Cancer Surveillance in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With a Pretransplant History of Malignancy: Multidisciplinary Collaborative Expert Opinion.

With improved medical treatments, the prognosis for many malignancies has improved, and more patients are presenting for transplant evaluation with a history of treated cancer. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with a prior malignancy are at higher risk of posttransplant recurrence or de novo malignancy, and they may require a cancer surveillance program that is individualized to their specific needs. There is a dearth of literature on optimal surveillance strategies specific to SOT recipients. A working group of transplant physicians and cancer-specific specialists met to provide expert opinion recommendations on optimal cancer surveillance after transplantation for patients with a history of malignancy. Surveillance strategies provided are mainly based on general population recurrence risk data, immunosuppression effects, and limited transplant-specific data and should be considered expert opinion based on current knowledge. Prospective studies of cancer-specific surveillance models in SOT recipients should be supported to inform posttransplant management of this high-risk population.

Commonly Drawn Immunologic and Inflammatory Markers as Risk Predictors for Anal Cancer in Veterans Living With HIV.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine if immune inflammatory markers (neutrophil lymphocyte ratio [NLR], platelet lymphocyte ratio [PLR], and prognostic nutritional index [PNI]) correlate with anal cancer risk in people living with HIV and to compare these markers with the CD4/CD8 ratio. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a regional retrospective cohort study of veterans living with HIV who were screened for or diagnosed with anal neoplasia or cancer from 2001 to 2019. The NLR, PLR, PNI, and CD4/CD8 ratio within 1 year of anal pathology results were computed. Patients with anal cancer were compared to patients without anal cancer. Regression modeling was used to estimate the odds of developing anal cancer. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-four patients were included (37 with anal cancer, 297 without anal cancer). In patients with anal cancer, NLR and PLR were higher (2.17 vs 1.69, p = .04; 140 vs 110, p = .02, respectively), while PNI and CD4/CD8 ratio were lower (44.65 vs 50.01, p < .001; 0.35 vs 0.80, p < .001, respectively). On multivariate logistic regression modeling, only PNI (odds ratio, 0.90; p = .001) and CD4/CD8 ratio (odds ratio, 0.05; p < .001) were associated with increased anal cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: Although NLR and PLR independently correlate with anal cancer risk, when controlling for other risk predictors, only PNI and CD4/CD8 ratio were statistically significant biomarkers for anal cancer. The CD4/CD8 ratio is the strongest immune inflammatory marker that predicts risk of anal cancer among veterans living with HIV.

Analysis of >15 000 Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Reveals Nonanal Genitourinary HPV-related Disease as Highest Risk Predictor for Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions/Anal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplantation is a risk predictor for virally-mediated anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and cancer (anal disease). Precancerous squamous intraepithelial lesions can be detected by screening, and treatment may prevent cancer progression. Screening recommendations are not well defined. We aim to define prevalence and describe risk predictors for anal disease in a large population of solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: Retrospective single-center cohort analysis included solid organ transplant recipients cared for between 2001 and 2022 (N = 15 362). The cohort of recipients who developed anal disease was compared with those who did not. Greedy propensity score matching was performed for organ-specific recipients, and time-to-event analysis for the development of anal disease was performed in those with genitourinary human papilloma virus (HPV) disease versus those without. RESULTS: Prevalence of anal disease was 0.6% (cancer 0.2%). The average years from transplant to the diagnosis of anal disease was 11.67. Anal disease was more common in women (68.5% versus 31.5%, P  < 0.001), patients who had other HPV-related genitourinary diseases (40.4% versus 0.6%, P  < 0.001), who were of younger age at transplant (39.62 versus 46.58, P  < 0.001), and had increased years from transplant (17.06 versus 12.57, P  < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the odds of anal disease increased by 4% each year posttransplant. History of genitourinary HPV disease (odds ratio 69.63) and female sex (odds ratio 1.96) were the most significant risk predictors for anal disease. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of anal cancer among solid organ transplant recipients was equal to the general population (0.2%). Due to the low prevalence of overall disease, these data suggest that anal screenings in transplant recipients should be targeted to higher-risk subsets: female recipients farther out from transplant and patients with genitourinary HPV-related diseases.

A Qualitative Study of Barriers to Anal Cancer Screenings in US Veterans Living with HIV.

People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at high risk for anal cancer. Anal cancer screenings are recommended annually for US veterans with HIV. Screenings can identify treatable precursor lesions and prevent cancer development. In a previous study, we found screening rate to be only 15%. Semistructured interviews were conducted with Veterans Affairs (VA) providers who treat veterans living with HIV. Participants described their experiences with anal cancer screenings. Researchers developed a codebook based on Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and coded data using thematic analysis to identify barriers to anal cancer screenings. Twenty-three interviews were conducted with VA providers representing 10 regions. Barriers identified corresponded with five targetable TDF domains: Knowledge, Skills, Environmental Context/Resources, Professional Roles/Identities, and Social Influence. Many providers lacked knowledge of screening protocols. Knowledgeable providers often lacked needed resources, including swabs, clinic space, reliable pathology, access to high-resolution anoscopy, or leadership support to implement a screening program. Providers mentioned competing priorities in the care of veterans with HIV infection and lack of skilled/trained personnel to perform the tests. It was often unclear which provider specialty should "own" screening responsibilities. Additional factors included patient discomfort with screening exams. Anal cancer screening protocols are recommended but not widely adopted in VA. There is a critical need to address barriers to anal cancer screenings in veterans. The TDF domains identified align with five intervention domains to target, including education, training, resource/environment, delineation of provider roles, and improved counseling efforts. Targeting these barriers may help improve the uptake of anal cancer screenings within VA.

Duration of Time CD4/CD8 Ratio is Below 0.5 is Associated with Progression to Anal Cancer in Patients with HIV and High-Grade Dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: A CD4/CD8 ratio < 0.5 is associated with increased risk of advanced anal disease (AAD) but it is unknown if duration below 0.5 matters. The purpose of this study was to determine if duration of a CD4/CD8 ratio < 0.5 is associated with increased risk of invasive anal cancer (IC) in people living with HIV and high-grade dysplasia (HSIL). METHODS: This single institution, retrospective study used the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Anal Dysplasia and Anal Cancer Database. Patients with IC versus HSIL alone were compared. Independent variables were mean and percentage of time the CD4/CD8 ratio was < 0.5. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to estimate the adjusted odds of anal cancer. RESULTS: We identified 107 patients with HIV infection and AAD (87 with HSIL, 20 with IC). A history of smoking was significantly associated with the development of IC (95% in patients with IC vs. 64% in patients with HSIL; p = 0.015). Mean time the CD4/CD8 ratio was < 0.5 was significantly longer in patients with IC compared with patients with HSIL (7.7 years vs. 3.8 years; p = 0.002). Similarly, the mean percentage of time the CD4/CD8 ratio was < 0.5 was higher in those with IC versus those with HSIL (80% vs. 55%; p = 0.009). On multivariate analysis, duration CD4/CD8 ratio was < 0.5 was associated with increased odds of developing IC (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.53; p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective, single-institution study of a cohort of people living with HIV and HSIL, increasing duration the CD4/CD8 ratio was < 0.5 was associated with increased odds of developing IC. Monitoring the number of years the CD4/CD8 ratio is < 0.5 could inform decision making in patients with HIV infection and HSIL.

Treating acute diverticulitis in pre- and post-solid-organ transplant patients: a single-institution cohort study.

AIM: Immunosuppressed patients are more likely to fail nonoperative management of acute diverticulitis and have more postoperative complications than the immunocompetent. Transplant recipients form a subcategory among the immunosuppressed with unique challenges. The aim of this work is to report 30-day postoperative complications after colectomy for acute diverticulitis and success rates of nonoperative management in pre- and post-transplant patients. METHOD: This is a retrospective cohort study at a single-institution tertiary referral centre. Patients with a history of acute diverticulitis were extracted from a database of 6152 recipients of solid-organ abdominal transplant between 2000 and 2015 and stratified by the index episode of diverticulitis: before or after solid-organ transplant surgery. Outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications and failure of nonoperative management. RESULTS: Acute diverticulitis occurred in 93 patients, 69 (74%) posttransplant. Postcolectomy complications were higher posttransplant than pretransplant (43% vs. 13%, p = 0.04). Posttransplant status was not an independent risk factor for complications (odds ratio 3.59, 95% CI 0.79-16.31) when adjusting for sex and surgical acuity. Immediate urgent colectomy (29% vs. 31%, p = 0.84) and failure of nonoperative management (7% vs. 9%, p = 0.82) were similar. Complications occurred equally in those requiring urgent colectomy after nonoperative management and those undergoing immediate urgent colectomy. CONCLUSION: Urgent colectomy rates are similar in solid-organ abdominal transplant recipients pre- and posttransplant. Posttransplant complication rates appear to be increased but transplant status as an independent factor is not significantly associated with an increased risk in this study cohort. These findings should be considered when counselling patients on the relative risks and benefits of surgical intervention for diverticulitis before versus after solid-organ transplantation.

Do immune inflammatory markers correlate with anal dysplasia and anal cancer risk in patients living with HIV?

PURPOSE: People living with HIV (PLWH) are at an elevated risk for developing anal cancer. As screening is invasive, markers predicting those at highest risk for anal cancer could guide individualized screening. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) are surrogate inflammatory/immune markers known to correlate with cancer outcomes. This study aims to assess whether these markers correlate with anal cancer risk in PLWH. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-institution cohort study of PLWH at a single academic medical center who were diagnosed with or screened for anal dysplasia between 2001 and 2019. Aforementioned markers collected within one year of diagnosis were recorded. Regression modeling was used to estimate odds of anal cancer. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was utilized to determine optimal cutoff for screening values. RESULTS: Five-hundred-fourteen patients were included. NLR and PNI were significantly associated with cancer risk on univariate (p = 0.03, p = 0.001) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.03, p = 0.01). NLR increased across all grades of dysplasia. PLR was not associated with cancer risk. A NLR of ≥ 1.64 can be utilized to capture 76% of cancer patients in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: NLR values in patients living with HIV correlate with risk of anal cancer and increasing grades of dysplasia. A cutoff NLR of ≥ 1.64 can be used to help capture those at risk. NLR is a promising marker of risk of anal cancer and progression of anal dysplasia in patients with HIV infection and could be used to risk-stratify screening and surveillance intervals.

Prevalence of High-Grade Anal Dysplasia and Anal Cancer in Veterans Living With HIV and CD4/CD8 Ratio as a Marker For Increased Risk: A Regional Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The Department of Veterans Affairs cares for the largest population of patients with HIV of any healthcare system in the United States. Screening for anal dysplasia/cancer is recommended for all veterans with HIV. Exams are invasive, burdensome, and resource intensive. We currently lack markers of disease to tailor screening. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence of advanced anal disease (high-grade dysplasia and anal cancer) and to determine whether CD4/CD8 ratio correlates with risk. DESIGN: This was a retrospective regional cohort study of veterans with HIV. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at eight medical centers between 2001 and 2019. PATIENTS: Patients with advanced disease were compared with patients with nonadvanced anal pathology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Logistic regression modeling was used to estimate adjusted odds of disease as a function of CD4/CD8. Lowest (nadir) CD4/CD8 and nearest CD4/CD8 ratio in each cohort were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 2267 veterans were included. Fifteen percent had anal pathology (112 with advanced disease (37 cancer and 75 high-grade), 222 with nonadvanced disease). Nadir and nearest ratio were lower in patients with advanced disease versus nonadvanced (0.24 vs 0.45 (p < 0.001) and 0.50 vs 0.88 (p < 0.001)). In adjusted models, a 1-unit increase in nadir or nearest ratio conferred decreased risk of advanced disease (OR = 0.19 (95% CI, 0.07-0.53); p < 0.001; OR = 0.22 (95% CI, 0.12-0.43); p < 0.001). Using a minimum sensitivity analysis, a cutoff nadir ratio of 0.42 or nearest ratio of 0.76 could be used to risk stratify. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective analysis with a low screening rate. CONCLUSIONS: In a regional cohort of veterans with HIV, 15% were formally assessed for anal dysplasia. Advanced anal disease was present in 33% of those screened, 5% of the HIV-positive population. A strong predictor of advanced disease in this cohort is the CD4/CD8 ratio, which is a promising marker to stratify screening practices. Risk stratification using CD4/CD8 has the potential to decrease burdensome invasive examinations for low-risk patients and to intensify examinations for those at high risk. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B528. PREVALENCIA DE DISPLASIA ANAL DE ALTO GRADO Y CNCER ANAL EN VETERANOS QUE VIVEN CON EL VIH Y LA RELACIN CD / CD COMO MARCADOR DE MAYOR RIESGO UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE REGIONAL RETROSPECTIVE: ANTECEDENTES:El Departamento de Asuntos de Veteranos atiende a la población más grande de pacientes con el virus de inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) de cualquier sistema de salud en los Estados Unidos. Se recomienda la detección de displasia / cáncer anal para todos los veteranos con VIH. Los exámenes son invasivos, onerosos y requieren muchos recursos. Actualmente carecemos de marcadores de enfermedad para adaptar la detección.OBJETIVO:Establecer la prevalencia de enfermedad anal avanzada (displasia de alto grado y cáncer anal) y determinar si la relación CD4 / CD8 se correlaciona con el riesgo.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte regional retrospectivo de veteranos con VIH.AJUSTE:Ocho centros médicos entre 2001-2019.PACIENTES:Se comparó a pacientes con enfermedad avanzada con pacientes con patología anal no avanzada.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se utilizó un modelo de regresión logística para estimar las probabilidades ajustadas de enfermedad en función de CD4 / CD8. Se evaluó la relación CD4 / CD8 más baja (nadir) y la relación CD4 / CD8 más cercana en cada cohorte.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 2267 veteranos. El 15% tenía patología anal (112 enfermedad avanzada (37 cáncer, 75 de alto grado), 222 enfermedad no avanzada). El nadir y el cociente más cercano fueron menores en los pacientes con enfermedad avanzada frente a los no avanzados (0,24 frente a 0,45 (p <0,001) y 0,50 frente a 0,88 (p <0,001)), respectivamente. En modelos ajustados, el aumento de una unidad en el nadir o el cociente más cercano confirió una disminución del riesgo de enfermedad avanzada (OR 0,19 (IC del 95%: 0,07, 0,53, p <0,001)) y (OR 0,22 (IC del 95%: 0,12, 0,43, p <0,001))), respectivamente. Utilizando un análisis de sensibilidad mínima, se podría utilizar un cociente del nadir de corte de 0,42 o el cociente más cercano de 0,76 para estratificar el riesgo.LIMITACIONES:Análisis retrospectivo con una tasa de detección baja.CONCLUSIONES:En una cohorte regional de veteranos con VIH, el 15% fueron evaluados formalmente por displasia anal. La enfermedad anal avanzada estuvo presente en el 33% de los examinados, el 5% de la población VIH +. Un fuerte predictor de enfermedad avanzada en esta cohorte es la relación CD4 / CD8, que es un marcador prometedor para estratificar las prácticas de detección. La estratificación del riesgo usando CD4 / CD8 tiene el potencial de disminuir los exámenes invasivos onerosos para los pacientes de bajo riesgo e intensificar los exámenes para los de alto riesgo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B528.