Analyzing pepsin degradation assay conditions used for allergenicity assessments to ensure that pepsin susceptible and pepsin resistant dietary proteins are distinguishable.

The susceptibility of a dietary protein to proteolytic degradation by digestive enzymes, such as gastric pepsin, provides information on the likelihood of systemic exposure to a structurally intact and biologically active macromolecule, thus informing on the safety of proteins for human and animal consumption. Therefore, the purpose of standardized in vitro degradation studies that are performed during protein safety assessments is to distinguish whether proteins of interest are susceptible or resistant to pepsin degradation via a study design that enables study-to-study comparison. Attempting to assess pepsin degradation under a wide-range of possible physiological conditions poses a problem because of the lack of robust and consistent data collected under a large-range of sub-optimal conditions, which undermines the needs to harmonize in vitro degradation conditions. This report systematically compares the effects of pH, incubation time, and pepsin-to-substrate protein ratio on the relative degradation of five dietary proteins: three pepsin susceptible proteins [ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco), horseradish peroxidase (HRP), hemoglobin (Hb)], and two pepsin resistant proteins [lipid transfer protein (LTP) and soybean trypsin inhibitor (STI)]. The results indicate that proteins susceptible to pepsin degradation are readily distinguishable from pepsin-resistant proteins when the reaction conditions are within the well-characterized optima for pepsin. The current standardized in vitro pepsin resistant assay with low pH and high pepsin-to-substrate ratio fits this purpose. Using non-optimal pH and/or pepsin-to-substrate protein ratios resulted in susceptible proteins no longer being reliably degraded by this stomach enzyme, which compromises the ability of this in vitro assay to distinguish between resistant and susceptible proteins and, therefore, no longer providing useful data to an overall weight-of-evidence approach to assessing safety of proteins.

Two novel bovine somatotropin species generated from a common dehydroalanine intermediate.

Under stressed conditions such as prolonged exposure to high pH, the C-terminal disulfide bridge in bovine somatotropin (bST) is susceptible to a base catalyzed beta-elimination reaction. This reaction converts the disulfide bond to a dehydroalanine residue with loss of a sulphur atom. Two altered species were isolated in pure form and determined to be generated from this dehydroalanine intermediate. One is a monomeric lanthionyl bST (L-bST) with a thioether linkage, and the other is an inter-molecular disulfide linked dimer containing a lysinoalanine. These two novel structures were unambiguously determined using various techniques including enzymatic digestion, amino acid sequencing and analysis, and mass spectrometry. The monomeric L-bST was demonstrated to be equipotent to normal bST in a hypox rat assay, thus showing that formation of lanthionine in place of this disulfide bond does not affect it bioactivity.