Inner Retinal Microvasculature With Refraction in Juvenile Rhesus Monkeys.

Purpose: To characterize inner retinal microvasculature of rhesus monkeys with a range of refractive errors using optical coherence tomography angiography. Method: Refractive error was induced in right eyes of 18 rhesus monkeys. At 327 to 347 days of age, axial length and spherical equivalent refraction (SER) were measured, and optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography scans (Spectralis, Heidelberg) were collected. Magnification-corrected metrics included foveal avascular zone area and perfusion density, fractal dimension, and lacunarity of the superficial vascular complex (SVC) and deep vascular complex (DVC) in the central 1-mm diameter and 1.0- to 1.5-mm, 1.5- to 2.0-mm, and 2.0- to 2.5-mm annuli. Pearson correlations were used to explore relationships. Results: The mean SER and axial length were 0.78 ± 4.02 D (-7.12 to +7.13 D) and 17.96 ± 1.08 mm (16.41 to 19.93 mm), respectively. The foveal avascular zone area and SVC perfusion density were correlated with retinal thickness for the central 1 mm (P < 0.05). SVC perfusion density of 2.0- to 2.5-mm annulus decreased with increasing axial length (P < 0.001). SVC and DVC fractal dimensions of 2.0- to 2.5-mm were correlated with axial length and SER, and DVC lacunarity of 1.5- to 2.0-mm annulus was correlated with axial length (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Several inner retinal microvasculature parameters were associated with increasing axial length and SER in juvenile rhesus monkeys. These findings suggest that changes in retinal microvasculature could be indicators of refractive error development. Translational Relevance: In juvenile rhesus monkeys, increasing myopic refraction and axial length are associated with alterations in the inner retinal microvasculature, which may have implications in myopia-related changes in humans.

Optic Nerve Head Morphology and Macula Ganglion Cell Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness in Axially Anisometropic Rhesus Monkeys.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of axial elongation on optic nerve head morphology and macula inner retinal thickness in young rhesus monkeys. Methods: Both eyes of 26 anisometropic, 1-year-old rhesus monkeys were imaged using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Before imaging, the animals were sedated, their eyes were dilated, and axial length was measured using an optical biometer. OCT imaging included a 20 degrees, 24-line radial scan centered on the optic nerve head (ONH) and two 20 degrees × 20 degrees raster scans, one centered on the ONH and the other on the macula. Radial scans were analyzed using programs written in MATLAB to quantify the Bruch's membrane opening (BMO) area and position, minimum rim width (MRW), anterior lamina cribrosa surface (ALCS) position, size of any scleral crescent, circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and choroid thickness (pCh). Macula total retinal thickness (mTRT) and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thicknesses were quantified from macula scans. Linear least square regression was determined for OCT measures and axial length of the right eye, and for inter-eye differences. Results: Animals were 341 ± 18 days old at the time of imaging. BMO area (R2 = 0.38), ALCS position (R2 = 0.45), scleral crescent area (R2 = 0.35), pCh thickness (R2 = 0.21), mTRT (R2 = 0.24), and GCIPL thickness (R2 = 0.16) were correlated with the axial length (all P < 0.05). For each of these parameters, the right-eye regression slope did not differ from the slope of the interocular difference (P > 0.57). Conclusions: There are posterior segment morphological differences in anisometropic rhesus monkeys related to axial length. Whether these differences increase the risk of pathology remains to be investigated.

The Parameters Governing the Anti-Myopia Efficacy of Chromatically Simulated Myopic Defocus in Tree Shrews.

Purpose: We previously showed that exposing tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri, small diurnal mammals closely related to primates) to chromatically simulated myopic defocus (CSMD) counteracted small-cage myopia and instead induced hyperopia (approximately +4 diopters [D]). Here, we explored the parameters of this effect. Methods: Tree shrews were exposed to the following interventions for 11 days: (1) rearing in closed (n = 7) or open (n = 6) small cages; (2) exposed to a video display of Maltese cross images with CSMD combined with overhead lighting (n = 4); (3) exposed to a video display of Maltese cross images with zero blue contrast ("flat blue," n = 8); and (4) exposed to a video display of black and white grayscale tree images with different spatial filtering (blue pixels lowpass <1 and <2 cycles per degree [CPD]) for the CSMD. Results: (1) Tree shrews kept in closed cages, but not open cages, developed myopia. (2) Overhead illumination reduced the hyperopia induced by CSMD. (3) Zero-blue contrast produced hyperopia but slightly less than the CSMD. (4) Both of the CSMD tree images counteracted small cage myopia, but the one low pass filtering blue <1 CPD was more effective at inducing hyperopia. Conclusions: Any pattern with reduced blue contrast at and below approximately 1 CPD counteracts myopia/promotes hyperopia, but maximal effectiveness may require that the video display be the brightest object in the environment. Translational Relevance: Chromatically simulated myopic blur might be a powerful anti-myopia therapy in children, but the parameter selection could be critical. Issues for translation to humans are discussed.

The effects of intensity, spectral purity and duty cycle on red light-induced hyperopia in tree shrews.

INTRODUCTION: There have recently been several clinical studies suggesting that brief periods of exposure to red light (repeated low-level red light, 'RLRL') may produce a dramatic anti-myopia effect, calling for further investigations into its therapeutic parameters. Unfortunately, many experimental species used in refractive studies develop myopia in response to this wavelength. Tree shrews are the only animal model other than rhesus monkeys that consistently exhibit hyperopic responses to ambient red light. Here, tree shrews were used to study the influence of the spectral purity, duty cycle and intensity of red light on its anti-myopic effect. METHODS: Juvenile tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri) were raised from 24 to 35 days after eye opening under ambient lighting that was: standard white colony fluorescent light; pure narrow band red light of either 600, 50-100 or 5 lux; red light that was diluted with 10% white light (by lux) or 50% white and 2 s of pure red light that alternated with 2 s of pure white light (50% duty cycle). Refractive measures were taken with a NIDEK ARK-700 autorefractor and axial dimensions with a LenStar LS-900 Axial Biometer. RESULTS: The pro-hyperopia effect of ambient red light was greatly reduced by even small amounts of concurrent white light 'contamination', but remained robust if 2-s periods of pure white light alternated with 2 s of red. Finally, the hyperopic effect of red light was maintained at reduced luminance levels in the 50-100 lux range and only failed at 5 lux. CONCLUSIONS: These results have implications for understanding the mechanisms by which ambient red light affects refractive development, and possibly also for clinical therapies using RLRL. Nevertheless, it remains to be determined if the mechanism of the current clinical RLRL therapy is the same as that operating on tree shrews in ambient red light.

The effects of ambient narrowband long-wavelength light on lens-induced myopia and form-deprivation myopia in tree shrews.

Here we examine the effects of ambient red light on lens-induced myopia and diffuser-induced myopia in tree shrews, small diurnal mammals closely related to primates. Starting at 24 days of visual experience (DVE), seventeen tree shrews were reared in red light (624 ± 10 or 634 ± 10 nm, 527-749 human lux) for 12-14 days wearing either a -5D lens (RL-5D, n = 5) or a diffuser (RLFD, n = 5) monocularly, or without visual restriction (RL-Control, n = 7). Refractive errors and ocular dimensions were compared to those obtained from tree shrews raised in broad-spectrum white light (WL-5D, n = 5; WLFD, n = 10; WL Control, n = 7). The RL-5D tree shrews developed less myopia in their lens-treated eyes than WL-5D tree shrews at the end of the experiment (-1.1 ± 0.9D vs. -3.8 ± 0.3D, p = 0.007). The diffuser-treated eyes of the RLFD tree shrews were near-emmetropic (-0.3 ± 0.6D, vs. -5.4 ± 0.7D in the WLFD group). Red light induced hyperopia in control animals (RL-vs. WL-Control, +3.0 ± 0.7 vs. +1.0 ± 0.2D, p = 0.02), the no-lens eyes of the RL-5D animals, and the no-diffuser eyes of the RLFD animals (+2.5 ± 0.5D and +2.3 ± 0.3D, respectively). The refractive alterations were consistent with the alterations in vitreous chamber depth. The lens-induced myopia developed in red light suggests that a non-chromatic cue could signal defocus to a less accurate extent, although it could also be a result of "form-deprivation" caused by defocus blur. As with previous studies in rhesus monkeys, the ability of red light to promote hyperopia appears to correlate with its ability to retard lens-induced myopia and form-deprivation myopia, the latter of which might be related to non-visual ocular mechanisms.

Long-term blue light rearing does not affect in vivo retinal function in young rhesus monkeys.

PURPOSE: Exposure to blue light is thought to be harmful to the retina. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of long-term exposure to narrowband blue light on retinal function in rhesus monkeys. METHODS: Young rhesus monkeys were reared under short-wavelength "blue" light (n = 7; 465 nm, 183 ± 28 lx) on a 12-h light/dark cycle starting at 26 ± 2 days of age. Age-matched control monkeys were reared under broadband "white" light (n = 8; 504 ± 168 lx). Light- and dark-adapted full-field flash electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded at 330 ± 9 days of age. Photopic stimuli were brief red flashes (0.044-5.68 cd.s/m2) on a rod-saturating blue background and the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) standard 3.0 white flash on a 30 cd/m2 white background. Monkeys were dark adapted for 20 min and scotopic stimuli were ISCEV standard white flashes of 0.01, 3.0, and 10 cd.s/m2. A-wave, b-wave, and photopic negative response (PhNR) amplitudes were measured. Light-adapted ERGs in young monkeys were compared to ERGs in adult monkeys reared in white light (n = 10; 4.91 ± 0.88 years of age). RESULTS: For red flashes on a blue background, there were no significant differences in a-wave (P = 0.46), b-wave (P = 0.75), and PhNR amplitudes (P = 0.94) between white light and blue light reared monkeys for all stimulus energies. ISCEV standard light- and dark-adapted a- and b-wave amplitudes were not significantly different between groups (P > 0.05 for all). There were no significant differences in a- and b-wave implicit times between groups for all ISCEV standard stimuli (P > 0.05 for all). PhNR amplitudes of young monkeys were significantly smaller compared to adult monkeys for all stimulus energies (P < 0.05 for all). There were no significant differences in a-wave (P = 0.19) and b-wave (P = 0.17) amplitudes between young and adult white light reared monkeys. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term exposure to narrowband blue light did not affect photopic or scotopic ERG responses in young monkeys. Findings suggest that exposure to 12 h of daily blue light for approximately 10 months does not result in altered retinal function.

Chromatically simulated myopic blur counteracts a myopiagenic environment.

There is a world-wide epidemic of myopia (nearsightedness), produced largely by human-made environmental visual cues that disrupt the emmetropization feedback mechanism that normally uses defocus cues to produce and maintain eyes in good focus. Previous studies have shown that the wavelength of light affects this process and that myopic defocus can slow the progression of myopia in children. We first asked if continuous exposure to a small cage with restricted viewing distance would produce an environmentally-induced myopia in tree shrews, small diurnal mammals closely related to primates. A group (n = 7) spent 11 days in a small cage with restricted viewing distance; one wall was a video display covered with Maltese crosses that included low-to-high spatial frequencies in the range visible to tree shrews. This group developed myopia (-1.2 ± 0.4 [stderr] D) that was significant relative to a colony group of seven animals (+1.0 ± 0.2 D) raised in mesh cages allowing more distant viewing. We then asked if chromatically-simulated myopic defocus, produced by blurring just the blue channel of the video display, would counteract this environmentally-induced myopia in a group of eight tree shrews. This group instead became significantly hyperopic (+4.0 ± 0.4 D) due to slowed axial elongation. These results demonstrate the high potency of chromatic cues in refractive regulation and may provide the basis for an anti-myopia treatment in humans.

Comparing low-coherence interferometry and A-scan ultrasonography in measuring ocular axial dimensions in young rhesus monkeys.

We investigated a commercial low-coherence interferometer (LenStar LS 900 optical biometer) in measuring young rhesus monkey ocular dimensions. Ocular biometry data obtained using a LenStar and an A-scan ultrasound instrument (OPT-scan 1000) from 163 rhesus monkeys during 20-348 days of age were compared by means of coefficients of concordance and 95% limits of agreement. Linear regression was employed to examine and analyze the inter-instrument discrepancies. In young rhesus monkeys, the test-retest reliability of the LenStar was equal to or exceeded that of A-scan ultrasound (intraclass correlation = 0.86 to 0.93). The inter-instrument agreement was strong for vitreous chamber depth and axial length (coefficient of concordance = 0.95 and 0.86, respectively) and moderate for anterior chamber depth and lens thickness (coefficient of concordance = 0.74 and 0.63, respectively). The LenStar systematically underestimated ocular dimensions when compared to A-scan ultrasound (mean magnitude of difference = 0.11-0.57 mm). This difference could be minimized using linear calibration functions to equate LenStar data with ultrasound data. When this method was applied, the values between instruments were in excellent absolute agreement (mean magnitude of difference = 0.004-0.01 mm). In conclusion, the LenStar reliably measured ocular dimensions in young monkeys. When an appropriate calibration function is applied, the LenStar can be used as a substitute for A-scan ultrasonography.

Corrigendum: Long-term narrowband lighting influences activity but not intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell-driven pupil responses.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.711525.].

Long-Term Narrowband Lighting Influences Activity but Not Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cell-Driven Pupil Responses.

Purpose: Light affects a variety of non-image forming processes, such as circadian rhythm entrainment and the pupillary light reflex, which are mediated by intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of long- and short-wavelength ambient lighting on activity patterns and pupil responses in rhesus monkeys. Methods: Infant rhesus monkeys were reared under either broadband "white" light (n = 14), long-wavelength "red" light (n = 20; 630 nm), or short-wavelength "blue" light (n = 21; 465 nm) on a 12-h light/dark cycle starting at 24.1 ± 2.6 days of age. Activity was measured for the first 4 months of the experimental period using a Fitbit activity tracking device and quantified as average step counts during the daytime (lights-on) and nighttime (lights-off) periods. Pupil responses to 1 s red (651 nm) and blue (456 nm) stimuli were measured after approximately 8 months. Pupil metrics included maximum constriction and the 6 s post-illumination pupil response (PIPR). Results: Activity during the lights-on period increased with age during the first 10 weeks (p < 0.001 for all) and was not significantly different for monkeys reared in white, red, or blue light (p = 0.07). Activity during the 12-h lights-off period was significantly greater for monkeys reared in blue light compared to those in white light (p = 0.02), but not compared to those in red light (p = 0.08). However, blue light reared monkeys exhibited significantly lower activity compared to both white and red light reared monkeys during the first hour of the lights-off period (p = 0.01 for both) and greater activity during the final hour of the lights-off period (p < 0.001 for both). Maximum pupil constriction and the 6 s PIPR to 1 s red and blue stimuli were not significantly different between groups (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusion: Findings suggest that long-term exposure to 12-h narrowband blue light results in greater disruption in nighttime behavioral patterns compared to narrowband red light. Normal pupil responses measured later in the rearing period suggest that ipRGCs adapt after long-term exposure to narrowband lighting.

The effects of reduced ambient lighting on lens compensation in infant rhesus monkeys.

Although reduced ambient lighting (~50 lx) does not increase the degree of form-deprivation myopia (FDM) in chickens or infant monkeys, it does reduce the probability that monkeys will recover from FDM and that the normal age-dependent reduction in hyperopia will occur in monkeys reared with unrestricted vision. These findings suggest that low ambient lighting levels affect the regulatory mechanism responsible for emmetropization. To study this issue, infant rhesus monkeys (age ~ 24 days) were reared under dim light (55 ± 9 lx) with monocular -3D (dim-light lens-induced myopia, DL-LIM, n = 8) or +3D spectacle lenses (dim-light lens-induced hyperopia, DL-LIH, n = 7) until approximately 150 days of age. Refractive errors, ocular parameters and sub-foveal choroidal thickness were measured periodically and compared with normal-light-reared, lens-control monkeys (NL-LIM, n = 16; NL-LIH, n = 7). Dim light rearing significantly attenuated the degree of compensatory anisometropias in both the DL-LIM (-0.63 ± 0.77D vs. -2.11 ± 1.10D in NL-LIM) and DL-LIH treatment groups (-0.18 ± 1.93D vs. +1.71 ± 0.39D in NL-LIH). These effects came about because the treated and fellow control eyes had a lower probability of responding appropriately to the eye's effective refractive state. Vision-induced interocular differences in choroidal thickness were only observed in monkeys that exhibited compensating refractive changes, suggesting that failures in detecting the relative magnitude of optical errors underlay the abnormal refractive responses. Our findings suggest that low ambient lighting levels reduce the efficacy of the vision-dependent mechanisms that regulate refractive development.

The development of and recovery from form-deprivation myopia in infant rhesus monkeys reared under reduced ambient lighting.

Although reduced ambient lighting ("dim" light) can cause myopia in emmetropizing chicks, it does not necessarily lead to myopic changes in emmetropizing rhesus monkeys. Because myopia is rarely spontaneous, a question remained whether dim light would hasten the progression of visually induced myopia. To determine the effects of dim light on the development of and recovery from form-deprivation myopia (FDM), seven 3-week-old infant rhesus monkeys were reared under dim light (mean ± SD = 55 ± 9 lx) with monocular diffuser spectacles until ~154 days of age, then maintained in dim light with unrestricted vision until ~337 days of age to allow for recovery. Refractive errors, corneal powers, ocular axial dimensions and sub-foveal choroidal thicknesses were measured longitudinally and compared to those obtained from form-deprived monkeys reared under typical laboratory lighting (504 ± 168 lx). Five of the seven subjects developed FDMs that were similar to those observed among their normal-light-reared counterparts. The average degree of form-deprivation-induced myopic anisometropia did not differ significantly between dim-light subjects (-3.88 ± 3.26D) and normal-light subjects (-4.45 ± 3.75D). However, three of the five dim-light subjects that developed obvious FDM failed to exhibit any signs of recovery and the two monkeys that were isometropic at the end of the treatment period manifest abnormal refractive errors during the recovery period. All refractive changes were associated with alterations in vitreous chamber elongation rates. It appears that dim light is not a strong myopiagenic stimulus by itself, but it can impair the optical regulation of refractive development in primates.

Topically instilled caffeine selectively alters emmetropizing responses in infant rhesus monkeys.

Oral administration of the adenosine receptor (ADOR) antagonist, 7-methylxanthine (7-MX), reduces both form-deprivation and lens-induced myopia in mammalian animal models. We investigated whether topically instilled caffeine, another non-selective ADOR antagonist, retards vision-induced axial elongation in monkeys. Beginning at 24 days of age, a 1.4% caffeine solution was instilled in both eyes of 14 rhesus monkeys twice each day until the age of 135 days. Concurrent with the caffeine regimen, the monkeys were fitted with helmets that held either -3 D (-3D/pl caffeine, n = 8) or +3 D spectacle lenses (+3D/pl caffeine, n = 6) in front of their lens-treated eyes and zero-powered lenses in front of their fellow-control eyes. Refractive errors and ocular dimensions were measured at baseline and periodically throughout the lens-rearing period. Control data were obtained from 8 vehicle-treated animals also reared with monocular -3 D spectacles (-3D/pl vehicle). In addition, historical comparison data were available for otherwise untreated lens-reared controls (-3D/pl controls, n = 20; +3D/pl controls, n = 9) and 41 normal monkeys. The vehicle controls and the untreated lens-reared controls consistently developed compensating axial anisometropias (-3D/pl vehicle = -1.44 ± 1.04 D; -3D/pl controls = -1.85 ± 1.20 D; +3D/pl controls = +1.92 ± 0.56 D). The caffeine regime did not interfere with hyperopic compensation in response to +3 D of anisometropia (+1.93 ± 0.82 D), however, it reduced the likelihood that animals would compensate for -3 D of anisometropia (+0.58 ± 1.82 D). The caffeine regimen also promoted hyperopic shifts in both the lens-treated and fellow-control eyes; 26 of the 28 caffeine-treated eyes became more hyperopic than the median normal monkey (mean (±SD) relative hyperopia = +2.27 ± 1.65 D; range = +0.31 to +6.37 D). The effects of topical caffeine on refractive development, which were qualitatively similar to those produced by oral administration of 7-MX, indicate that ADOR antagonists have potential in treatment strategies for preventing and/or reducing myopia progression.

Eccentricity-dependent effects of simultaneous competing defocus on emmetropization in infant rhesus monkeys.

Dual-focus lenses that impose simultaneous competing myopic defocus over the entire visual field produce axial hyperopic shifts in refractive error. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effects of eccentricity on the ability of myopic defocus signals to influence central refractive development in infant monkeys. From 24 to 152 days of age, rhesus monkeys were reared with binocular, dual-focus lenses that had central, zero-powered zones surrounded by alternating concentric annular power zones of +3D and zero power. Between subject groups the diameter of the central, zero-powered zone was varied from 2 mm to 8 mm in 2 mm steps (+3D/pl 2 mm, n = 6; +3D/pl 4 mm, n = 6; +3D/pl 6 mm, n = 8, or + 3D/pl 8 mm, n = 6). For the treatment lens with 2, 4, 6 and 8 mm central zones, objects at eccentricities beyond 11°, 16°, 19° and 23°, respectively, were imaged exclusively through the dual-power peripheral zones. Refractive status (retinoscopy), corneal power (keratometry) and axial dimensions (ultrasonography) were measured at two-week intervals. Comparison data were obtained from monkeys reared with binocular, single-vision +3D full-field lenses (+3D FF, n = 6) and 41 normal control monkeys reared with unrestricted vision. At the end of the rearing period, with the exception of the +3D/pl 8 mm group (median = +3.64 D), the ametropias for the other lens-reared groups (medians: FF = +4.39 D, 2 mm = +5.19 D, 4 mm = +5.59 D, 6 mm = +3.50 D) were significantly more hyperopic than that for the normal monkeys (+2.50 D). These hyperopic errors were associated with shallower vitreous chambers. The key finding was that the extent and consistency of these hyperopic ametropias varied with the eccentricity of the dual-focus zones. The results confirm that myopic defocus in the near periphery can slow axial growth, but that imposed defocus beyond about 20° from the fovea does not consistently alter central refractive development.

Effects of low intensity ambient lighting on refractive development in infant rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Studies in chickens suggest low intensity ambient lighting causes myopia. The purpose of this experiment was to examine the effects of low intensity ambient lighting (dim light) on normal refractive development in macaque monkeys. Seven infant rhesus monkeys were reared under dim light (room illumination level: ~55 lx) from 24 to ~310 days of age with otherwise unrestricted vision. Refractive error, corneal power, ocular axial dimensions, and choroidal thickness were measured in anesthetized animals at the onset of the experiment and periodically throughout the dim-light-rearing period, and were compared with those of normal-light-reared monkeys. We found that dim light did not produce myopia; instead, dim-light monkeys were hyperopic relative to normal-light monkeys (median refractive errors at ~155 days, OD: +3.13 D vs. +2.31 D; OS: +3.31D vs. +2.44 D; at ~310 days, OD: +2.75D vs. +1.78D, OS: +3.00D vs. +1.75D). In addition, dim-light rearing caused sustained thickening in the choroid, but it did not alter corneal power development, nor did it change the axial nature of the refractive errors. These results showed that, for rhesus monkeys and possibly other primates, low ambient lighting by itself is not necessarily myopiagenic, but might compromise the efficiency of emmetropization.

Convergence insufficiency in Chinese high school students.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of convergence insufficiency was determined in a sample of Chinese high school students. The associations between the frequency of convergence insufficiency, gender, refractive error and accommodative insufficiency were investigated. METHODS: This was a single-site, prospective cross-sectional study. In total, 928 eligible teenagers (mean age 15.9 ± 0.8) from a local high school in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China participated in this study. Refraction and binocular vision tests were performed on all eligible participants. The following three signs were used to classify participants: sign 1, exophoria at near at least 4▵ greater than at far; sign 2, receded near point of convergence (≥ 6 cm break point); and sign 3, insufficient near positive fusional vergence (that is, failing Sheard's criterion or ≤ 15▵ break point). Diagnostic groups of convergence insufficiency classification were defined as follows: (1) 3-Sign convergence insufficiency (all three signs present); (2) 2-Sign convergence insufficiency (sign 1 plus sign 2 or 3); (3) 1-Sign convergence insufficiency (sign 1 only); and (4) no convergence insufficiency (that is, participants not classified into one of the above groups). RESULTS: The number and frequency of individuals with 3-Sign, 2-Sign, and 1-Sign convergence insufficiency as well as no convergence insufficiency group were 25 (2.7 per cent), 119 (12.8 per cent), 303 (32.6 per cent) and 481 (51.8 per cent), respectively. Gender (χ2 = 36.6, df = 3, p < 0.001), refractive error grouping (χ2 = 37.7, df = 9, p < 0.001) and accommodative insufficiency (χ2 = 15.4, df = 3, p = 0.002) were all significantly associated with convergence insufficiency. Male gender, hyperopia, or accommodative insufficiency were more likely to be classified with 3-Sign convergence insufficiency. The frequency of accommodative insufficiency was 9.5 per cent (88 of 928 participants). CONCLUSION: Compared to the data from school- and clinic-based populations in the USA and South Africa, the data from this sample of Chinese high school students showed a lower frequency of 3-Sign convergence insufficiency (2.7 per cent). Convergence insufficiency was associated with refractive error, gender and accommodative insufficiency.

Narrow-band, long-wavelength lighting promotes hyperopia and retards vision-induced myopia in infant rhesus monkeys.

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of narrow band, long-wavelength lighting on normal refractive development and the phenomena of lens compensation and form-deprivation myopia (FDM) in infant rhesus monkeys. Starting at 24 and continuing until 151 days of age, 27 infant rhesus monkeys were reared under long-wavelength LED lighting (630 nm; illuminance = 274 ± 64 lux) with unrestricted vision (Red Light (RL) controls, n = 7) or a +3 D (+3D-RL, n = 7), -3 D (-3D-RL, n = 6) or diffuser lens (From Deprivation (FD-RL), n = 7) in front of one eye and a plano lens in front of the fellow eye. Refractive development, corneal power, and vitreous chamber depth were measured by retinoscopy, keratometry, and ultrasonography, respectively. Comparison data were obtained from normal monkeys (Normal Light (NL) controls, n = 39) and lens- (+3D-NL, n = 9; -3D-NL, n = 18) and diffuser-reared controls (FD-NL, n = 16) housed under white fluorescent lighting. At the end of the treatment period, median refractive errors for both eyes of all RL groups were significantly more hyperopic than that for NL groups (P = 0.0001 to 0.016). In contrast to fluorescent lighting, red ambient lighting greatly reduced the likelihood that infant monkeys would develop either FDM or compensating myopia in response to imposed hyperopic defocus. However, as in the +3D-NL monkeys, the treated eyes of the +3D-RL monkeys exhibited relative hyperopic shifts resulting in significant anisometropias that compensated for the monocular lens-imposed defocus (P = 0.001). The red-light-induced alterations in refractive development were associated with reduced vitreous chamber elongation and increases in choroidal thickness. The results suggest that chromatic cues play a role in vision-dependent emmetropization in primates. Narrow-band, long-wavelength lighting prevents the axial elongation typically produced by either form deprivation or hyperopic defocus, possibly by creating direction signals normally associated with myopic defocus.

Comparison of tacrolimus, fluorometholone, and saline in mild-to-moderate contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of tacrolimus, fluorometholone, and saline in the treatment of mild to moderate contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). METHODS: This was a double-masked, randomized pilot study. A total of 18 soft contact lens users (n = 36 eyes) with mild to moderate papillary conjunctivitis were enrolled. Subjects were randomly assigned into three groups to receive tacrolimus 0.05%, fluorometholone 0.1%, or saline (sodium chloride 0.9%). Drugs were prescribed at the baseline visit (visit 1) and instilled twice daily for 4 weeks. Follow-up visits were taken at week 1 (visit 2), week 2 (visit 3), week 4 (visit 4, drug usage suspended at this visit), and week 6 (visit 5, 2 weeks after interrupting eye drops). Contact lens use was discontinued during the 6 weeks of the study, and variables assessed were symptoms and signs, tear film status, and intraocular pressures. Conjunctival impression cytology was performed at baseline and visit 5 to assess ocular surface status. RESULTS: Mean roughness and redness scores decreased significantly from visit 1 to visit 5, but the variation tendency was comparable in all groups (P = 0.180 and 0.889, respectively). Subjective symptom parameters were improved in all CLPC patients at visit 5, and there was no remarkable difference in symptom reduction in three groups. The mean Schirmer value and mean break-up time (BUT) did not change significantly in the three groups during the study. Ocular surface findings by impression cytology improved significantly after three treatments. Intraocular pressure fluctuation from baseline to 6-week follow-up was not statistically significant in all subjects. No adverse treatment-related event was observed in any study group. CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus 0.05% may be a safe and effective treatment for mild to moderate CLPC and is comparable with fluorometholone 0.1% in efficacy. Contact lens cessation accompanied with saline may also be effective in treating mild to moderate CLPC.