Impact of motivational feedback on levels of physical activity and quality of life by activity monitoring following knee arthroplasty surgery-protocol for a randomized controlled trial nested in a prospective cohort (Knee-Activity).

BACKGROUND: Evidence on how to improve daily physical activity (PA) levels following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or medial uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) by motivational feedback is lacking. Moreover, it is unknown whether a focus on increased PA after discharge from the hospital improves rehabilitation, physical function, and quality of life. The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) nested in a prospective cohort is (a) to investigate whether PA, physical function, and quality of life following knee replacement can be increased using an activity monitoring device including motivational feedback via a patient app in comparison with activity monitoring without feedback (care-as-usual), and (b) to investigate the potential predictive value of PA level prior to knee replacement for the length of stay, return to work, and quality of life. METHODS: The study is designed as a multicenter, parallel-group, superiority RCT with balanced randomization (1:1) and blinded outcome assessments. One hundred and fifty patients scheduled for knee replacement (TKA or mUKA) will be recruited through Odense University Hospital, Denmark, Vejle Hospital, Denmark and Herlev/Gentofte Sygehus, Denmark. Patients will be randomized to either 12 weeks of activity monitoring and motivational feedback via a patient app by gamification or 'care-as-usual,' including activity monitoring without motivational feedback. The primary outcome is the between-group change score from baseline to 12-week follow-up of cumulative daily accelerometer counts, which is a valid proxy for average objectively assessed daily PA. DISCUSSION: Improving PA through motivational feedback following knee replacement surgery might improve post-surgical function, health-related quality of life, and participation in everyday life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT06005623. Registered on 2023-08-22. TRIAL STATUS: Recruiting.

The effect of robot-assisted versus standard training on motor function following subacute rehabilitation after ischemic stroke - protocol for a randomised controlled trial nested in a prospective cohort (RoboRehab).

BACKGROUND: Body weight unloaded treadmill training has shown limited efficacy in further improving functional capacity after subacute rehabilitation of ischemic stroke patients. Dynamic robot assisted bodyweight unloading is a novel technology that may provide superior training stimuli and continued functional improvements in individuals with residual impairments in the chronic phase after the ischemic insult. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of dynamic robot-assisted versus standard training, initiated 6 months post-stroke, on motor function, physical function, fatigue, and quality of life in stroke-affected individuals still suffering from moderate-to-severe disabilities after subacute rehabilitation. METHODS: Stroke-affected individuals with moderate to severe disabilities will be recruited into a prospective cohort with measurements at 3-, 6-, 12- and 18-months post-stroke. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be nested in the prospective cohort with measurements pre-intervention (Pre), post-intervention (Post) and at follow-up 6 months following post-intervention testing. The present RCT will be conducted as a multicentre parallel-group superiority of intervention study with assessor-blinding and a stratified block randomisation design. Following pre-intervention testing, participants in the RCT study will be randomised into robot-assisted training (intervention) or standard training (active control). Participants in both groups will train 1:1 with a physiotherapist two times a week for 6 months (groups are matched for time allocated to training). The primary outcome is the between-group difference in change score of Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Assessment from pre-post intervention on the intention-to-treat population. A per-protocol analysis will be conducted analysing the differences in change scores of the participants demonstrating acceptable adherence. A priori sample size calculation allowing the detection of the minimally clinically important between-group difference of 6 points in the primary outcome (standard deviation 6 point, α = 5% and ß = 80%) resulted in 34 study participants. Allowing for dropout the study will include 40 participants in total. DISCUSSION: For stroke-affected individuals still suffering from moderate to severe disabilities following subacute standard rehabilitation, training interventions based on dynamic robot-assisted body weight unloading may facilitate an appropriate intensity, volume and task-specificity in training leading to superior functional recovery compared to training without the use of body weight unloading. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT06273475. TRIAL STATUS: Recruiting. Trial identifier: NCT06273475. Registry name: ClinicalTrials.gov. Date of registration on ClinicalTrials.gov: 22/02/2024.

Criterion validity of muscle strain analyses of skeletal muscle function in patients with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the wide range of existing performance measures to evaluate functional status of patients with multiple sclerosis, the heterogeneous nature of the disease hinders clinical characterization and monitoring of disease severity. Speckle tracking ultrasonography is a non-invasive technique to assess isolated muscle function by evaluating the contractile properties of muscle tissue, i.e. muscle strain. The aim of this study was to investigate whether muscle strain measured by speckle tracking ultrasonography could be a useful quantitative measure of muscle function in patients with multiple sclerosis. The criterion validity of muscle strain was compared to that of validated performance measures of upper and lower extremity function. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used baseline data from an explorative observational cohort study (the MUST study). Participants recruited from a hospital outpatient MS clinic underwent speckle tracking ultrasonography of the biceps brachii, supraspinatus, and soleus muscles of the dominant side according to pre-defined submaximal isometric contractions. Participants also completed the Timed 25-Foot Walk Test, the Six Spot Step Test, the 2-minute walking test, the Nine-Hole Peg Test, the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale, and the Oxford Shoulder Score. Gaussian distribution was investigated by visual inspection of normal probability plots and the Shapiro-Wilk test. The Timed 25-Foot Walk Test and Nine-Hole Peg Test were selected as gold standards for function of the lower and upper extremities, respectively. Criterion validity was assessed using Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient ρ (rho), comparing the muscle strain and performance measures against predefined gold standards. Differences in criterion validity were estimated using squared correlations on the Fischer's Z-scale, with non-parametric bootstrapping to obtain bias-corrected, accelerated bootstrap confidence intervals (95% BCa). RESULTS: Criterion validity showed good to excellent correlations between the gold standard for lower extremity function and the 2-minute walking test and Six Spot Step Test, and a fair correlation to the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale. No significant correlation was found between the gold standard for upper extremity function and the performance measure. There were no significant correlations between the gold standards and muscle strain. CONCLUSION: The absence of criterion validity for muscle strain alongside fair to strong criterion validity for the performance measures indicates that speckle tracking ultrasonography assessment of muscle strain is either invalid or evaluates other constructs of multiple sclerosis. Muscle strain assessed by speckle tracking ultrasonography cannot be recommended for the evaluation of treatment effects or disease progression in multiple sclerosis.

Evaluation of functional outcome measures after fampridine treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis - An interventional follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this interventional study on participants with multiple sclerosis (MS) with walking disability was to evaluate changes in functional hand and walking measurements after fampridine treatment, after stratifying by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). We furthermore wanted to investigate different functional measurements to evaluate their ability to detect responders to fampridine with a clinically relevant improvement. METHODS: Patients were recruited from the MS Clinic at Odense University Hospital and were classified into two disability groups based on their EDSS score (moderate EDSS (EDSSMod) 4.5-5.5 [n = 19] and severe EDSS (EDSSSev) 6.0-7.0 [n = 14]). At baseline (visit 1) they completed the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), Nine Hold Peg Test (9HPT), 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12), and the Six Spot Step Test (SSST). Participants were given 10 mg twice daily fampridine for 14 days before retested (visit 2). For each measurement, cut-off values were used to define responders with a clinically relevant improvement to treatment. The measurements were evaluated separately and in combination. RESULTS: Of the 33 participants, 25 (75.8%) were identified as having a clinically relevant improvement (CRI). For all patients combined (EDSSAll), all five measurements showed significant functional improvement after treatment. For the individual measurements, the highest participant response rates after 14 days of fampridine treatment were seen on the MSWS-12 (57.6%) and 2MWT (42.4%). The 2MWT also showed the largest performance improvement (18.5%) from visit 1 to visit 2. For patients with severe disability (EDSSSev), no significant improvement was seen after fampridine treatment on the T25FW, and most of the responders to T25FW had moderate disability (EDSSMod, 71.5%). Conversely for the SSST, most responders were EDSSSev (83.3%). No participants had a clinically relevant improvement on the 9HPT. The combination of T25FW, SSST, and MSWS-12 was less sensitive in distinguishing responders from non-responders, whereas the combination of 2MWT and MSWS-12 identified the same responders and could better distinguish fampridine responders from non-responders. CONCLUSION: EDSS level did not influence the effect of fampridine treatment on functional hand and walking measures and the responsiveness of the measurements differed only a little between moderate and severe EDSS levels. The combination of self-reported walking capacity (MSWS-12) and walking endurance (2MWT) was better than T25FW, SSST, and MSWS-12 at detecting clinically meaningful improvement after fampridine treatment, which could prove useful in the clinical monitoring of walking disabilities in MS during fampridine treatment.