Single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing from paired normal-adenocarcinoma lung samples provide both common and discordant biological insights.

Whether single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures the same biological information as single-nucleus RNA-sequencing (snRNA-seq) remains uncertain and likely to be context-dependent. Herein, a head-to-head comparison was performed in matched normal-adenocarcinoma human lung samples to assess biological insights derived from scRNA-seq versus snRNA-seq and better understand the cellular transition that occurs from normal to tumoral tissue. Here, the transcriptome of 160,621 cells/nuclei was obtained. In non-tumor lung, cell type proportions varied widely between scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq with a predominance of immune cells in the former (81.5%) and epithelial cells (69.9%) in the later. Similar results were observed in adenocarcinomas, in addition to an overall increase in cell type heterogeneity and a greater prevalence of copy number variants in cells of epithelial origin, which suggests malignant assignment. The cell type transition that occurs from normal lung tissue to adenocarcinoma was not always concordant whether cells or nuclei were examined. As expected, large differential expression of the whole-cell and nuclear transcriptome was observed, but cell-type specific changes of paired normal and tumor lung samples revealed a set of common genes in the cells and nuclei involved in cancer-related pathways. In addition, we showed that the ligand-receptor interactome landscape of lung adenocarcinoma was largely different whether cells or nuclei were evaluated. Immune cell depletion in fresh specimens partly mitigated the difference in cell type composition observed between cells and nuclei. However, the extra manipulations affected cell viability and amplified the transcriptional signatures associated with stress responses. In conclusion, research applications focussing on mapping the immune landscape of lung adenocarcinoma benefit from scRNA-seq in fresh samples, whereas snRNA-seq of frozen samples provide a low-cost alternative to profile more epithelial and cancer cells, and yield cell type proportions that more closely match tissue content.

Prognostic implication of methylation-based circulating tumor DNA detection prior to surgery in stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) positivity at diagnosis, which is associated with worse outcomes in multiple solid tumors including stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), may have utility to guide (neo)adjuvant therapy. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 260 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC (180 adenocarcinoma, 80 squamous cell carcinoma) were allocated (2:1) to high- and low-risk groups based on relapse versus disease-free status ≤5 years post-surgery. We evaluated the association of preoperative ctDNA detection by a plasma-only targeted methylation-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test with NSCLC relapse ≤5 years post-surgery in the overall population, followed by histology-specific subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Across clinical stage I patients, preoperative ctDNA detection did not associate with relapse within 5 years post-surgery. Sub-analyses confined to lung adenocarcinoma suggested a histology-specific association between ctDNA detection and outcome. In this group, ctDNA positivity tended to associate with relapse within 2 years, suggesting prognostic implications of MCED test positivity may be histology- and time-dependent in stage I NSCLC. Preoperative ctDNA detection was associated with upstaging of clinical stage I to pathological stage II-III NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest preoperative ctDNA detection in patients with resectable clinical stage I NSCLC using MCED, a pan-cancer screening test developed for use in an asymptomatic population, has no detectable prognostic value for relapse ≤5 years post-surgery. MCED detection may be associated with early adenocarcinoma relapse and increased pathological upstaging rates in stage I NSCLC. However, given the exploratory nature of these findings, independent validation is required.

A Test to Comprehensively Capture the Known Genetic Component of Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis.

The recent European Respiratory Society statement on familial pulmonary fibrosis supports the need for genetic testing in the care of patients and their relatives. However, no solution (i.e., a concrete test) was provided to implement genetic testing in daily practice. Herein, we tabulated and standardized the nomenclature of 128 genetic variants in 20 genes implicated in adult-onset pulmonary fibrosis. The objective was to develop a laboratory-developed test (LDT) on the basis of standard Sanger sequencing to capture all known familial pulmonary fibrosis-associated variants. Targeted DNA fragments were amplified using harmonized PCR conditions to perform the LDT in a single 96-well plate. The new genetic test was evaluated in 62 sporadic cases of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. As expected in this population, we observed a low yield of disease-causing mutations. More important, 100% of targeted variants by the LDT were successfully evaluated. Furthermore, four variants of uncertain significance with in silico-predicted deleterious scores were identified in three patients, suggesting novel pathogenic variants in genes known to cause idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Finally, the MUC5B promoter variant rs35705950 was strongly enriched in these patients with a minor allele frequency of 41.1% compared with 10.6% in a matched population-based cohort (n = 29,060), leading to an estimation that this variant may explain up to 35% of the population-attributable risk. This LDT provides a solution for rapid clinical translation. Technical laboratory details are provided so that specialized pulmonary centers can implement the LDT in house to expedite the clinical recommendations of expert panels.

Tumor Mutational Burden by Whole-Genome Sequencing in Resected NSCLC of Never Smokers.

BACKGROUND: Data are scarce about tumor mutational burden (TMB) as a biomarker in never smokers with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: TMB was assessed by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and compared with in silico reduced whole-exome sequencing (WES) and targeted commercial next-generation sequencing (NGS) gene panels in 92 paired tumor-normal samples from never smokers who underwent NSCLC resection with curative intent. Analyses were performed to test for association with survival after surgery and to identify the optimal prognostic TMB cutoff. RESULTS: Tumors of never smokers with NSCLC had low TMB scores (median 1.57 mutations/Mb; range, 0.13-17.94). A TMB cutoff of 1.70 mutations/Mb was associated with a 5-year overall survival of 58% in the high-TMB (42% of cases) compared with 86% in low-TMB patients (Wald P = 0.0029). TMB scores from WGS and WES were highly correlated (Spearman ρ = 0.93, P < 2.2e-16). TMB scores from NGS panels demonstrated high intraindividual fluctuations and identified high-TMB patients with 65% concordance in average compared with WGS. CONCLUSIONS: In resected NSCLC of never smokers, high TMB was associated with worse prognosis. WES provided a good estimate of TMB while targeted NGS panels seem to lack adequate depth and resolution in the setting of low mutation burden. IMPACT: TMB is a prognostic indicator of survival in resected NSCLC from individuals who never smoked. In this setting of low mutation counts, TMB can be accurately measured by WGS or WES, but not NGS panels.