Glutaminase inhibition in combination with azacytidine in myelodysplastic syndromes: a phase 1b/2 clinical trial and correlative analyses.

Malignancies are reliant on glutamine as an energy source and a facilitator of aberrant DNA methylation. We demonstrate preclinical synergy of telaglenastat (CB-839), a selective glutaminase inhibitor, combined with azacytidine (AZA), followed by a single-arm, open-label, phase 1b/2 study in persons with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The dual primary endpoints evaluated clinical activity, safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints evaluated pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, overall survival, event-free survival and duration of response. The dose-escalation study included six participants and the dose-expansion study included 24 participants. Therapy was well tolerated and led to an objective response rate of 70% with (marrow) complete remission in 53% of participants and a median overall survival of 11.6 months, with evidence of myeloid differentiation in responders determined by single-cell RNA sequencing. Glutamine transporter solute carrier family 38 member 1 in MDS stem cells was associated with clinical responses and predictive of worse prognosis in a large MDS cohort. These data demonstrate the safety and efficacy of CB-839 and AZA as a combined metabolic and epigenetic approach in MDS. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03047993 .

Current status and research directions in acute myeloid leukemia.

The understanding of the molecular pathobiology of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has spurred the identification of therapeutic targets and the development of corresponding novel targeted therapies. Since 2017, twelve agents have been approved for the treatment of AML subsets: the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax; the CD33 antibody drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin; three FLT3 inhibitors (midostaurin, gilteritinib, quizartinib); three IDH inhibitors (ivosidenib and olutasidenib targeting IDH1 mutations; enasidenib targeting IDH2 mutations); two oral hypomethylating agents (oral poorly absorbable azacitidine; fully absorbable decitabine-cedazuridine [latter approved as an alternative to parenteral hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia but commonly used in AML]); and CPX-351 (encapsulated liposomal 5:1 molar ratio of cytarabine and daunorubicin), and glasdegib (hedgehog inhibitor). Other targeted therapies (menin inhibitors, CD123 antibody-drug conjugates) are showing promising results. To achieve optimal results in such a rare and heterogeneous entity as AML requires expertise, familiarity with this rare cancer, and the access to, and delivery of disparate therapies under rigorous supportive care conditions. In this review, we update the standard-of-care and investigational therapies and outline promising current and future research directions.

Longitudinal follow up of a phase 2 trial of venetoclax added to hyper-CVAD, nelarabine and pegylated asparaginase in patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma.

Optimal frontline use of active agents in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) is prudent to improve outcomes. We report the long-term follow-up of the phase 2 trial of HyperCVAD with nelarabine and pegylated asparaginase (Original cohort). In the latest protocol iteration venetoclax was added to the induction/consolidation regimen (Venetoclax cohort). Eligible patients were adults with untreated T-ALL/LBL or after minimal therapy and with adequate organ function. Primary endpoint of this analysis was improvement in 2-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with venetoclax. From Aug 2007 to Dec 2024, 145 patients, at a median age of 35.4 years, were treated; 46 (33.8%) were in the venetoclax cohort. At median follow-up (mFU) of 62.4 months, 5-year PFS, duration of response (DOR), and OS were 63.7%, 72.0% and 66.2% respectively. In the venetoclax cohort (mFU 24.4 months) 2-year PFS (87.9% versus 64.1%, p = 0.03) and 2-year DOR (93.6% versus 69.2%, p = 0.005) were superior to the original cohort (mFU 89.4 months) and 2-year OS appeared better (87.8% versus 73.9%, p = 0.16). Febrile neutropenia was the most common serious adverse event, seen in 60% patients. The addition of venetoclax to HyperCVAD-nelarabine-pegylated asparaginase was tolerable and led to improvement in DOR and PFS.

Decitabine, venetoclax, and ponatinib for advanced phase chronic myeloid leukaemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia: a single-arm, single-centre phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive myeloid disease-consisting of chronic myeloid leukaemia in the myeloid blast phase and in the accelerated phase, and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia-is associated with poor outcomes. Although previous studies have suggested the benefit of chemotherapy and BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations, the optimal regimen is uncertain and prospective studies for this rare group of diseases are scant. Preclinical and retrospective clinical data suggest possible synergy between the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax and BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We therefore aimed to design a study to evaluate the safety and activity of a novel combination of decitabine, venetoclax, and the third-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib in advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive myeloid diseases. METHODS: For this phase 2 study, patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated or relapsed or refractory myeloid chronic myeloid leukaemia-blast phase, chronic myeloid leukaemia-accelerated phase, or advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-3 were eligible. Patients were eligible regardless of the number of previous lines of therapy received or previous receipt of ponatinib. Cycle 1 (induction) consisted of a 7-day lead-in of ponatinib 45 mg orally daily (days 1-7), followed by combination therapy with decitabine 20 mg/m2 intravenously on days 8-12, venetoclax orally daily with ramp-up to a maximum dose of 400 mg on days 8-28, and ponatinib 45 mg orally daily on days 8-28. Cycles 2-24 consisted of decitabine 20 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1-5, venetoclax orally 400 mg on days 1-21, and ponatinib orally daily on days 1-28. Response-based dosing of ponatinib was implemented in consolidation cycles, with reduction to 30 mg daily in patients who reached complete remission or complete remission with an incomplete haematological recovery and a reduction to 15 mg daily in patients with undetectable BCR::ABL1 transcripts. The primary endpoint was the composite rate of complete remission or complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04188405) and is still ongoing. RESULTS: Between July 12, 2020, and July 8, 2023, 20 patients were treated (14 with chronic myeloid leukaemia-blast phase, four with chronic myeloid leukaemia-accelerated phase, and two with advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia). The median age was 43 years (IQR 32-58); 13 (65%) patients were male and seven (35%) were female; and 12 (60%) were White, three (15%) were Hispanic, four (20%) were Black, and one (5%) was Asian. 12 (60%) patients had received 2 or more previous BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and 14 (70%) patients had at least one high-risk additional chromosomal abnormality or complex karyotype. The median duration of follow-up was 21·2 months (IQR 14·1-24·2). The complete remission or complete remission with an incomplete haematological recovery rate was 50% (10 of 20 patients); complete remission in one [5%] patient and complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery in nine [45%]). An additional six (30%) patients had a morphologic leukaemia-free state. The most common grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events were febrile neutropenia in eight (40%) patients, infection in six (30%), and alanine or aspartate transaminase elevation in five (25%). Eight (40%) patients had at least one cardiovascular event of any grade. There were three on-study deaths, none of which was considered related to the study treatment and all from infections in the setting of refractory leukaemia. INTERPRETATION: The combination of decitabine, venetoclax, and ponatinib is safe and shows promising activity in patients with advanced phase chronic myeloid leukaemia, including those with multiple previous therapies or high-risk disease features. Further studies evaluating chemotherapy and venetoclax-based combination strategies using newer-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors are warranted. FUNDING: Takeda Oncology, the National Institutes of Health, and the National Cancer Institute Cancer Center.

Measurable residual disease monitoring in AML: Prospects for therapeutic decision-making and new drug development.

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is strongly associated with risk of relapse and long-term survival outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Apart from its clear prognostic impact, MRD information is also increasingly used to guide therapeutic decision-making, including selection of appropriate patients for stem cell transplant, use of post-transplant maintenance, and candidacy for non-transplant maintenance therapies or MRD-directed clinical trials. While much progress has been made in accurately assessing MRD and understanding its clinical importance, many questions remain about how to optimize MRD testing and guide treatment decisions for individual patients. In this review, we discuss the common methods to assess MRD in AML and the prognostic impact of MRD across common clinical scenarios. We also review emerging and investigational strategies to target MRD and discuss some of the important unanswered questions and challenges in the field.

Menin inhibitors in pediatric acute leukemia: a comprehensive review and recommendations to accelerate progress in collaboration with adult leukemia and the international community.

Aberrant expression of HOX and MEIS1 family genes, as seen in KMT2A-rearranged, NUP98-rearranged, or NPM1-mutated leukemias leads to arrested differentiation and leukemia development. HOX family genes are essential gatekeepers of physiologic hematopoiesis, and their expression is regulated by the interaction between KMT2A and menin. Menin inhibitors block this interaction, downregulate the abnormal expression of MEIS1 and other transcription factors and thereby release the differentiation block. Menin inhibitors show significant clinical efficacy against KMT2A-rearranged and NPM1-mutated acute leukemias, with promising potential to address unmet needs in various pediatric leukemia subtypes. In this collaborative initiative, pediatric and adult hematologists/oncologists, and stem cell transplant physicians have united their expertise to explore the potential of menin inhibitors in pediatric leukemia treatment internationally. Our efforts aim to provide a comprehensive clinical overview of menin inhibitors, integrating preclinical evidence and insights from ongoing global clinical trials. Additionally, we propose future international, inclusive, and efficient clinical trial designs, integrating pediatric populations in adult trials, to ensure broad access to this promising therapy for all children and adolescents with menin-dependent leukemias.

Efficacy and Safety of Gilteritinib versus Sorafenib as Post-Transplant Maintenance in Patients With FLT3-ITD Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: FLT3-ITD AML is associated with an increased risk of relapse, leading many patients to receive an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) after induction. Unfortunately, relapse rate after alloHCT remains high and strategies are needed to improve outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients with FLT3-ITD AML who received alloHCT from 6/1/2016 to 12/31/2020 and received gilteritinib (GILT) or sorafenib (SORA)as post-transplant maintenance, outside of a clinical trial. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were treated with either GILT (n = 27) or SORA (n = 29) for post-HCT maintenance. One patient was treated with SORA after first alloHCT and GILT after second alloHCT. Patient characteristics were comparable between groups. FLT3 inhibitors were utilized in pre-alloHCT therapy in all but 1 patient. The median duration of time that patients remained on GILT was 385 days (range, 10-804) and on SORA 315 days (range, 3-1777). 1-year PFS and relapse incidence were similar between GILT and SORA; PFS was 66% versus 76% (P = .4) and relapse incidence was 19% versus 24% (P = .6), respectively.Both groups had high incidence of Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity, including neutropenia (45% GILT and 34% SORA) and thrombocytopenia (30% GILT and 52% SORA). Only 44% and 14% patients who received GILT and SORA did not discontinue maintenance, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed comparable PFS and a similar toxicity profile when SORA and GILT are used as post- HCT maintenance therapy.

A phase 2 trial of mini-hyper-CVD, blinatumomab, and ponatinib in Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Twenty adults with newly diagnosed (ND) or relapsed/refractory (RR) Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or chronic myeloid leukemia in lymphoid blast phase (CML-LBP), were treated with mini-hyperCVD, ponatinib, and blinatumomab. Complete molecular response was achieved in 78% of ND patients, while CR/CRi was achieved in 100% of RR and CML-LBP. The 3-year overall survival rate was 76% (95% CI, 47%-90%).

Efficacy of Chemotherapy-Free Regimens in the Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The historical standard of care for Ph+ ALL is chemotherapy plus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Recently chemotherapy-free regimens have shown promising efficacy. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of chemotherapy-free regimens for Ph+ ALL. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for chemotherapy-free regimens for Ph+ ALL published between January 2000 and October 2023. Of the 5,348 articles screened, 9 nonrandomized clinical trials enrolling 413 patients were included. Two trials (N = 117) included treatment with 3 agents (blinatumomab, TKI, and steroid) and 7 trials (N = 248) included treatment with 2 agents (TKI and steroids). R software was used to conduct the meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023482439). RESULTS: The pooled complete molecular response (CMR) rate of patients receiving a TKI, blinatumomab, and steroids was 81% (95%CI, 69%-89%). TKIs plus blinatumomab were nearly 6 times as likely to have CMR (odds ratio [OR], 5.98; 95%CI, 2.99-11.96) and more than 5 times as likely to be alive at 1-year (OR, 5.1; 95%CI, 1.74-14.9) as compared to TKIs alone. Patients receiving ponatinib were about twice as likely as those receiving dasatinib to achieve CMR (OR, 2.51; 95%CI, 0.72-8.72). CONCLUSION: Adding blinatumomab to TKIs and steroids significantly improved Ph+ ALL patients' response and survival rates. Regimens with ponatinib elicited higher molecular response rates than those with other TKIs. The high response and survival rates achieved with blinatumomab plus TKIs and steroids suggest that further studies are required to assess the need for intensive treatments such as chemotherapy or stem cell transplant in these patients.

Results of the Simultaneous Combination of Ponatinib and Blinatumomab in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive ALL.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.In this analysis, we update our experience with the chemotherapy-free regimen of blinatumomab and ponatinib in 60 patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive ALL. At a median follow-up of 24 months, the complete molecular response rate by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was 83% (67% at the end of course one), and the rate of measurable residual disease negativity by next-generation clono-sequencing was 98% (45% at the end of course one). Only two patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Seven patients relapsed: two with systemic disease, four with isolated CNS relapse, and one with extramedullary Ph-negative, CRLF2-positive pre-B ALL. The estimated 3-year overall survival rate was 91% and event-free survival rate was 77%. Three patients discontinued blinatumomab because of adverse events (related, n = 1; unrelated, n = 2) and nine discontinued ponatinib because of cerebrovascular ischemia, coronary artery stenosis, persistent rash, elevated liver function tests with drug-induced fatty liver, atrial thrombus, severe arterial occlusive disease of lower extremities, pleuro-pericardial effusion, and debilitation. In conclusion, the simultaneous combination of ponatinib and blinatumomab is a highly effective and relatively safe nonchemotherapy regimen. This regimen also reduces the need for intensive chemotherapy and HSCT in first remission in the majority of patients.

Outcomes of Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML and Hyperleukocytosis.

PURPOSE: AML presenting with hyperleukocytosis is associated with poor outcomes. We aim to understand the factors associated with early mortality and overall survival (OS) to help guide management and improve early mortality. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 129 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AML and a WBC count ≥100 × 109/L between January 2010 and April 2020. Logistic regression models estimated odds ratios for 4-week mortality. Cox proportional hazard models estimated hazard ratios for OS. RESULTS: The median age was 65 years (range, 23-86); the median WBC was 146 × 109/L (range, 100-687). Seventy-five (58%) patients had clinical leukostasis (CL). FLT3, NPM1, and RAS pathway mutations were detected in 63%, 45%, and 27% of patients, respectively. Cytoreduction consisted of hydroxyurea in 124 (96%) patients, cytarabine in 69 (54%), and leukapheresis in 31 (24%). The cumulative 4-week and 8-week mortality rates were 9% and 13%, respectively, all in patients age 65 years and older. By multivariate analysis, older age, CL, and thrombocytopenia <40 × 109/L were independently associated with a higher 4-week mortality rate. After a median follow-up of 49.4 months, the median OS was 14.3 months (95% CI, 7 to 21.6), with 4-year OS of 29%. Age 65 years and older, CL, tumor lysis syndrome, elevated LDH ≥2,000 U/L, elevated lactate ≥2.2 mmol/L, and poor-risk cytogenetics were independent factors associated with worse OS. CONCLUSION: Hyperleukocytosis is a life-threatening hematologic emergency. Early recognition and intervention including cytoreduction, blood product support, antibiotics, and renal replacement therapy may help mitigate the risk of morbidity and early mortality.

Advances in the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the role of frontline immunotherapy-based regimens.

Blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) are both active in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and improve outcomes compared with conventional chemotherapy in this setting. Several prospective clinical trials have explored the use of these agents in adults with newly diagnosed B-cell ALL, with promising outcomes observed in younger and older adults and in both Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive and Ph-negative ALL. These novel regimens result in high rates of deep measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity and may improve survival compared with chemotherapy-only approaches, allowing for less reliance on intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This review discusses novel approaches to integrating INO and/or blinatumomab into frontline ALL regimens, including the potential role of chemotherapy-free regimens in some subgroups. The role of MRD monitoring is also discussed, including how this can inform decisions for consolidative allogeneic HSCT or investigational approaches with CD19 CAR T-cells.

NPM1-mutated myeloid neoplasms are a unique entity not defined by bone marrow blast percentage.

INTRODUCTION: NPM1-mutated (NPM1mut) myeloid neoplasms (MNs) with <20% bone marrow (BM) blasts (NPM1mut MNs<20) are uncommon, and their classification remains inconsistent. METHODS: The clinicopathologic features of 54 patients with NPM1mut MNs <20 were evaluated and compared with wild-type NPM1 MNs <20 and NPM1mut MNs≥20, respectively. RESULTS: NPM1mut MNs had similar features regardless of blast percentage, except for higher IDH2 (29% vs 7%, p = .023) and FLT3 (70% vs 11%, p < .001) frequency in patients with ≥20% BM blasts. Thirty-three (61%) patients with NPM1mut MNs <20 received low-intensity chemotherapy (LIC) and 12 (22%) received intensive chemotherapy (IC). Higher complete remission rates (75% vs 27%, p = .006) and median overall survival (mOS) (not reached vs 30.4 months, p = .06) were observed with IC compared to LIC. Young patients (age <60 years) did not reach mOS either when treated with LIC or IC. Stem cell transplant was associated with increased survival only in patients treated with LIC (HR, 0.24; p = .025). No differences in mOS were observed by BM blast strata (32.2 months, not reached and 46.9 months for <10%, 10%-19%, and ≥20% blasts, p = .700) regardless of treatment modality (LIC: p = .900; IC: p = .360). Twenty-three patients (43%) with NPM1mut MNs <20 had marrow blast progression to ≥20%. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, NPM1mut MNs define a unique entity independent of BM blast percentage.

Results of ponatinib as frontline therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase.

BACKGROUND: Ponatinib is a third-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with robust activity in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. Herein, we report the long-term follow-up of the phase 2 trial of ponatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. METHODS: Patients received ponatinib 30 to 45 mg/day. The primary end point was the rate of 6-month complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). The study was held in June 2014 because of the risk of cardiovascular toxicity, requiring patients to change TKI. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were treated with ponatinib (median dose, 45 mg/day). Median age was 48 years (range, 21-75); 30 (59%) had baseline cardiovascular comorbidities. Median treatment duration was 13 months (range, 2-25). Fourteen patients (28%) discontinued ponatinib because of toxicities, 36 (71%) after the Food and Drug Administration warning/study closure, and one for noncompliance. Dasatinib was the most frequently chosen second-line TKI (n = 34; 66%). Among 46 patients evaluable at 6 months, 44 (96%) achieved CCyR, 37 (80%) major molecular response, 28 (61%) MR4, and 21 (46%) MR4.5. The cumulative 6-month rates of CCyR, major molecular response, MR4, and MR4.5 were 96%, 78%, 50%, and 36%, respectively. Durable MR4 ≥24 or ≥60 months was observed in 67% and 51% of patients, respectively. The 24-month event-free survival rate was 97%. After a median follow-up of 128 months, the 10-year overall survival rate was 90%. Eight patients (16%) had serious grade 2 to 3 cardiovascular adverse events, leading to permanent discontinuation in five (10%). CONCLUSION: Ponatinib yielded high cytogenetic and molecular responses in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Its use in the frontline setting is hindered by arterio-/vaso-occlusive and other severe toxicities.

Outcome of 3q26.2/MECOM rearrangements in chronic myeloid leukemia.

STUDY AIMS: To evaluate the outcomes of patients with 3q26.2/MECOM-rearranged chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). METHODS: We reviewed consecutive adult patients with 3q26.2/MECOM-rearranged CML between January 1, 1998 and February 16, 2023. Rearrangements of 3q26.2/MECOM were confirmed by conventional cytogenetics, and fluorescence in situ hybridization starting in 2015. RESULTS: We identified 55 patients with MECOM-rearranged CML, including 23 in chronic phase (CP) or accelerated phase (AP) and 32 in blast phase (BP). Nine patients (16%) achieved a major cytogenetic response (MCyR) or deeper. At a median follow-up of 89 months, median survival was 14 months. The 5-year survival rate was 19% overall, 23% in CML-CP/AP, and 15% in CML-BP. In the 6-month landmark analysis, the 5-year survival rate was 41% for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) recipients versus 17% for non-recipients (P = 0.050). Multivariate analysis showed that the percentage of marrow blasts and achievement of MCyR or deeper could predict survival. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of 3q26.2/MECOM-rearranged CML are poor despite the availability of multiple BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Third-generation TKIs in combination with novel agents and possible allo-SCT could be considered given the poor outcomes and resistance to second-generation TKIs.

Combination therapy with novel agents for acute myeloid leukaemia: Insights into treatment of a heterogenous disease.

The treatment landscape of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is evolving rapidly. Venetoclax in combination with intensive chemotherapy or doublets or triplets with targeted or immune therapies is the focus of numerous ongoing trials. The development of mutation-targeted therapies has greatly enhanced the treatment armamentarium, with FLT3 inhibitors and isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors improving outcomes in frontline and relapsed/refractory (RR) AML, and menin inhibitors showing efficacy in RR NPM1mut and KMT2A-rearranged AML. With so many new drugs approved, the number of potential combinatorial approaches to leverage the maximal benefit of these agents has increased dramatically, while at the same time introducing clinical challenges, such as key preclinical and clinical data supporting the development of combinatorial therapy, how to optimally combine or sequence these novel agents, how to optimise dose and duration to maintain safety while enhancing efficacy, the optimal duration of therapy and the role of measurable residual disease in decision-making in both intensive and low-intensity therapy settings. In this review, we will outline the evidence leading to the approval of key agents in AML, their on-label current approvals and how they may be optimally combined in a safe and deliverable fashion to further improve outcomes in AML.