RESUMO
Patients with cancer have a high risk of intubation, intensive care unit admission, or death from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19); age and comorbidities are additional risk factors. Vaccination is effective against COVID-19; however, patients with cancer have been excluded from pivotal clinical trials for COVID-19 vaccines. Data on COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients who are older are lacking. This observational study was conducted to evaluate the seropositivity rate and safety of a two-dose regimen of the BNT162b2 or mRNA1273 vaccine in older patients (age ≥ 70 years) with solid tumors or with hematological malignances who are undergoing active anticancer treatment or whose treatment has been terminated within 6 months of vaccination. The control group was composed of healthy volunteers that were age-matched with the patient group. The primary endpoint was the seropositivity rate, and the secondary endpoints were safety, the factors influencing seroconversion, the IgG titers of patients versus healthy volunteers, and post-vaccine COVID-19 infection between 20 March 2021 and 14 July 2021. At our Institution (Oncology and Hematology Department, Hospital of Piacenza, North Italy), 443 patients with cancer underwent a program for COVID-19 vaccination; 115 (25.95%) were older than 70 (range 71-86 years) and form the basis of this study. All 115 patients accepted the vaccination. There were 64 female patients (55.65%), 94 patients (81.74%) with solid tumors, and 21 patients (18.26%) with hematological malignances. The primary endpoint of seropositivity was observed in 75 patients (65.22%)-70.21% in patients with solid tumors and 42.86% in patients with hematological malignances-versus in 100% of patients in the control group. Of the secondary endpoints, no grade 3-4 side effects and no COVID-19 infections were reported. The factor influencing seroconversion was the type of cancer. The patients' median IgG titers were significantly lower than in the control groups. The COVID-19 vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA1273 were effective and safe among older patients with cancer when administered in real-world conditions.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Early reports on patients with cancer and COVID-19 have suggested a high mortality rate compared with the general population. Patients with thoracic malignancies are thought to be particularly susceptible to COVID-19 given their older age, smoking habits, and pre-existing cardiopulmonary comorbidities, in addition to cancer treatments. We aimed to study the effect of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on patients with thoracic malignancies. METHODS: The Thoracic Cancers International COVID-19 Collaboration (TERAVOLT) registry is a multicentre observational study composed of a cross-sectional component and a longitudinal cohort component. Eligibility criteria were the presence of any thoracic cancer (non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC], small-cell lung cancer, mesothelioma, thymic epithelial tumours, and other pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms) and a COVID-19 diagnosis, either laboratory confirmed with RT-PCR, suspected with symptoms and contacts, or radiologically suspected cases with lung imaging features consistent with COVID-19 pneumonia and symptoms. Patients of any age, sex, histology, or stage were considered eligible, including those in active treatment and clinical follow-up. Clinical data were extracted from medical records of consecutive patients from Jan 1, 2020, and will be collected until the end of pandemic declared by WHO. Data on demographics, oncological history and comorbidities, COVID-19 diagnosis, and course of illness and clinical outcomes were collected. Associations between demographic or clinical characteristics and outcomes were measured with odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs using univariable and multivariable logistic regression, with sex, age, smoking status, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease included in multivariable analysis. This is a preliminary analysis of the first 200 patients. The registry continues to accept new sites and patient data. FINDINGS: Between March 26 and April 12, 2020, 200 patients with COVID-19 and thoracic cancers from eight countries were identified and included in the TERAVOLT registry; median age was 68·0 years (61·8-75·0) and the majority had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 (142 [72%] of 196 patients), were current or former smokers (159 [81%] of 196), had non-small-cell lung cancer (151 [76%] of 200), and were on therapy at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis (147 [74%] of 199), with 112 (57%) of 197 on first-line treatment. 152 (76%) patients were hospitalised and 66 (33%) died. 13 (10%) of 134 patients who met criteria for ICU admission were admitted to ICU; the remaining 121 were hospitalised, but were not admitted to ICU. Univariable analyses revealed that being older than 65 years (OR 1·88, 95% 1·00-3·62), being a current or former smoker (4·24, 1·70-12·95), receiving treatment with chemotherapy alone (2·54, 1·09-6·11), and the presence of any comorbidities (2·65, 1·09-7·46) were associated with increased risk of death. However, in multivariable analysis, only smoking history (OR 3·18, 95% CI 1·11-9·06) was associated with increased risk of death. INTERPRETATION: With an ongoing global pandemic of COVID-19, our data suggest high mortality and low admission to intensive care in patients with thoracic cancer. Whether mortality could be reduced with treatment in intensive care remains to be determined. With improved cancer therapeutic options, access to intensive care should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting based on cancer specific mortality and patients' preference. FUNDING: None.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Torácicas/epidemiologia , Idoso , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Causas de Morte , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/patologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Pneumonia Viral/patologia , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Neoplasias Torácicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Torácicas/patologia , Neoplasias Torácicas/terapiaRESUMO
Background: We describe cancer patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection treated at the Piacenza's general hospital (north Italy). Materials & methods: 25 cancer patients infected by COVID-19 admitted at the Piacenza's general hospital from 21 February to 18 March 2020. Outcome from the infection were compared with infected noncancer patients. Results: 20 patients (80%) were treated with antiviral therapy and hydroxychloroquine and five (20%) received hydroxychloroquine alone. Nine (36%) patients died, while 16 (64%) overcome the infection. In the control group the mortality was 16.13% and the overcome from infection was 83.87%. Conclusion: Mortality for COVID-19 was greater in cancer patients when compared with noncancer patients, worse prognosis for older age, women and patients treated with hydroxychloroquine alone. However, the comparisons did not reach statistical significance in most cases. This could be due to the small sample size that is the main limitation of the study.
Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Coronavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Ceftriaxona/uso terapêutico , Cobicistat/uso terapêutico , Darunavir/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Itália , Lopinavir/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Pandemias , Ritonavir/uso terapêutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19RESUMO
Purpose: Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma has a very poor prognosis. Although irinotecan, oxaliplatin and leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil (FOLFIRINOX) significantly increases survival in advanced pancreatic cancer, compared to employing only gemcitabine (GEM), toxicities have tempered enthusiasm for its use. Methods: This study retrospectively analyses the real-world clinical practice with full and attenuated doses of FOLFIRINOX in unselected patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer, treated at an Italian general hospital. Efficacy, tolerability, and toxicity were evaluated, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Fifty consecutive patients with advanced (13) or metastatic (37) pancreatic adenocarcinomas were treated with FOLFIRINOX at the Medical Oncology Unit, Piacenza General Hospital, North Italy. The first enrolled consecutive 18 patients (36%) of this series started the treatment with a full dose of the regimen, while the subsequent 32 (64%) consecutive patients received dose attenuation (-20% bolus fluorouracil and -25% irinotecan). In the entire group, the response rate, median OS, and median PFS were 30%, 10.1 months, and 5.6 months, respectively, with no differences in objective response in the 32 patients that received an attenuated dose compared with the 18 patients receiving a full dose of chemotherapy. However, neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, and vomiting were statistically increased in the 18 patients receiving a full dose compared with the 32 patients receiving an attenuated dose of FOLFIRINOX (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the efficacy and tolerability of modified FOLFIRINOX in advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.
RESUMO
Central nervous system (CNS) metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) are rare, and occur in 0.16-0.69% of patients with gastric or gastro-esophageal (GE) junction cancer. Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2) is associated with poor prognosis in the absence of HER-2-targeted therapy, and with an increased incidence of CNS metastases in patients with breast cancer. The role of HER-2 overexpression in CNS metastases is not well known in gastric adenocarcinoma. The purpose of the present retrospective study was to assess the incidence of CNS metastases and to evaluate the associations between the CNS and HER-2 status in a series of consecutive patients with gastric or GE junction cancer. Between 2007 and 2013, 300 patients with gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction, were admitted to Piacenza General Hospital, Italy. These cases were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate CNS metastases. The metastases were diagnosed with imaging techniques performed on symptomatic patients. Gastric histological samples of patients with CNS metastases were reviewed and tested for HER-2. A total of 7 of the 300 patients (2.33%) with GC were observed to have CNS metastases and 6 (85.71%) had HER-2 positive disease. These patients exhibited a poor prognosis with a median overall survival rate of 4.1 months (range, 2.1-6.6 months). These results suggested there may be CNS recurrence susceptibility in patients with HER-2 positive GC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that associates CNS metastases and HER-2 status in gastric or GE junction cancer.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Filgrastim biosimilars have recently been introduced into clinical practice. To date biosimilars have demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety as the originator in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Published experience in engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is limited and concerns relatively few patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the aim of assessing the efficacy and the safety of filgrastim biosimilars in post-ASCT bone marrow recovery, we conducted a single institution, retrospective study in 56 lymphoma and myeloma patients who received filgrastim biosimilars (Tevagrastim(®) and Zarzio(®)) at standard doses from day 5. We compared our results with recently published data on the originator. A cost analysis of each biosimilar was performed. RESULTS: Neutrophil counts recovered in 55 patients. The median number of filgrastim biosimilar vials injected was seven per patient. The median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery was 10 and 12 days, respectively. Twenty-six patients had febrile neutropenia, in half of whom the agent involved was identified. In the cost analysis, the use of Tevagrastim(®) and Zarzio(®) was associated with cost reductions of 56% and of 86%, respectively. DISCUSSION: Despite differences in CD34+ cell counts and time of starting filgrastim, our results in terms of time to engraftment and median number of vials injected are similar to published data. Comparing our results by single conditioning regimen to recent literature data, the time to engraftment and duration of hospitalisation were equivalent. Significant differences were observed in the incidence of febrile neutropenia, perhaps due to different preventive and prophylactic protocols for infections. Although prospective studies should be performed to confirm our results, filgrastim biosimilars were found to be effective and safe in engraftment after ASCT.
Assuntos
Medicamentos Biossimilares/administração & dosagem , Filgrastim/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Linfoma/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Adulto , Idoso , Autoenxertos , Medicamentos Biossimilares/efeitos adversos , Medicamentos Biossimilares/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Filgrastim/efeitos adversos , Filgrastim/economia , Humanos , Linfoma/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/economia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: At diagnosis, about 35% of patients with gastric cancer present with distant metastases, and most patients with gastric cancer and liver metastases are excluded from curative surgery. CASE: We report a case of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative gastric cancer with metastases to the liver and perigastric lymph nodes. The patient (a 60-year-old man) was considered unresectable at diagnosis and was treated with palliative chemotherapy (docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil by continuous intravenous infusion over 5 days every 3 weeks). However, after 6 courses of chemotherapy, a computed tomography scan showed a reduction of the liver metastasis and the disappearance of the enlarged perigastric lymph nodes. The patient then underwent a curative gastrectomy, lymphadenectomy and liver resection. After surgery, the patient was treated with 6 courses of FOLFOX-4 regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy. With a follow-up of 26 months after surgery, the patient is alive and disease free. CONCLUSION: In patients with metastatic gastric cancer, the prognosis is poor with a median overall survival of 11 months since curative treatments are excluded; however, this case illustrated that a personalized treatment with chemotherapy and surgery can allow a curative strategy in selected patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Gastrectomia , Quimioterapia de Indução/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Docetaxel , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Gastrectomia/tendências , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Taxoides/administração & dosagemRESUMO
Luminal gastrointestinal (GI) metastases from breast cancer are rare, reports are fragmentary and poor. The purposes of this study are to assess the gastrointestinal involvement from breast cancer in a retrospective study at a single institution and reviewing the related literature. Between January 2007 and December 2011 a total of 980 patients with breast cancer were treated at our institution, patients' records and report database were analysed. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this study. A search of the literature using PubMed, CancerLit, Embase, was performed. Selected for the present review were papers published in English before June 2012. Five of 980 patients (0.5%) showed gastrointestinal metastases from breast cancer, 3 patients had gastric involvement, 1 jejunum, and 1 rectum. Reviewing the literature, 206 patients affected by gastrointestinal metastasis from breast cancer were identified: the most frequent site of metastasis was the stomach (60%). The majority of the patients underwent chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, someone surgery and radiotherapy. GI metastases from breast cancer are rare, but possible, and a very late recurrence can also occur. Cyto-histological diagnosis is mandatory, to differentiate GI metastases from breast cancer to other diseases and to allow an adequate treatment.
RESUMO
We describe a man who presented at our institution with tachyarrhythmia and dyspnea. Echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) of the chest performed during hospitalization revealed a mass within the left atrium. A biopsy of the mass showed a non-small-cell lung cancer, adenocarcinoma G3. Metastatic involvement of the heart is rare; most cases are asymptomatic and diagnosed only during autopsies. Echocardiography, CT scan and MRI are complementary investigations in the evaluation of cardiac lesions. In the setting of cardiac metastatic cancer, all management is palliative.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Most patients with advanced cancer are frequently malnourished and frequently they develop decreased oral fluid intake and dehidratation. Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is an increasingly used therapy for patients with advanced cancer. A central venous access device is often an essential component allowing parenteral nutrition and hidratation. However central venous catheter (CVC) insertion represents a risk for pneumothorax or other mechanical complications. This study aimed to determine the reduction of risks related to central venous catheter positionement in the setting of cancer patients with palliative programm. METHODS: Consecutive patients with a variety of cancer in advanced phase requiring palliative care who were undergoing placement of central venous catheter for parenteral nutrition or hydratation have been prospectively studied in a program of ultrasound-guided CVC placement. Four types of possible complications were defined:mechanical, thrombotic, infection and malfunctioning. After sterilization, local anesthesia is applied and a 7.5 MHZ puncturing US probe is placed in the supraclavicular site and a 16-gauge needle is advanced under real-time US guidance, into the last portion of internal jugular vein by experienced physicians. The Seldinger tecnique is used to place the catheter that is advanced into the superior vena cava until insertion to right atrium. Two hours after each procedure a chest X-ray and US scanning are carried out to confirm CVC position and rule out a pneumotorax. RESULTS: From 30 October 2000 to 31 October 2008: 209 CVC insertional procedure were applied in 207 patients with cancer in the palliative phase only. There were 101 women and 106 men with a mean age of 67.68 year (range 22-86). A single needle puncture of the vein was performed on 206 of 209 procedures (98.6%), the technique was efficacious at the first attempt in 98.6% of cases, in 2 patients (0.96%) the CVC was positioned at the second attempt. The procedure failed only one case (0.44%). No cases of pneumothorax, of major bleeding or nerve punctured were reported. Symptomatic vein thrombosis developed in one patient (0.44%). Infection episodes were reported in two cases. Mean time for CVC permanence was 92.5±9.1 days (range 8-158). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that US-guided CVC insertion is a safe, cheap procedure for cancer patients in advanced phase and with palliative program, allowing parenteral nutrition and hydratation.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of the combination of non- pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet) and ifosfamide in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. METHODS: Cohorts of four patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas received up to five cycles of intravenous ifosfamide 3000 mg/m2 on days 1- 3 in combination with escalating doses of intravenous Myocet on day 1 every 3 weeks until dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least one patient. Starting dose of Myocet was 40 mg/m2 to be escalated through 10 mg/m2 increase up to 80 mg/m2. Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria v3.0 (NCI-CTC v3.0). RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled in the study and 8 of them received the treatment. Median age was 45 years, 3 patients were male and 5 were female. DLT, consisting of neutropenic fever, was reached in one patient at dose level 2 (Myocet 50 mg/m2). Therefore, the MTD and the recommended phase II dose is 40 mg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of intravenous Myocet 40 mg/m2 on day 1 and ifosfamide 3,000 mg/m2 on days 1-3 every 3 weeks is safe and feasible; a phase II study is ongoing.