RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adalimumab biosimilar MSB11022 (Idacio ®) has been approved for the same indications as its originator (Humira ®), based on findings from clinical trials in plaque psoriasis. Data on its efficacy and safety in inflammatory bowel disease, however, are scarce. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study of 44 patients with inflammatory bowel disease: 30 were treated with originator adalimumab, 5 were directly started on MSB11022, and 9 switched from originator to biosimilar adalimumab. To evaluate the effectiveness of the use of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease, both laboratory markers (fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein) and scales that measure the activity of inflammatory bowel disease using specific scales (Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) have been usEd.) for Crohn's disease and Mayo Score for Ulcerative Colitis. Efficacy was evaluated by recording the adverse effects that could occur with the administration of adalimumab (original or biosimilar). The success of the switch was determined by analyzing meaningful differences in effectiveness and safety criteria. Concomitant therapy and the need for dose intensification were also analyzed. Objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of biosimilar adalimumab in adalimumab-naïve patients and patients switched from originator adalimumab. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in clinical disease activity (P=.317) or biochemical parameters [fecal calprotectin (P=.445) and C-reactive protein P=.661)] after the switch from the originator adalimumab to MSB11022. There was not a significant reduction in the concomitant use of corticosteroids and thiopurines (P=.157). No emergency room visits or hospitalizations were observed during the study period and none of the patients experienced serious adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Between originator adalimumab and biosimilar-start cohorts, no differences were observed, between originator adalimumab and switch cohorts, no significant differences were found either, and with the pre- and post-switch to biosimilar comparison, 2 of the 9 patients experienced AEs after the switch. The biosimilar showed a favorable safety profile (one patient with a serious adverse effect (rash) with biosimilar discontinued treatment) and no significant changes to clinical or biochemical parameters were observed after the switch.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication among cancer patients, often leading to longer hospital stays, discontinuation of cancer treatment, and a poor prognosis. This study aims to provide insight into the incidence of severe AKI in this population and identify the risk factors associated with renal replacement therapy (RRT) and in-hospital mortality. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 3201 patients with cancer and severe AKI admitted to a Comprehensive Cancer Center between January 1995 and July 2023. Severe AKI was defined according to the KDIGO guidelines as grade ≥ 2 AKI with nephrological in-hospital follow-up. Data were analyzed in two timelines: Period A (1995-2010) and Period B (2011-2023). RESULTS: A total of 3201 patients (1% of all hospitalized cases) were included, with a mean age of 62.5 ± 17.2 years. Solid tumors represented 75% of all neoplasms, showing an increasing tendency, while hematological cancer decreased. Obstructive AKI declined, whereas the incidence of sepsis-associated, prerenal, and drug-induced AKI increased. Overall, 20% of patients required RRT, and 26.4% died during hospitalization. A predictive model for RRT (AUC 0.833 [95% CI 0.817-0.848]) identified sepsis and hematological cancer as risk factors and prerenal and obstructive AKI as protective factors. A similar model for overall in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.731 [95% CI 0.71-0.752]) revealed invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), sepsis, and RRT as risk factors and obstructive AKI as a protective factor. The model for hemato-oncological patients' mortality (AUC 0.832 [95% CI 0.803-0.861]) included IMV, sepsis, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and drug-induced AKI. Mortality risk point score models were derived from these analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This study addresses the demographic and clinical features of cancer patients with severe AKI. The development of predictive models for RRT and in-hospital mortality, along with risk point scores, may play a role in the management of this population.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is the treatment of choice for type 1 diabetes patients with end-stage renal disease. Donor characteristics are determinants of graft and patient survival. We aimed to study the impact of donor age on outcomes in SPKT. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 254 patients submitted to SPKT between 2000 and 2021. Patients were classified as "younger donor" (donor age <40 years) and "older donor" (donor age ≥40 years). RESULTS: Fifty-three patients received grafts from older donors. Pancreas graft survival rates at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years were 89%, 83%, 77%, and 73% in the younger donor group, respectively, and 77%, 73%, 67%, and 62% in the older donor group, respectively (P = .052). Older donors and previous major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were associated with pancreas graft failure at 15 years. Kidney transplant survival (1, 5, 10, and 15 years) was lower in the older donor cohort (94%, 92%, 69%, 60% vs 97%, 94%, 89%, and 84%, respectively; P = .004). Older donor, recipient age, and previous MACE predicted kidney graft failure at 15 years. Patient survival rates at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years were 98%, 95%, 91%, and 81% in the younger donor group, respectively, versus 92%, 90%, 84%, and 72% in the older donor group, respectively (P = .127). CONCLUSIONS: The kidney graft survival rate was lower in the older donor group, whereas pancreas graft survival and patient survival did not differ significantly. Multivariate analysis showed that a donor age of ≥40 years was an independent predictor of pancreas and kidney graft failure at 15 years in SPKT patients.
