What Do Breast Cancer Previvors Tell Us About Their Stories? To Know or Not to Know?

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the (1) experiences of breast cancer previvor women during genetic testing; (2) perceptions of the impact of genetic testing on their personal, social, family, and professional lives; and (3) views on breast cancer prevention and follow-up processes. This study focused on the risk of breast cancer in persons with BRCA mutations. METHODS: Data were collected through individual in-depth semistructured interviews. The data were analyzed using the MAXQDA program based on the method suggested by Graneheim and Lundman. RESULTS: This study was conducted in Istanbul, Turkey, and included 17 participants. Five themes emerged from the data analysis-Acquaintance with BRCA, Living with BRCA, Managing the Legacy, Maternalism, and We Are Here, including a total of 12 categories. CONCLUSION: The previvors had negative experiences during genetic testing, mainly owing to a lack of information, stigma, and women's roles in society. A structured and individualized process for genetic counseling was identified as the main requirement. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: National and international policies on breast cancer previvors should be developed to prevent breast cancer and reduce mortality. Adopting a multidisciplinary approach during genetic counseling will favorably contribute to previvors' medical and psychosocial well-being. Follow-up programs before and after genetic testing should be created. Society's cultural and genetic literacy levels should be evaluated, and activities should be planned to raise social awareness.

Local steroid injection in severe idiopathic granulomatous mastitis as a new first-line treatment modality with promising therapeutic efficacy.

Background: Intralesional steroid injection has recently evolved as a novel treatment modality for localized idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (= IGM). We aimed to explore the therapeutic efficacy of local steroid injections (LSI) in patients with severe IGM. Methods: Fifty-one patients diagnosed with severe IGM were included in the study and treated with either local steroid injection (LSI) alone (n = 25) or combined LSI with systemic oral steroid treatment (OST) (n = 26). The local steroid injection protocol included an intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection into the palpable granulomas every 4-week, and topical administration of steroid-containing pomades twice a day on the affected surface of the breast. Patients with a combined LSI and OST received low-dose oral methylprednisolone (<16 mg). Results: Patients with LSI alone required more LSI applications than those in the combined LSI with OST group (LSI: 5 ± 2.9; vs. LSI/OST: 3.5 ± 2.5; p = 0.080) to obtain an effective optimum therapeutic response. At a median of 12 months (range, 4-42), no difference was found in complete response rates between patients in the LSI group and the combined LSI group with OST (52 vs. 53.9%, p = 0.999). However, steroid-related systemic side effects were lower in the LSI alone group (p < 0.008). Conclusion: Local steroid injection could be considered as the first-line treatment in patients with severe IGM until a therapeutic response has been obtained either as the sole treatment modality or combined with oral steroids. Compared with systemic oral steroid therapy, local steroid administration can be considered a new treatment modality with fewer side effects.

Adherence to adjuvant tamoxifen and associated factors in breast cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant endocrine therapy reduces the recurrence and mortality of early hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in both pre- and postmenopausal women. The aim of this study was to investigate adjuvant tamoxifen adherence and associated factors in breast cancer survivors. METHODS: This descriptive, prospective study was conducted in 2019-2020 with the participation of 531 women who survived breast cancer and were under follow-up at the Senology Institute of a hospital in Istanbul. Inclusion criteria were having completed treatment for early hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, being prescribed tamoxifen, and being 18 years or older. Data were collected using a patient information form and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8). RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 44.9 ± 6.5 years, and the mean duration of tamoxifen use was 834.4 ± 685.7 days. The women's mean MMAS-8 score was 6.86 ± 1.39. Medication adherence was significantly positively correlated with current age (p = 0.006) and age at diagnosis (p = 0.002). There was a statistically significant difference between tamoxifen adherence according to participants' employment status (p = 0.028), chronic disease status (p = 0.018), loss of libido (p = 0.012), treatment-related changes in mood changes (p = 0.004), and having negative effects affecting daily life (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Overall, breast cancer survivors in this study reported moderate adherence to tamoxifen. The women's individual characteristics and the adverse effects of treatment influenced medication adherence. Healthcare professionals can help increase adherence to this treatment, which reduces the risk of mortality, by explaining the importance of the medication, identifying and eliminating barriers to adherence, and informing women about evidence-based interventions to increase medication compliance.