to evaluate associations between ATV or DRV exposures and the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in a nested case-control study within ANRS-CO4 French Hospital Database on HIV (FHDH). METHODS: Cases were individuals who had a first validated MI between 2006 and 2012. Up to 5 controls were selected at random with replacement among individuals with no history of MI, followed at the time of MI diagnosis, and matched for age and sex. Conditional logistic regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders (MI risk factors and HIV-related parameters) and for cumulative exposure to each antiretroviral drug (ARV). RESULTS: Overall, 408 MI cases and 1250 controls were included: 109 (27%) cases and 288 (23%) controls had been exposed to ATV, and 41 (10%) cases and 107 (9%) controls had been exposed to DRV. There was no significant association between exposure to ATV (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], .87-2.73) or DRV (adjusted OR = 0.51; 95% CI, .11-2.32) and the risk of MI. CONCLUSIONS: In FHDH, exposures to ATV or to DRV were not significantly associated with the risk of MI, adjusting for complete ARV history, contrary to the analysis in DAD.

Lack of correlation between the size of HIV proviral DNA reservoir and the level of immune activation in HIV-infected patients with a sustained undetectable HIV viral load for 10 years.

BACKGROUND: The persistence of HIV residual replication in patients with an undetectable plasma viral load (pVL) may limit immune recovery and facilitate inflammation-induced comorbidities. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate any correlation between immune restoration and intracellular [IC] HIV-DNA in cART-treated patients with a sustained undetectable pVL. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cross sectional study included 62 patients with a median duration of undetectable pVL of 10.3 years. IC HIV DNA in peripheral mononuclear blood cells (PBMCs) and T cell subsets were measured at the last visit. pVL, CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell counts were retrospectively collected from the onset of long-term inhibition by antiretroviral treatment. The patients were separated into two groups: 27 non-blippers (sustained pVL< threshold value during all the visits) and 35 blippers ( ≥ 1 episodes of pVL> threshold but < 1000 copies/ml). The median pVL in blippers was 115 copies/ml. RESULTS: The median IC HIV DNA rate was 34 copies/10(6) PBMCs (71% ≥ 20 copies/10(6) PBMCs) with no significant difference between the groups. The proportion of CD8(+)CD38(+) and CD8(+)DR(+) T cells was higher in blipper patients, but the difference was only significant for the CD8(+)DR(+) marker (p = 0.036). No correlation was found between markers of immune activation on CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and the IC HIV-DNA level. CONCLUSION: No relation was found between the size of HIV reservoirs and immune activation in patients with sustained undetectable pVL. Mechanisms of immune activation have to be better understood in order to define specific therapeutic interventions.