Does remote ischemic preconditioning affect the systemic inflammatory response by modulating presepsin levels?

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) on the inflammatory response during CPB by means of serum presepsin levels at preoperative and postoperative 1st and 24th h. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, cross-sectional study we included 81 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Patients were randomized and RIPC was applied to 40 patients in the study group before anesthesia. The remaining 41 patients were determined as the control group. The relationships between RIPC and factors such as presepsin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and leukocyte levels were investigated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in postoperative leukocyte and CRP values (p = 0.52, p = 0.13, respectively). When the preoperative and postoperative first hour presepsin values of the patients were compared, no significant difference was found in the control group (p = 0.17), but a significant difference was found in the study group (p < 0.05). When the presepsin values were compared between the groups, a significant difference was found only in the postoperative first hour value (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It was observed that RIPC application caused to increase the presepsin levels in the postoperative first hour significantly in the study group (p < 0.05).

The effects of perioperative goal-directed therapy on acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery in the early period.

Background: This study aims to investigate the effects of goaldirected fluid therapy on the development of acute kidney injury in the perioperative period in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: Between November 2019 and May 2021, a total of 60 patients (46 males, 14 females; mean age: 62.5±9.6 years; range, 44 to 76 years) who were scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups as the study group (Group S, n=30) and control group (Group C, n=30). The patients in Group C were treated with standard therapy, while the patients in Group S were treated with goal-directed fluid therapy. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classification and renal biomarkers were used for the evaluation of acute kidney injury. Results: Acute kidney injury rates were similar in both groups (30%). Postoperative fluid requirement, intra-, and postoperative erythrocyte suspension requirements were significantly lower in Group S than Group C (p=0.002, p=0.02, and p=0.002, respectively). Cystatin-C was lower in Group S (p<0.002). The kidney injury molecule-1, glomerular filtration rate, and creatinine levels were similar in both groups. The length of hospital stay was longer in Group C than Group S (p<0.001). Conclusion: Although goal-directed fluid therapy does not change the incidence of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, it can significantly decrease Cystatin-C levels. Goal-directed fluid therapy can also decrease fluid and erythrocyte requirements with shorter length of hospital stay.