Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros













Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Stroke ; 53(8): 2607-2616, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35674046

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rescue treatment for delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after subarachnoid hemorrhage can include induced hypertension (iHTN) and, in refractory cases, endovascular approaches, of which selective, continuous intraarterial nimodipine (IAN) is one variant. The combination of iHTN and IAN can dramatically increase vasopressor demand. In case of unsustainable doses, iHTN is often prioritized over IAN. However, evidence in this regard is largely lacking. We investigated the effects of a classical (iHTN+IAN) and modified (IANonly) treatment protocol for refractory DCI in an observational study. METHODS: Rescue treatment for DCI was initiated with iHTN (target >180 mm Hg systolic) and escalated to IAN in refractory cases. Until July 2018, both iHTN and IAN were offered in cases refractory to iHTN alone. After protocol modification, iHTN target was preemptively lowered to >120 mm Hg when IAN was initiated (IANonly). Primary outcome was noradrenaline demand. Secondary outcomes included noradrenaline-associated complications, brain tissue oxygenation, DCI-related infarction and favorable 6-month outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 4-5). RESULTS: N=29 and n=20 patients were treated according to the classical and modified protocol, respectively. Protocol modification resulted in a significant reduction of noradrenaline demand (iHTN+IAN 0.70±0.54 µg/kg per minute and IANonly 0.26±0.20 µg/kg per minute, P<0.0001) and minor complications (15.0% versus 48.3%, unadjusted odds ratio, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.05-0.79]; P<0.05) with comparable rates of major complications (20.0% versus 20.7%, odds ratio, 0.96 [0.23-3.95]; P=0.95). Incidence of DCI-related infarction (45.0% versus 41.1%, odds ratio, 1.16 [0.37-3.66]; P=0.80) and favorable clinical outcome (55.6% versus 40.0%, odds ratio, 1.88 [0.55-6.39]; P=0.32) were similar. Brain tissue oxygenation was significantly higher with IANonly (26.6±12.8, 39.6±15.4 mm Hg; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Assuming the potential of iHTN to be exhausted in case of refractory hypoperfusion, additional IAN may serve as a last-resort measure to bridge hypoperfusion in the DCI phase. With close monitoring, preemptive lowering of pressure target after induction of IAN may be a safe alternative to alleviate total noradrenaline load and potentially reduce complication rate.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica , Hipertensão , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea , Vasoespasmo Intracraniano , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiologia , Infarto Cerebral/complicações , Infarto Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos Clínicos , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Nimodipina/uso terapêutico , Norepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/complicações , Vasoespasmo Intracraniano/etiologia
2.
Crit Care Med ; 50(2): 183-191, 2022 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35100191

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The recommendation of induced hypertension for delayed cerebral ischemia treatment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage has been challenged recently and ideal pressure targets are missing. A new concept advocates an individual cerebral perfusion pressure where cerebral autoregulation functions best to ensure optimal global perfusion. We characterized optimal cerebral perfusion pressure at time of delayed cerebral ischemia and tested the conformity of induced hypertension with this target value. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: University hospital neurocritical care unit. PATIENTS: Thirty-nine aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with invasive neuromonitoring (20 with delayed cerebral ischemia, 19 without delayed cerebral ischemia). INTERVENTIONS: Induced hypertension greater than 180 mm Hg systolic blood pressure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Changepoint analysis was used to calculate significant changes in cerebral perfusion pressure, optimal cerebral perfusion pressure, and the difference of cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure 48 hours before delayed cerebral ischemia diagnosis. Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure increased 30 hours before the onset of delayed cerebral ischemia from 82.8 ± 12.5 to 86.3 ± 11.4 mm Hg (p < 0.05). Three hours before delayed cerebral ischemia, a changepoint was also found in the difference of cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (decrease from -0.2 ± 11.2 to -7.7 ± 7.6 mm Hg; p < 0.05) with a corresponding increase in pressure reactivity index (0.09 ± 0.33 to 0.19 ± 0.37; p < 0.05). Cerebral perfusion pressure at time of delayed cerebral ischemia was lower than in patients without delayed cerebral ischemia in a comparable time frame (cerebral perfusion pressure delayed cerebral ischemia 81.4 ± 8.3 mm Hg, no delayed cerebral ischemia 90.4 ± 10.5 mm Hg; p < 0.05). Inducing hypertension resulted in a cerebral perfusion pressure above optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (+12.4 ± 8.3 mm Hg; p < 0.0001). Treatment response (improvement of delayed cerebral ischemia: induced hypertension+ [n = 15] or progression of delayed cerebral ischemia: induced hypertension- [n = 5]) did not correlate to either absolute values of cerebral perfusion pressure or optimal cerebral perfusion pressure, nor the resulting difference (cerebral perfusion pressure [p = 0.69]; optimal cerebral perfusion pressure [p = 0.97]; and the difference of cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure [p = 0.51]). CONCLUSIONS: At the time of delayed cerebral ischemia occurrence, there is a significant discrepancy between cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure with worsening of autoregulation, implying inadequate but identifiable individual perfusion. Standardized induction of hypertension resulted in cerebral perfusion pressures that exceeded individual optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in delayed cerebral ischemia patients. The potential benefit of individual blood pressure management guided by autoregulation-based optimal cerebral perfusion pressure should be explored in future intervention studies.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/etiologia , Circulação Cerebrovascular/fisiologia , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/complicações , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/fisiopatologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Neurosurg Rev ; 45(2): 1413-1420, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34604940

RESUMO

This study aims to investigate the characteristics of patients with mild aneurysmal and non-aneurysmal perimesencephalic and non-perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH, pmSAH, npmSAH) with emphasis on admission biomarkers, clinical course, and outcome. A prospective cohort of 115 patients with aSAH (Hunt and Hess 1-3) and of 35 patients without aneurysms (16 pmSAH and 19 npmSAH) admitted between January 2014 and January 2020 was included. Demographic data, blood samples on admission, complications (hydrocephalus, shunt dependency, delayed cerebral ischemia DCI, DCI-related infarction, and mortality), and outcome after 6 months were analyzed. Demographic data was comparable between all groups except for age (aSAH 55 [48-65] vs. npmSAH 60 [56-68] vs. pmSAH 52 [42-60], p = 0.032) and loss of consciousness (33% vs. 0% vs. 0%, p = 0.0004). Admission biomarkers showed poorer renal function and highest glucose levels for npmSAH patients. Complication rate in npmSAH was high and comparable to that of aSAH patients (hydrocephalus, shunt dependency, DCI, DCI-related infarction, mortality), but nearly absent in patients with pmSAH. Favorable outcome after 6 months was seen in 92.9% of pmSAH, 83.3% of npmSAH, and 62.7% of aSAH (p = 0.0264). In this prospective cohort of SAH patients, npmSAH was associated with a complicated clinical course, comparable to that of patients with aSAH. In contrast, such complications were nearly absent in pmSAH patients, suggesting fundamental differences in the pathophysiology of patients with different types of non-aneurysmal hemorrhage. Our findings underline the importance for a precise terminology according the hemorrhage etiology as a basis for more vigilant management of npmSAH patients. NCT02142166, 05/20/2014, retrospectively registered.


Assuntos
Aneurisma Intracraniano , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea , Idoso , Isquemia Encefálica/etiologia , Infarto Cerebral/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraniano/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/etiologia
4.
Front Neurol ; 12: 690183, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34194387

RESUMO

Objective: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a common complication after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and can lead to infarction and poor clinical outcome. The underlying mechanisms are still incompletely understood, but animal models indicate that vasoactive metabolites and inflammatory cytokines produced within the subarachnoid space may progressively impair and partially invert neurovascular coupling (NVC) in the brain. Because cerebral and retinal microvasculature are governed by comparable regulatory mechanisms and may be connected by perivascular pathways, retinal vascular changes are increasingly recognized as a potential surrogate for altered NVC in the brain. Here, we used non-invasive retinal vessel analysis (RVA) to assess microvascular function in aSAH patients at different times after the ictus. Methods: Static and dynamic RVA were performed using a Retinal Vessel Analyzer (IMEDOS Systems GmbH, Jena) in 70 aSAH patients during the early (d0-4), critical (d5-15), late (d16-23) phase, and at follow-up (f/u > 6 weeks) after the ictus. For comparison, an age-matched cohort of 42 healthy subjects was also included in the study. Vessel diameters were quantified in terms of the central retinal arterial and venous equivalent (CRAE, CRVE) and the retinal arterio-venous-ratio (AVR). Vessel responses to flicker light excitation (FLE) were quantified by recording the maximum arterial and venous dilation (MAD, MVD), the time to 30% and 100% of maximum dilation (tMAD30, tMVD30; tMAD, tMVD, resp.), and the arterial and venous area under the curve (AUCart, AUCven) during the FLE. For subgroup analyses, patients were stratified according to the development of DCI and clinical outcomes after 12 months. Results: Vessel diameter (CRAE, CRVE) was significantly smaller in aSAH patients and showed little change throughout the whole observation period (p < 0.0001 vs. control for all time periods examined). In addition, aSAH patients exhibited impaired arterial but not venous responses to FLE, as reflected in a significantly lower MAD [2.2 (1.0-3.2)% vs. 3.6 (2.6-5.6)% in control subjects, p = 0.0016] and AUCart [21.5 (9.4-35.8)%*s vs. 51.4 (32.5-69.7)%*s in control subjects, p = 0.0001] on d0-4. However, gradual recovery was observed during the first 3 weeks, with close to normal levels at follow-up, when MAD and AUCart amounted to 3.0 [2.0-5.0]% (p = 0.141 vs. control, p = 0.0321 vs. d5-15) and 44.5 [23.2-61.1]%*s (p = 0.138 vs. control, p < 0.01 vs. d0-4 & d5-15). Finally, patients with clinical deterioration (DCI) showed opposite changes in the kinetics of arterial responses during early and late phase, as reflected in a significantly lower tMAD30 on d0-4 [4.0 (3.0-6.8) s vs. 7.0 (5.0-8.0) s in patients without DCI, p = 0.022) and a significantly higher tMAD on d16-23 (24.0 (21.0-29.3) s vs. 18.0 (14.0-21.0) s in patients without DCI, p = 0.017]. Conclusion: Our findings confirm and extend previous observations that aSAH results in sustained impairments of NVC in the retina. DCI may be associated with characteristic changes in the kinetics of retinal arterial responses. However, further studies will be required to determine their clinical implications and to assess if they can be used to identify patients at risk of developing DCI. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04094155.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA