Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for frequent premature ventricular complexes: rationale and design of the TASC-V trial.

BACKGROUND: Premature Ventricular Complexes (PVCs) are very common in clinical practice, with frequent PVCs (more than 30 beats per hour) or polymorphic PVCs significantly increasing the risk of mortality. Previous studies have shown that vagus nerve stimulation improves ventricular arrhythmias. Stimulation of the auricular distribution of the vagus nerve has proven to be a simple, safe, and effective method to activate the vagus nerve. Transcutaneous au ricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has shown promise in both clinical and experimental setting for PVCs; however, high-quality clinical studies are lacking, resulting in insufficient evidence of efficacy. METHODS: The study is a prospective, randomized, parallel-controlled trial with a 1:1 ratio between the two groups. Patients will be randomized to either the treatment group (taVNS) or the control group (Sham-taVNS) with a 6-week treatment and a subsequent 12-week follow-up period. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with a ≥ 50% reduction in the number of PVCs monitored by 24-hour Holter. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients with a ≥ 75% reduction in PVCs, as well as the changes in premature ventricular beats, total heartbeats, and supraventricular premature beats recorded by 24-hour Holter. Additional assessments compared score changes in PVCs-related symptoms, as well as the score change of self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), and 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). DISCUSSION: The TASC-V trial will help to reveal the efficacy and safety of taVNS for frequent PVCs, offering new clinical evidence for the clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04415203 (Registration Date: May 30, 2020).

Lung-intestinal axis, Shuangshen granules attenuate lung metastasis by regulating the intestinal microbiota and related metabolites.

BACKGROUND: Based on the proposed lung-intestinal axis, there is a significant correlation between the microbiota and lung metastasis. Targeting the microbial composition is valuable in modulating the host response to cancer therapeutics. As a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula, Shuangshen granules (SSG) are clinically useful in delaying lung metastasis, but its underlying mechanisms remain unknown. METHODS: The C57BL/6N mice were chosen to establish the Lewis lung cancer models. The broad-spectrum antibiotics (ABX) group was set up to estimate the effect of microbiota composition on metastasis. The therapeutic effects of different doses of SSG in treating lung metastasis were investigated through histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot analysis methods. Additionally, the phenotype of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in the lung and blood was evaluated by flow cytometry. The fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and negative control (ABX plus high dose SSG group) experiments were also designed to assess intestinal microbiota's role in SSG intervention's outcome in lung metastasis. The 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and Untargeted metabolomic analysis were used to analyze intestinal microbiota and metabolite changes mediated by SSG in tumor-bearing mice with lung metastasis. RESULT: ABX could observably lead to intestinal microbiota dysbiosis and enhance metastasis. SSG showed a significant chemopreventive effect in lung metastasis, reduced metastatic nodules and the expression levels of pre-metastatic niche biomarkers, and enriched the ratio of CD86+F4/80+CD11b+ cells, while FMT delayed metastasis similarly. The analysis of microbiota and metabolites revealed that SSG significantly enriched probiotics in feces, including Akkermansia muciniphila, Lachnoclostridium sp YL32, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, and potential anti-cancer serum metabolites, including Ginsenoside Rb1, Isoquinoline, Betulin and so on. We also investigated the mechanism of SSG protection against lung metastasis and showed that SSG regulated microbiota, improved TAMs polarization, and inhibited the expression of the NF-κB pathway. CONCLUSION: The results presented in our article demonstrated that SSG improved TAMs polarization and inhibited the NF-κB pathway by alleviating intestinal microbiota imbalance and metabolic disorders in tumor-bearing mice, resulting in delayed lung metastasis.

Acupuncture for chronic sciatica: protocol for a multicenter randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic Sciatica is a disabling condition causing considerable medical, social and financial implications. Currently, there is no recognised long-term effective treatment to alleviate sciatica. Acupuncture has been widely used for treating chronic pains with persistent analgesic effects. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for chronic sciatica with follow-up in 52 weeks. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicenter randomised sham-controlled trial. A total of 216 patients with chronic sciatica will be enrolled and randomly assigned to the acupuncture or sham acupuncture group. There will be 10 treatment sessions applied in 4 weeks with frequency decreased over time. Patients will complete follow-ups during 52 weeks. The primary outcomes are changes in leg pain intensity and disability from baseline to week 4. Secondary outcomes include back pain intensity, frequency and bothersomeness, quality of life, and global perceived effect. Adverse events will be recorded in detail. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval of this trial was granted from the ethics committee of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine and all study centres (No. 2020BZYLL0803). Written informed consent will be obtained from enrolled patients. Trial results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100044585 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, http://www.chictr.org.cn, registered on 24 March 2021); preresults.

Electroacupuncture vs topical diclofenac sodium gel for patients with hand osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Hand osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent joint disorder and a great burden to both patients and society. While electroacupuncture (EA) and topical diclofenac sodium gel (DSG) are both currently used to treat OA, no head-to-head study of EA and topical DSG for hand OA exists. Thus, it remains unknown whether one intervention offers improved outcomes over the other. This study aims to compare the effects of EA and topical DSG in patients with hand OA. METHODS: A total of 108 participants with hand OA according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria will be recruited and randomly assigned to the EA group or topical DSG group with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants in the EA group will receive EA treatment thrice weekly for 4 weeks, followed by a 12-week follow-up. In the topical DSG group, topical DSG at a dose of 2 g over the affected joints per hand will be applied four times per day for 4 weeks. The outcomes will be measured at weeks 4, 8, and 16. The primary outcome will be the change in average overall finger joint pain intensity in the dominant hand from baseline to week 4. All outcome variables will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat principle. All statistical tests will be two-sided. DISCUSSION: This study will help determine which of the two treatment protocols, EA or topical DSG, is more effective for the clinical treatment of hand OA. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04402047. Registered 16 May 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04402047.

Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Evidence increasingly suggested that impaired respiratory function remained in about 40% of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after discharge, jeopardizing their activities of daily living and quality of life (QoL) in a long term. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) can improve exercise capacity and QoL in individuals with chronic lung disease; however, evidence on the effect of PR for patients with post-COIVD-19 was scarce. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of PR on lung impairment for patients with post-COVID-19. Methods: Five databases were searched for all the published trials of PR for patients with post-COVID-19 from 2019 to October 2021. Data were extracted using a standardized form. The risks of bias of included studies were assessed using the Cochrane risk of the bias assessment tool. Data were synthesized where possible; otherwise, qualitative analysis was done. Results: Among 6,000 retrieved studies, 3 studies with 233 patients after COVID-19 were included. The pooled estimate of PR effect on 6-min walk test (6-MWT) (50.41, 95% CI 34.34 to 66.48; p < 0.0001) was in favor of the experiment group with clinical importance. It is found that PR could improve the symptom of dyspnea and QoL; however, its effect on pulmonary function test was inconsistent across studies. The risk of bias of included studies varied, with major concerns on the risk of blinding of participants and interventions performers. Conclusion: The review showed that PR could improve exercise capacity measured by 6-MWT among patients with mild-to-moderate lung impairment after COVID-19. The interpretation of effects on lung function, dyspnea, and QoL should be cautious due to inadequate and conflicting data reported across studies. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021289562, identifier: CRD42021289562.