Optimal methods of vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: a systematic review, dose-response and pairwise meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D supplementation may prevent acute respiratory infections (ARIs). This study aimed to identify the optimal methods of vitamin D supplementation. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched from database inception through July 13, 2023. Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Data were pooled using random-effects model. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with one or more ARIs. RESULTS: The analysis included 43 RCTs with 49320 participants. Forty RCTs were considered to be at low risk for bias. The main pairwise meta-analysis indicated there were no significant preventive effects of vitamin D supplementation against ARIs (risk ratio [RR]: 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97 to 1.01, I2 = 49.6%). The subgroup dose-response meta-analysis indicated that the optimal vitamin D supplementation doses ranged between 400-1200 IU/day for both summer-sparing and winter-dominant subgroups. The subgroup pairwise meta-analysis also revealed significant preventive effects of vitamin D supplementation in subgroups of daily dosing (RR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.99, I2 = 55.7%, number needed to treat [NNT]: 36), trials duration < 4 months (RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.97, I2 = 48.8%, NNT: 16), summer-sparing seasons (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.98, I2 = 55.8%, NNT: 26), and winter-dominant seasons (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.89, I2 = 9.7%, NNT: 10). CONCLUSION: Vitamin D supplementation may slightly prevent ARIs when taken daily at doses between 400 and 1200 IU/d during spring, autumn, or winter, which should be further examined in future clinical trials.

COVID-19 vaccination: 2023 Taiwan Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics (TAGG) consensus statements.

The COVID-19 pandemic remains challenging due to the rapid evolution of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. This article discusses recent findings on high-risk groups for COVID-19 mortality and morbidity, along with consensus statements from the 2023 Taiwan Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics (TAGG) meeting. It examines evidence on viral mutation mechanisms, emerging variants, and their implications for vaccination strategies. The article underscores advanced age, immunocompromised status, chronic medical conditions, occupational exposure, and socioeconomic disparities as significant risk factors for severe COVID-19 outcomes. TAGG's consensus emphasizes robust vaccination promotion, prioritizing elderly, and immunocompromised groups, individualized multi-dose regimens for immunocompromised patients, and simplified clinical guidelines. Discussions on global and regional recommendations for regular, variant-adapted boosters highlight the non-seasonal nature of COVID-19. Key agreements include escalating domestic preparedness, implementing vigorous risk-based vaccination, and adapting global guidelines to local contexts. Given ongoing viral evolution, proactive adjustment of vaccination policies is essential. Scientific consensus, tailored recommendations, and rapid knowledge dissemination are vital for optimizing COVID-19 protection among vulnerable groups in Taiwan. This article seeks to inform clinical practice and public health policy by summarizing expert-driven vaccination perspectives.

Implication of genotypes for prognosis of Candida glabrata bloodstream infections.

BACKGROUND: Genotyping isolates of a specific pathogen may demonstrate unique patterns of antimicrobial resistance, virulence or outcomes. However, evidence for genotype-outcome association in Candida glabrata is scarce. We aimed to characterize the mycological and clinical relevance of genotypes on C. glabrata bloodstream infections (BSIs). METHODS: Non-duplicated C. glabrata blood isolates from hospitalized adults were genotyped by MLST, and further clustered by the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA). A clonal complex (CC) was defined by UPGMA similarities of >90%. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by a colorimetric microdilution method and interpreted following CLSI criteria. RESULTS: Of 48 blood isolates evaluated, 13 STs were identified. CC7 was the leading CC (n = 14; 29.2%), including 13 ST7. The overall fluconazole and echinocandin resistance rates were 6.6% and 0%, respectively. No specific resistance patterns were associated with CC7 or other CCs. Charlson comorbidity index (adjusted OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05-3.11) was the only predictor for CC7. By multivariable Cox regression analyses, CC7 was independently associated with 28 day mortality [adjusted HR (aHR), 3.28; 95% CI, 1.31-8.23], even after considering potential interaction with neutropenia (aHR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.23-9.42; P for interaction, 0.24) or limited to 34 patients with monomicrobial BSIs (aHR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.15-7.08). Also, the Kaplan-Meier estimate showed greater mortality with CC7 (P = 0.003). Fluconazole resistance or echinocandin therapy had no significant impact on mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested comorbid patients were at risk of developing CC7 BSIs. Further, CC7 was independently associated with worse outcomes.

A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b in Patients with Moderate COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a novel mono-pegylated proline-interferon. This clinical study aimed to evaluate its antiviral efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b against SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label study. Adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection with initial cycle threshold (Ct) value < 30 and symptom onset within 4 days were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive a single 250-µg dose of ropeginterferon alfa-2b subcutaneously plus standard of care (SOC) or to receive SOC alone. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a negative RT-PCR result for SARS-CoV-2 or discharged from the hospital before Day 8. Change in clinical status based on the World Health Organization (WHO) clinical progression scale and pulmonary infiltrations through chest radiograph were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were enrolled and treated with study medication. Higher percentages of patients who achieved Ct ≥ 30 or were discharged from the hospital were observed on Day 8 and every other time point of assessment, i.e., Days 5, 11, 15, and 22, in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group compared to the SOC alone group. However, the difference was statistically significant on Day 11 but not on Day 8. The primary endpoint was not met. The ropeginterferon alfa-2b group showed a higher improvement rate in lung infiltration on Day 5 (27.6% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.0087) and a higher improvement rate in WHO clinical progression scores on Day 8 (69.4% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.03) than those in the SOC group. No ropeginterferon alfa-2b-related serious adverse event was observed. CONCLUSION: Our data show that ropeginterferon alfa-2b with SOC shortened the duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding compared with SOC alone. In addition, ropeginterferon alfa-2b as an additional therapy could be beneficial by improving lung infiltration.

Complete response to front-line therapies is associated with long-term survival in HIV-related lymphomas in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for people living with HIV (PLWH) who develop lymphomas has been greatly improved by combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. However, real-world clinical data on this patient group in Asia are limited. METHODS: Treatment outcomes were retrospectively examined for 104 PLWH with lymphomas between 2000 and 2019. The cohort comprised five PLWH with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and 99 with non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including 61 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 19 with Burkitt lymphoma (BL), nine with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and ten with other subtypes. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were as follows: HL (100%), PCNSL (76.2%), other subtypes (60.0%), BL (57.4%), and DLBCL (55.6%). Individuals who achieved complete response (CR) to front-line therapies had a significantly better 5-year OS rate than those without (96.2% vs. 17.8%, p < 0.001). PLWH who received cART for ≤6 months had significantly lower CD4+ T-cell counts at lymphoma diagnosis than those who received cART for longer periods (p = 0.048). Additionally, the 5-year OS rate was better for PLWH who received cART for ≤6 months before lymphomas diagnosis than those who received cART for longer periods (64.5% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.114). CONCLUSIONS: PLWH with DLBCL or BL had OS rates compatible to patients without HIV infection. Better outcomes for patients achieving CR to front-line therapy and those with shorter cART duration before lymphoma diagnosis suggest an underlying biological distinction in the lymphomas and the involvement of immunity, which warrants further studies.

Evaluation of the synergistic effect of eravacycline and tigecycline against carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) poses a substantial healthcare challenge. This study assessed the in vitro efficacy of selected antibiotic combinations against CRKP infections. METHODS: Our research involved the evaluation of 40 clinical isolates of CRKP, with half expressing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and half producing Metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL), two key enzymes contributing to carbapenem resistance. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of four antibiotics: eravacycline, tigecycline, polymyxin-B, and ceftazidime/avibactam. Synergistic interactions between these antibiotic combinations were examined using checkerboard and time-kill analyses. RESULTS: We noted significant differences in the MICs of ceftazidime/avibactam between KPC and MBL isolates. Checkerboard analysis revealed appreciable synergy between combinations of tigecycline (35%) or eravacycline (40%) with polymyxin-B. The synergy rates for the combination of tigecycline or eravacycline with polymyxin-B were similar among the KPC and MBL isolates. These combinations maintained a synergy rate of 70.6% even against polymyxin-B resistant isolates. In contrast, combinations of tigecycline (5%) or eravacycline (10%) with ceftazidime/avibactam showed significantly lower synergy than combinations with polymyxin-B (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). Among the MBL CRKP isolates, only one exhibited synergy with eravacycline or tigecycline and ceftazidime/avibactam combinations, and no synergistic activity was identified in the time-kill analysis for these combinations. The combination of eravacycline and polymyxin-B demonstrated the most promising synergy in the time-kill analysis. CONCLUSION: This study provides substantial evidence of a significant synergy when combining tigecycline or eravacycline with polymyxin-B against CRKP strains, including those producing MBL. These results highlight potential therapeutic strategies against CRKP infections.

Clinical manifestations and risk factors for COVID-19 and its severity in patients with hematological malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hematological malignancies (HM) were at a high risk of developing severe disease from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to assess the clinical outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with HM. METHODS: Adult patients with HM who were hospitalized with a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 between May, 2021 and November, 2022 were retrospectively identified. Primary outcome was respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation or mortality within 60 days after hospitalization. We also analyzed associated factors for de-isolation (defined as defervescence with a consecutive serial cycle threshold value > 30) within 28 days. RESULTS: Of 152 eligible patients, 22 (14.5%) developed respiratory failure or mortality in 60 days. Factors associated with developing respiratory failure that required mechanical ventilation or mortality included receipt of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR], 5.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-15.85), type 2 diabetes mellitus (aHR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.04-5.90), lymphopenia at admission (aHR, 6.85; 95% CI, 2.45-19.15), and receiving <2 doses of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines (aHR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.19-7.60). Ninety-nine (65.1%) patients were de-isolated in 28 days, against which two hazardous factors were identified: receipt of B-cell depletion therapies within one year prior to COVID-19 (aHR, 0.55, 95% CI, 0.35-0.87) and lymphopenia upon admission (aHR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-1.00). CONCLUSION: We found a high rate of respiratory failure and mortality among patients with HM who contracted the SARS-CoV-2. Factors associated with developing respiratory failure or mortality in 60 days included receipt of allo-HSCT, type 2 diabetes mellitus and lymphopenia upon admission. Having received ≥2 doses of vaccination conferred protection against clinical progression.

The prevalence, clinical reasoning and impact of non-standard anti-tuberculosis regimens at the initial prescription.

Regarding clinically-concerning non-standard initial anti-tuberculous (TB) regimens, few studies have examined their prevalence, risk factors and impacts. We recruited patients with drug susceptible TB and non-standard initial anti-TB regimens (NSTB group) and matched them with patients with standard initial regimens (STB group) in a 1:1 ratio. The risk factors and outcomes were analyzed. During the 11-year study period, we analyzed 50 (3.7%) patients with NSTB from a total set of 1337 patients with drug-susceptible TB. Pyrazinamide (60%) was the drug most commonly not prescribed in the NSTB group, followed by ethambutol (34%). Multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors as underlying eye disease (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 8.869; 95% CI 2.542-30.949; p = 0.001), gout/hyperuricemia (aOR: 4.012 [1.196-13.425]; p = 0.024), and liver disease (aOR: 12.790 [3.981-41.089]; p < 0.001). The NSTB group had longer treatment durations (281 ± 121 vs. 223 ± 63 days; p = 0.003) and more occurrences of treatment interruption (26% vs. 8%; p = 0.021) than the STB group. In conclusion, NSTB occurs in around 3.7% of patients and is associated with longer treatment and more treatment interruption. The risk factors might include underlying liver and eye diseases, and gout. Further studies to improve non-standard initial regimens and prevent negative outcomes are warranted.

Effectiveness and evolution of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein titers after three doses of COVID-19 vaccination in people with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Real-world vaccine effectiveness following the third dose of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 remains less investigated among people with HIV (PWH). METHODS: PWH receiving the third dose of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 (either 50- or 100-µg) were enrolled. Participants were followed for 180 days until the fourth dose of COVID-19 vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 infection, seroconversion of anti-nucleocapsid IgG, death, or loss to follow-up. Anti-spike IgG was determined every 1-3 months. RESULTS: Of 1427 participants undergoing the third-dose COVID-19 vaccination, 632 (44.3%) received 100-µg mRNA-1273, 467 (32.8%) 50-µg mRNA-1273, and 328 (23.0%) BNT162b2 vaccine and the respective rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection or seroconversion of anti-nucleocapsid IgG was 246.1, 280.8 and 245.2 per 1000 person-months of follow-up (log-rank test, p = 0.28). Factors associated with achieving anti-S IgG titers >1047 BAU/mL included CD4 count <200 cells/mm3 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.11; 95% CI, 0.04-0.31), plasma HIV RNA >200 copies/mL (aOR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09-0.80), having achieved anti-spike IgG >141 BAU/mL within 3 months after primary vaccination (aOR, 3.69; 95% CI, 2.68-5.07), receiving BNT162b2 vaccine as the third dose (aOR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10-0.41; reference, 100-µg mRNA-1273), and having previously received two doses of mRNA vaccine in primary vaccination (aOR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1,75-3.45; reference, no exposure to mRNA vaccine). CONCLUSIONS: PWH receiving different types of the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine showed similar vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection. An additional dose with 100-µg mRNA-1273 could generate a higher antibody response than with 50-µg mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccine.

Effect of early dexamethasone on outcomes of COVID-19: A quasi-experimental study using propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND: The RECOVERY trial demonstrated that the use of dexamethasone is associated with a 36% lower 28-day mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 on invasive mechanical ventilation. Nevertheless, the optimal timing to start dexamethasone remains uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental study at National Taiwan University Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan) using propensity score matching to simulate a randomized controlled trial to receive or not to receive early dexamethasone (6 mg/day) during the first 7 days following the onset of symptoms. Treatment was standard protocol-based, except for the timing to start dexamethasone, which was left to physicians' decision. The primary outcome is 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes include secondary infection within 60 days and fulfilling the criteria of de-isolation within 20 days. RESULTS: A total of 377 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled. Early dexamethasone did not decrease 28-day mortality in all patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.10) or in patients who required O2 for severe/critical disease at admission (aOR, 1.05; 95%CI, 0.94-1.18); but is associated with a 24% increase in superinfection in all patients (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.37) and a 23% increase in superinfection in patients of O2 for several/critical disease at admission (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.47). Moreover, early dexamethasone is associated with a 42% increase in likelihood of delayed clearance of SARS-CoV-2 virus (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.01-1.98). CONCLUSION: An early start of dexamethasone (within 7 days after the onset of symptoms) could be harmful to hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on antimicrobial resistance among major pathogens causing healthcare-associated infection.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused great impact on healthcare systems, including antibiotic usage and multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial infections at hospitals. We aim to investigate the trends of antimicrobial resistance among the major pathogens causing healthcare-associated infection (HAI) at intensive care units (ICU). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The demographic characteristics of hospitalization, usage of antimicrobial agents, counted by half-an-year DID (defined daily dose per 1000 patient-days), and HAI density of five major MDR bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA), of ICU patients at a medical center in Taiwan during January 2017 to December 2021 were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The total antibiotic usage, counted by DID, had a significant increasing trend, before COVID-19 occurrence in 2017-2019, but no further increase during the pandemic period in 2020-2021. However, comparing the two time periods, antibiotics consumption was significantly increased during pandemic period. There was no significant change of HAI density in MRSA, VRE, CRAB, CRKP, and CRPA, comparing the pandemic to the pre-pandemic period. Although, CRKP and CRPA infection rates were increasing during the pre-pandemic period, there was no further increase of CRKP and CRPA HAI rates during the pandemic period. CONCLUSION: During COVID-19 pandemic, there was no significant increase in HAI density of five major MDR bacteria at ICU in Taiwan, despite increased antibiotic usage. Strict infection prevention measures for COVID-19 precautions and sustained antimicrobial stewardship probably bring these effects.

Impact of an integrated medication management model on the collaborative working relationship among healthcare professionals in a hospital: an explanatory mixed methods study.

An integrated medication management (IMM) model was implemented in a medical center ward to improve the delivery of clinical pharmaceutical services (CPSs). This model incorporated a ward-based clinical pharmacist who performed medication reconciliation and medication reviews. It was perceived to promote interprofessional collaboration between pharmacists and non-pharmacist healthcare professionals (NPHPs, including attending physicians, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the IMM on NPHPs' intentions to collaborate with pharmacists and understand the mechanism of the impact of the IMM on interprofessional collaboration. A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was employed in the study. Initially, a questionnaire was administered to assess the effects of the IMM on NPHPs' intentions to collaborate with pharmacists. The NPHPs' experiences with the IMM were then documented using semi-structured interviews with inductive thematic analysis. Fifty-eight NPHPs completed the questionnaire, and NPHPs from the intervention ward reported a higher intention to discuss patient-related medication issues with pharmacists, indicating collaboration. Eleven NPHPs were interviewed, and they stated having better working relationships with pharmacists, experiencing more effective CPSs, and noting improved communication with pharmacists. The integration of quantitative and qualitative findings demonstrates that the critical mechanism of the IMM in promoting collaborative relationships is to integrate pharmacists into medical practice, which familiarizes NPHPs with pharmacists' roles, improves communication, and enables pharmacists to identify NPHPs' needs. To summarize, allowing ward-based pharmacists to engage in medical teams on a regular basis appears vital for improving interprofessional teamwork. Furthermore, stakeholders aiming to promote CPS in their institutions should consider the needs and communication channels among NPHPs.

CT findings of 144 in-hospital patients with influenza pneumonia: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Patients with influenza infection during their period of admission may have worse computed tomography (CT) manifestation according to the clinical status. This study aimed to evaluate the CT findings of in-hospital patients due to clinically significant influenza pneumonia with correlation of clinical presentations. METHODS: In this retrospective, single center case series, 144 patients were included. All in-hospital patients were confirmed influenza infection and underwent CT scan. These patients were divided into three groups according to the clinical status of the most significant management: (1) without endotracheal tube and mechanical ventilator (ETTMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); (2) with ETTMV; (3) with ETTMV and ECMO. Pulmonary opacities were scored according to extent. Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between clinical parameters and CT scores. RESULTS: The predominant CT manifestation of influenza infection was mixed ground-glass opacity (GGO) and consolidation with both lung involvement. The CT scores were all reach significant difference among all three groups (8.73 ± 6.29 vs 12.49 ± 6.69 vs 18.94 ± 4.57, p < 0.05). The chest CT score was correlated with age, mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) days (all p values were less than 0.05). In addition, the CT score was correlated with peak lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level and peak C-reactive protein (CRP) level (all p values were less than 0.05). Concomitant bacterial infection had higher CT score than primary influenza pneumonia (13.02 ± 7.27 vs 8.95 ± 5.99, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Thin-section chest CT scores correlated with clinical and laboratory parameters in in-hospital patients with influenza pneumonia.

Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b in COVID-19 Patients with Comorbidities.

INTRODUCTION: Ropeginterferon alfa-2b represents a new-generation PEGylated interferon. It is approved for the treatment of polycythemia vera and shows promising anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities. OBJECTIVE: This clinical study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and comorbidities. METHODS: The randomized controlled study is designed to enroll adult patients with COVID-19 infection and comorbidities. Patients are non-responders to anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs or not suitable to receive them. Comorbidities include hematologic cancer, solid tumor, and well-controlled autoimmune disease. Non-responders to anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs are defined as having received treatment but have a Ct value < 30 at 14 days after symptom onset. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ropeginterferon alfa-2b at 250 µg plus standard of care (SOC) or SOC alone. SARS-CoV-2 antigen test will be conducted at day 15 and day 29 visits to determine whether to administer additional ropeginterferon alfa-2b doses. Patients who are positive on the antigen test on days 15 and 29 will receive the second and third doses of ropeginterferon alfa-2b at 350 µg and 500 µg, respectively. Patients with a negative antigen test but a Ct value < 30 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) at days 15 and 29 are also administered the second (350 µg) and third (500 µg) doses. Patients at high risk of COVID-19 rebound/relapse, e.g., immunocompromised patients, will be given additional ropeginterferon alfa-2b doses even if the Ct is ≥ 30. Approximately 60 patients will be enrolled. PLANNED OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is to compare the time from randomization to the achievement of Ct value ≥ 30 by RT-PCR between ropeginterferon alfa-2b and control groups. Our previous studies have shown safety and promising anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities in patients with moderate or severe COVID-19. This study will provide valuable data in patients with COVID-19 and comorbidities, for whom safe and effective treatment is urgently needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT05808322).

Immunogenicity and safety of heterologous booster with protein-based COVID-19 vaccine (NVX-CoV2373) in healthy adults: A comparative analysis with mRNA vaccines.

BACKGROUND: Information on the protein-based severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine-NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax), as a heterologous booster remains limited. We investigated the immunogenicity and adverse events of NVX-CoV2373 as a second booster and compared them with those of mRNA vaccines in healthy adults. METHODS: Healthcare workers who had received an mRNA vaccine (mRNA-1273 or BNT-162b2) as the first booster (third dose) 12 weeks prior were recruited. Participants voluntarily received either NVX-CoV2373 or an mRNA vaccine as a second booster. Participants with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded. The primary outcomes included serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (SP) and neutralizing antibody titers against B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.1.529 (Omicron) BA2, and BA5 variants on the 28th day after the boost. Secondary outcomes included new SARS-CoV-2 infections and adverse events reported during the study period. RESULTS: A total of 160 participants were enrolled in this study. Compared with the mRNA vaccination group (n = 59), the NVX-CoV2373 vaccination group (n = 101) had significantly lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 SP antibody titers and neutralizing antibody titers against all variants tested after the boost. During the study period, higher rates of new SARS-CoV-2 infections and a lower incidence of adverse events were observed in the NVX-CoV2373 vaccination group. No significant differences in cellular immune responses were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Compared to a homologous mRNA booster vaccination, heterologous boosters with NVX-CoV2373 showed lower antibody responses, a higher incidence of new SARS-CoV-2 infections, and fewer adverse events.

Achievements of COVID-19 vaccination programs: Taiwanese perspective.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a global health crisis. The specific characteristics of aerosol transmission in the latent period and the contagiousness of SARS-CoV-2 lead to rapid spread of infection in the community. Vaccination is the most effective method for preventing infection and severe outcomes. As of December 1, 2022, 88% of the Taiwanese population had received at least two doses of COVID-19 vaccines. Heterologous vaccination with ChAdOx1-mRNA-based or ChAdOx1-protein-based vaccines has been found to elicit higher immunogenicity than homologous vaccination with ChAdOx1-ChAdOx1 vaccines. A longitudinal cohort study revealed that 8-12-week intervals between the two heterologous vaccine doses of the primary series led to good immunogenicity and that the vaccines were safe. A third booster dose of mRNA vaccine is being encouraged to evoke effective immune responses against variants of concern. A novel domestic recombinant protein subunit vaccine (MVC-COV1901) was manufactured and authorized for emergency use in Taiwan. It has shown a good safety profile, with promising neutralizing antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2. Given the global pandemic due to emerging novel variants of SARS-CoV-2, booster COVID-19 vaccines and appropriate intervals between booster doses need to be investigated.

Liver dysfunction and clinical outcomes of unvaccinated COVID-19 patients with and without chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: Liver dysfunction is common during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), while its clinical impact and association with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remain uncertain. We aimed to investigate liver dysfunction in COVID-19 patients and its impacts on those with/without CHB. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients at National Taiwan University Hospital, stratified according to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) serostatus, with demographics, laboratory data, and hospitalization course reviewed, and clinical outcomes compared through multivariable analyses. RESULTS: We enrolled 109 COVID-19 patients unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 by August 2021. The HBsAg-positive group (n = 34) had significantly higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (26 vs. 16 U/L, P = 0.034), platelet (224 vs. 183 k/µL, P = 0.010) and longer hospitalizations (17 vs. 13 days, P = 0.012) compared with HBsAg-negative group (n = 75), while percentages of hepatitis (2-fold ALT elevation), oxygen supplementation, ventilators usage, COVID-specific treatment, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality were comparable. Older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.04, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.08, P = 0.032) and higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (OR: 1.08, 95 % CI: 1.004-1.16, P = 0.038) were associated with oxygen supplementation according to multivariable analyses. Higher AST predicted ICU admission (OR: 1.11, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.19, P = 0.008). Oxygen usage (OR: 5.64, 95 % CI: 1.67-19.09, P = 0.005) and shock (OR: 5.12, 95 % CI: 1.14-22.91, P = 0.033) were associated with liver dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: CHB patients had higher ALT levels and longer hospitalizations during COVID-19. Higher AST levels predict severe COVID-19 and ICU admission.

CXCL9 as a Reliable Biomarker for Discriminating Anti-IFN-γ-Autoantibody-Associated Lymphadenopathy that Mimics Lymphoma.

The diagnosis of adult-onset immunodeficiency syndrome associated with neutralizing anti-interferon γ autoantibodies (AIGA) presents substantial challenges to clinicians and pathologists due to its nonspecific clinical presentation, absence of routine laboratory tests, and resemblance to certain lymphoma types, notably nodal T follicular helper cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic type (nTFHL-AI). Some patients undergo lymphadenectomy for histopathological examination to rule out lymphoma, even in the absence of a preceding clinical suspicion of AIGA. This study aimed to identify reliable methods to prevent misdiagnosis of AIGA in this scenario through a retrospective case-control analysis of clinical and pathological data, along with immune gene transcriptomes using the NanoString nCounter platform, to compare AIGA and nTFHL-AI. The investigation revealed a downregulation of the C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL9) gene in AIGA, prompting an exploration of its diagnostic utility. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) targeting CXCL9 was performed on lymph node specimens to assess its potential as a diagnostic biomarker. The findings exhibited a significantly lower density of CXCL9-positive cells in AIGA compared to nTFHL-AI, displaying a high diagnostic accuracy of 92.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Furthermore, CXCL9 IHC demonstrated its ability to differentiate AIGA from various lymphomas sharing similar characteristics. In conclusion, CXCL9 IHC emerges as a robust biomarker for differentiating AIGA from nTFHL-AI and other similar conditions. This reliable diagnostic approach holds the potential to avert misdiagnosis of AIGA as lymphoma, providing timely and accurate diagnosis.

Current practice and recommendations for management of hepatitis B virus in people living with HIV in Asia.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection is higher in Asia than in Europe and North America and varies significantly between different regions within Asia. Important routes of transmission of both these infections include high-risk unprotected sexual contact, intravenous drug use, and transmission of maternal infection perinatally or in early childhood. While life expectancy among people living with HIV has been extended with effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), HBV-induced liver injury and complications have emerged as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in people living with HIV. OBJECTIVES: This article describes the prevalence of co-infection, current clinical practice, and recommendations for the management of people living with HIV-HBV co-infection in Asia. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Screening for HBV should occur at the time of HIV diagnosis; however, HBV screening rates in people living with HIV in Asia vary widely by region. Similarly, people with HBV should be screened for HIV before initiation of HBV antiviral therapy. People with HIV-HBV co-infection should be assessed for liver damage and risk factors for liver disease and be monitored regularly for liver complications and HBV DNA. Medical treatment with ART is lifelong and includes tenofovir and lamivudine or emtricitabine, unless intolerant or contraindicated, as these are active against both HIV and HBV. HBV vaccination programmes are effective in reducing co-infection rates. Mother-to-child transmission can be prevented through measures such as vaccination, antenatal screening, and treatment of pregnant women who are infected.

Does Hospitalist Care Enhance Palliative Care and Reduce Aggressive Treatments for Terminally Ill Patients? A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

BACKGROUND: Information on the use of palliative care and aggressive treatments for terminally ill patients who receive care from hospitalists is limited. METHODS: This three-year, retrospective, case-control study was conducted at an academic medical center in Taiwan. Among 7037 patients who died in the hospital, 41.7% had a primary diagnosis of cancer. A total of 815 deceased patients who received hospitalist care before death were compared with 3260 patients who received non-hospitalist care after matching for age, gender, catastrophic illness, and Charlson comorbidity score. Regression models with generalized estimating equations were performed. RESULTS: Patients who received hospitalist care before death, compared to those who did not, had a higher probability of palliative care consultation (odds ratio (OR) = 3.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.63-4.41), and a lower probability to undergo invasive mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.10-0.17), tracheostomy (OR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06-0.31), hemodialysis (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.89), surgery (OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.19-0.31), and intensive care unit admission (OR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.08-0.14). Hospitalist care was associated with reductions in length of stay (coefficient (B) = -0.54, 95% CI: -0.62--0.46) and daily medical costs. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalist care is associated with an improved palliative consultation rate and reduced life-sustaining treatments before death.