Endoscopic assessment of the J pouch in ulcerative colitis: A narrative review.

Patients with ulcerative colitis sometimes need a total colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis due to medically refractory disease or colitis-associated neoplasia. Up to 50% of patients with ulcerative colitis postoperatively develop pouchitis and the rate of chronic inflammatory pouch conditions requiring pouch excision or diverting ileostomy is reported to be 10%. In order to diagnose and monitor pouchitis, pouchoscopy is essential to assess endoscopic inflammatory findings of the J pouch and to survey neoplasia development, particularly in the remnant distal rectum. However, endoscopic protocols for the evaluation of the pouch may not be standardized worldwide and the reliability of existing disease activity indices for pouchitis has been questioned due to the lack of validation. Recently, reliable endoscopic scoring systems based on an observation of the anatomical location of the J pouch were reported and a significant association between the distribution pattern of endoscopic inflammation (i.e., endoscopic phenotype) and pouch outcomes was also uncovered. In this review, we discuss how to survey the J pouch using pouchoscopy, endoscopic indices for pouchitis disease activity, endoscopic phenotypes and classification, and the pathological mechanisms of pouchitis phenotype in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Interrupting inflammatory bowel disease therapy: why, who, when and how to consider medication holidays.

INTRODUCTION: Medication holidays in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) offer a potential means to balance disease management, costs, and quality of life. This concept is increasingly relevant in light of the chronic nature of IBD, the cumulative side effects associated with long-term pharmacotherapy, and the evolving treatment landscape that now includes a large armamentarium of effective induction, maintenance, and rescue therapies paired with disease monitoring tools that enable early intervention. AREAS COVERED: This review critically examines the rationale, implementation, and risks of medication holidays in IBD. Recent evidence is reviewed to help guide the risks of relapse involved with cessation of therapy. The selection criteria for patients, the necessary monitoring protocols, and strategies for managing potential relapses are outlined. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the potential benefits, medication holidays in IBD involve significant risks and require careful patient selection and active management. Current research highlights a need for improved predictive models and a deeper understanding of patient-specific outcomes and consequences. The future of medication holidays will depend heavily on advancements in noninvasive monitoring technologies and more personalized approaches to therapy. Ultimately, establishing clearer guidelines for safely conducting medication holidays will be crucial in integrating this strategy into routine clinical practice.

Noninvasive, microbiome-based diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease.

Despite recent progress in our understanding of the association between the gut microbiome and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the role of microbiome biomarkers in IBD diagnosis remains underexplored. Here we developed a microbiome-based diagnostic test for IBD. By utilization of metagenomic data from 5,979 fecal samples with and without IBD from different geographies and ethnicities, we identified microbiota alterations in IBD and selected ten and nine bacterial species for construction of diagnostic models for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, respectively. These diagnostic models achieved areas under the curve >0.90 for distinguishing IBD from controls in the discovery cohort, and maintained satisfactory performance in transethnic validation cohorts from eight populations. We further developed a multiplex droplet digital polymerase chain reaction test targeting selected IBD-associated bacterial species, and models based on this test showed numerically higher performance than fecal calprotectin in discriminating ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease from controls. Here we discovered universal IBD-associated bacteria and show the potential applicability of a multibacteria biomarker panel as a noninvasive tool for IBD diagnosis.

Deployment of an Artificial Intelligence Histology Tool to Aid Qualitative Assessment of Histopathology Using the Nancy Histopathology Index in Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by increased stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and urgency. To streamline the quantitative assessment of histopathology using the Nancy Index in UC patients, we developed a novel artificial intelligence (AI) tool based on deep learning and tested it in a proof-of-concept trial. In this study, we report the performance of a modified version of the AI tool. METHODS: Nine sites from 6 countries were included. Patients were aged ≥18 years and had UC. Slides were prepared with hematoxylin and eosin staining. A total of 791 images were divided into 2 groups: 630 for training the tool and 161 for testing vs expert histopathologist assessment. The refined AI histology tool utilized a 4-neural network structure to characterize images into a series of cell and tissue type combinations and locations, and then 1 classifier module assigned a Nancy Index score. RESULTS: In comparison with the proof-of-concept tool, each feature demonstrated an improvement in accuracy. Confusion matrix analysis demonstrated an 80% correlation between predicted and true labels for Nancy scores of 0 or 4; a 96% correlation for a true score of 0 being predicted as 0 or 1; and a 100% correlation for a true score of 2 being predicted as 2 or 3. The Nancy metric (which evaluated Nancy Index prediction) was 74.9% compared with 72.3% for the proof-of-concept model. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a modified AI histology tool in UC that correlates highly with histopathologists' assessments and suggests promising potential for its clinical application.

This multicenter study deployed an artificial intelligence tool based on machine learning to scan histopathology slides from ulcerative colitis biopsies and assign a Nancy Histopathology Index. The performance of the tool was similar to that of a panel of expert histopathologists.

Etrasimod Corticosteroid-Free Efficacy, Impact of Concomitant Corticosteroids on Efficacy and Safety, and Corticosteroid-Sparing Effect in UC: Analyses of the ELEVATE UC Clinical Programme.

BACKGROUND: Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). This post hoc analysis reports efficacy and safety by baseline corticosteroid use in the ELEVATE UC clinical programme. METHODS: Patients with UC received etrasimod 2 mg or placebo for up to 52 weeks. Corticosteroid use was permitted; tapering was recommended from Week 12. Efficacy was assessed at Weeks 12 and 52 in ELEVATE UC 52, and Week 12 in ELEVATE UC 12, in patients in the corticosteroid (CS) and no-CS subgroups. CS-free efficacy at Week 52 was assessed in patients with baseline CS use. RESULTS: In ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, 93/289 (32.2%) and 65/238 (27.3%) patients receiving etrasimod and 42/144 (29.2%) and 34/116 (29.3%) patients receiving placebo, respectively, had concomitant CS use at baseline. In the CS and no-CS subgroups, higher proportions of patients who received etrasimod vs placebo achieved clinical remission (p < 0.05) in ELEVATE UC 52 at Weeks 12 (CS: 32.3% vs 16.7%; no-CS: 26.0% vs 4.9%) and 52 (CS: 31.2% vs 9.5%; no-CS: 33.2% vs 6.9%). In the CS subgroup, significantly more patients receiving etrasimod than placebo achieved CS-free clinical remission at Week 52 (31.2% vs 7.1%). No increases in infection rates were observed with baseline CS use. Safety was comparable between subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Etrasimod demonstrated efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission in both subgroups. CSfree remission was achieved in the CS subgroup. Safety was consistent, with no increase in infections.

Evaluation of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving different sequences of first- and second-line biologic treatments: findings from ROTARY.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at risk of developing dysplasia and, subsequently, colorectal cancer (CRC) owing to chronic inflammation. Patients may also experience other severe disease complications, such as hospitalization and surgery. Several biologics are available for the treatment of patients with IBD and some patients require multiple lines of treatment owing to loss of response or tolerability to their prescribed biologic. Previous studies suggest that the choice of initial biologic treatment may impact the outcomes of later treatment lines. In this study, we assessed adverse clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who received different biologic treatment sequences. METHODS: ROTARY part B was a retrospective cohort study using the Optum® Clinical Database that evaluated the incidences of IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, dysplasia, CRC, and infections in patients with CD or UC who received two biologics successively. First-line biologics included adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab (CD only), and vedolizumab; second-line biologics included infliximab and adalimumab. RESULTS: In patients with CD, the treatment sequence of ustekinumab to infliximab was associated with the highest overall incidences of hospitalization (51.9%), surgery (40.7%), CRC (3.7%), and infection (37.0%). Vedolizumab followed by an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of experiencing an adverse medical event (hospitalization, surgery, or infection) than two successive anti-TNFα treatments (odds ratio, 1.526; 95% confidence interval, 1.004-2.320; P < 0.05). In patients with UC, the treatment sequence of vedolizumab to adalimumab resulted in the lowest overall incidence of adverse outcomes (20.3%, 6.3%, 0.0%, 6.3%, and 4.7% for hospitalization, surgery, CRC, dysplasia, and infection, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We describe differences in adverse clinical outcomes associated with sequencing of biologics in patients with CD or UC and demonstrate favorable results in patients who received vedolizumab as a first-line biologic. These results provide potential guidance to clinicians choosing sequences of biologic treatments in patients with IBD.

A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Symptoms and Modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index Among Endoscopic Phenotypes of the J Pouch in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Background: The modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI) based on clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings is used to diagnose pouchitis, but validated instruments to monitor pouchitis are still lacking. We recently established an endoscopic classification that described 7 endoscopic phenotypes with different outcomes. We assessed symptoms and compared mPDAIs among phenotypes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed pouchoscopies and classified them into 7 main phenotypes: normal (n = 25), afferent limb (AL) involvement (n = 4), inlet involvement (n = 14), diffuse (n = 7), focal inflammation of the pouch body (n = 25), cuffitis (n = 18), and pouch-related fistulas (n = 10) with a single phenotype were included. Complete-case analysis was conducted. Results: One hundred and three IBD patients were included. The median mPDAI was 0 (IQR 0-1.0) in patients with a normal pouch. Among inflammatory phenotypes, the highest median mPDAI was 4.0 (IQR 2.25-4.75) in cuffitis, followed by 3.0 (IQR 2.5-4.0) in diffuse inflammation, 2.5 (IQR 1.25-4.0) in inlet involvement, 2.5 (IQR 2.0-3.5) in AL involvement, 2.0 (IQR 1.0-3.0) in focal inflammation, and 1.0 (IQR 0.25-2.0) in the fistula phenotype. Perianal symptoms were frequently observed in pouch-related fistulas (8/10, 80%) and cuffitis (13/15, 87%). Among patients with cuffitis, all had incomplete emptying (6/6, 100%). Conclusions: We correlated the mPDAI with the endoscopic phenotypes and described the limited utility of symptoms in distinguishing between inflammatory phenotypes. Further studies are warranted to understand which symptoms should be monitored for each phenotype and whether mPDAI can be minimized after pouch normalization.

Phase 2 Trial of Anti-TL1A Monoclonal Antibody Tulisokibart for Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Tulisokibart is a tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A) monoclonal antibody in development for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. A genetic-based diagnostic test was designed to identify patients with an increased likelihood of response. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with glucocorticoid dependence or failure of conventional or advanced therapies for ulcerative colitis to receive intravenous tulisokibart (1000 mg on day 1 and 500 mg at weeks 2, 6, and 10) or placebo. Cohort 1 included patients regardless of status with respect to the test for likelihood of response. Cohort 2 included only patients with a positive test for likelihood of response. The primary analysis was performed in cohort 1; the primary end point was clinical remission at week 12. Patients with a positive test for likelihood of response from cohorts 1 and 2 were combined in prespecified analyses. RESULTS: In cohort 1, a total of 135 patients underwent randomization. A significantly higher percentage of patients who received tulisokibart had clinical remission than those who received placebo (26% vs. 1%; difference, 25 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14 to 37; P<0.001). In cohort 2, a total of 43 patients underwent randomization. A total of 75 patients with a positive test for likelihood of response underwent randomization across both cohorts. Among patients with a positive test for likelihood of response (cohorts 1 and 2 combined), clinical remission occurred in a higher percentage of patients who received tulisokibart than in those who received placebo (32% vs. 11%; difference, 21 percentage points; 95% CI, 2 to 38; P = 0.02). Among all the enrolled patients, the incidence of adverse events was similar in the tulisokibart and placebo groups; most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term trial, tulisokibart was more effective than placebo in inducing clinical remission in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. (Funded by Prometheus Biosciences, a subsidiary of Merck; ARTEMIS-UC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04996797.).

Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes With Etrasimod Treatment in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of Data From ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12.

BACKGROUND: Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Here, we evaluate the impact of etrasimod 2 mg QD on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with UC. METHODS: This post hoc analysis used data from the Phase 3 randomized controlled trials, ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12. HRQoL measures included: Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Ulcerative Colitis (WPAI:UC) completed at baseline, Week 12 (both trials), and Week 52 (ELEVATE UC 52 only). For IBDQ analyses, patients were stratified by prior exposure to biologics/Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) and baseline modified Mayo score (MMS; 4-6 or 7-9). RESULTS: Generally, significantly greater proportions of patients receiving etrasimod (N = 527) vs placebo (N = 260) achieved IBDQ remission (IBDQ total score ≥170) and IBDQ response (IBDQ total score increase from baseline ≥16), with significant improvement in all IBDQ domain scores at Week 12 and maintained through Week 52. Significant differences in IBDQ remission and IBDQ response rates between etrasimod and placebo were more consistent among biologic/JAKi-naive patients vs those who were biologic/JAKi-experienced and in those with baseline MMS 7-9 vs 4-6. Significant improvements were observed in several SF-36 domain and summary scores and WPAI:UC domain scores at Week 12 and Week 52. CONCLUSIONS: Etrasimod 2 mg QD demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful improvements across multiple HRQoL measures, including WPAI, vs placebo. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03945188; NCT03996369.

In this analysis of ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, we show that etrasimod 2 mg once daily vs placebo demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful improvements in patients' health-related quality of life measured by various instruments.

Mirikizumab Sustained Impact on Fatigue in Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease in the Phase 2 AMAG Study.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a burdensome, under-recognized, multidimensional symptom experienced by patients with Crohn's disease (CD). We evaluated the impact of mirikizumab on fatigue and the association between changes in select patient-reported outcomes and clinical measures with changes in fatigue from baseline to week 104 (W104). METHODS: Patients (N = 191) were randomized (2:1:1:2) to receive placebo (PBO), 200 mg, 600 mg, or 1000 mg of mirikizumab, administered intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks at W0, W4, and W8. Patients who achieved ≥1 point improvement in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) and received mirikizumab at W12 (rerandomized maintenance cohort) were rerandomized to continue induction IV treatment assignment (IV-C) or received 300 mg of mirikizumab subcutaneously (SC) until W52. Nonrandomized maintenance cohort had endoscopic nonimprovers (1000 mg) and PBO patients (PBO/1000 mg) who received 1000 mg of mirikizumab until W52. Subjects from the maintenance period with clinical benefit received 300 mg SC Q4W from W52 to W104. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) questionnaire was used to assess fatigue, and the FACIT-F associations were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: At W12, mirikizumab groups reported improved FACIT-F scores compared with PBO, and improvement was maintained through W52 and W104. Changes in FACIT-F at W52 and W104 had strong correlations with changes at the same time point in quality of life (QoL) scores but lacked correlations with changes in inflammatory biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Mirikizumab treatment significantly improved fatigue in patients with moderately to severely active CD, which was sustained to W104. The improvement in fatigue was correlated with improvement in clinical measures and was strongly correlated with improvement in QoL.

Fatigue is a common symptom of Crohn's disease that negatively impacts quality of life. Mirikizumab treatment improved FACIT-Fatigue scores compared with placebo up to week 104. Improvement in fatigue was also associated with improved emotional, social, and physical concepts.

Maternal gestational diabetes mellitus associates with altered gut microbiome composition and head circumference abnormalities in male offspring.

The impact of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on maternal or infant microbiome trajectory remains poorly understood. Utilizing large-scale longitudinal fecal samples from 264 mother-baby dyads, we present the gut microbiome trajectory of the mothers throughout pregnancy and infants during the first year of life. GDM mothers had a distinct microbiome diversity and composition during the gestation period. GDM leaves fingerprints on the infant's gut microbiome, which are confounded by delivery mode. Further, Clostridium species positively correlate with a larger head circumference at month 12 in male offspring but not females. The gut microbiome of GDM mothers with male fetuses displays depleted gut-brain modules, including acetate synthesis I and degradation and glutamate synthesis II. The gut microbiome of female infants of GDM mothers has higher histamine degradation and dopamine degradation. Together, our integrative analysis indicates that GDM affects maternal and infant gut composition, which is associated with sexually dimorphic infant head growth.

Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Peripheral Arthritis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) decreases quality of life and remains poorly understood. Given the prevalence of this condition and its negative impact, it is surprising that evidence-based disease definitions and diagnostic strategies are lacking. This systematic review summarizes available data to facilitate development and validation of diagnostics, patient-reported outcomes, and imaging indices specific to this condition. METHODS: A literature search was conducted. Consensus or classification criteria, case series, cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials related to diagnosis were included. RESULTS: A total of 44 studies reporting data on approximately 1500 patients with pSpA were eligible for analysis. Data quality across studies was only graded as fair to good. Due to large heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not possible. The majority of studies incorporated patient-reported outcomes and a physical examination. A total of 13 studies proposed or validated screening tools, consensus, classification, or consensus criteria. A total of 28 studies assessed the role of laboratory tests, none of which were considered sufficiently accurate for use in diagnosis. A total of 17 studies assessed the role of imaging, with the available literature insufficient to fully endorse any imaging modality as a robust diagnostic tool. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights existing inconsistency and lack of a clear diagnostic approach for IBD-associated pSpA. Given the absence of an evidence-based approach, a combination of existing criteria and physician assessment should be utilized. To address this issue comprehensively, our future efforts will be directed toward pursuit of a multidisciplinary approach aimed at standardizing evaluation and diagnosis of IBD-associated pSpA.

This systematic review highlights the lack of an evidence-based approach to the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease­associated peripheral spondyloarthritis and the need to standardize evaluation and diagnosis via multidisciplinary collaboration with development of patient-reported outcomes and imaging indices.

Endoscopic Normalization and Transition of J-Pouch Phenotypes Over Time in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who undergo proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis may develop pouchitis. We previously proposed a novel endoscopic classification of pouchitis describing 7 phenotypes with differing outcomes. This study assessed phenotype transitions over time. METHODS: We classified pouch findings into 7 main phenotypes: (1) normal, (2) afferent limb (AL) involvement, (3) inlet (IL) involvement, (4) diffuse, (5) focal inflammation of the pouch body, (6) cuffitis, and (7) pouch-related fistulas noted more than 6 months after ileostomy takedown. Among 2 endoscopic phenotypes, the phenotype that was first identified was defined as the primary phenotype, and the phenotype observed later was defined as the subsequent phenotype. RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed 1359 pouchoscopies from 426 patients (90% preoperative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis). The frequency of primary phenotype was 31% for AL involvement, 42% for IL involvement, 28% for diffuse inflammation, 72% for focal inflammation, 45% for cuffitis, 18% for pouch-related fistulas, and 28% for normal pouch. The most common subsequent phenotype was focal inflammation (64.8%), followed by IL involvement (38.6%), cuffitis (37.8%), AL involvement (25.6%), diffuse inflammation (23.8%), normal pouch (22.8%), and pouch-related fistulas (11.9%). Subsequent diffuse inflammation, pouch-related fistulas, and AL or IL stenoses significantly increased the pouch excision risk. Patients who achieved subsequent normal pouch were less likely to have pouch excision than those who did not (8.1% vs 15.7%; P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: Pouch phenotype and the risk of pouch loss can change over time. In patients with pouch inflammation, subsequent pouch normalization is feasible and associated with favorable outcome.

Endoscopic pouch phenotypes can change over time and subsequent development of diffuse inflammation, pouch-related fistulas, and afferent limb/inlet stenoses significantly worsen pouch outcomes. In patients with pouch inflammation, subsequent pouch normalization is feasible and associated with favorable outcomes.

The Effect of Etrasimod on Fecal Calprotectin and High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein: Results From the ELEVATE UC Clinical Program.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers offer potential alternatives to endoscopies in monitoring ulcerative colitis (UC) progression and therapeutic response. This post hoc analysis of the ELEVATE UC clinical program assessed potential predictive values of fecal calprotectin (fCAL) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as biomarkers and associated responses to etrasimod, an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active UC, in 2 phase 3 clinical trials. METHODS: In ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, patients were randomized 2:1 to 2 mg of etrasimod once daily or placebo for 52 or 12 weeks, respectively. Fecal calprotectin/hsCRP differences between responders and nonresponders for efficacy end points (clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic improvement-histologic remission [EIHR]) were assessed by Wilcoxon P-values. Sensitivity and specificity were presented as receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: In ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, 289 and 238 patients received etrasimod and 144 and 116 received placebo, respectively. Baseline fCAL/hsCRP concentrations were generally balanced. Both trials had lower week-12 median fCAL levels in week-12 responders vs nonresponders receiving etrasimod for clinical remission, clinical response, and EIHR (all P < .001), with similar trends for hsCRP levels (all P < .01). For etrasimod, AUCs for fCAL/hsCRP and EIHR were 0.85/0.74 (week 12; ELEVATE UC 52), 0.83/0.69 (week 52; ELEVATE UC 52), and 0.80/0.65 (week 12; ELEVATE UC 12). CONCLUSIONS: Fecal calprotectin/hsCRP levels decreased with etrasimod treatment; ROC analyses indicated a prognostic correlation between fCAL changes during induction and short-/long-term treatment response.

We show associations between fecal calprotectin (fCAL) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels with efficacy outcomes among patients receiving 2 mg of etrasimod once daily, and that fCAL levels may be an early indicator of the achievement of long-term efficacy end point achievement.

Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease-Associated Anorectal and Fistula Cancers: Systematic Review and Expert Consensus.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (PFCD)-associated anorectal and fistula cancers are rare but often devastating diagnoses. However, given the low incidence and consequent lack of data and clinical trials in the field, there is little to no guidance on screening and management of these cancers. To inform clinical practice, we developed consensus guidelines on PFCD-associated anorectal and fistula cancers by multidisciplinary experts from the international TOpClass consortium. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review by standard methodology, using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessment tool. We subsequently developed consensus statements using a Delphi consensus approach. RESULTS: Of 561 articles identified, 110 were eligible, and 76 articles were included. The overall quality of evidence was low. The TOpClass consortium reached consensus on 6 structured statements addressing screening, risk assessment, and management of PFCD-associated anorectal and fistula cancers. Patients with long-standing (>10 years) PFCD should be considered at small but increased risk of developing perianal cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma of the anus and anorectal carcinoma. Risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, notably human papilloma virus, should be considered. New, refractory, or progressive perianal symptoms should prompt evaluation for fistula cancer. There was no consensus on timing or frequency of screening in patients with asymptomatic perianal fistula. Multiple modalities may be required for diagnosis, including an examination under anesthesia with biopsy. Multidisciplinary team efforts were deemed central to the management of fistula cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory bowel disease clinicians should be aware of the risk of PFCD-associated anorectal and fistula cancers in all patients with PFCD. The TOpClass consortium consensus statements outlined herein offer guidance in managing this challenging scenario.

Development of Luminescent Biosensors for Calprotectin.

Calprotectin, a metal ion-binding protein complex, plays a crucial role in the innate immune system and has gained prominence as a biomarker for various intestinal and systemic inflammatory and infectious diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and tuberculosis (TB). Current clinical testing methods rely on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), limiting accessibility and convenience. In this study, we introduce the Fab-Enabled Split-luciferase Calprotectin Assay (FESCA), a novel quantitative method for calprotectin measurement. FESCA utilizes two new fragment antigen binding proteins (Fabs), CP16 and CP17, that bind to different epitopes of the calprotectin complex. These Fabs are fused with split NanoLuc luciferase fragments, enabling the reconstitution of active luciferase upon binding to calprotectin either in solution or in varied immobilized assay formats. FESCA's output luminescence can be measured with standard laboratory equipment as well as consumer-grade cell phone cameras. FESCA can detect physiologically relevant calprotectin levels across various sample types, including serum, plasma, and whole blood. Notably, FESCA can detect abnormally elevated native calprotectin from TB patients. In summary, FESCA presents a convenient, low-cost, and quantitative method for assessing calprotectin levels in various biological samples, with the potential to improve the diagnosis and monitoring of inflammatory diseases, especially in at-home or point-of-care settings.

Management of colorectal neoplasia in IBD patients: current practice and future perspectives.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are at increased risk of developing colorectal neoplasia (CRN). In this review, we aim to provide an up-to-date overview and future perspectives on CRN management in IBD. Advances in endoscopic surveillance and resection techniques have resulted in a shift towards endoscopic management of neoplastic lesions in place of surgery. Endoscopic treatment is recommended for all CRN if complete resection is feasible. Standard (cold snare) polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection should be performed depending on lesion complexity (size, delineation, morphology, surface architecture, submucosal fibrosis/invasion) to maximize the likelihood of complete resection. If complete resection is not feasible, surgical treatment options should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team. While (sub)total and proctocolectomy play an important role in management of endoscopically unresectable CRN, partial colectomy may be considered in a subgroup of patients in endoscopic remission with limited disease extent without other CRN risk factors. High synchronous and metachronous CRN rates warrant careful mucosal visualization with shortened intervals for at least 5 years after treatment of CRN.

Overview to Challenges in IBD 2024-2029.

The mission of the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation is to cure Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis and to improve the quality of lives of patients living with these diseases-in other words, to care and cure. To achieve these missions, there is a need to identify and prioritize research gaps and approaches to address these gaps, which is the aim of Challenges in IBD 2024. The Foundation convened close to 80 experts in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including researchers, clinicians, patients and caregivers, funders, industry representatives, and Foundation scientific staff and organized them into 5 workgroups, one for each of the 5 Challenges topics: Preclinical Human IBD Mechanisms, Environmental Triggers, Precision Medicine, Novel Technologies, and Pragmatic Clinical Research. The findings of these groups outline a research agenda that intends to change the research paradigm in IBD by introducing 2 concepts in the course of IBD that warrant specific focus: interception (during the preclinical phase) and restoration of normal physiology after remission is achieved. We hope these reviews will stimulate innovations in our understanding and management of IBD.

Utility of the Endoscopic Healing Index in Identifying Active Inflammation in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Real World Data from a Tertiary Center.

BACKGROUND: The Endoscopic Healing Index (EHI) analyzes biomarkers in a patient's peripheral blood to assess mucosal healing. We aimed to characterize the effectiveness of the EHI as a predictor of disease activity in a real world clinical setting. METHODS: This retrospective study looked at patients treated and followed up at the University of Chicago Medicine IBD center who had EHI tests done as part of routine clinical care. The results of the EHI were compared with radiological imaging or endoscopy performed within 3 months of the EHI in order to determine accuracy at diagnosing active inflammation. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with CD and with an available EHI were included in this study. Four (50%) patients with an EHI of < 20 (n = 8) had evidence of objective inflammation. A cutoff of ≤ 20 had a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 23.5% for predicting no evidence of any objective inflammation with an AUROC of 0.69. This score had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 50% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 72.3%. A cutoff EHI of 30 tended to classify patients as either having objective evidence of inflammation or not more often than FCAL (Correctly classifying inflammation: 89% vs 64%, respectively; p = 0.32). CONCLUSION: In this real world analysis, the EHI showed poor predictive value for the absence of active inflammation as assessed by imaging or endoscopy, has limited utility in confirming deep remission and should be used with another objective modality.

Impact of a health-system specialty pharmacy on time to upadacitinib initiation.

PURPOSE: Upadacitinib has been found to improve symptoms as early as day 1 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. As a result, early and timely initiation of upadacitinib is paramount to prevent hospital admission for an acute flare. The purpose of this study was to identify the time to initiation of upadacitinib, comparing external specialty pharmacies (ESPs) to a health-system specialty pharmacy (HSSP). METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study at the University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and included patients initiated on upadacitinib between March 1, 2022, and April 1, 2023. Data collected included demographics, prior authorization information, appeal information, insurance type, date the prescription was sent, and date the patient initiated therapy (patients were called to confirm the date). The primary outcome evaluated was the days from prescribing to patient initiation. Secondary outcomes included the total time to initiation and the time to notification from insurance regarding determination of a prior authorization or appeal. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up, initiated therapy through alternative means, or had previously initiated upadacitinib. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were initiated on upadacitinib during the study period (n = 18 through the UCM HSSP, n = 89 through an ESP). The median number of days to patient initiation was 3 days (interquartile range, 3-6 days) for the UCM specialty pharmacy vs 9 days (interquartile range, 4-13 days) for ESPs (P = 0.003). A total of 88.9% of patients filling through the UCM specialty pharmacy initiated upadacitinib within 7 days, compared to 47.2% of patients filling through an ESP (P = 0.001). Seven patients needed earlier initiation of therapy to prevent hospital admission. CONCLUSION: This study validates the ability of HSSPs to initiate therapies earlier than ESPs with a particular focus on upadacitinib.