Clinical and Pathophysiologic Insights of Free triiodothyronine/Free thyroxine Ratio in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Data from the NETDiamond Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid dysfunction is common in patients with heart failure (HF). Impaired conversion of free T4 (FT4) into free T3 (FT3) is thought to occur in these patients, decreasing the availability of FT3 and contributing to HF progression. In HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), it is not known whether changes in conversion of thyroid hormones (THs) are associated with clinical status and outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of FT3/FT4 ratio and TH with clinical, analytical, and echocardiographic parameters, as well as their prognostic impact in individuals with stable HFpEF. METHODS: We evaluated 74 HFpEF participants of the NETDiamond cohort without known thyroid disease. We performed regression modeling to study the associations of TH and FT3/FT4 ratio with clinical, anthropometric, analytical, and echocardiographic parameters, and survival analysis to evaluate associations with the composite of diuretic intensification, urgent HF visit, HF hospitalization, or cardiovascular death over a median follow-up of 2.8 years. RESULTS: The mean age was 73.7 years and 62% were men. The mean FT3/FT4 ratio was 2.63 (standard deviation: 0.43). Subjects with lower FT3/FT4 ratio were more likely to be obese and have atrial fibrillation. Lower FT3/FT4 ratio was associated with higher body fat (ß = -5.60 kg per FT3/FT4 unit, p = 0.034), higher pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) (ß = -10.26 mm Hg per FT3/FT4 unit, p = 0.002), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (ß = 3.60% per FT3/FT4 unit, p = 0.008). Lower FT3/FT4 ratio was associated with higher risk for the composite HF outcome (HR = 2.50, 95% CI: 1.04-5.88, per 1-unit decrease in FT3/FT4, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFpEF, lower FT3/FT4 ratio was associated with higher body fat, higher PASP, and lower LVEF. Lower FT3/FT4 predicted a higher risk of diuretic intensification, urgent HF visits, HF hospitalization, or cardiovascular death. These findings suggest that decreased FT4 to FT3 conversion might be a mechanism associated with HFpEF progression.

The impact of heart failure therapy in patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent heart failure (HF) guidelines have re-classified HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 41% and 49% as HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). HFmrEF treatment is often considered a grey zone as no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted exclusively on these patients. AIMS: A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to compare treatment effect of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and beta-blockers (BB) in HFmrEF cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: RCTs sub-analyses evaluating the efficacy of pharmacological treatment in HFmrEF patients were searched. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their variance were extracted from each RCT for (i) composite of CV death or HF hospitalizations, (ii) CV death, and (iii) HF hospitalizations. A random-effects NMA was performed to compare and assess the treatment efficiency. Six RCTs with subgroup analysis according to participants' ejection fraction, a patient-level pooled meta-analysis of two RCTs, and an individual patient-level analysis of eleven BB RCTs were included, totalling 7966 patients. To our primary endpoint, SGLT2i vs. placebo was the only comparison with significant results, with a 19% risk reduction in the composite of CV death or HF hospitalizations [HR 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.98]. In HF hospitalizations, the impact of the pharmacological therapies was more notorious, and ARNi reduced in 40% the risk of HF hospitalizations (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.92), SGLT2i in 26% (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.93) and renin-angiotensin system inhibition (RASi) with ARB and ACEi in 28% (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.98). Although BBs were globally less beneficial, they were the only class that supported a reduced risk of CV death (HR vs. placebo: 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.95). We did not observe a statistically significant difference in any comparison between active treatments. There was a sound reduction with ARNi on the primary endpoint (HR vs. BB: 0.81, 95% CI 0.47-1.41; HR vs. MRA 0.94, 95% CI 0.53-1.66) and on HF hospitalizations (HR vs. RASi 0.83, 95% CI 0.62-1.11; HR vs. SGLT2i 0.80, 95% CI 0.50-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to SGLT2i, pharmacological treatment recommended for HF with reduced LVEF, namely, ARNi, MRA, and BB, can also be effective in HFmrEF. This NMA did not show significant superiority over any pharmacological class.

Clinical associations and prognostic implications of 6-minute walk test in rheumatoid arthritis.

The clinical associations and prognostic implications of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is yet to be explored. To identify the clinical features and prognostic implications associated with the 6MWT in patients with RA. Cohort study including 387 RA patients who underwent 6MWT. Regression models (linear and logistic) were built to identify independent predictors of shorter 6MWT distance. Cox proportional models were used to study the association of 6MWT distance with cardiovascular outcomes. Patients were subdivided according to 6MWT tertiles: 126 patients walked > 405 m, 129 walked 345-405 m, and 132 walked < 345 m. Older age (> 55 years), elevated waist circumference, NT-pro BNP > 125 pg/mL, anemia, C-reactive protein ≥ 3 mg/dL, and troponin T ≥ 14 pg/mL were independent predictors of walking shorter distances. Patients walking less than 345 m had higher risk of a subsequent cardiovascular hospitalization or cardiovascular death compared with patients walking 345 m or more (adjusted HR: 2.98, 95%CI: 1.37-6.51, p = 0.006). Older age, abdominal obesity, anemia, cardiac dysfunction, and inflammation were associated with walking shorter distances in patients with RA. Walking less than 345 m in the 6MWT was associated with a poor cardiovascular prognosis. The 6MWT is simple, reproducible, and inexpensive, easily performed in routine practice, and provides important information regarding the patients´ status and outcomes, enabling the monitorization of the therapeutic optimization of the various domains of the RA.

Multiple versus single arterial grafting in the elderly: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score studies.

INTRODUCTION: The benefit of adding a second arterial conduit is still controversial, mainly in specific subgroups. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score (PS) studies comparing survival and early results in elderly patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with multiple (MAG) versus single arterial grafting (SAG). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were used to find relevant literature (1960-April 2020). Survival at a ≥1-year follow-up and early outcomes were evaluated. Outcomes were collected from matched samples or PS adjusted analysis: hazard ratio (HR) along with their variance, frequencies or odds ratios. Random effect models were used to compute combined statistical measures and 95% confidence intervals (CI) through generic inverse variance method (time-to-event) or Mantel-Haenszel method (binary events). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Eleven PS cohorts and 1 RCT comprising >18,800 patients older than 70 (>6200 MAG and >12,500 SAG) were included in this meta-analysis. MAG was associated with lower long-term mortality (pooled HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.72-0.91, P<0.01, I2=64%) in the absence of higher risk of early mortality (pooled OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.25, P=0.27, I2=0%). In a meta-regression, MAG survival advantage was more pronounced in studies with a higher MAG usage rate (ß=-0.0052, P=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that advanced age should not limit MAG's use considering its benefits in long-term survival. Of note, an individualized patient selection for this approach is warranted.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies comparing off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly.

INTRODUCTION: Comparison of short and mid-term outcomes between off-pump CABG (OPCAB) and on-pump CABG (ONCAB) in patients older than 65 throughout a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was conducted using 3 databases. RCTs reporting mortality outcomes of OPCAB versus ONCAB among the elderly were included. Data on myocardial infarction, stroke, re-revascularization, renal failure and composite endpoints after CABG were also collected. Random effects models were used to compute statistical combined measures and 95% confidence intervals (CI). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Five RCTs encompassing 6221 patients were included (3105 OPCAB and 3116 ONCAB). There were no significant differences on mid-term mortality (pooled HR: 1.02, 95%CI: 0.89-1.17, P=0.80) and composite endpoint incidence (pooled HR: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.88-1.09, P=0.72) between OPCAB and ONCAB. At 30-day, there were no differences in mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and renal complications. The need for early re-revascularization was significantly higher in OPCAB (pooled OR: 3.22, 95%CI: 1.28-8.09, P=0.01), with a higher percentage of incomplete revascularization being reported for OPCAB in trials included in this pooled result (34% in OPCAB vs. 29% in ONCAB, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Data from RCTs in elderly patients showed that OPCAB and ONCAB provide similar mid-term results. OPCAB was associated with a higher risk of early re-revascularization. As CABG on the elderly is still insufficiently explored, further RCTs, specifically designed targeting this population, are needed to establish a better CABG strategy for these patients.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitors in insulin-treated diabetes: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. Sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLTi) improve outcomes without hypoglycaemic risk. AIMS: To study the effect of SGLTi in patients with T2D with and without background insulin treatment in outcome-driven RCTs. METHODS: Random effects models. RESULTS: A total of 54 374 patients with T2D were included in the analysis, of which 26 551 (48.8%) were treated with insulin. For 3P-MACE in patients without insulin treatment, the HR (95% CI) for the effect of SGLTi vs placebo was 0.93 (0.81-1.05), with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 49.2%, Q statistic P = 0.11). In insulin-treated patients, the HR (95% CI) was 0.88 (0.82-0.95), without evidence of heterogeneity (I2 =0.0%, Q statistic P =0.91). The pooled effect evidenced a 10% reduction of 3P-MACE with SGLTi (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96), without SGLTi-by-insulin interaction P = 0.53. For the composite outcome of HF hospitalisation or cardiovascular death in patients without insulin treatment, the HR (95% CI) for the effect of SGLTi vs placebo was 0.77 (0.61-0.92), with marked heterogeneity (I2 = 66.8%, Q statistic P = 0.02). In insulin-treated patients, the HR (95% CI) was 0.77 (0.68-0.86), without significant heterogeneity (I2 = 31.7%, Q statistic P = 0.25). The pooled effect evidenced a 23% reduction of HF hospitalisations or cardiovascular death with SGLTi (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.68-0.85), without SGLTi-by-insulin interaction P = 0.98. CONCLUSION: SGLTi reduces cardiovascular events regardless of insulin use. However, the treatment effect is more homogeneous among insulin-treated patients, supporting the use of SGLTi for the treatment of patients with T2D requiring insulin for glycaemic control.

Prevalence, risk factors and proteomic bioprofiles associated with heart failure in rheumatoid arthritis: The RA-HF study.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have high risk of heart failure (HF). AIMS: Identifying the risk factors and mechanistic pathways associated with HF in patients with RA. METHODS: Cohort study enrolling 355 RA patients. HF was defined according to the ESC criteria. 93 circulating protein-biomarkers (91CVDIIOlink®+troponin-T+c-reactive protein) were measured. Regression modeling (multivariate and multivariable) were built and network analyses were performed - based on the identified relevant protein biomarkers. RESULTS: 115 (32.4%) patients fulfilled the ESC criteria for HF, but only 24 (6.8%) had a prior HF diagnosis. Patients with HF were older (67 vs. 55yr), had a longer RA duration (10 vs. 14yr), had more frequently diabetes, hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia, atrial fibrillation, and ischemic arterial disease. Several protein-biomarkers remained independently associated with HF, the top (FDR1%) were adrenomedullin, placenta-growth-factor, TNF-receptor-11A, and angiotensin-converting-enzyme-2. The networks underlying the expression of these biomarkers pointed towards congestion, apoptosis, inflammation, immune system signaling and RAAS activation as central determinants of HF in RA. Similar HF-associated biomarker-pathways were externally found in patients without RA. Having RA plus HF increased the risk of cardiovascular events compared to RA patients without RF; adjusted-HR (95%CI)=2.37 (1.07-5.30), p=0.034 CONCLUSION: Age, cardiovascular risk factors, and RA duration increase the HF odds in patients with RA. Few RA patients had a correct prior HF diagnosis, but the presence of HF increased the patients` risk. RA patients with HF largely share the mechanistic pathways of HF patients without RA. Randomized HF trials should include patients with RA. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV ID: NCT03960515.

Early And Midterm Outcomes Following Aortic Valve Replacement With Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Valves In Patients Aged 50 To 70 Years.

OBJECTIVES: To compare 7-year survival and freedom from reoperation, as well as early clinical and hemodynamic outcomes, after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with mechanical or bioprosthetic valves in patients aged 50-70 years. METHODS: single-center retrospective cohort study including adults aged 50-70 years who underwent SAVR in 2012 with a mechanical or bioprosthetic valve. Median follow-up was 7 years. Univariable analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-Rank tests for survival and freedom from reoperation analyses. Multivariable time-to-event analyses were conducted using Cox Regression. RESULTS: Of a total of 193 patients, 76 (39.4%) received mechanical valves and 117 (60.6%) received bioprosthetic valves. A trend for better survival was found for mechanical prostheses when adjusting for EuroSCORE II (HR: 0.35; 95%CI: 0.12-1.02, p=0.054), but using a backward stepwise Cox regression prosthesis type was not retained by the model as an independent predictor of survival. Moreover, mechanical prostheses showed trends for higher freedom from reoperation (100% vs. 95.5%, Log-Rank, p=0.076), higher median EuroSCORE II (2.52% vs. 1.95%, p=0.06) and early mortality (7.9% vs. 2.6%, p=0.086). However, after adjusting for EuroSCORE II, there was no significant difference in early mortality (OR: 2.3, 95%CI: 0.5-10.5, p=0.272). Regarding hemodynamic performance at follow-up echocardiogram, there were no differences other than left ventricular mass regression, which was not as pronounced in the mechanical group (-12% vs. -21%, p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Mechanical and bioprosthetic aortic valves prostheses showed similar mid-term survival in the 50-70 age group. Further prospective and larger studies are needed to provide evidence-based recommendations on this topic.

Multiple versus single arterial grafting in coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score studies.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score (PS) studies comparing survival and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with multiple (MAG) versus single arterial grafting (SAG). METHODS: MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were used to find relevant literature (1960-2018). Survival at a follow-up ≥1 year, MACCEs and early outcomes were evaluated. Time-to-event outcomes were collected through hazard ratio (HR) along with their variance, and the other endpoints using frequencies from matched sample or adjusted odds ratios. Random effect models were used to compute combined statistical measures and 95% confidence intervals (CI) through generic inverse variance method (time-to-event) or Mantel-Haenszel method (binary events). RESULTS: Twenty-nine PS cohorts and 8 RCTs comprising 122,832 patients (52,178 MAG and 70,654 SAG) were included in this meta-analysis. MAG was associated with lower early mortality (OR: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.71-0.95, p = .007), long-term mortality (HR: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.73-0.78, p < .001) and MACCEs (HR: 0.85, 95%CI: 0.79-0.91, p < .001). Increased risk of sternal wound complications (SWC) was only observed when the bilateral internal mammary artery configuration was used for MAG (OR MAG BIMA: 1.96, 95%CI: 1.37-2.81, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Although the BIMA configuration increases the risk of SWC, MAG improves both early and long-term survival as well as MACCEs in CABG.

Early dual antiplatelet therapy versus aspirin monotherapy after coronary artery bypass surgery: survival and safety outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There is currently conflicting evidence regarding outcomes of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We aim to compare the survival and safety outcomes of DAPT versus aspirin (ASA) within a 24h window after CABG. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study on consecutive patients undergoing 1st isolated CABG surgery in 2010. Survival analysis (median follow-up 9 years) was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression using propensity score (PS) as a covariate along with DAPT. Bleeding was assessed through red blood cells' (RBC) transfusion, re-exploration of thorax and drainage. RESULTS: We included 351 patients (251 were DAPT). Kaplan-Meier curves showed similar cumulative survival between groups (9y: 75% DAPT vs. 67% ASA, Log-rank P=0.103), as well as the PS adjusted analysis (HR DAPT: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.57-1.51). We found no differences in early mortality (2 DAPT and 1 ASA). Total median cell-saver transfusion (300 mL vs. 250 mL) and the re-exploration of thorax due to bleeding (1.6% vs. 4%) showed no statistical significance either. On the other hand, postoperative total median chest tube drainage was higher in the ASA group (1220 mL DAPT vs. 1320 mL ASA, P=0.034). There was also a lower frequency of DAPT patients requiring RBC transfusions (≥3 units 4.8% vs. 13%, P=0.009, respectively). Redo-CABG was performed in 3 patients (2 DAPT vs. 1 ASA) during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ASA, DAPT showed a non-significant impact on long-term survival and demonstrated to be a safe option. Further studies are needed to provide recommendations on the therapeutical strategy following CABG.

Survival after bilateral internal mammary artery in coronary artery bypass grafting: Are women at risk?

BACKGROUND: Most observational studies support long-term survival benefit after bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) compared with single internal mammary artery (SIMA) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) but data on females is scarce. We compared survival and safety of BIMA versus SIMA CABG between males and females at our tertiary care center. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort including consecutive patients with at least 2 left-coronary system (LCS) vessel disease who underwent isolated CABG with at least 1 IMA conduit and a minimum of 2 conduits targeting the LCS in 2004-2013. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome, secondary outcomes were early mortality and reoperation due to sternal wound complications (SWC). Kaplan-Meier analysis after inverse probability weighting using propensity score (IPW) was used to compare BIMA and SIMA CABG amongst genders. Results were confirmed in subgroup analysis. RESULTS: BIMA CABG was performed in 39% out of 2424 eligible procedures and in 27% of 460 females. No differences were found in survival after BIMA and SIMA CABG (median and maximum follow-up of 5.5 and 12 years, respectively) but a statistical interaction was observed with gender (P < 0.001). Females who underwent BIMA CABG showed higher mortality (weighted HR in females subset: 3.16; 95% CI: 1.56-6.29, P = 0.001). BIMA CABG showed a higher incidence of reoperation due to SWC (IPW adjusted model OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.16-2.60) that was mostly ascribable to males (weighted OR in males: 3.10; 95% CI: 1.74-5.51, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Females may experience higher mortality after BIMA CABG which should be further explored.

Freedom Solo® versus Trifecta® bioprostheses: clinical and haemodynamic evaluation after propensity score matching.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare the stentless Freedom Solo® (FS) and the stented Trifecta® (TF) aortic bioprostheses with regard to haemodynamic profile, left ventricular mass regression and early and late postoperative outcomes and survival. METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (2009-16) with either the FS or TF at 1 centre was performed. Local databases and national records were queried. Prosthesis haemodynamics and left ventricular dimensions were obtained from postoperative echocardiograms. After propensity score matching (21 covariates), the Kaplan-Meier and competing risk analyses were performed for survival and the combined outcome of structural valve deterioration and endocarditis, respectively. Haemodynamics and mass regression were assessed by a mixed-effects model including propensity score as a covariate. RESULTS: From a total sample of 397 patients with the FS and 525 TF bioprostheses with a median follow-up time of 4.0 (2.2-6.0) and 2.4 (1.4-3.7) years, respectively, a matched sample of 329 pairs was obtained. Matched groups showed no differences in survival (hazard ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval = 0.69-1.56) or cumulative hazards of combined outcome (subdistribution hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval = 0.21-1.39). Although the TF showed an improved haemodynamic profile, no difference was found in mass regression. Patients with TF bioprostheses had higher rates of prolonged mechanical ventilation, whereas patients with the FS bioprosthesis showed higher rates of thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The TF showed an improved haemodynamic profile compared to the FS, but this did not translate into further reverse remodelling. Postoperative outcomes and survival rates were comparable for both bioprostheses. Long-term follow-up is needed for comparisons with classical bioprosthesis models.