Radiomultiomics: quantitative CT clusters of severe asthma associated with multi-omics.

RATIONALE: Lung quantitative computed tomographic (qCT) severe asthma clusters have been reported, but their replication and underlying disease mechanisms are unknown. We identified and replicated qCT clusters of severe asthma in two independent asthma cohorts and determined their association with molecular pathways. METHODS: We used consensus clustering on qCT measurements of airway and lung CT scans, performed in 105 severe asthmatic adults from the U-BIOPRED cohort. The same qCT measurements were used to replicate qCT clusters in a subsample of the ATLANTIS asthma cohort (n=97). We performed integrated enrichment analysis using blood, sputum, bronchial biopsies, bronchial brushings and nasal brushings transcriptomics and blood and sputum proteomics to characterize radiomultiomic-associated clusters (RACs). RESULTS: qCT clusters and clinical features in U-BIOPRED were replicated in the matched ATLANTIS cohort. In the U-BIOPRED cohort, RAC1 (n=30) was predominantly female with elevated BMI, mild airflow limitation, normal qCT parameters and upregulation of the complement pathway. RAC2 (n=34) subjects had a lower degree of airflow limitation, airway wall thickness and dilatation, with upregulation of proliferative pathways, including neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 2/tyrosine kinase receptor B (NTRK2/TRKB), and down-regulation of semaphorin pathways. RAC3 (n=41) showed increased lung attenuation area and air trapping, severe airflow limitation, hyperinflation, and upregulation of cytokine signaling and signaling by interleukin pathways, and matrix metallopeptidase 1, 2 and 9. CONCLUSIONS: U-BIOPRED severe asthma qCT clusters were replicated in a matched independent asthmatic cohort and associated with specific molecular pathways. Radiomultiomics might represent anovel strategy to identify new molecular pathways in asthma pathobiology.

ECG-based risk factors for adverse cardiopulmonary events and treatment outcomes in COPD.

BACKGROUND: COPD has high mortality, compounded by comorbid cardiovascular disease. We investigated two electrocardiogram (ECG) markers, Cardiac Infarction Injury Score (CIIS) and P pulmonale, as prognostic tools for adverse cardiopulmonary events in COPD. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the IMPACT trial. Outcomes included odds (odds ratio [95% confidence intervals]) of adverse cardiopulmonary events stratified by CIIS threshold (<20/≥20) and P pulmonale (baseline). Events included all-cause death, hospitalisation/death, cardiovascular adverse event of special interest (CVAESI), severe COPD exacerbations, and moderate/severe COPD exacerbations. Effects of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI based on CIIS and P pulmonale were also assessed. RESULTS: We included 9448 patients. Patients with CIIS ≥20 had greater odds of all-cause death (1.73[1.27-2.37]; p<0.001), hospitalisation/death (1.33[1.17-1.50]; p<0.001), CVAESI (1.27[1.08-1.48]; p<0.005), severe COPD exacerbations (1.41[1.21-1.64]; p<0.001) and moderate/severe COPD exacerbations (1.25[1.13-1.40]; p<0.001) versus CIIS <20. Patients with P pulmonale (versus without) had greater odds of all-cause death (2.25[1.54-3.29]; p<0.001), hospitalisation/death (1.51[1.28-1.79]; p<0.001), severe COPD exacerbations (2.00[1.65-2.41]; p<0.001) and moderate/severe COPD exacerbations (1.25[1.08-1.46]; p<0.001). A combined model demonstrated patients with CIIS ≥20 and P pulmonale had increased risk of all-cause death (3.38[1.23-9.30]; p=0.019), hospitalisation/death (1.61[1.14-2.22]; p=0.004), and rate of severe COPD exacerbations (1.89[1.22-2.91]; p=0.004) and moderate/severe COPD exacerbations (1.25[1.00-1.56]; p=0.046). The risk of all-cause death and CVAESI was reduced with FF/UMEC/VI versus UMEC/VI in patients with CIIS ≥20, but not CIIS <20. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest potential clinical relevance of CIIS and P pulmonale as risk indicators for adverse cardiopulmonary events in COPD.

Dupilumab reduces exacerbations and improves lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema: Phase 3 randomized trial (BOREAS).

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, reduced exacerbations and improved lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 inflammation in the phase 3 BOREAS trial. OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical outcomes in patients from BOREAS by emphysema status. METHODS: Patients with COPD and type 2 inflammation (screening blood eosinophils ≥300 cells/µL) on maximal inhaled therapy were randomized to add-on dupilumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks for 52 weeks. We assessed the annualized moderate/severe COPD exacerbation rates over 52 weeks and change from baseline to Week 12 in prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in patients with and without investigator-reported emphysema. RESULTS: Investigator-reported emphysema was present in 306/939 patients (32.6%) at baseline. Dupilumab reduced exacerbation rates vs placebo by 29% (relative risk [RR] 0.71 [95% CI 0.53-0.95]) and 31% (RR 0.69 [95% CI 0.53-0.89]) in patients with and without emphysema, respectively. Prebronchodilator FEV1 least squares mean difference from baseline to Week 12 for dupilumab vs placebo was 0.07 L ([95% CI 0.002-0.14]) and 0.09 L ([95% CI 0.04-0.14]) in patients with and without emphysema, respectively. No treatment by emphysema interaction effect was observed for the annualized rate of exacerbations (P value for interaction = 0.8296) or change in prebronchodilator FEV1 (P value for interaction = 0.6438). CONCLUSION: Dupilumab efficacy was similar in patients with COPD and type 2 inflammation, with or without investigator-reported emphysema.

Expiratory flow limitation development index (ELDI): a novel method of assessing respiratory mechanics in COPD.

BACKGROUND: Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) can be detected using oscillometric reactance and is associated with a worse clinical presentation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Reactance can show negative swings upon exhalation, which may develop at different rates between patients. We propose a new method to quantify the rate of EFL development; the EFL Development Index (ELDI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from 124 COPD patients was performed. Data included lung function tests, Impulse Oscillometry (IOS), St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score. Fifty four patients had repeat data after 6 months. Twenty two patients had data recorded after 5 days of treatment with long acting bronchodilator therapy. EDLI was calculated as the mean expiratory reactance divided by the minimum expiratory reactance. RESULTS: The mean ELDI was used to categorise patients with rapid onset of EFL (> 0.63; n = 29) or gradual onset (≤ 0.63; n = 34). Those with rapid development had worse airflow obstruction, lower quality of life scores, and greater resting hyperinflation, compared to those with gradual development. In patients with EFL, ELDI correlated with symptoms scores, airflow obstruction, lung volumes and gas diffusion. Both EFL and ELDI were stable over 6 months. EFL and EDLI improved with bronchodilator treatment. CONCLUSIONS: COPD patients with rapid EFL development (determined by ELDI) had worse clinical characteristics than those with gradual EFL development. The rate of EFL development appears to be associated with clinical and physiological characteristics.

Striving for Stability in Patients with COPD: A New Way Forward?

This article summarises key themes from a symposium held during the recent European Respiratory Society congress, which took place in Vienna, Austria, 7-11 September 2024. The symposium was sponsored by GSK and entitled 'Striving for disease stability in COPD: Giving patients more of their best days'. During the session, the speakers (MeiLan Han, Lowie Vanfleteren and Dave Singh) highlighted the specific challenges of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), such as its unpredictable and unstable nature, with additional insights provided from patients with COPD in the form of video interviews. The faculty discussed whether treatment standards and goals should be more ambitious to provide all patients the stability and predictability they deserve and the opportunity to do more while living with COPD.

Airway tryptase levels inform the lack of clinical efficacy of the tryptase inhibitor MTPS9579A in asthma.

BACKGROUND: Tryptase, a mast cell protease, has been identified as a potential therapeutic target in managing patients with refractory asthma. We assessed the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of MTPS9579A, an anti-tryptase antibody, in a phase 2a randomized trial for patients with uncontrolled asthma and a phase 1c trial to understand activity within the lower respiratory tract. METHODS: Phase 2a patients (n = 134) received 1800 mg MTPS9579A or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was time to the first composite exacerbation event. Phase 1c patients (n = 27) received one intravenous dose of 300 or 1800 mg MTPS9579A or placebo. Both trials measured MTPS9579A concentrations and effects on tryptase in serum and nasal lining fluid; phase 1c also analyzed bronchial lining fluid. RESULTS: MTPS9579A did not meet the primary endpoint (hazard ratio = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.55-1.47; p = 0.6835); exacerbation rates in the placebo group were low. Serum and nasal MTPS9579A pharmacokinetics and tryptase levels were consistent with data from healthy volunteers. However, in phase 1c patients, compared to nasal levels, MTPS9579A bronchial concentrations were 6.8-fold lower, and bronchial active and total tryptase levels were higher (119-fold and 30-fold, respectively). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling predicted intravenous doses of 3800 mg every 4 weeks would be necessary to achieve 95% active tryptase inhibition from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The MTPS9579A dose tested in the phase 2a study was insufficient to inhibit tryptase in bronchial lining fluid, likely contributing to the observed lack of efficacy.

Effect of ensifentrine on dyspnea in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pooled analysis of the ENHANCE trials.

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea is a critical component of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We report the effect of ensifentrine, a novel PDE3/PDE4 inhibitor, on dyspnea using pooled data from the Phase 3 ENHANCE-1/2 trials. METHODS: The pooled population (ensifentrine, n = 975; placebo, n = 574) included patients aged 40-80 years with post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.7, FEV1 30-70% predicted, mMRC Dyspnea Scale score ≥2, and a smoking history ≥10 pack-years. Patients taking dual LAMA/LABA or LAMA/LABA/ICS triple therapy were excluded. Dyspnea measures included the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS), and rescue medication use. RESULTS: After 24 weeks, ensifentrine significantly improved TDI scores (least-squares mean difference, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.64, 1.30; p < 0.001) and across all TDI subdomains. Ensifentrine-treated patients were more likely to be TDI responders at week 24 (p < 0.001), which was consistent across clinically relevant subgroups. Ensifentrine-treated patients had improved E-RS breathlessness subdomain scores (p = 0.053) and reduced rescue medication use (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Ensifentrine produced clinically meaningful improvements in multiple dyspnea measures in patients with symptomatic, moderate-to-severe COPD. A limitation of this study was the exclusion of patients taking dual LAMA/LABA and LAMA/LABA/ICS triple therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifiers are ENHANCE-1: NCT04535986; ENHANCE-2: NCT04542057.

Effect of Triple Therapy on Cardiovascular and Severe Cardiopulmonary Events in COPD: A Post-hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Clinical Trial (ETHOS).

Rationale: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary events. In the Phase III, 52-week ETHOS trial (NCT02465567), triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) reduced rates of moderate/severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality versus dual therapy with glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (GFF) or budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BFF). However, the effect of BGF on cardiovascular events versus GFF remains unevaluated. Further, the effect of BGF on time to first severe exacerbation has not been reported. Objective: Assess the effects of BGF 320/18/9.6 µg (BGF 320) and other ICS-containing arms on cardiovascular and severe cardiopulmonary endpoints versus GFF in patients with COPD from ETHOS. Methods: Patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD and a history of exacerbations were randomized to twice-daily BGF 320, BGF 160/18/9.6 µg, BFF 320/9.6 µg, or GFF 18/9.6 µg (GFF). Time to first severe COPD exacerbation was a pre-specified endpoint; post-hoc cardiovascular and severe cardiopulmonary endpoints included time to first major adverse cardiac event (MACE), time to first cardiovascular adverse event (AE) of special interest (CVAESI), time to first cardiac AE, and time to the composite endpoint of first severe cardiopulmonary event. Measurements and Main Results: BGF 320 reduced the rate of first occurrence (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) of cardiovascular and severe cardiopulmonary events versus GFF, including for CVAESI (0.63 [0.48, 0.82]), cardiac AE (0.60 [0.48, 0.76]), and severe cardiopulmonary event (0.80 [0.67, 0.95]). Conclusions: BGF had a benefit on cardiovascular endpoints and severe cardiopulmonary events versus GFF in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD.

Rethinking Blood Eosinophils for Assessing Inhaled Corticosteroids Response in COPD: A Post Hoc Analysis From the FLAME Trial.

BACKGROUND: The varied treatment response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with COPD and the associated increased risk of pneumonia necessitate a personalized ICS therapeutic approach. This is informed by blood eosinophil count (BEC), which predicts ICS treatment response. However, BEC appears to change in response to ICS treatment. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does (1) BEC measured on ICS treatmen (2) BEC measured off ICS treatment, or (3) the change in BEC during ICS treatment best predict treatment response to ICS in COPD? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fluticasone Salmeterol on COPD Exacerbations Trial (FLAME), a 52-week, double-blind randomized controlled trial compared long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) with LABA/ICS. Corticosteroids were prohibited during a 4-week run-in period. We chose patients previously on ICS, thereby allowing BEC before and after the run-in period to represent BEC on and off ICS, respectively. In this post hoc analysis, we revisited outcome data, exploring how the three BEC biomarkers interacted with treatment response to the ICS-containing regimen. RESULTS: Our study confirms that LABA/LAMA combination is superior, or at least noninferior, to LABA/ICS in curbing exacerbations for most FLAME participants. However, higher BEC off ICS, higher BEC on ICS, and significant BEC suppression during ICS treatment corresponded to superior response to LABA/ICS in terms of exacerbation rate, time to first exacerbation, and time to first pneumonia. In a subgroup, including 9% of participants, BEC changed significantly during ICS treatment (≥ 200 cells/µL), and higher BEC on ICS did not predict ICS treatment response. For these patients, BEC off ICS and BEC change proved more predictive. Excess pneumonia risk associated with ICS appeared to be confined to patients who do not benefit from this treatment. BEC was not predictive of treatment effects on lung function and health status. INTERPRETATION: This exploratory analysis advocates preferentially using BEC off ICS or BEC change during ICS treatment for guiding ICS treatment decisions. BEC measured on ICS is less predictive of treatment response. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01782326; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

COPD Exacerbations Before and During COVID-19 in France, Germany, Italy, the UK and the US.

Background: Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were reported less frequently during the COVID-19 pandemic. We report real-world data on COPD exacerbation rates before and during this pandemic. Methods: Exacerbation patterns were analysed using electronic medical records or claims data of patients with COPD before (2017-2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020 through early 2022) in France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States. Data from each country were analysed separately. The proportions of patients with COPD receiving maintenance treatment were also estimated. Results: The proportion of patients with exacerbations fell 45-78% across five countries in 2020 versus 2019. Exacerbation rates in most countries were reduced by >50% in 2020 compared with 2019. The proportions of patients with an exacerbation increased in most countries in 2021. Across each country, seasonal exacerbation increases seen during autumn and winter in pre-pandemic years were absent during the first year of the pandemic. The percentage of patients filling COPD prescriptions across each country increased by 4.53-22.13% in 2019 to 9.94-34.17% in 2021. Conclusion: Early, steep declines in exacerbation rates occurred in 2020 versus 2019 across all five countries and were accompanied by a loss of the seasonal pattern of exacerbation.

Nasal epithelial gene expression identifies relevant asthma endotypes in the ATLANTIS study.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is an inflammatory airways disease encompassing multiple phenotypes and endotypes. Several studies suggested gene expression in nasal epithelium to serve as a proxy for bronchial epithelium, being a non-invasive approach to investigate lung diseases. We hypothesised that molecular differences in upper airway epithelium reflect asthma-associated differences in the lower airways and are associated with clinical expression of asthma. METHODS: We analysed nasal epithelial gene expression data from 369 patients with asthma and 58 non-asthmatic controls from the Assessment of Small Airways Involvement in Asthma study. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed on asthma-associated genes. Asthma-associated gene signatures were replicated in independent cohorts with nasal and bronchial brushes data by comparing Gene Set Variation Analysis scores between asthma patients and non-asthmatic controls. RESULTS: We identified 67 higher expressed and 59 lower expressed genes in nasal epithelium from asthma patients compared with controls (false discovery rate<0.05), including CLCA1, CST1 and POSTN, genes well known to reflect asthma in bronchial airway epithelium. Hierarchical clustering revealed several molecular asthma endotypes with distinct clinical characteristics, including an endotype with higher blood and sputum eosinophils, high fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and more severe small airway dysfunction, as reflected by lower forced expiratory flow at 50%. In an independent cohort, we demonstrated that genes higher expressed in the nasal epithelium reflect asthma-associated changes in the lower airways. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the nasal epithelial gene expression profile reflects asthma-related processes in the lower airways. We suggest that nasal epithelium may be a useful non-invasive tool to identify asthma endotypes and may advance personalised management of the disease.

Effect of Prior ChAdOx1 COVID-19 Immunisation on T-Cell Responses to ChAdOx1-HBV.

There are varying data concerning the effect of prior anti-vector immunity on the T-cell response induced by immunisation with an identical vectored vaccine containing a heterologous antigen insert. To determine whether prior exposure to ChAdOx1-SARS-CoV2 immunisation (Vaxzevria®) impacts magnitudes of antigen-specific T-cell responses elicited by subsequent administration of the same viral vector (encoding HBV antigens, ChAdOx1-HBV), healthy volunteers that had received Vaxzevria® (n = 15) or the Pfizer or Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (n = 11) between 10 and 18 weeks prior were recruited to receive a single intramuscular injection of ChAdOx1-HBV. Anti-ChAdOx1-neutralising antibody titers were determined, and vector or insert-specific T-cell responses were measured by a gamma-interferon ELISpot and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay using multiparameter flow cytometry. Participants were followed for three months after the ChAdOx1-HBV injection, which was well-tolerated, and no dropouts occurred. The baseline ChAdOx1 neutralisation titers were higher in the Vaxzevria® cohort (median of 848) than in the mRNA cohort (median of 25). T-cell responses to HBV antigens, measured by ELISpot, were higher on day 28 in the mRNA group (p = 0.013) but were similar between groups on day 84 (p = 0.441). By ICS, these differences persisted at the last time point. There was no clear correlation between the baseline responses to the adenoviral hexon and the subsequent ELISpot responses. As vaccination within 3 months using the same viral vector backbone affected the insert-specific T-cell responses, a greater interval after prior adenoviral immunisation using heterologous antigens may be warranted in settings in which these cells play critical roles.

A Simulation Study of the Effect of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Choice on Reliever Medication Use, Symptom Control and Exacerbation Risk in Moderate-Severe Asthma.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between immediate symptom control, reliever medication use and exacerbation risk on treatment response and factors that modify it have not been assessed in an integrated manner. Here we apply simulation scenarios to evaluate the effect of individual baseline characteristics on treatment response in patients with moderate-severe asthma on regular maintenance dosing monotherapy with fluticasone propionate (FP) or combination therapy with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) or budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR). METHODS: Reduction in reliever medication use (puffs/24 h), change in symptom control scores (ACQ-5), and annualised exacerbation rate over 12 months were simulated in a cohort of patients with different baseline characteristics (e.g. time since diagnosis, asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5) symptom score, smoking status, body mass index (BMI) and sex) using drug-disease models derived from large phase III/IV clinical studies. RESULTS: Simulation scenarios show that being a smoker, having higher baseline ACQ-5 and BMI, and long asthma history is associated with increased reliever medication use (p < 0.01). This increase correlates with a higher exacerbation risk and higher ACQ-5 scores over the course of treatment, irrespective of the underlying maintenance therapy. Switching non-responders to ICS monotherapy to combination therapy after 3 months resulted in immediate reduction in reliever medication use (i.e. 1.3 vs. 1.0 puffs/24 h for FP/SAL and BUD/FOR, respectively). In addition, switching patients with ACQ-5 > 1.5 at baseline to FP/SAL resulted in 34% less exacerbations than those receiving regular dosing BUD/FOR (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We have identified baseline characteristics of patients with moderate to severe asthma that are associated with greater reliever medication use, poor symptom control and higher exacerbation risk. Moreover, the effects of different inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta agonist (LABA) combinations vary significantly when considering long-term treatment performance. These factors should be considered in clinical practice as a basis for personalised management of patients with moderate-severe asthma symptoms.

In this study we looked at how different factors affect the response to asthma treatment in people with moderate to severe asthma who are taking regular medication. Specifically, we wanted to quantify how much asthma duration, differences in the degree of symptom control and lung function, as well as smoking habit, body weight, and sex influence how well someone responds to regular maintenance therapy. Using computer simulations based on models obtained from data in a large patient population with moderate­severe asthma, we explored scenarios that reflect real-life management of patients undergoing treatment with inhaled corticosteroids alone or in combination with long-acting beta agonists over a 12-month period. We looked at how much reliever inhaler they use, how well they rate their asthma control, and how often they have asthma attacks. By considering these results together, we evaluated how well the treatments work on ongoing symptoms and/or reduce the risk of future asthma attacks. Our simulations showed that smokers, people with higher asthma symptom scores, who are obese, and have a longer history of asthma tend to use their reliever inhalers more often. This was linked to a higher risk of having asthma attacks and worse symptom control. Switching those patients who do not respond well to their initial treatment with corticosteroid to combination therapy reduced how much reliever inhaler they need. Also, the effects of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination therapy were greater than budesonide/formoterol. In conclusion, our study found that certain patient characteristics can predict how well someone responds to asthma treatment.

Sex differences in asthma control, lung function and exacerbations: the ATLANTIS study.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a heterogeneous disease with a prevalence and severity that differs between male and female patients. QUESTION: What are differences between male and female patients with asthma with regard to asthma control, lung function, inflammation and exacerbations? METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis in the ATLANTIS (Assessment of Small Airways Involvement in Asthma) study, an observational cohort study including patients with asthma from nine countries with a follow-up of 1 year during which patients were characterised with measures of large and small airway function, questionnaires, inflammation and imaging. We compared differences in baseline characteristics and longitudinal outcomes between male and female patients with asthma. RESULTS: 773 patients were enrolled; 450 (58%) of these were female. At baseline, female patients with asthma were in higher Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) steps (p=0.042), had higher Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (F: 0.83; M: 0.66, p<0.001) and higher airway resistance as reflected by uncorrected impulse oscillometry outcomes (ie, R5-R20: F: 0.06; M: 0.04 kPa/L/s, p=0.002). Male patients with asthma had more severe airway obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity % predicted: F: 91.95; M: 88.33%, p<0.01) and more frequently had persistent airflow limitation (F: 27%; M: 39%, p<0.001). Blood neutrophils were significantly higher in female patients (p=0.014). With Cox regression analysis, female sex was an independent predictor for exacerbations. INTERPRETATION: We demonstrate that female patients are in higher GINA steps, exhibit worse disease control, experience more exacerbations and demonstrate higher airway resistance compared with male patients. The higher exacerbation risk was independent of GINA step and blood eosinophil level. Male patients, in turn, have a higher prevalence of persistent airflow limitation and more severe airflow obstruction. These findings show sex can affect clinical phenotyping and outcomes in asthma. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02123667.

The relevance of eosinophils in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: inflammation, microbiome, and clinical outcomes.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is caused by the inhalation of noxious particles such as cigarette smoke. The pathophysiological features include airway inflammation, alveolar destruction, and poorly reversible airflow obstruction. A subgroup of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has higher blood eosinophil counts, associated with an increased response to inhaled corticosteroids and increased biomarkers of pulmonary type 2 inflammation. Emerging evidence shows that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with increased pulmonary eosinophil counts have an altered airway microbiome. Higher blood eosinophil counts are also associated with increased lung function decline, implicating type 2 inflammation in progressive pathophysiology in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We provide a narrative review of the role of eosinophils and type 2 inflammation in the pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, encompassing the lung microbiome, pharmacological targeting of type 2 pathways in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and the clinical use of blood eosinophil count as a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease biomarker.

The effect of inhaler prescription on the development of lung cancer in COPD: a nationwide population-based study.

BACKGROUND: COPD is associated with the development of lung cancer. A protective effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on lung cancer is still controversial. Hence, this study investigated the development of lung cancer according to inhaler prescription and comorbidties in COPD. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. The development of lung cancer was investigated from the index date to December 31, 2020. This cohort included COPD patients (≥ 40 years) with new prescription of inhalers. Patients with a previous history of any cancer during screening period or a switch of inhaler after the index date were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 63,442 eligible patients, 39,588 patients (62.4%) were in the long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA) group, 22,718 (35.8%) in the ICS/LABA group, and 1,136 (1.8%) in the LABA group. Multivariate analysis showed no significant difference in the development of lung cancer according to inhaler prescription. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for age, sex, and significant factors in the univariate analysis, demonstrated that diffuse interstitial lung disease (DILD) (HR = 2.68; 95%CI = 1.86-3.85), a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (HR = 1.05; 95%CI = 1.01-1.08), and two or more hospitalizations during screening period (HR = 1.19; 95%CI = 1.01-1.39), along with older age and male sex, were independently associated with the development of lung cancer. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the development of lung cancer is not independently associated with inhaler prescription, but with coexisting DILD, a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and frequent hospitalization.

Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and CYP3A4 interaction potential of the selective P2X3 receptor antagonist filapixant: A randomized multiple ascending-dose study in healthy young men.

AIMS: We report on investigations exploring the P2X3-receptor antagonist filapixant's effect on taste perception and cough-reflex sensitivity and describe its pharmacokinetics, including its CYP3A4-interaction potential. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 3 × 12 healthy men (18-45 years) were assigned (3:1) to filapixant (20, 80 or 250 mg by mouth) or placebo twice daily over 2 weeks. A single dose of midazolam (1 mg), a CYP3A4 substrate, was administered with and without filapixant. Assessments included a taste-strips test, a taste questionnaire, cough challenge with adenosine triphosphate, adverse event reports and standard safety assessments. RESULTS: Taste disturbances were observed mainly in the 250-mg group: six of nine participants (67%) in this group reported hypo- or dysgeusia in the questionnaire; eight participants (89%) reported taste-related adverse events. Five participants (56%) had a decrease in overall taste-strips-test scores ≥2 points (point estimate -1.1 points, 90% confidence interval [-3.3; 1.1]). Cough counts increased with adenosine triphosphate concentration but without major differences between treatments. Filapixant exposure increased proportionally to dose. Co-administration of filapixant had no clinically relevant effect on midazolam pharmacokinetics. Area under the concentration-time curve ratios and 90% confidence intervals were within 80-125%. No serious or severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, filapixant was safe and well tolerated, apart from mild, transient taste disturbances. Such disturbances occurred more frequently than expected based on (in vitro) receptor-selectivity data, suggesting that other factors than P2X3:P2X2/3 selectivity might also play an important role in this context. The cough-challenge test showed no clear treatment effect. Filapixant has no clinically relevant CYP3A4 interaction potential.

Nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) in the treatment of viral exacerbations of COPD.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory viral infections are major drivers of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. Interferon-ß is naturally produced in response to viral infection, limiting replication. This exploratory study aimed to demonstrate proof-of-mechanism, and evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled recombinant interferon-ß1a (SNG001) in COPD. Part 1 assessed the effects of SNG001 on induced sputum antiviral interferon-stimulated gene expression, sputum differential cell count, and respiratory function. Part 2 compared SNG001 and placebo on clinical efficacy, sputum and serum biomarkers, and viral clearance. METHODS: In Part 1, patients (N = 13) with stable COPD were randomised 4:1 to SNG001 or placebo once-daily for three days. In Part 2, patients (N = 109) with worsening symptoms and a positive respiratory viral test were randomised 1:1 to SNG001 or placebo once-daily for 14 days in two Groups: A (no moderate exacerbation); B (moderate COPD exacerbation [i.e., acute worsening of respiratory symptoms treated with antibiotics and/or oral corticosteroids]). RESULTS: In Part 1, SNG001 upregulated sputum interferon gene expression. In Part 2, there were minimal SNG001-placebo differences in the efficacy endpoints; however, whereas gene expression was initially upregulated by viral infection, then declined on placebo, levels were maintained with SNG001. Furthermore, the proportion of patients with detectable rhinovirus (the most common virus) on Day 7 was lower with SNG001. In Group B, serum C-reactive protein and the proportion of patients with purulent sputum increased with placebo (suggesting bacterial infection), but not with SNG001. The overall adverse event incidence was similar with both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, SNG001 was well-tolerated in patients with COPD, and upregulated lung antiviral defences to accelerate viral clearance. These findings warrant further investigation in a larger study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU clinical trials register (2017-003679-75), 6 October 2017.

Dupilumab for COPD with Blood Eosinophil Evidence of Type 2 Inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation, has shown efficacy and safety in a phase 3 trial involving patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 inflammation and an elevated risk of exacerbation. Whether the findings would be confirmed in a second phase 3 trial was unclear. METHODS: In a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with COPD who had a blood eosinophil count of 300 cells per microliter or higher to receive subcutaneous dupilumab (300 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations. Key secondary end points, analyzed in a hierarchical manner to adjust for multiplicity, included the changes from baseline in the prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at weeks 12 and 52 and in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ; scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating better quality of life) total score at week 52. RESULTS: A total of 935 patients underwent randomization: 470 were assigned to the dupilumab group and 465 to the placebo group. As prespecified, the primary analysis was performed after a positive interim analysis and included all available data for the 935 participants, 721 of whom were included in the analysis at week 52. The annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.06) with dupilumab and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.60) with placebo; the rate ratio as compared with placebo was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.82; P<0.001). The prebronchodilator FEV1 increased from baseline to week 12 with dupilumab (least-squares mean change, 139 ml [95% CI, 105 to 173]) as compared with placebo (least-squares mean change, 57 ml [95% CI, 23 to 91]), with a significant least-squares mean difference at week 12 of 82 ml (P<0.001) and at week 52 of 62 ml (P = 0.02). No significant between-group difference was observed in the change in SGRQ scores from baseline to 52 weeks. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups and consistent with the established profile of dupilumab. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COPD and type 2 inflammation as indicated by elevated blood eosinophil counts, dupilumab was associated with fewer exacerbations and better lung function than placebo. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; NOTUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04456673.).