RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The overall reject rate (RR) of our newly set up Radiology department was an average of 14%, higher than the recommended 8% target and 10% threshold set by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). An analysis done to identify potential causes of a high RR suggested that radiographers might have been rejecting images of diagnostic value. A lack of consistency in the definition of a diagnostic value image amongst radiographers may be a possible cause in the higher overall RR. This study aims to investigate potential discrepancies among radiographers in defining a diagnostic radiograph. METHODS: An online survey composed of an image bank with a questionnaire was created, participants grade each image as either accepted or rejected. Fleiss Kappa was used to determine the level of agreement between the radiographers in accepting or rejecting the images in the image bank. RESULTS: Twenty radiographers with varying years of experience participated in this study. There was fair agreement amongst the radiographers' judgements, k=.277 (95% CI, .277 to .278), p < .005. Individual kappa for the "Accept" and "Reject" categories were both 0.277. There is no significant difference in the agreement level across the junior (k=.278), intermediate (k=.371) and senior (k=.275) radiographers. CONCLUSION: The result suggests that there is discrepancy in the radiographers' definition of a diagnostic radiograph and this misalignment of radiographers' perception might be one of the underlying causes of high RR. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study has provided the researchers with a better insight on the underlying cause of the department high RR. By calibrating the radiographers' definition of a diagnostic radiograph, it will help realign the radiographer's agreement on when a radiograph should be rejected. This will reduce the overall RR and patient's overall dose. A lower RR translates to a more efficient turnaround time in General Radiography services, ensuring quality service is provided without further strain on our limited resources.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the suspension of clinical training for undergraduate radiography students in Singapore. Coordinated preparation plans and strategies between the university and hospitals were needed to safely resume clinical placements within national and hospitals' risk control measures against COVID-19 transmission. METHODS: Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) and the Radiology Department of Singapore General Hospital (SGH) had collaborated to meet requirements for safe resumption of clinical placements. SIT prepared students by emphasising compliance to all risk measures, addressing concerns of risk transmission, meeting learning objectives, and reassessing infection control competencies. In tandem, SGH prepared an orientation programme and used technology for open communication among faculty, clinical educators and students which included monitoring of well-being and rapid dissemination of updates. Of note, SGH reorganised operating procedures and physical spaces to meet national standards of safe physical distancing, restricted movement between treatment areas and teams, and rosters to remain committed to the supervision and education of students. RESULTS: Clinical placements resumed 3 months following suspension. Clinical educators faced the challenge of the need for balance between increasing clinical load and student supervision. A solution was frequent engagement and support by faculty, with educators and students via video conferencing platforms. Students' well-being was frequently checked. There was less variation in cases which simulation training made up for some of the learning objectives. CONCLUSION: Adaptation and commitment to continue active and quality clinical education while ensuring students' safety were vital during a pandemic. Clinical training within stringent precautionary measures may shape the era of the new norm.
