Left atrial appendage occlusion for patients with valvular diseases without atrial fibrillation (the OPINION Study): study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a significant cause of perioperative stroke in aortic and mitral valve surgeries. Although several large studies have evaluated surgical left atrial appendage occlusion (SLAAO) during cardiac surgeries, their retrospective nature and an uncontrolled broad spectrum of conditions leave them subject to potential residual confounding. This trial aims to test the hypothesis that opportunistic SLAAO can prevent long-term stroke after cardiac surgery in patients receiving mitral or aortic valve surgeries without a history of AF and with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or higher. METHODS AND DESIGN: This study is a single-blinded, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. A total of 2118 patients planning to undergo aortic or mitral surgery without AF will be recruited and equally randomised into intervention or control arms at a 1:1 ratio. In the intervention arm, suture excision of the left atrial appendage (LAA) will be performed during the operation in addition to the original surgery plan. In the control arm, the operation will be performed according to the surgery plan without any intervention on the LAA. The primary outcome is a composite of newly occurred ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack and cardiovascular mortality during a 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes include postoperative AF, cardiovascular mortality, newly occurred ischaemic stroke, newly occurred transient ischaemic attack, newly occurred haemorrhagic stroke, bleeding events, and AF-associated health utilisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Ethics Committee in Fuwai Hospital approved this study. Patients will give informed consent to the study. An information leaflet will be provided to participating patients to introduce the SLAAO procedure. Patients and the public will not get involved in developing the research hypothesis, study design or any other part of this protocol. We plan to publish several papers in peer-reviewed journals about the current research and these will include a description of the study's development and the main findings of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100042238.

Causal effect of hypertension and blood pressure on aortic diseases: evidence from Mendelian randomization.

Hypertension or elevated blood pressure was documented to be an important risk factor for aortic diseases in observational studies, yet the causality remains to be determined. By applying a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, we aim to determine whether hypertension or elevated blood pressure (systolic blood pressure [SBP] or diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) is linked causally to aortic aneurysm or aortic dissection. Genetic instruments and summary statistics for hypertension and aortic diseases were obtained from large genome-wide association studies. The traditional inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used to obtain the causal estimates. Sensitivity analyses including MR-Egger, weighted median and multivariable MR were also performed. Our results suggested that genetic liability to hypertension was associated with aortic dissection (odds ratio [OR]: 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-2.58; P = 1.13 × 10-3) and aortic aneurysm (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.22-1.66; P = 7.79 × 10-6). Per standard deviation increase in genetically-determined DBP was significantly associated with increased aortic dissection (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.09-1.19; P = 1.58 × 10-9) and aortic aneurysm (OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.05-1.09; P = 8.37 × 10-14). There was a null association between SBP and aortic dissection (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.99-1.94; P = 0.38) or aortic aneurysm (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.99-1.01; P = 0.92). Sensitivity analyses documented similar results. Therefore, hypertension and elevated DBP are causally associated with higher risks of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. Preventive interventions for aortic diseases may consider individuals with hypertension, especially those with higher DBP. Meanwhile, further research is required to determine the mechanisms underlying the significantly greater correlation between DBP and aortic diseases than SBP.

Long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft with or without surgical ventricular reconstruction in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

Background: Patients with chronic myocardial infarction (MI) and severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction have poor clinical outcomes. This study aimed to determine whether coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) leads to further improvement in long-term patient outcomes compared with isolated CABG (I-CABG). Methods: From April 2010 to June 2013, 140 consecutive patients with chronic MI and severe LV dysfunction who received contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CE-CMR) within 1 month before surgery were enrolled in this study. The cardiovascular events (CVEs) and long-term survival of patients who underwent CABG and SVR were compared with those who met the criteria for SVR but received I-CABG. Results: A total of 140 patients were included in the final analysis, including 70 patients who underwent CABG and SVR and 70 patients who underwent I-CABG. No differences were observed in the baseline characteristics, LV function, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) between the two groups. CABG+SVR patients experienced a longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (116.0±35.0 vs. 100.2±23.8 minutes, P=0.002) and ventilation time [median (interquartile range): 22.0 (17.0, 37.0) vs. 20.0 (15.0, 24.0) hours, P=0.019] than I-CABG patients. During a mean follow-up of 123.1±12.7 months (range, 102-140 months), the CABG+SVR group had fewer rehospitalizations for congestive heart failure (CHF) (4.3% vs. 19.1%, P=0.007), but no statistical difference in the mortality rate was observed (2.9% vs. 4.4%, P=0.987). The cumulative CVE-free survival rate was significantly higher in CABG+SVR patients (87.0% vs. 67.6%, P=0.007). Conclusions: Our findings indicated that patients with chronic MI and severe LV dysfunction experienced similar perioperative outcomes after CABG+SVR or I-CABG. However, the CABG+SVR group resulted in fewer rehospitalizations for CHF and a higher cumulative CVE-free survival rate.

Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a multi-faceted computerized antimicrobial stewardship intervention in surgical settings: A single-centre cluster-randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate antimicrobial use is common among patients undergoing surgery. It remains unclear whether a multi-faceted computerized antimicrobial stewardship programme is effective and safe in reducing inappropriate antimicrobial use in surgical settings. METHODS: A multi-faceted computerized antimicrobial stewardship intervention system was developed, and an open-label, cluster-randomized, controlled trial was conducted among 18 surgical teams that enrolled 2470 patients for open chest cardiovascular surgery. The surgical teams were divided at random into intervention and control groups at a ratio of 1:1. The primary endpoints were days of therapy (DOT)/1000 patient-days, defined daily dose (DDD)/1000 patient-days and length of therapy (LOT)/1000 patient-days. RESULTS: Mean DOT, DDD and LOT per 1000 patient-days were significantly lower in the intervention group compared with the control group (472.2 vs 539.8, 459.5 vs 553.8, and 438.4 vs 488.7; P<0.05), with reductions of 14.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.8-16.7%], 18.7% (95% CI 15.9-21.4%) and 11.9% (95% CI 9.6-14.1%), respectively. The daily risk of inappropriate antimicrobial use after discharge from the intensive care unit decreased by 23.9% [95% CI 15.5-31.5% (incidence risk ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.85)] in the intervention group. There was no significant difference in rates of infection or surgical-related complications between the groups. Median antimicrobial costs were significantly lower in the intervention group {873.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 684.5-1255.4] RMB vs 1178.7 (IQR 869.1-1814.5) RMB; P<0.001} (1 RMB approximately equivalent to 0.16 US$ in 2022). CONCLUSIONS: The multi-faceted computerized antimicrobial stewardship interventions reduced inappropriate antimicrobial use safely. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04328090.

Association between stress hyperglycaemia and in-hospital cardiac events after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients without diabetes: A retrospective observational study of 5450 patients.

AIMS: To investigate the impact of stress hyperglycaemia (SH) on in-hospital adverse cardiac events after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients without diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 5450 patients without diabetes who underwent CABG were analysed. SH was defined as any two instances in which the random blood glucose level was >7.8 mmol/L after CABG in the intensive care unit (ICU). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including in-hospital mortality, acute myocardial infarction, stroke and acute renal failure. Secondary outcomes included surgical site infection (SSI) and length of ICU stay. RESULTS: Patients with SH had higher rates of MACEs (5.7% vs. 2.3%, p < .0001) and higher SSI (3.3% vs. 1.4%, p = .0003) and longer ICU stays (2.6 ± 2.0 vs. 1.3 ± 1.3 days, p < .0001) than those without SH. Furthermore, SH was associated with a higher risk of MACEs [odds ratio (OR): 2.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38-3.90], SSI (OR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.20-3.95) and longer ICU stay (OR: 12.27, 95% CI: 9.41-16.92) after adjusting for confounders. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with SH >10 mmol/L or SH that occurred in the ICU and lasted more than 48 h had increased risks of postoperative complications (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: SH was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACEs, SSI and longer ICU stay after CABG in patients without diabetes. In addition, SH >10 mmol/L or that occurred in the ICU and lasted more than 48 h increased the risk of adverse outcomes.

Effect of glycemic control and glucose fluctuation on in-hospital adverse outcomes after on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal glycemic control level in diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (On-Pump) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of different blood glucose control levels and glucose fluctuations on in-hospital adverse outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing on-pump CABG. METHOD: A total of 3918 patients with diabetes undergoing CABG were reviewed in this study. A total of 1638 patients were eligible for inclusion and were categorized into strict, moderate and liberal glucose control groups based on post-operative mean blood glucose control levels of < 7.8 mmol/L, from 7.8 to 9.9 mmol/L and ≥ 10.0 mmoL/L, respectively. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite endpoint including in-hospital all-cause mortality and major cardiovascular complications. The secondary endpoint was defined as major cardiovascular complications including acute myocardial infarction, strokes and acute kidney injuries. To determine the associations between blood glucose fluctuations and adverse outcomes, patients with different glycemic control levels were further divided into subgroups according to whether the largest amplitude of glycemic excursion (LAGE) was ≥ 4.4 mmol/L or not. RESULTS: A total of 126 (7.7%) patients had a composite endpoint. Compared with moderate control, strict glucose control was associated with an increased risk of the primary endpoint (adjusted OR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.18-4.15, p = 0.01) and the secondary endpoint (adjusted OR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.01-3.77, p = 0.049). Furthermore, LAGE ≥ 4.4 mmol/L was significantly associated with the primary endpoint (adjusted OR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.12-2.50, p = 0.01) and the secondary endpoint (adjusted OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.17-2.62, p = 0.01),respectively. Patients with LAGE ≥ 4.4 mmol/L had significantly higher rates of the composite endpoint and major vascular complications in both the strict-control (the primary endpoint, 66.7% vs 12.4%, p = 0.034, the secondary endpoint, 66.7% vs 10.3%, p = 0.03) and moderate-control groups (the primary endpoint, 10.2% vs 6.0%, p = 0.03, the secondary endpoint, 10.2% vs 5.8%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: After On-Pump CABG patients with diabetes, strict glucose control (< 7.8 mmol/L) and relatively large glucose fluctuations (LAGE ≥ 4.4 mmol/L) were independently associated with in-hospital adverse outcomes.

Outcome differences between surgeons performing first and subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting procedures in a day: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: With increasing surgical workload, it is common for cardiac surgeons to perform coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after other procedures in a workday. To investigate whether prior procedures performed by the surgeon impact the outcomes, we compared the outcomes between CABGs performed first versus those performed after prior procedures, separately for on-pump and off-pump CABGs as they differed in technical complexity. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing isolated CABG in China from January 2013 to December 2018. Patients were categorised as undergoing on-pump and off-pump CABGs. Outcomes of the procedures performed first in primary surgeons' daily schedule (first procedure) were compared with subsequent ones (non-first procedure). The primary outcome was an adverse events composite (AEC) defined as the number of adverse events, including in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury and reoperation. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome, presented as binary variables. Mixed-effects models were used, adjusting for patient and surgeon-level characteristics and year of surgery. RESULTS: Among 21 866 patients, 10 109 (16.1% as non-first) underwent on-pump and 11 757 (29.6% as non-first) off-pump CABG. In the on-pump cohort, there was no significant association between procedure order and the outcomes (all p>0.05). In the off-pump cohort, non-first procedures were associated with an increased number of AEC (adjusted rate ratio 1.29, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.47, p<0.001), myocardial infarction (adjusted OR (ORadj) 1.43, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.81, p=0.003) and stroke (ORadj 1.73, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.53, p=0.005) compared with first procedures. These increases were only found to be statistically significant when the procedure was performed by surgeons with <20 years' practice or surgeons with a preindex volume <700 cases. CONCLUSIONS: For a technically challenging surgical procedure like off-pump CABG, prior workload adversely affected patient outcomes.

Effect of High- vs Low-Dose Tranexamic Acid Infusion on Need for Red Blood Cell Transfusion and Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: The OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Tranexamic acid is recommended for reducing blood loss and transfusion in cardiac surgery. However, it remains unknown whether a high dose of tranexamic acid provides better blood-sparing effect than a low dose without increasing the risk of thrombotic complications or seizures in cardiac surgery. Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse events of high-dose vs low-dose tranexamic acid in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial among adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The study enrolled 3079 patients at 4 hospitals in China from December 26, 2018, to April 21, 2021; final follow-up was on May 21, 2021. Interventions: Participants received either a high-dose tranexamic acid regimen comprising a 30-mg/kg bolus, a 16-mg/kg/h maintenance dose, and a 2-mg/kg prime (n = 1525) or a low-dose regimen comprising a 10-mg/kg bolus, a 2-mg/kg/h maintenance dose, and a 1-mg/kg prime (n = 1506). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was the rate of allogeneic red blood cell transfusion after start of operation (superiority hypothesis), and the primary safety end point was a composite of the 30-day postoperative rate of mortality, seizure, kidney dysfunction (stage 2 or 3 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes [KDIGO] criteria), and thrombotic events (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism) (noninferiority hypothesis with a margin of 5%). There were 15 secondary end points, including the individual components of the primary safety end point. Results: Among 3079 patients who were randomized to treatment groups (mean age, 52.8 years; 38.1% women), 3031 (98.4%) completed the trial. Allogeneic red blood cell transfusion occurred in 333 of 1525 patients (21.8%) in the high-dose group and 391 of 1506 patients (26.0%) in the low-dose group (risk difference [RD], -4.1% [1-sided 97.55% CI, -∞ to -1.1%]; relative risk, 0.84 [1-sided 97.55% CI, -∞ to 0.96; P = .004]). The composite of postoperative seizure, thrombotic events, kidney dysfunction, and death occurred in 265 patients in the high-dose group (17.6%) and 249 patients in the low-dose group (16.8%) (RD, 0.8%; 1-sided 97.55% CI, -∞ to 3.9%; P = .003 for noninferiority). Fourteen of the 15 prespecified secondary end points were not significantly different between groups, including seizure, which occurred in 15 patients (1.0%) in the high-dose group and 6 patients (0.4%) in the low-dose group (RD, 0.6%; 95% CI, -0.0% to 1.2%; P = .05). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, high-dose compared with low-dose tranexamic acid infusion resulted in a modest statistically significant reduction in the proportion of patients who received allogeneic red blood cell transfusion and met criteria for noninferiority with respect to a composite primary safety end point consisting of 30-day mortality, seizure, kidney dysfunction, and thrombotic events. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03782350.

In Situ Deposition of Skin-Adhesive Liquid Metal Particles with Robust Wear Resistance for Epidermal Electronics.

Comfort and mechanical stability are vital for epidermal electronics in daily use. In situ deposition of circuitry without the protection of substrates or encapsulation can produce imperceptible, conformal, and permeable epidermal electronics. However, they are easily destroyed by daily wear because the binding force between deposited materials and skin is usually weak. Here, we in situ deposited skin-adhesive liquid metal particles (ALMP) to fabricate epidermal electronics with robust wear resistance. It represents the most wear-resistant in situ deposited epidermal electronic materials. It can withstand ∼1600 cm, 175 g loaded paper tape wearing by a standard abrasion wear tester. Stretchability, conformality, permeability, and thinness of the ALMP coating provide an imperceptible and comfortable wearing experience. Without degradation of electrical property caused by solvent evaporation, the dry ALMP coating possesses natural advantages over gel electrodes. In situ deposited ALMP is an ideal material for fabricating comfortable epidermal electronics.

Effect of early hypoglycaemia on hospitalization outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of early postoperative hypoglycaemia on hospitalization outcomes including major cardiovascular complications and in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Data from an observational study of 9583 patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who underwent CABG were analyzed. Hypoglycaemia was defined as a nadir blood glucose level <70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was used to identify 251-balanced pairs of patients to compare outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 306 (3.2%) patients experienced hypoglycaemia, of whom, 133 had diabetes, 173 hadn't diabetes. Patients who were hypoglycaemia had higher incidences of compositeoutcomes than those without hypoglycaemia (12.1% versus 6.0%, P < 0.0001). Postoperative length of ICU stay was longer in patients with hypoglycaemia [2.8 (0.8-21.0) versus 2.0 (0.25-36.0) days, P < 0.0001]. After PSM, the compositeoutcomes and length of ICU stay remained significantly increased for the patients with hypoglycaemia [compositeoutcomes: odd ratio (OR) 2.78, 95% CI, 1.30-5.88, P = 0.01; length of ICU stay: OR 1.60, 95% CI, 1.14-2.26, P = 0.007]. CONCLUSION: Postoperative hypoglycaemia was an independent associated factor of adverse composite outcomes and a lengthened ICU stay after CABG. Hypoglycaemia should be avoided for both postoperative patients with and without diabetes.

Impact of coronary total occlusion on graft failure and outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to assess the impact of chronic total occlusion on long-term graft failure and outcomes in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: We conducted an observational study involving a single-center subgroup of the CORONARY trial. At 6 to 9 years after coronary artery bypass grafting, all alive patients were invited for coronary computed tomography angiography and clinical follow-up. We assessed the association between chronic total occlusion graft and failing graft showing Fitzgibbon type B or O. Risk factors associated with chronic total occlusion graft failure were assessed. The impact of chronic total occlusion on clinical outcomes was analyzed, including death, myocardial infarction, and repeated revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were enrolled between May 2007 and October 2011. Of 301 alive patients at follow-up time (median, 6.8 years; interquartile range, 6.0-8.0 years), repeat coronary computed tomography angiography was performed in 206 patients (68.4%) with 723 grafts (154 chronic total occlusion grafts and 569 nonchronic total occlusion grafts). Chronic total occlusion graft was significantly associated with an increased risk of long-term graft failure after adjustment for patient- and graft-level characteristics (adjusted odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-3.62; P < .001). Arterial graft, side-to-side anastomosis, higher graft flow, and antiplatelet therapy at discharge were associated with chronic total occlusion graft patency. The presence of 1 or more chronic total occlusions was not significantly associated with long-term composite of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.51; P = .707). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic total occlusion graft was associated with an increased risk of graft failure. Surgical technique and guideline-directed medical therapy should be noted to improve chronic total occlusion graft patency.

Effects of left atrial appendage surgical treatment on the incidence of ischemic cerebrovascular accidents in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: We sought to assess different surgical methods for left atrial appendage treatment to determine whether any could reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation-related long-term ischemic cerebrovascular accidents. METHODS: A total of 1243 patients were treated with left atrial appendage removal, and 107 patients (8.6%) were lost to follow-up and excluded. The primary outcome was the long-term incidence of ischemic cerebrovascular events (ie, ischemic stroke, excluding transient ischemic attack) and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of the 1136 patients, 37 (3.3%) had ischemic cerebrovascular events. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year freedoms from long-term ischemic cerebrovascular events of the left atrial appendage extracardiac ligation group were 99.7%, 94.0%, and 90.8%, respectively. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survivals of the left atrial appendage intracardiac suture group were 99.7%, 94.6%, and 93.6%, respectively. There was a significant difference between the left atrial appendage extracardiac ligation group and the left atrial appendage excision group (P = .041). Seventeen patients (4.6%) had long-term ischemic cerebrovascular events in the left atrial appendage extracardiac ligation group (1.1% per year), 14 patients (3.5%) in the left atrial appendage intracardiac suture group (0.9% per year), and 6 patients (1.7%) in the left atrial appendage excision group (0.44% per year). Left atrial appendage excision can reduce the occurrence of long-term thrombotic stroke compared with left atrial appendage extracardiac ligation (95% confidence interval, 1.09-9.26; P = .035). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with atrial fibrillation, the removal of the left atrial appendage can effectively prevent stroke caused by atrial fibrillation.

Risk Factors for Aortic Regurgitation Progression After Repair of Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: The main treatment for a ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA) is surgical repair. Postoperative progression of aortic regurgitation (AR) following SVA repair increases the risk of reoperation, which decreases the long-term survival. Thus, identifying the risk factors for postoperative AR progression is of great significance. METHODS: Adult patients who were diagnosed with ruptured SVA and underwent surgical repair at the current centre were reviewed. Necessary data in the institutional database were extracted. The perioperative and follow-up assessments of the aortic valve by transthoracic echocardiography were also obtained. The aortic regurgitation progression was grouped into three categories: newly developing, recurrence, and worsening. Sixteen (16) variables were screened to identify potential risk factors by univariate logistic regression analysis or Chi-squared test. Variables with p-values <0.1 were further analysed by multivariate logistic regression models to find independent risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 198 consecutive patients from June 2006 to January 2018 were included. The overall incidence of postoperative AR progression was 19.2% (38 of 198). After the univariate analysis, SVA originating from the right coronary sinus, coexisting with ventricular septal defect, larger diameter of aortic annulus, and larger cardiothoracic ratio were screened as potential risk factors. Multivariate analysis indicated that coexisting with a ventricular septal defect (VSD) (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.217-6.532; p=0.016) and larger cardiothoracic ratio (OR, 1.061; 95% CI, 1.001-1.124; p=0.047) were independent risk factors for postoperative AR progression. CONCLUSIONS: To prevent postoperative AR progression after surgical repair, more careful inspection and appropriate surgical techniques are necessary for patients coexisting with VSD or with a larger cardiothoracic ratio.

No-Touch Versus Conventional Vein Harvesting Techniques at 12 Months After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: Multicenter Randomized, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Vein graft occlusion is deemed a major challenge in coronary artery bypass grafting. Previous studies implied that the no-touch technique for vein graft harvesting could reduce occlusion rate compared with the conventional approach; however, evidence on the clinical benefit and generalizability of the no-touch technique is scare. METHODS: From April 2017 to June 2019, we randomly assigned 2655 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting at 7 hospitals in a 1:1 ratio to receive no-touch technique or conventional approach for vein harvesting. The primary outcome was vein graft occlusion on computed tomography angiography at 3 months and the secondary outcomes included 12-month vein graft occlusion, recurrence of angina, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. The generalized estimate equation model was used to account for the cluster effect of grafts from the same patient. RESULTS: During the follow-up, 2533 (96.0%) participants received computed tomography angiography at 3 months after coronary artery bypass grafting and 2434 (92.2%) received it at 12 months. The no-touch group had significantly lower rates of vein graft occlusion than the conventional group both at 3 months (2.8% versus 4.8%; odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.41-0.80]; P<0.001) and 12 months (3.7% versus 6.5%; odds ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.41-0.76]; P<0.001). Recurrence of angina was also less common in the no-touch group at 12 months (2.3% versus 4.1%; odds ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.35-0.85]; P<0.01). Rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were of no significant difference between the 2 groups. The no-touch technique was associated with higher rates of leg wound surgical interventions at 3-month follow-up (10.3% versus 4.3%; odds ratio, 2.55 [95% CI, 1.85-3.52]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the conventional vein harvesting approach in coronary artery bypass grafting, the no-touch technique significantly reduced the risk of vein graft occlusion and improved patient prognosis. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03126409.

Coronary Evaluation Before Heart Valvular Surgery by Using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Versus Invasive Coronary Angiography.

Background Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive, less expensive, low-radiation alternative to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). ICA is recommended for coronary evaluation before heart valvular surgery, and the supporting evidence for CCTA is insufficient. Our study is a single-center, prospective cohort study designed to evaluate the feasibility of CCTA instead of ICA in detection of coronary artery disease before surgery. Methods and Results Heart valvular surgery candidates were consecutively enrolled between April 2017 and December 2018. Nine hundred fifty-eight patients in the CCTA group underwent CCTA primarily, and those with ≥50% coronary stenosis or uncertain diagnosis underwent subsequent ICA. One thousand five hundred twenty-five patients in the ICA group underwent ICA directly before surgery. Coronary artery bypass grafting decision was made by surgeons according to CCTA or ICA results. Most of the patients (78.8%) in the CCTA group avoided invasive angiography. Thirty-day mortality (0.7% versus 0.9%, P=0.821), myocardial infarction (6.4% versus 6.9%, P=0.680 ), and low cardiac output syndrome (4.2% versus 2.8%, P=0.085) were similar in the CCTA and ICA groups. Median duration of follow-up was 19.3 months (interquartile range, 14.2-30.0 months), cumulative rates of mortality (2.6% versus 2.6%, P=0.882) and major adverse cardiac events (9.6% versus 9.0%, P=0.607) showed no difference between the 2 groups. Coronary evaluation expense was lower in the CCTA group ($149.6 versus $636.0, P<0.001). Conclusions The strategy of using CCTA as a doorkeeper in coronary evaluation before heart valvular surgery showed noninferiority in identification of candidates for coronary artery bypass grafting and postoperative safety.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Clopidogrel and Aspirin Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Background The optimal antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting remains unclear. We evaluated the association of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel plus aspirin and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods and Results A total of 18 069 consecutive patients who underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between 2013 and 2017 were identified from a contemporary registry, and 10 854 (60.1%) received DAPT with clopidogrel plus aspirin as determined by claimed prescriptions after surgery. Cox regression models with inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to examine the associations between DAPT and outcomes. Patients who received DAPT, compared with those who received aspirin monotherapy, had a lower incidence of a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization at 6 months (2.9% versus 4.2%; inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.77; P<0.001) as well as death (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.41-0.90), myocardial infarction (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.74), and stroke (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.74). The incidence of major bleeding did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.69-1.78). Similar results were noted across multiple subgroups as well as when using different analytic methods. Conclusions Among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, DAPT with clopidogrel plus aspirin as secondary prevention was associated with reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events within 6 months as compared with aspirin monotherapy, and there was no significant increase in major bleeding.

Influence of operator volume on early outcomes of septal myectomy for isolated hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) recommend that septal myectomy be performed by experienced operators. However, the impact of operator volume on surgical treatment outcomes for isolated HCM has been poorly investigated. METHODS: From 2002 to 2014, 435 consecutive patients with isolated HCM undergoing myectomy at the Fuwai Hospital were retrospectively enrolled. All 29 surgeons were divided into beginner surgeons (operator volume ≤20) and experienced surgeons (operator volume >20) according to the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HCM. Propensity score matching of patients in the two groups was performed. RESULTS: Baseline differences included advanced New York Heart Association classification and older age in the experienced surgeon group. After matching, in the beginner surgeon group (107 cases), residual obstruction (18.7% vs. 0.9%, P<0.001) was more common, and the postoperative left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient (20.7±15.1 vs. 14.3±7.4 mmHg, P<0.001) was higher than that of the experienced surgeon group. In the experienced surgeon group (107 cases), the incidence of mitral valve replacement (1.9% vs. 11.2%, P<0.001) and permanent pacemaker implantation (1.9% vs. 3.7%, P<0.001) was significantly lower than that in the beginner surgeon group. However, there was no difference in procedural mortality (1.9% vs. 1.9%) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Operator volume is an important factor in achieving better obstruction obliteration after septal myectomy in patients with isolated HCM.

Extracardiac Tricuspid Annuloplasty: A Novel Technique for Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation.

We report 3 cases of functional tricuspid regurgitation and demonstrate a novel tricuspid repair technique through the right atrioventricular groove without cardiopulmonary bypass or open heart surgery, which provides a new idea for the treatment of functional tricuspid regurgitation.

Comparison of clinical results between percutaneous closure and surgical repair of ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to investigate whether percutaneous closure of ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA) is as safe and effective as surgery repair. BACKGROUND: Percutaneous closure of ruptured SVA has been becoming an alternative to the traditional surgical repair recently. The reports regarding direct comparison of these two treatment options are scarce. METHODS: The medical records from the institutional database were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 134 patients were reviewed, including 26 patients undergoing percutaneous closure and 108 patients being treated surgically. To reduce the potential bias, 32 patients from Surgical Repair group were selected by propensity score matching. RESULTS: All the ruptured SVAs were successfully closed in each group. No severe procedure-related complications were found in the perioperative period. After matching, there were no significant differences in the baseline clinical characteristics. The median postoperative hospital stays of Matched group were significantly longer than that of Percutaneous Closure group (7 days vs. 1 day, p < .001). Aortic regurgitation, residual shunt and recurrence of SVAs were common complications in both Percutaneous Closure group and Surgical Repair group. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriately selected patients with ruptured SVA could be treated by percutaneous closure with an acceptable risk of short-term complications. Though surgical repair remains the main treatment option for ruptured SVAs, percutaneous closure could be considered in patients with a small-size rupture and no associated cardiac abnormalities.