HLA evolutionary divergence (HED) informs the effect of HLA-B mismatch on outcomes after haploidentical transplantation.

Graft versus tumor relies on tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) that are presented to donor T cells via human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). The HLA evolutionary divergence (HED) between alleles of a single individual can dictate the ability to present TAAs. The impact of HED in haploidentical donor transplantation (HIDT) has not been studied. We studied the effect of HED on transplant outcomes following HIDT. We analyzed 322 consecutive recipient/donor pairs with a median follow-up of 57.2 months. Pairwise divergence of HLA class I and II showed that HLA-B, -DRB1, and -DQB1 contributing most to mean HED. The mean HED was class I 6.85 (HLA-A 7.08, -B 8.24, and -C 5.07), class II 8.58 (HLA-DRB1 10.97, -DQB1 10.06 and -DPB1 4.06). A high HED in class I mismatched recipient/donor haplotype (RD MM) was significant for worse DFS (HR 1.11, p = 0.020), and relapse (HR 1.11, p = 0.02). Also, a high HED in RD MM HLA-B haplotype had worse OS (HR 1.07, p = 0.02), DFS (HR 1.09, p = 0.002), higher relapse (HR 1.10, p = 0.003), and similar NRM to low HED. The multivariate analysis showed that high HED in RD MM HLA-B (≥7.8 vs <7.8) had worse DFS (HR 1.53, p = 0.01), higher relapse (HR 1.61, p = 0.024), and similar NRM and OS.

Impact of Graft-Versus-Host Disease on Relapse and Nonrelapse Mortality Following Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide-Based Transplantation.

Following conventional graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, the development of acute and/or chronic GVHD is associated with lower relapse rates. However, the effects of GVHD on relapse and non-relapse mortality following post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based GVHD prophylaxis have not been well studied. To this end, we analyzed the impact of acute and chronic GVHD following PTCy-based haploidentical donor transplantation (HIDT). The analysis included 335 consecutive HIDT recipients transplanted at a single institution between 2005 and 2021. Landmark analysis (LA) and time-dependent multivariable analysis (MVA) were utilized to study the impact of GVHD development on transplant outcome. Landmarks were defined as Day +100 for acute GVHD and one-year for chronic GVHD. Recipient characteristics included a median age of 50 (19-80) years, most commonly transplanted for acute leukemia[/MDS [242]. PBSC was the graft source in 81%, and regimen intensity was myeloablative in 49%. Median follow-up was 65 (23-207) months. In landmark analysis, development of grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD (versus 0-1) was associated with inferior 3-year overall survival (OS 47% versus 64%, P = .041), due to higher NRM (25% versus 10%, P = .013). In contrast, development of grade 2 acute GVHD had no significant effect on NRM or survival. When restricted to acute leukemia/MDS patients, development of grade II acute GVHD was associated with improved OS (79% versus 58%, P = .027) and a trend towards lower relapse (24% versus 36%, P = .08). Development of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD resulted in significantly higher NRM (15% versus 4%, P = .010), but had no impact on relapse, DFS or OS. In Cox multivariate analysis (MVA), grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were both associated with significantly higher NRM (HR 3.38, P < .001 and HR3.35, P < .001, respectively). In addition, grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD predicted worse OS (HR 1.80, P = .007) and DFS (HR 1.55, P = .041). In contrast, relapse was not impacted by acute or chronic GVHD in MVA. Grade 2 acute GVHD was not associated with transplant outcome in MVA. In summary, both grade 3 to 4 acute and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were associated with higher NRM after PTCy-based HIDT, without an effect on relapse risk. Methods of early identification of such patients in order to augment GVHD prophylaxis are clearly needed.

Racial, Ethnic and Socioeconomic Diversity and Outcomes of Patients with Graft-versus-Host Disease: A CIBMTR Analysis.

Socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity have been associated with outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Certain aspects of GVHD management such as the need for long term care, prolonged immunosuppressive treatment, and need for close follow up for complications may exacerbate disparities. Adults (≥ 18 years) reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) who underwent a first alloHCT for acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myeloproliferative neoplasm between 2008 - 2018 were included. Endpoints for those developing GVHD included overall survival (OS), transplant related mortality (TRM), and disease relapse. Models were adjusted for patient and transplant related variables. A two-sided p-value < 0.01 was considered significant. Among the 14,825 allo-HCT recipients, 6,259 (42.2%) and 6,675 (45.0%) patients developed aGVHD and cGVHD, respectively. In patients with aGVHD, non-Hispanic Blacks had increased TRM (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.24-1.83, p=0.0001) and overall mortality (HR 1.31, 1.14-1.50, p=0.0002) compared with non-Hispanic Whites, an association that disappeared when severity of aGVHD was included in the model. Lower SES was associated with increased risk of disease relapse (p=0.0016) but not OS or TRM. In patients who developed cGVHD, race and ethnicity were not associated with OS, TRM and disease relapse. However, the highest quartile of annual household income (≥ $80,000) had improved OS (HR 0.77, 0.69-0.85, p<0.0001) and reduced TRM (HR 0.86, 0.67-0.87, p<0.0001) compared with lowest quartile, adjusting for race and ethnicity. Race/ethnicity and SES are associated with outcomes after GVHD. Optimizing health care resources available to low SES patients and strategies to minimize the risk of severe GVHD in non-Hispanic Blacks may improve long-term outcomes.

Revised HLA-DP TCE-Core Permissiveness Model Better Defines Relapse Risk and Survival following Haploidentical Transplant.

The presence of an HLA-DPB1 nonpermissive mismatch (NPMM) by the TCE-3 model has been associated with improved survival following haploidentical donor transplantation (HIDT) using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). With the development of a revised model (TCE-Core) that further separates TCE-3 "group 3" alleles into "core" (C) and "noncore" (NC) alleles, a formerly permissive mismatch (PMM) resulting from group 3 alleles in both donor and recipient is now considered a C-NPMM if 1 or more of those alleles is NC. We aimed to study the additional effect of HLA-DPB1 C-NPMM according to the TCE-Core algorithm, as well as the directional vector of the mismatch, on outcomes following HIDT. To this end, we analyzed 242 consecutive HIDT recipients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who underwent transplantation between 2005 and 2021 (median age, 51 years; range, 19 to 80 years). The median follow-up was 62 months (range, 23 to 199 months). Of the 136 HIDTs classified as PMM by TCE-3, 73 were reclassified as a C-NPMM by the TCE-Core algorithm, of which 36 were in the graft-versus host (GVH) vector (37 were host-versus-graft [HVG] only). Given comparable survival between conventional NPMM and C-NPMM, GVH/bidirectional were analyzed together (nonpermissive). HVG-only C-NPMM were combined with HLA-DPB1-matched and PMM (permissive) because of similar outcomes. The presence of a TCE-Core-defined nonpermissive HLA-DP mismatch resulted in superior 5-year overall survival (OS) (66% versus 47%) and disease-free survival (DFS) (60% versus 43%). Compared to the conventional TCE-3 algorithm, TCE-Core identified a higher percentage of nonpermissive transplants (38% versus 23%) and better discriminated outcomes between nonpermissive and permissive status, with a larger difference in survival outcomes using TCE-Core compared to TCE-3 (OS Δ, 18.3% versus 12.7%; DFS Δ, 16.5% versus 8.5%). In multivariable analysis (MVA), a nonpermissive TCE-Core mismatch led to improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], .54; P = .003) and DFS (HR, .62; P = .013), largely due to decreased relapse risk (HR, .63; P = .049). In contrast, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) outcomes were not significantly impacted. In summary, the presence of nonpermissive TCE-Core HLA-DP mismatch strongly predicts survival following PTCy-based HIDT, owing to a reduction in relapse risk without a corresponding increase in GVHD or NRM. As a donor selection tool, TCE-Core appears to better discriminate HIDT outcomes while at the same time identifying a larger percentage of the potential donor pool.

Plain language summary of the KarMMa-3 study of ide-cel or standard of care regimens in people with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

What is this summary about? This plain language summary describes the results of a Phase 3 study called KarMMa-3. In this ongoing study, researchers looked at a relatively new treatment for people with multiple myeloma, a type of blood cancer, whose cancer got worse despite treatment (refractory) or had cancer that at first improved with treatment, but eventually stopped responding (relapsed).How was this study conducted? In the KarMMa-3 study, people with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma received either a one-time infusion of a new treatment, named ide-cel, or one of the standard of care regimens currently available for patients with this cancer. People were treated with the standard of care regimens in weekly or monthly cycles until the cancer got worse, there were unacceptable side effects, or the person withdrew from the study.What were the results? The results of this study showed that people receiving the one-time infusion of ide-cel lived longer without the cancer getting worse and had a greater reduction in cancer cells than patients receiving the standard of care regimen. A higher percentage of patients receiving ide-cel responded to treatment than patients receiving the standard of care regimen, and the response to treatment was better with idecel. These results show that ide-cel is a promising treatment for this challenging disease.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03651128 (KarMMa-3 study).

CPX-351 Pharmacokinetics and Safety in Adults with Hematologic Malignancies and Renal Function Impairment: Phase 1 Trial.

This open-label phase 1 study (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03555955) assessed CPX-351 pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety in patients with hematologic malignancies with normal or impaired renal function. Patients were enrolled into three cohorts based on their creatinine clearance (CrCl): ≥90 mL/min (Cohort 1, normal renal function, n = 7), 30 to <59 mL/min (Cohort 2, moderate renal impairment, n = 8), or <30 mL/min (Cohort 3, severe renal impairment, n = 6). Patients received intravenous CPX-351 for initial induction; blood and urine samples were collected for PK analysis. The primary objective was to assess the PK parameters for cytarabine, daunorubicin, and their respective metabolites, arabinosyluracil (Ara-U) and daunorubicinol. Renal impairment did not significantly impact the cytarabine, daunorubicin, or daunorubicinol exposure, but it caused a slight increase in the Ara-U exposure. The CPX-351 side effect profile was similar in patients with impaired renal function compared to those with normal renal function. All the patients reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), most commonly febrile neutropenia and nausea (57% each) and hyperglycemia (43%); no patients discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. These data suggest that CPX-351 dose adjustment is not required for patients with hematologic malignancies with moderate or severe renal impairment.

Immunosuppression-Free Status at 1 Year after Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide.

The development of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in 1-year survivors after matched related or unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation was shown to be associated with higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and worse overall survival (OS). The impact of chronic GVHD requiring immunosuppression (IS) for recipients of haploidentical transplantation (HIDT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) who have survived to 1 year post-transplantation has not been studied previously and was investigated for this analysis. A total of 322 adult patients who underwent HIDT at our center were included in this study. The effect of IS-free status on post-transplantation outcomes was assessed. The median follow-up for survivors was 63.9 months (range, 18.3 to 165 months). A total of 163 patients (65%) were IS-free at 1 year post-HIDT. Baseline characteristics of this group were similar to those of patients still requiring IS, except for higher percentages of female donor-male recipient pairs (28% versus 15%; P =.03) and female donors (48% versus 30%; P =.008). Logistic regression to identify patients more likely to be on IS at 1 year post-HIDT identified the use of a female donor as a significant risk factor (odds ratio, 2.11; P = .009). In a Cox regression analysis, patients requiring IS at 1 year post-transplantation had higher NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 4.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80 to 6.72; P < .001) and showed a trend toward worse disease-free survival (DFS) (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, .95 to 2.66; P =.08), with no impact on OS (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, .90 to 2.31; P = .13) or relapse (HR, .77; 95% CI, .37 to 1.61; P = .49). These results indicate that use of a female donor is a significant risk factor for requiring IS at 1 year post-HIDT. Additionally, chronic GVHD requiring IS at 1-year post-HIDT no significant effect on relapse but is associated with higher NRM and a trend toward worse DFS.

Plain language summary of the TRANSFORM study primary analysis results: liso-cell as a second treatment regimen for large B-cell lymphoma following failure of the first treatment regimen.

What is this summary about? People diagnosed with a disease called large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) may experience return, or early relapse, of their disease within the first year after receiving and responding to their first (first-line) treatment regimen. Others may have primary refractory disease, meaning that the disease either did not respond to first-line treatment at all or only responded for a very brief period. Second (second-line) treatment includes immunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT, which has the potential to cure LBCL. However, if the disease does not respond to immunotherapy, people cannot receive ASCT, and less than 30% of people are cured.Therefore, new second-line treatment options are required, such as CAR T cell therapy, which uses a person's own genetically engineered lymphocytes, also called T cells, to fight their lymphoma. In this article, we summarize the key results of the phase 3 TRANSFORM clinical study that tested if liso-cel, a CAR T cell treatment, can safely and effectively be used as a second-line treatment for people with early relapsed or primary refractory (relapsed/refractory) LBCL.A total of 184 adults with relapsed/refractory LBCL who were able to receive ASCT were randomly treated with either liso-cel or standard of care (SOC) as second-line treatment. SOC included immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT.What were the key takeaways? Almost all (97%) people in the liso-cel group completed treatment, whereas 53% of people in the SOC group did not complete treatment, mostly due to their disease not responding or relapsing, and therefore they were not able to receive ASCT. People who received liso-cel as a second-line treatment lived longer without the occurrence of an unfavorable medical event or worsening of the disease and had a better response to treatment than those who received SOC as second-line treatment. People who received liso-cel reported side effects that researchers considered to be manageable, and that were known to occur with CAR T cell treatment.What were the main conclusions reported by the researchers? Results from the TRANSFORM study support the use of liso-cel as a more effective second-line treatment compared with SOC that is safe for people with relapsed/refractory LBCL.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03575351 (TRANSFORM study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).