Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros












Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Cancer ; 94(9): 1293-9, 2006 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16622465

RESUMO

The humanised anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody matuzumab (formerly EMD 72000) is active against pancreatic cancer in preclinical studies. This phase I study assessed the safety and potential benefit of combined treatment with matuzumab and standard-dose gemcitabine. Three groups of chemotherapy-naive advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients (n=17) received escalating doses of matuzumab (400 mg weekly, 800 mg biweekly, or 800 mg weekly) and gemcitabine (1000 mg m-2 weekly in weeks 1-3 of each 4-week cycle). Toxicity, antitumour activity, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, and pharmacodynamic (PD) markers in skin biopsies were evaluated. Severe treatment-related toxicities were limited to grade 3 neutropenia (n=3), leucopenia (n=1), and decreased white blood cell count (n=1). Common study drug-related adverse events were skin toxicities (grade 2=6, grade 1=7) and fever (grade 1=4). Matuzumab inhibited phosphorylated EGFR and affected receptor-dependent signalling and transduction; effects were seen even in the lowest-dose group. Pharmacokinetic data were consistent with results of matuzumab monotherapy. Partial response (PR) or stable disease occurred in eight of 12 evaluated patients (66.7%), with three PRs among six evaluated patients in the group receiving 800 mg weekly. Matuzumab in biologically effective doses with standard gemcitabine therapy appears well tolerated. The combination is feasible and may have enhanced activity.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Cetuximab , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptores ErbB/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos , Resultado do Tratamento , Gencitabina
2.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 129(42): 2227-32, 2004 Oct 15.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15483756

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) is increasingly used for the diagnosis of malignant and benign disease in the region of the upper GI tract. We prospectively investigated the clinical accuracy and safety of this method in unselected patients under routine conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 101 consecutive patients (median 61.5 years; 56 female) were enrolled in the study, in whom a total of 106 tissue biopsies were obtained by using EUS-FNA. Major indications for EUS-FNA were suspicious lesions located in the mediastinum, esophagus, stomach, pancreas, liver, biliary system, adrenals or retroperitoneum. A longitudinal echoendoscope (HITACHI FG-34UX) equipped with a standard 22G -aspiration needle was used. The aspirated specimens were analyzed further by using standard cytology and/or histology. Lymph-node biopsies were additionally subjected to flow-cytometry (FACS-light-chain restriction). Surgery was used for reference (where available). In the remaining cases the final diagnosis obtained by the clinical course and all available imaging and histologic informations (ultrasound, CT, MRT) was used for reference. RESULTS: EUS-FNA caused no serious complications. In 6/106 specimen (5.6 %) no sufficient cell material could be aspirated. In the remaining 100 specimens EUS-FNA reached an overall sensitivity of 78 % and a specificity of 100 %, while the accuracy was 89 % and the positive and negative predictive values were 100 % and 81 %, respectively. The greatest diagnostic accuracy was achieved in mediastinal and retroperitoneal lesions, while the accuracy of EUS-FNA in pancreatic lesions and perigastric lymph nodes was distinctly smaller (<80 %). Addition of FACS studies in patients with suspected malignant lymphoma increased the diagnostic accuracy in the small number of patients included in the study. CONCLUSION: EUS-FNA improves the tissue-based diagnosis of suspicious lesions in locations that are difficult to access (e. g., posterior mediastinum). EUS-FNA is safe, while its diagnostic accuracy is relatively high. Our preliminary data suggest that flow-cytometry may improve the fine-needle based diagnosis of non-Hodgkin s lymphoma, which should be further investigated.


Assuntos
Biópsia por Agulha/métodos , Doenças do Sistema Digestório/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças do Sistema Digestório/patologia , Endossonografia , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico por imagem , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Doenças do Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças do Mediastino/patologia , Glândulas Suprarrenais/diagnóstico por imagem , Glândulas Suprarrenais/patologia , Sistema Biliar/diagnóstico por imagem , Sistema Biliar/patologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Esôfago/diagnóstico por imagem , Esôfago/patologia , Feminino , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Fígado/diagnóstico por imagem , Fígado/patologia , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodos/patologia , Masculino , Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagem , Mediastino/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pâncreas/diagnóstico por imagem , Pâncreas/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Espaço Retroperitoneal/diagnóstico por imagem , Espaço Retroperitoneal/patologia , Segurança , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estômago/diagnóstico por imagem , Estômago/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...