Radiotherapy for Meningioma.

Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial brain tumor, and have a heterogeneous biology and an unmet need for targeted treatment options. Existing treatments for meningiomas are limited to surgery, radiotherapy, or a combination of these depending on clinical and histopathological features. Treatment recommendations for meningioma patients take into consideration radiologic features, tumor size and location, and medical comorbidities, all of which may influence the ability to undergo complete resection. Ultimately, outcomes for meningioma patients are dictated by extent of resection and histopathologic factors, such as World Health Organization (WHO) grade and proliferation index. Radiotherapy is a critical component of meningioma treatment as either a definitive intervention using stereotactic radiosurgery or external beam radiotherapy, or in the adjuvant setting for residual disease or for adverse pathologic factors, such as high WHO grade. In this chapter, we provide a comprehensive review of radiotherapy treatment modalities, therapeutic considerations, radiation planning, and clinical outcomes for meningioma patients.

Mutational Status and Clinical Outcomes Following Systemic Therapy with or without Focal Radiation for Resected Melanoma Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases occur frequently in advanced melanoma and traditionally require surgery and radiation therapy. New evidence demonstrates that systemic therapies are effective for controlling metastatic melanoma brain metastases. This study evaluated outcomes after resection of melanoma brain metastases treated with systemic therapy, with or without focal radiotherapy. METHODS: All patients received immunotherapy or BRAF/MEK inhibitors preoperatively or in the immediate 3 months postoperatively. Resection cavity failure, distant central nervous system progression, and adverse radiation effects were reported in the presence and absence of focal radiotherapy using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2020, 37 resection cavities in 29 patients met criteria for analysis. Of lesions, 22 (59%) were treated with focal radiotherapy, and 15 (41%) were treated with targeted therapy or immunotherapy alone. The 12- and 24-month freedom from local recurrence was 64.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42.1%-99.8%) and 46.3% (95% CI 24.5%-87.5%), respectively, for systemic therapy alone and 93.3% (95% CI 81.5%-100%) at both time points for focal radiotherapy (P = 0.01). On univariate analysis, focal radiotherapy was the only significant factor associated with reduction of local recurrence risk (hazard ratio 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.85; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in central nervous system progression-free survival or overall survival between patients who received systemic therapy plus focal radiotherapy compared with systemic therapy alone. BRAF mutation status was reviewed for either the brain metastasis (n = 9 patients, 31%) or the primary site (n = 20 patients, 69%), and patients harboring BRAFV600E mutations had worse progression-free survival (P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Focal radiotherapy with systemic therapy for resected melanoma brain metastases significantly decreased resection cavity recurrence compared with systemic therapy alone. BRAF mutation status correlated with poorer outcomes.

Meningioma DNA methylation groups identify biological drivers and therapeutic vulnerabilities.

Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors. There are no effective medical therapies for meningioma patients, and new treatments have been encumbered by limited understanding of meningioma biology. Here, we use DNA methylation profiling on 565 meningiomas integrated with genetic, transcriptomic, biochemical, proteomic and single-cell approaches to show meningiomas are composed of three DNA methylation groups with distinct clinical outcomes, biological drivers and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Merlin-intact meningiomas (34%) have the best outcomes and are distinguished by NF2/Merlin regulation of susceptibility to cytotoxic therapy. Immune-enriched meningiomas (38%) have intermediate outcomes and are distinguished by immune infiltration, HLA expression and lymphatic vessels. Hypermitotic meningiomas (28%) have the worst outcomes and are distinguished by convergent genetic and epigenetic mechanisms driving the cell cycle and resistance to cytotoxic therapy. To translate these findings into clinical practice, we show cytostatic cell cycle inhibitors attenuate meningioma growth in cell culture, organoids, xenografts and patients.

Use of advanced PET-volume metrics predicts risk of local recurrence and overall survival in anal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Anal cancer is an uncommon malignancy with the primary treatment for localized disease being concurrent radiation and chemotherapy. Pre-treatment PET/CT is useful for target delineation, with minimal exploration of its use in prognostication. In the post-treatment setting there is growing evidence for advanced PET metrics in assessment of treatment response, and early identification of recurrence essential for successful salvage, however this data is limited to small series. METHODS: Patient with non-metastatic anal cancer from a single institution were retrospectively reviewed for receipt of pre- and post-treatment PET/CTs. PET data was co-registered with radiation therapy planning CT scans for precise longitudinal assessment of advanced PET metrics including SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), for assessment with treatment outcomes. Treatment outcomes included local recurrence (LR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), as defined from the completed radiation therapy to the time of the event. Cox proportional hazard modeling with inverse probability weighting (IPW) using the propensity score based on age, BMI, T-stage, and radiation therapy dose were utilized for assessment of these metrics. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2017 there were 72 patients who had pre-treatment PET/CT, 61 (85%) had a single follow up PET/CT, and 35 (49%) had two follow up PET/CTs. The median clinical follow-up time was 25 months (IQR: 13-52) with a median imaging follow up time of 16 months (IQR: 7-29). On pre-treatment PET/CT higher MTV2.5 and TLG were significantly associated with higher risk of local recurrence (HR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.06-1.16, p<0.001; and HR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.19, p<0.001), and worse PFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04-1.13, p<0.001; and HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03-1.12, p = 0.003) and OS (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04-1.16, p = 0.001; and HR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.20, p = 0.004). IPW-adjusted pre-treatment PET/CT showed higher MTV2.5 (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.17, p = 0.012) and TLG (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00-1.20, p = 0.048) were significantly associated with worse PFS, and post-treatment MTV2.5 was borderline significant (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.00-1.35, p = 0.052). CONCLUSION: Advanced PET metrics, including higher MTV2.5 and TLG, in the pre-treatment and post-treatment setting are significantly associated with elevated rates of local recurrence, and worse PFS and OS. This adds to the growing body of literature that PET/CT for patient with ASCC should be considered for prognostication, and additionally is a useful tool for consideration of early salvage or clinical trial of adjuvant therapies.

Improved Tumor Control Related to Radiotherapy Technological Development for Hypopharyngeal Cancer.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx (SCCHP) is associated with worse survival compared to other head and neck subsites. This report quantifies the impact of technological improvements in radiotherapy (RT) on outcomes over 6 decades. METHODS: Patients with SCCHP receiving curative-intent treatment between 1962 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Kaplan-Meier analyses of freedom from local recurrence (FFLR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared across treatment eras and radiation techniques. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to specify the effect of RT technique. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four patients had a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR = 9-38). There were no differences in staging or use of surgery over time, but use of chemotherapy concurrent with RT increased (P < .001) beginning in the 2000s. The 24-month FFLR using two-dimensional RT (2D-RT), three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT), and intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) was 52%, 55%, and 80%, respectively; 24-month PFS was 39%, 46%, and 73%, respectively; and 24-month OS was 27%, 40%, and 68%, respectively. OS (P = .01), PFS (P = .03), and FFLR (P = 0.02) were improved with IMRT over 2D-RT, and FFLR appeared to be improved over 3D-CRT (P = .06). Controlling for chemotherapy use and other major variables, IMRT produced a strong influence over FFLR (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0-1.2, P = .08) and a benefit in OS (adjusted HR = 0.1, 95% CI: 0.0-0.4, P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Across 6 decades, patient and tumor characteristics remained similar whereas use of chemoradiation increased and IMRT was adopted. The introduction of IMRT was associated with improved FFLR, PFS, and OS, and a reduction in acute toxicity as compared to earlier radiation technologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E452-E458, 2021.

A Multi-institutional Comparative Analysis of Proton and Photon Therapy-Induced Hematologic Toxicity in Patients With Medulloblastoma.

PURPOSE: This multi-institutional retrospective study sought to examine the hematologic effects of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma using proton or photon therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clinical and treatment characteristics were recorded for 97 pediatric patients with medulloblastoma who received CSI without concurrent chemotherapy or with concurrent single-agent vincristine from 2000 to 2017. Groups of 60 and 37 patients underwent treatment with proton-based and photon-based therapy, respectively. Overall survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test. Comparisons of blood counts at each timepoint were conducted using multiple t tests with Bonferroni corrections. Univariate and multivariate analyses of time to grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity were performed with Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Median age of patients receiving proton and photon CSI was 7.5 years (range, 3.5-22.7 years) and 9.9 years (range, 3.6-19.5 years), respectively. Most patients had a diagnosis of standard risk medulloblastoma, with 86.7% and 89.2% for the proton and photon cohorts, respectively. Median total dose to involved field or whole posterior fossa was 54.0 Gy/Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and median CSI dose was 23.4 Gy/Gy(RBE) (range, 18-36 Gy/Gy[RBE]) for both cohorts. Counts were significantly higher in the proton cohort compared with the photon cohort in weeks 3 to 6 of radiation therapy (RT). Although white blood cell counts did not differ between the 2 cohorts, patients receiving proton RT had significantly higher lymphocyte counts throughout the RT course. Similar results were observed when excluding patients who received vertebral body sparing proton RT or limiting to those receiving 23.4 Gy. Only photon therapy was associated with decreased time to grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity on univariate and multivariable analyses. No difference in overall survival was observed, and lymphopenia did not predict survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who receive CSI using proton therapy experience significantly decreased hematologic toxicity compared with those receiving photon therapy.

Vertebral body fracture rates after stereotactic body radiation therapy compared with external-beam radiation therapy for metastatic spine tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is utilized to deliver highly conformal, dose-escalated radiation to a target while sparing surrounding normal structures. Spinal SBRT can allow for durable local control and palliation of disease while minimizing the risk of damage to the spinal cord; however, spinal SBRT has been associated with an increased risk of vertebral body fractures. This study sought to compare the fracture rates between SBRT and conventionally fractionated external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in patients with metastatic spine tumors. METHODS: Records from patients treated at the University of California, San Francisco, with radiation therapy for metastatic spine tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Vertebral body fracture and local control rates were compared between SBRT and EBRT. Ninety-six and 213 patients were identified in the SBRT and EBRT groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the need to control for primary tumor histology (p = 0.003 for prostate cancer, p = 0.0496 for renal cell carcinoma). The patient-matched EBRT comparison group was created by matching SBRT cases using propensity scores for potential confounders, including the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), the number and location of spine levels treated, sex, age at treatment, duration of follow-up (in months) after treatment, and primary tumor histology. Covariate balance following group matching was confirmed using the Student t-test for unequal variance. Statistical analysis, including propensity score matching and multivariate analysis, was performed using R software and related packages. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients met inclusion criteria, with 45 SBRT and 45 EBRT matched cases. Balance of the covariates, SINS, age, follow-up time, and primary tumor histology after the matching process was confirmed between groups (p = 0.062, p = 0.174, and 0.991, respectively, along with matched tumor histology). The SBRT group had a higher 5-year rate of vertebral body fracture at 22.22% (n = 10) compared with 6.67% (n = 3) in the EBRT group (p = 0.044). Survival analysis was used to adjust for uneven follow-up time and showed a significant difference in fracture rates between the two groups (p = 0.044). SBRT also was associated with a higher rate of local control (86.67% vs 77.78%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with metastatic cancer undergoing SBRT had higher rates of vertebral body fractures compared with patients undergoing EBRT, and this difference held up after survival analysis. SBRT also had higher rates of initial local control than EBRT but this difference did not hold up after survival analysis, most likely because of a high percentage of radiosensitive tumors in the EBRT cohort.

A Prognostic Gene-Expression Signature and Risk Score for Meningioma Recurrence After Resection.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic markers for meningioma are needed to risk-stratify patients and guide postoperative surveillance and adjuvant therapy. OBJECTIVE: To identify a prognostic gene signature for meningioma recurrence and mortality after resection using targeted gene-expression analysis. METHODS: Targeted gene-expression analysis was used to interrogate a discovery cohort of 96 meningiomas and an independent validation cohort of 56 meningiomas with comprehensive clinical follow-up data from separate institutions. Bioinformatic analysis was used to identify prognostic genes and generate a gene-signature risk score between 0 and 1 for local recurrence. RESULTS: We identified a 36-gene signature of meningioma recurrence after resection that achieved an area under the curve of 0.86 in identifying tumors at risk for adverse clinical outcomes. The gene-signature risk score compared favorably to World Health Organization (WHO) grade in stratifying cases by local freedom from recurrence (LFFR, P < .001 vs .09, log-rank test), shorter time to failure (TTF, F-test, P < .0001), and overall survival (OS, P < .0001 vs .07) and was independently associated with worse LFFR (relative risk [RR] 1.56, 95% CI 1.30-1.90) and OS (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.07-1.64), after adjusting for clinical covariates. When tested on an independent validation cohort, the gene-signature risk score remained associated with shorter TTF (F-test, P = .002), compared favorably to WHO grade in stratifying cases by OS (P = .003 vs P = .10), and was significantly associated with worse OS (RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.19-2.88) on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The prognostic meningioma gene-expression signature and risk score presented may be useful for identifying patients at risk for recurrence.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for adrenal metastases of oligometastatic or oligoprogressive tumor patients.

INTRODUCTION: Local ablative treatment strategies are frequently offered to patients diagnosed with oligometastatic disease. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), as ablative treatment option, is well established for lung and liver metastases, whereas for isolated adrenal gland metastases the level of evidence is scarce. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This single-institution analysis of oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease was limited to patients who received SBRT to adrenal metastasis between 2012 and 2019. Patient, tumor, treatment characteristics, and dosimetric parameters were analyzed for evaluation of their effect on survival outcomes. RESULTS: During the period of review 28 patients received ablative SBRT to their adrenal gland metastases. Most common primary tumors were non-small cell lung cancers (46%) with most patients diagnosed with a single adrenal gland metastasis (61%), which occurred after a median time of 14 months. SBRT was delivered to a median biological effective dose at α/ß of 10 (BED10) of 75 Gy (range: 58-151 Gy). Median gross tumor volume (GTV) and median planning target volume (PTV) were 42 and 111 mL, respectively. The homogeneity and conformity indices were 1.17 (range: 1.04-1.64) and 0.5 (range: 0.4.0.99), respectively, with the conformity index being affected by dose restrictions to organs at risk (OARs) in 50% of the patients. Overall response rate based on RECIST criteria was 86% (CR = 29%, PR = 57%) with 2-year local control (LC) of 84.8%, 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 26.3%, and 1-and 2-year overall survival (OS) of 46.6 and 32.0%, respectively. During follow up, only two local recurrences occurred. A trend for superior LC was seen if BED10 was ≥75Gy (p = 0.101) or if the PTV was < 100 ml (p = 0.072). SBRT was tolerated well with only mild toxicity. CONCLUSION: SBRT for adrenal metastases resulted in promising LC with low toxicity. Treatment response appeared to be superior, if SBRT was applied with higher BED. As the close proximity of OARs often limits the application of sufficiently high doses, further dose escalations strategies and techniques should be investigated in future.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery to More Than 10 Brain Metastases: Evidence to Support the Role of Radiosurgery for Ideal Hippocampal Sparing in the Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases are a common occurrence, with literature supporting the treatment of a limited number of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), as opposed to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Less well understood is the role of SRS in patients with ≥10 brain metastases. METHODS: Patients treated with SRS to ≥10 brain metastases without concurrent WBRT between March 1999 and December 2016 were reviewed. Analysis was performed for overall survival, treated lesion freedom from progression (FFP), freedom from new metastases (FFNMs), and adverse radiation effect. Hippocampal volumes were retrospectively generated in patients treated with up-front SRS for evaluation of dose volume metrics. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were identified with 75 patients having up-front SRS and 68 patients being treated as salvage therapy after prior WBRT. The median number of lesions per patient was 13 (interquartile range [IQR], 11-17). Median total volume of treatment was 4.1 cm3 (IQR, 2.0-9.9 cm3). The median 12-month FFP for up-front and salvage treatment was 96.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95.5-98.1) and 83.6% (95% CI, 79.9-87.5), respectively (P < 0.001). Twelve-month FFNMs for up-front and salvage SRS was 18.8% (95% CI, 10.9-32.3) versus 19.2% (95% CI, 9.7-37.8), respectively (P = 0.90). The mean hippocampal dose was 150 cGy (IQR, 100-202 cGy). CONCLUSIONS: Excellent rates of local control can be achieved when treating patients with >10 intracranial metastases either in the up-front or salvage setting. Hippocampal sparing is readily achievable with expected high rates of new metastatic lesions in treated patients.